Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 2001 Oct;159(2):647–657. doi: 10.1093/genetics/159.2.647

Patterns of DNA sequence variation suggest the recent action of positive selection in the janus-ocnus region of Drosophila simulans.

J Parsch 1, C D Meiklejohn 1, D L Hartl 1
PMCID: PMC1461828  PMID: 11606541

Abstract

Levels of nucleotide polymorphism in three paralogous Drosophila simulans genes, janusA (janA), janusB (janB), and ocnus (ocn), were surveyed by DNA sequencing. The three genes lie in tandem within a 2.5-kb region of chromosome arm 3R. In a sample of eight alleles from a worldwide distribution we found a significant departure from neutrality by several statistical tests. The most striking feature of this sample was that in a 1.7-kb region containing the janA and janB genes, 30 out of 31 segregating sites contained variants present only once in the sample, and 29 of these unique variants were found in the same allele. A restriction survey of an additional 28 lines of D. simulans revealed strong linkage disequilibrium over the janA-janB region and identified six more alleles matching the rare haplotype. Among the rare alleles, the level of DNA sequence variation was typical for D. simulans autosomal genes and showed no departure from neutrality. In addition, the rare haplotype was more similar to the D. melanogaster sequence, indicating that it was the ancestral form. These results suggest that the derived haplotype has risen to high worldwide frequency relatively recently, most likely as a result of natural selection.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (134.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Andolfatto P., Kreitman M. Molecular variation at the In(2L)t proximal breakpoint site in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans. Genetics. 2000 Apr;154(4):1681–1691. doi: 10.1093/genetics/154.4.1681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Andolfatto P., Przeworski M. A genome-wide departure from the standard neutral model in natural populations of Drosophila. Genetics. 2000 Sep;156(1):257–268. doi: 10.1093/genetics/156.1.257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Andolfatto P., Wall J. D., Kreitman M. Unusual haplotype structure at the proximal breakpoint of In(2L)t in a natural population of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1999 Nov;153(3):1297–1311. doi: 10.1093/genetics/153.3.1297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ayala F. J., Chang B. S., Hartl D. L. Molecular evolution of the Rh3 gene in Drosophila. Genetica. 1993;92(1):23–32. doi: 10.1007/BF00057504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ayala F. J., Hartl D. L. Molecular drift of the bride of sevenless (boss) gene in Drosophila. Mol Biol Evol. 1993 Sep;10(5):1030–1040. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Baba-Aïssa F., Solignac M., Dennebouy N., David J. R. Mitochondrial DNA variability in Drosophila simulans: quasi absence of polymorphism within each of the three cytoplasmic races. Heredity (Edinb) 1988 Dec;61(Pt 3):419–426. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1988.133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Begun D. J., Aquadro C. F. Evolutionary inferences from DNA variation at the 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase locus in natural populations of drosophila: selection and geographic differentiation. Genetics. 1994 Jan;136(1):155–171. doi: 10.1093/genetics/136.1.155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Begun D. J., Whitley P. Reduced X-linked nucleotide polymorphism in Drosophila simulans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 May 23;97(11):5960–5965. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.11.5960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Braverman J. M., Hudson R. R., Kaplan N. L., Langley C. H., Stephan W. The hitchhiking effect on the site frequency spectrum of DNA polymorphisms. Genetics. 1995 Jun;140(2):783–796. doi: 10.1093/genetics/140.2.783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bénassi V., Depaulis F., Meghlaoui G. K., Veuille M. Partial sweeping of variation at the Fbp2 locus in a west African population of Drosophila melanogaster. Mol Biol Evol. 1999 Mar;16(3):347–353. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Charlesworth B., Morgan M. T., Charlesworth D. The effect of deleterious mutations on neutral molecular variation. Genetics. 1993 Aug;134(4):1289–1303. doi: 10.1093/genetics/134.4.1289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Civetta A., Singh R. S. Sex-related genes, directional sexual selection, and speciation. Mol Biol Evol. 1998 Jul;15(7):901–909. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Depaulis F., Brazier L., Veuille M. Selective sweep at the Drosophila melanogaster Suppressor of Hairless locus and its association with the In(2L)t inversion polymorphism. Genetics. 1999 Jul;152(3):1017–1024. doi: 10.1093/genetics/152.3.1017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Depaulis F., Veuille M. Neutrality tests based on the distribution of haplotypes under an infinite-site model. Mol Biol Evol. 1998 Dec;15(12):1788–1790. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Fay J. C., Wu C. I. Hitchhiking under positive Darwinian selection. Genetics. 2000 Jul;155(3):1405–1413. doi: 10.1093/genetics/155.3.1405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Fu Y. X., Li W. H. Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations. Genetics. 1993 Mar;133(3):693–709. doi: 10.1093/genetics/133.3.693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hamblin M. T., Aquadro C. F. High nucleotide sequence variation in a region of low recombination in Drosophila simulans is consistent with the background selection model. Mol Biol Evol. 1996 Oct;13(8):1133–1140. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hamblin M. T., Veuille M. Population structure among African and derived populations of Drosophila simulans: evidence for ancient subdivision and recent admixture. Genetics. 1999 Sep;153(1):305–317. doi: 10.1093/genetics/153.1.305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hasson E., Wang I. N., Zeng L. W., Kreitman M., Eanes W. F. Nucleotide variation in the triosephosphate isomerase (Tpi) locus of Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. Mol Biol Evol. 1998 Jun;15(6):756–769. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hudson R. R., Bailey K., Skarecky D., Kwiatowski J., Ayala F. J. Evidence for positive selection in the superoxide dismutase (Sod) region of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1994 Apr;136(4):1329–1340. doi: 10.1093/genetics/136.4.1329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hudson R. R., Kaplan N. L. Statistical properties of the number of recombination events in the history of a sample of DNA sequences. Genetics. 1985 Sep;111(1):147–164. doi: 10.1093/genetics/111.1.147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hudson R. R., Sáez A. G., Ayala F. J. DNA variation at the Sod locus of Drosophila melanogaster: an unfolding story of natural selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Jul 22;94(15):7725–7729. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.15.7725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kaplan N. L., Hudson R. R., Langley C. H. The "hitchhiking effect" revisited. Genetics. 1989 Dec;123(4):887–899. doi: 10.1093/genetics/123.4.887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kim Y., Stephan W. Joint effects of genetic hitchhiking and background selection on neutral variation. Genetics. 2000 Jul;155(3):1415–1427. doi: 10.1093/genetics/155.3.1415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kirby D. A., Muse S. V., Stephan W. Maintenance of pre-mRNA secondary structure by epistatic selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Sep 26;92(20):9047–9051. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.20.9047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kirby D. A., Stephan W. Multi-locus selection and the structure of variation at the white gene of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1996 Oct;144(2):635–645. doi: 10.1093/genetics/144.2.635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Kliman R. M., Andolfatto P., Coyne J. A., Depaulis F., Kreitman M., Berry A. J., McCarter J., Wakeley J., Hey J. The population genetics of the origin and divergence of the Drosophila simulans complex species. Genetics. 2000 Dec;156(4):1913–1931. doi: 10.1093/genetics/156.4.1913. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Labate J. A., Biermann C. H., Eanes W. F. Nucleotide variation at the runt locus in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. Mol Biol Evol. 1999 Jun;16(6):724–731. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Moriyama E. N., Powell J. R. Intraspecific nuclear DNA variation in Drosophila. Mol Biol Evol. 1996 Jan;13(1):261–277. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Parsch J., Braverman J. M., Stephan W. Comparative sequence analysis and patterns of covariation in RNA secondary structures. Genetics. 2000 Feb;154(2):909–921. doi: 10.1093/genetics/154.2.909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Rozas J., Gullaud M., Blandin G., Aguadé M. DNA variation at the rp49 gene region of Drosophila simulans: evolutionary inferences from an unusual haplotype structure. Genetics. 2001 Jul;158(3):1147–1155. doi: 10.1093/genetics/158.3.1147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Rozas J., Rozas R. DnaSP version 3: an integrated program for molecular population genetics and molecular evolution analysis. Bioinformatics. 1999 Feb;15(2):174–175. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/15.2.174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Russo C. A., Takezaki N., Nei M. Molecular phylogeny and divergence times of drosophilid species. Mol Biol Evol. 1995 May;12(3):391–404. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Smith J. M., Haigh J. The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene. Genet Res. 1974 Feb;23(1):23–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Tajima F. Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics. 1989 Nov;123(3):585–595. doi: 10.1093/genetics/123.3.585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Tsaur S. C., Wu C. I. Positive selection and the molecular evolution of a gene of male reproduction, Acp26Aa of Drosophila. Mol Biol Evol. 1997 May;14(5):544–549. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Watterson G. A. On the number of segregating sites in genetical models without recombination. Theor Popul Biol. 1975 Apr;7(2):256–276. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(75)90020-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Yanicostas C., Ferrer P., Vincent A., Lepesant J. A. Separate cis-regulatory sequences control expression of serendipity beta and janus A, two immediately adjacent Drosophila genes. Mol Gen Genet. 1995 Mar 10;246(5):549–560. doi: 10.1007/BF00298961. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Yanicostas C., Lepesant J. A. Transcriptional and translational cis-regulatory sequences of the spermatocyte-specific Drosophila janusB gene are located in the 3' exonic region of the overlapping janusA gene. Mol Gen Genet. 1990 Dec;224(3):450–458. doi: 10.1007/BF00262440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Yanicostas C., Vincent A., Lepesant J. A. Transcriptional and posttranscriptional regulation contributes to the sex-regulated expression of two sequence-related genes at the janus locus of Drosophila melanogaster. Mol Cell Biol. 1989 Jun;9(6):2526–2535. doi: 10.1128/mcb.9.6.2526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES