Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 2001 Aug;158(4):1785–1800. doi: 10.1093/genetics/158.4.1785

Modeling linkage disequilibrium between a polymorphic marker locus and a locus affecting complex dichotomous traits in natural populations.

Z W Luo 1, C I Wu 1
PMCID: PMC1461768  PMID: 11514462

Abstract

Linkage disequilibrium is an important topic in evolutionary and population genetics. An issue yet to be settled is the theory required to extend the linkage disequilibrium analysis to complex traits. In this study, we present theoretical analysis and methods for detecting or estimating linkage disequilibrium (LD) between a polymorphic marker locus and any one of the loci affecting a complex dichotomous trait on the basis of samples randomly or selectively collected from natural populations. Statistical properties of these methods were investigated and their powers were compared analytically or by use of Monte Carlo simulations. The results show that the disequilibrium may be detected with a power of 80% by using phenotypic records and marker genotype when both the trait and marker variants are common (30%) and the LD is relatively high (40-100% of the theoretical maximum). The maximum-likelihood approach provides accurate estimates of the model parameters as well as detection of linkage disequilibrium. The likelihood method is preferred for its higher power and reliability in parameter estimation. The approaches developed in this article are also compared to those for analyzing a continuously distributed quantitative trait. It is shown that a larger sample size is required for the dichotomous trait model to obtain the same level of power in detecting linkage disequilibrium as the continuous trait analysis. Potential use of these estimates in mapping the trait locus is also discussed.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (149.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Allison D. B. Transmission-disequilibrium tests for quantitative traits. Am J Hum Genet. 1997 Mar;60(3):676–690. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brakefield P. M., Gates J., Keys D., Kesbeke F., Wijngaarden P. J., Monteiro A., French V., Carroll S. B. Development, plasticity and evolution of butterfly eyespot patterns. Nature. 1996 Nov 21;384(6606):236–242. doi: 10.1038/384236a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Churchill G. A., Doerge R. W. Empirical threshold values for quantitative trait mapping. Genetics. 1994 Nov;138(3):963–971. doi: 10.1093/genetics/138.3.963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Clark A. G., Weiss K. M., Nickerson D. A., Taylor S. L., Buchanan A., Stengård J., Salomaa V., Vartiainen E., Perola M., Boerwinkle E. Haplotype structure and population genetic inferences from nucleotide-sequence variation in human lipoprotein lipase. Am J Hum Genet. 1998 Aug;63(2):595–612. doi: 10.1086/301977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Clayton D., Jones H. Transmission/disequilibrium tests for extended marker haplotypes. Am J Hum Genet. 1999 Oct;65(4):1161–1169. doi: 10.1086/302566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Collins A., Morton N. E. Mapping a disease locus by allelic association. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Feb 17;95(4):1741–1745. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.4.1741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Coyne J. A., Crittenden A. P., Mah K. Genetics of a pheromonal difference contributing to reproductive isolation in Drosophila. Science. 1994 Sep 2;265(5177):1461–1464. doi: 10.1126/science.8073292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Darvasi A. Experimental strategies for the genetic dissection of complex traits in animal models. Nat Genet. 1998 Jan;18(1):19–24. doi: 10.1038/ng0198-19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Devlin B., Risch N. A comparison of linkage disequilibrium measures for fine-scale mapping. Genomics. 1995 Sep 20;29(2):311–322. doi: 10.1006/geno.1995.9003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Devlin B., Risch N., Roeder K. Disequilibrium mapping: composite likelihood for pairwise disequilibrium. Genomics. 1996 Aug 15;36(1):1–16. doi: 10.1006/geno.1996.0419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Fay J. C., Wu C. I. A human population bottleneck can account for the discordance between patterns of mitochondrial versus nuclear DNA variation. Mol Biol Evol. 1999 Jul;16(7):1003–1005. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Guo S. W., Lange K. Genetic mapping of complex traits: promises, problems, and prospects. Theor Popul Biol. 2000 Feb;57(1):1–11. doi: 10.1006/tpbi.2000.1449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hill W. G. Estimation of linkage disequilibrium in randomly mating populations. Heredity (Edinb) 1974 Oct;33(2):229–239. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1974.89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hill W. G. Tests for association of gene frequencies at several loci in random mating diploid populations. Biometrics. 1975 Dec;31(4):881–888. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hästbacka J., de la Chapelle A., Kaitila I., Sistonen P., Weaver A., Lander E. Linkage disequilibrium mapping in isolated founder populations: diastrophic dysplasia in Finland. Nat Genet. 1992 Nov;2(3):204–211. doi: 10.1038/ng1192-204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kaplan N. L., Hill W. G., Weir B. S. Likelihood methods for locating disease genes in nonequilibrium populations. Am J Hum Genet. 1995 Jan;56(1):18–32. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kearsey M. J., Farquhar A. G. QTL analysis in plants; where are we now? Heredity (Edinb) 1998 Feb;80(Pt 2):137–142. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2540.1998.00500.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kruglyak L. Prospects for whole-genome linkage disequilibrium mapping of common disease genes. Nat Genet. 1999 Jun;22(2):139–144. doi: 10.1038/9642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lande R., Thompson R. Efficiency of marker-assisted selection in the improvement of quantitative traits. Genetics. 1990 Mar;124(3):743–756. doi: 10.1093/genetics/124.3.743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lander E. S., Schork N. J. Genetic dissection of complex traits. Science. 1994 Sep 30;265(5181):2037–2048. doi: 10.1126/science.8091226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lander E. S. The new genomics: global views of biology. Science. 1996 Oct 25;274(5287):536–539. doi: 10.1126/science.274.5287.536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Luo Z. W., Suhai S. Estimating linkage disequilibrium between a polymorphic marker locus and a trait locus in natural populations. Genetics. 1999 Jan;151(1):359–371. doi: 10.1093/genetics/151.1.359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Luo Z. W., Thompson R., Woolliams J. A. A population genetics model of marker-assisted selection. Genetics. 1997 Jul;146(3):1173–1183. doi: 10.1093/genetics/146.3.1173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Nielsen D. M., Weir B. S. A classical setting for associations between markers and loci affecting quantitative traits. Genet Res. 1999 Dec;74(3):271–277. doi: 10.1017/s0016672399004231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Rabinowitz D. A transmission disequilibrium test for quantitative trait loci. Hum Hered. 1997 Nov-Dec;47(6):342–350. doi: 10.1159/000154433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Rannala B., Slatkin M. Likelihood analysis of disequilibrium mapping, and related problems. Am J Hum Genet. 1998 Feb;62(2):459–473. doi: 10.1086/301709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Risch N., Merikangas K. The future of genetic studies of complex human diseases. Science. 1996 Sep 13;273(5281):1516–1517. doi: 10.1126/science.273.5281.1516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Service S. K., Lang D. W., Freimer N. B., Sandkuijl L. A. Linkage-disequilibrium mapping of disease genes by reconstruction of ancestral haplotypes in founder populations. Am J Hum Genet. 1999 Jun;64(6):1728–1738. doi: 10.1086/302398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Spielman R. S., McGinnis R. E., Ewens W. J. Transmission test for linkage disequilibrium: the insulin gene region and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). Am J Hum Genet. 1993 Mar;52(3):506–516. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Thompson E. A., Neel J. V. Allelic disequilibrium and allele frequency distribution as a function of social and demographic history. Am J Hum Genet. 1997 Jan;60(1):197–204. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Thompson R. The maximum likelihood approach to the estimate of liability. Ann Hum Genet. 1972 Nov;36(2):221–231. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1972.tb00771.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Weir B. S., Cockerham C. C. Testing Hypotheses about Linkage Disequilibrium with Multiple Alleles. Genetics. 1978 Mar;88(3):633–642. doi: 10.1093/genetics/88.3.633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Weir B. S. Inferences about linkage disequilibrium. Biometrics. 1979 Mar;35(1):235–254. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Wu C. I., Palopoli M. F. Genetics of postmating reproductive isolation in animals. Annu Rev Genet. 1994;28:283–308. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.28.120194.001435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. de la Chapelle A., Wright F. A. Linkage disequilibrium mapping in isolated populations: the example of Finland revisited. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Oct 13;95(21):12416–12423. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.21.12416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES