Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 2002 Apr;160(4):1721–1731. doi: 10.1093/genetics/160.4.1721

Sperm competition and the dynamics of X chromosome drive: stability and extinction.

Jesse E Taylor 1, John Jaenike 1
PMCID: PMC1462075  PMID: 11973324

Abstract

Several empirical studies of sperm competition in populations polymorphic for a driving X chromosome have revealed that Sex-ratio males (those carrying a driving X) are at a disadvantage relative to Standard males. Because the frequency of the driving X chromosome determines the population-level sex ratio and thus alters male and female mating rates, the evolutionary consequences of sperm competition for sex chromosome meiotic drive are subtle. As the SR allele increases in frequency, the ratio of females to males also increases, causing an increase in the male mating rate and a decrease in the female mating rate. While the former change may exacerbate the disadvantage of Sex-ratio males during sperm competition, the latter change decreases the incidence of sperm competition within the population. We analyze a model of the effects of sperm competition on a driving X chromosome and show that these opposing trends in male and female mating rates can result in two coexisting locally stable equilibria, one corresponding to a balanced polymorphism of the SR and ST alleles and the second to fixation of the ST allele. Stochastic fluctuations of either the population sex ratio or the SR frequency can then drive the population away from the balanced polymorphism and into the basin of attraction for the second equilibrium, resulting in fixation of the SR allele and extinction of the population.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (126.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Cazemajor M., Joly D., Montchamp-Moreau C. Sex-ratio meiotic drive in Drosophila simulans is related to equational nondisjunction of the Y chromosome. Genetics. 2000 Jan;154(1):229–236. doi: 10.1093/genetics/154.1.229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Clark A. G., Begun D. J. Female genotypes affect sperm displacement in Drosophila. Genetics. 1998 Jul;149(3):1487–1493. doi: 10.1093/genetics/149.3.1487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Crow J. F. Why is Mendelian segregation so exact? Bioessays. 1991 Jun;13(6):305–312. doi: 10.1002/bies.950130609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Curtsinger J. W., Feldman M. W. Experimental and Theoretical Analysis of the "Sex-Ratio" Polymorphism in DROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURA. Genetics. 1980 Feb;94(2):445–466. doi: 10.1093/genetics/94.2.445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gershenson S. A New Sex-Ratio Abnormality in DROSOPHILA OBSCURA. Genetics. 1928 Nov;13(6):488–507. doi: 10.1093/genetics/13.6.488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hamilton W. D. Extraordinary sex ratios. A sex-ratio theory for sex linkage and inbreeding has new implications in cytogenetics and entomology. Science. 1967 Apr 28;156(3774):477–488. doi: 10.1126/science.156.3774.477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. James A. C., Jaenike J. "Sex ratio" meiotic drive in Drosophila testacea. Genetics. 1990 Nov;126(3):651–656. doi: 10.1093/genetics/126.3.651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Leigh E. G. How does selection reconcile individual advantage with the good of the group? Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Oct;74(10):4542–4546. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.10.4542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lyttle T. W. Experimental population genetics of meiotic drive systems. I. Pseudo-Y chromosomal drive as a means of eliminating cage populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1977 Jun;86(2 Pt 1):413–445. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Policansky D., Ellison J. "Sex ratio" in Drosophila pseudoobscura: spermiogenic failure. Science. 1970 Aug 28;169(3948):888–889. doi: 10.1126/science.169.3948.888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Price C. S., Dyer K. A., Coyne J. A. Sperm competition between Drosophila males involves both displacement and incapacitation. Nature. 1999 Jul 29;400(6743):449–452. doi: 10.1038/22755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Wilkinson G. S., Fry C. L. Meiotic drive alters sperm competitive ability in stalk-eyed flies. Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Dec 22;268(1485):2559–2564. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Wu C. I. The fate of autosomal modifiers of the sex-ratio trait in drosophila and other sex-linked meiotic drive systems. Theor Popul Biol. 1983 Oct;24(2):107–120. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(83)90035-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Wu C. I. Virility Deficiency and the Sex-Ratio Trait in DROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURA. II. Multiple Mating and Overall Virility Selection. Genetics. 1983 Nov;105(3):663–679. doi: 10.1093/genetics/105.3.663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES