Skip to main content
PMC home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 2001 Mar;157(3):1179–1189. doi: 10.1093/genetics/157.3.1179

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae MUM2 gene interacts with the DNA replication machinery and is required for meiotic levels of double strand breaks.

L Davis 1, M Barbera 1, A McDonnell 1, K McIntyre 1, R Sternglanz 1, Q Jin 1, J Loidl 1, J Engebrecht 1
PMCID: PMC1461570  PMID: 11238403

Abstract

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae MUM2 gene is essential for meiotic, but not mitotic, DNA replication and thus sporulation. Genetic interactions between MUM2 and a component of the origin recognition complex and polymerase alpha-primase suggest that MUM2 influences the function of the DNA replication machinery. Early meiotic gene expression is induced to a much greater extent in mum2 cells than in meiotic cells treated with the DNA synthesis inhibitor hydroxyurea. This result indicates that the mum2 meiotic arrest is downstream of the arrest induced by hydroxyurea and suggests that DNA synthesis is initiated in the mutant. Genetic analyses indicate that the recombination that occurs in mum2 mutants is dependent on the normal recombination machinery and on synaptonemal complex components and therefore is not a consequence of lesions created by incompletely replicated DNA. Both meiotic ectopic and allelic recombination are similarly reduced in the mum2 mutant, and the levels are consistent with the levels of meiosis-specific DSBs that are generated. Cytological analyses of mum2 mutants show that chromosome pairing and synapsis occur, although at reduced levels compared to wild type. Given the near-wild-type levels of meiotic gene expression, pairing, and synapsis, we suggest that the reduction in DNA replication is directly responsible for the reduced level of DSBs and meiotic recombination.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (380.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aparicio O. M., Weinstein D. M., Bell S. P. Components and dynamics of DNA replication complexes in S. cerevisiae: redistribution of MCM proteins and Cdc45p during S phase. Cell. 1997 Oct 3;91(1):59–69. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(01)80009-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Atcheson C. L., DiDomenico B., Frackman S., Esposito R. E., Elder R. T. Isolation, DNA sequence, and regulation of a meiosis-specific eukaryotic recombination gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Nov;84(22):8035–8039. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.22.8035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bell S. P., Kobayashi R., Stillman B. Yeast origin recognition complex functions in transcription silencing and DNA replication. Science. 1993 Dec 17;262(5141):1844–1849. doi: 10.1126/science.8266072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bergerat A., de Massy B., Gadelle D., Varoutas P. C., Nicolas A., Forterre P. An atypical topoisomerase II from Archaea with implications for meiotic recombination. Nature. 1997 Mar 27;386(6623):414–417. doi: 10.1038/386414a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bhargava J., Engebrecht J., Roeder G. S. The rec102 mutant of yeast is defective in meiotic recombination and chromosome synapsis. Genetics. 1992 Jan;130(1):59–69. doi: 10.1093/genetics/130.1.59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Borde V., Goldman A. S., Lichten M. Direct coupling between meiotic DNA replication and recombination initiation. Science. 2000 Oct 27;290(5492):806–809. doi: 10.1126/science.290.5492.806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Budd M. E., Wittrup K. D., Bailey J. E., Campbell J. L. DNA polymerase I is required for premeiotic DNA replication and sporulation but not for X-ray repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1989 Feb;9(2):365–376. doi: 10.1128/mcb.9.2.365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Budd M., Campbell J. L. Temperature-sensitive mutations in the yeast DNA polymerase I gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 May;84(9):2838–2842. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.9.2838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bullard S. A., Kim S., Galbraith A. M., Malone R. E. Double strand breaks at the HIS2 recombination hot spot in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Nov 12;93(23):13054–13059. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.23.13054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cao L., Alani E., Kleckner N. A pathway for generation and processing of double-strand breaks during meiotic recombination in S. cerevisiae. Cell. 1990 Jun 15;61(6):1089–1101. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90072-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Cervantes M. D., Farah J. A., Smith G. R. Meiotic DNA breaks associated with recombination in S. pombe. Mol Cell. 2000 May;5(5):883–888. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80328-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Cha R. S., Weiner B. M., Keeney S., Dekker J., Kleckner N. Progression of meiotic DNA replication is modulated by interchromosomal interaction proteins, negatively by Spo11p and positively by Rec8p. Genes Dev. 2000 Feb 15;14(4):493–503. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Dirick L., Goetsch L., Ammerer G., Byers B. Regulation of meiotic S phase by Ime2 and a Clb5,6-associated kinase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science. 1998 Sep 18;281(5384):1854–1857. doi: 10.1126/science.281.5384.1854. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Dutta A., Bell S. P. Initiation of DNA replication in eukaryotic cells. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 1997;13:293–332. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.13.1.293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Engebrecht J., Masse S., Davis L., Rose K., Kessel T. Yeast meiotic mutants proficient for the induction of ectopic recombination. Genetics. 1998 Feb;148(2):581–598. doi: 10.1093/genetics/148.2.581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Forsburg S. L., Hodson J. A. Mitotic replication initiation proteins are not required for pre-meiotic S phase. Nat Genet. 2000 Jul;25(3):263–268. doi: 10.1038/77015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Foss M., McNally F. J., Laurenson P., Rine J. Origin recognition complex (ORC) in transcriptional silencing and DNA replication in S. cerevisiae. Science. 1993 Dec 17;262(5141):1838–1844. doi: 10.1126/science.8266071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Giroux C. N., Dresser M. E., Tiano H. F. Genetic control of chromosome synapsis in yeast meiosis. Genome. 1989;31(1):88–94. doi: 10.1139/g89-017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Goldman A. S., Lichten M. The efficiency of meiotic recombination between dispersed sequences in Saccharomyces cerevisiae depends upon their chromosomal location. Genetics. 1996 Sep;144(1):43–55. doi: 10.1093/genetics/144.1.43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hill J. E., Myers A. M., Koerner T. J., Tzagoloff A. Yeast/E. coli shuttle vectors with multiple unique restriction sites. Yeast. 1986 Sep;2(3):163–167. doi: 10.1002/yea.320020304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hollingsworth N. M., Byers B. HOP1: a yeast meiotic pairing gene. Genetics. 1989 Mar;121(3):445–462. doi: 10.1093/genetics/121.3.445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hollingsworth N. M., Goetsch L., Byers B. The HOP1 gene encodes a meiosis-specific component of yeast chromosomes. Cell. 1990 Apr 6;61(1):73–84. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90216-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Ito H., Fukuda Y., Murata K., Kimura A. Transformation of intact yeast cells treated with alkali cations. J Bacteriol. 1983 Jan;153(1):163–168. doi: 10.1128/jb.153.1.163-168.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Keeney S., Giroux C. N., Kleckner N. Meiosis-specific DNA double-strand breaks are catalyzed by Spo11, a member of a widely conserved protein family. Cell. 1997 Feb 7;88(3):375–384. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81876-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Klapholz S., Waddell C. S., Esposito R. E. The role of the SPO11 gene in meiotic recombination in yeast. Genetics. 1985 Jun;110(2):187–216. doi: 10.1093/genetics/110.2.187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Klein F., Mahr P., Galova M., Buonomo S. B., Michaelis C., Nairz K., Nasmyth K. A central role for cohesins in sister chromatid cohesion, formation of axial elements, and recombination during yeast meiosis. Cell. 1999 Jul 9;98(1):91–103. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80609-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Krieg P. A., Melton D. A. In vitro RNA synthesis with SP6 RNA polymerase. Methods Enzymol. 1987;155:397–415. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(87)55027-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Lamb T. M., Mitchell A. P. Coupling of Saccharomyces cerevisiae early meiotic gene expression to DNA replication depends upon RPD3 and SIN3. Genetics. 2001 Feb;157(2):545–556. doi: 10.1093/genetics/157.2.545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Loidl J., Klein F., Engebrecht J. Genetic and morphological approaches for the analysis of meiotic chromosomes in yeast. Methods Cell Biol. 1998;53:257–285. doi: 10.1016/s0091-679x(08)60882-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Loidl J., Klein F., Scherthan H. Homologous pairing is reduced but not abolished in asynaptic mutants of yeast. J Cell Biol. 1994 Jun;125(6):1191–1200. doi: 10.1083/jcb.125.6.1191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Loo S., Fox C. A., Rine J., Kobayashi R., Stillman B., Bell S. The origin recognition complex in silencing, cell cycle progression, and DNA replication. Mol Biol Cell. 1995 Jun;6(6):741–756. doi: 10.1091/mbc.6.6.741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Merino S. T., Cummings W. J., Acharya S. N., Zolan M. E. Replication-dependent early meiotic requirement for Spo11 and Rad50. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Sep 12;97(19):10477–10482. doi: 10.1073/pnas.190346097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Mitchell A. P. Control of meiotic gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol Rev. 1994 Mar;58(1):56–70. doi: 10.1128/mr.58.1.56-70.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Padmore R., Cao L., Kleckner N. Temporal comparison of recombination and synaptonemal complex formation during meiosis in S. cerevisiae. Cell. 1991 Sep 20;66(6):1239–1256. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90046-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Prinz S., Amon A., Klein F. Isolation of COM1, a new gene required to complete meiotic double-strand break-induced recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1997 Jul;146(3):781–795. doi: 10.1093/genetics/146.3.781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Rockmill B., Roeder G. S. Meiosis in asynaptic yeast. Genetics. 1990 Nov;126(3):563–574. doi: 10.1093/genetics/126.3.563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Rose K., Rudge S. A., Frohman M. A., Morris A. J., Engebrecht J. Phospholipase D signaling is essential for meiosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Dec 19;92(26):12151–12155. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.26.12151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Rothstein R. Targeting, disruption, replacement, and allele rescue: integrative DNA transformation in yeast. Methods Enzymol. 1991;194:281–301. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(91)94022-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Santocanale C., Diffley J. F. A Mec1- and Rad53-dependent checkpoint controls late-firing origins of DNA replication. Nature. 1998 Oct 8;395(6702):615–618. doi: 10.1038/27001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Schild D., Byers B. Meiotic effects of DNA-defective cell division cycle mutations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Chromosoma. 1978 Dec 21;70(1):109–130. doi: 10.1007/BF00292220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Silva-Lopez E., Zamb T. J., Roth R. Role of premeiotic replication in gene conversion. Nature. 1975 Jan 17;253(5488):212–214. doi: 10.1038/253212a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Smith A. V., Roeder G. S. The yeast Red1 protein localizes to the cores of meiotic chromosomes. J Cell Biol. 1997 Mar 10;136(5):957–967. doi: 10.1083/jcb.136.5.957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Stuart D., Wittenberg C. CLB5 and CLB6 are required for premeiotic DNA replication and activation of the meiotic S/M checkpoint. Genes Dev. 1998 Sep 1;12(17):2698–2710. doi: 10.1101/gad.12.17.2698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Sugino A. Yeast DNA polymerases and their role at the replication fork. Trends Biochem Sci. 1995 Aug;20(8):319–323. doi: 10.1016/s0968-0004(00)89059-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Sun H., Treco D., Schultes N. P., Szostak J. W. Double-strand breaks at an initiation site for meiotic gene conversion. Nature. 1989 Mar 2;338(6210):87–90. doi: 10.1038/338087a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Sym M., Engebrecht J. A., Roeder G. S. ZIP1 is a synaptonemal complex protein required for meiotic chromosome synapsis. Cell. 1993 Feb 12;72(3):365–378. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90114-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Weiner B. M., Kleckner N. Chromosome pairing via multiple interstitial interactions before and during meiosis in yeast. Cell. 1994 Jul 1;77(7):977–991. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90438-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Wu T. C., Lichten M. Factors that affect the location and frequency of meiosis-induced double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1995 May;140(1):55–66. doi: 10.1093/genetics/140.1.55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. von Wettstein D., Rasmussen S. W., Holm P. B. The synaptonemal complex in genetic segregation. Annu Rev Genet. 1984;18:331–413. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.18.120184.001555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES