Skip to main content
PMC home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 2002 Sep;162(1):203–216. doi: 10.1093/genetics/162.1.203

Testing models of selection and demography in Drosophila simulans.

Jeffrey D Wall 1, Peter Andolfatto 1, Molly Przeworski 1
PMCID: PMC1462246  PMID: 12242234

Abstract

We analyze patterns of nucleotide variability at 15 X-linked loci and 14 autosomal loci from a North American population of Drosophila simulans. We show that there is significantly more linkage disequilibrium on the X chromosome than on chromosome arm 3R and much more linkage disequilibrium on both chromosomes than expected from estimates of recombination rates, mutation rates, and levels of diversity. To explore what types of evolutionary models might explain this observation, we examine a model of recurrent, nonoverlapping selective sweeps and a model of a recent drastic bottleneck (e.g., founder event) in the demographic history of North American populations of D. simulans. The simple sweep model is not consistent with the observed patterns of linkage disequilibrium nor with the observed frequencies of segregating mutations. Under a restricted range of parameter values, a simple bottleneck model is consistent with multiple facets of the data. While our results do not exclude some influence of selection on X vs. autosome variability levels, they suggest that demography alone may account for patterns of linkage disequilibrium and the frequency spectrum of segregating mutations in this population of D. simulans.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (433.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aguade M., Miyashita N., Langley C. H. Reduced variation in the yellow-achaete-scute region in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1989 Jul;122(3):607–615. doi: 10.1093/genetics/122.3.607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Andolfatto P., Przeworski M. A genome-wide departure from the standard neutral model in natural populations of Drosophila. Genetics. 2000 Sep;156(1):257–268. doi: 10.1093/genetics/156.1.257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Andolfatto P., Przeworski M. Regions of lower crossing over harbor more rare variants in African populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 2001 Jun;158(2):657–665. doi: 10.1093/genetics/158.2.657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Begun D. J., Aquadro C. F. Levels of naturally occurring DNA polymorphism correlate with recombination rates in D. melanogaster. Nature. 1992 Apr 9;356(6369):519–520. doi: 10.1038/356519a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Begun D. J., Whitley P. Reduced X-linked nucleotide polymorphism in Drosophila simulans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 May 23;97(11):5960–5965. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.11.5960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Begun D. J., Whitley P., Todd B. L., Waldrip-Dail H. M., Clark A. G. Molecular population genetics of male accessory gland proteins in Drosophila. Genetics. 2000 Dec;156(4):1879–1888. doi: 10.1093/genetics/156.4.1879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Braverman J. M., Hudson R. R., Kaplan N. L., Langley C. H., Stephan W. The hitchhiking effect on the site frequency spectrum of DNA polymorphisms. Genetics. 1995 Jun;140(2):783–796. doi: 10.1093/genetics/140.2.783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Caballero A. On the effective size of populations with separate sexes, with particular reference to sex-linked genes. Genetics. 1995 Feb;139(2):1007–1011. doi: 10.1093/genetics/139.2.1007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Charlesworth B. Background selection and patterns of genetic diversity in Drosophila melanogaster. Genet Res. 1996 Oct;68(2):131–149. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300034029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Charlesworth B., Morgan M. T., Charlesworth D. The effect of deleterious mutations on neutral molecular variation. Genetics. 1993 Aug;134(4):1289–1303. doi: 10.1093/genetics/134.4.1289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Charlesworth B. The effect of life-history and mode of inheritance on neutral genetic variability. Genet Res. 2001 Apr;77(2):153–166. doi: 10.1017/s0016672301004979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. David J. R., Capy P. Genetic variation of Drosophila melanogaster natural populations. Trends Genet. 1988 Apr;4(4):106–111. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(88)90098-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Fay J. C., Wu C. I. A human population bottleneck can account for the discordance between patterns of mitochondrial versus nuclear DNA variation. Mol Biol Evol. 1999 Jul;16(7):1003–1005. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gillespie J. H. Junk ain't what junk does: neutral alleles in a selected context. Gene. 1997 Dec 31;205(1-2):291–299. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1119(97)00470-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hamblin M. T., Veuille M. Population structure among African and derived populations of Drosophila simulans: evidence for ancient subdivision and recent admixture. Genetics. 1999 Sep;153(1):305–317. doi: 10.1093/genetics/153.1.305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Houle D., Hughes K. A., Assimacopoulos S., Charlesworth B. The effects of spontaneous mutation on quantitative traits. II. Dominance of mutations with effects on life-history traits. Genet Res. 1997 Aug;70(1):27–34. doi: 10.1017/s001667239700284x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hudson R. R., Kaplan N. L. Deleterious background selection with recombination. Genetics. 1995 Dec;141(4):1605–1617. doi: 10.1093/genetics/141.4.1605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hudson R. R., Kaplan N. L. Statistical properties of the number of recombination events in the history of a sample of DNA sequences. Genetics. 1985 Sep;111(1):147–164. doi: 10.1093/genetics/111.1.147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hudson R. R. Properties of a neutral allele model with intragenic recombination. Theor Popul Biol. 1983 Apr;23(2):183–201. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(83)90013-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kaplan N. L., Hudson R. R., Langley C. H. The "hitchhiking effect" revisited. Genetics. 1989 Dec;123(4):887–899. doi: 10.1093/genetics/123.4.887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lemeunier F., Ashburner M. A. Relationships within the melanogaster species subgroup of the genus Drosophila (Sophophora). II. Phylogenetic relationships between six species based upon polytene chromosome banding sequences. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1976 May 18;193(1112):275–294. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1976.0046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. McVean G. A., Vieira J. Inferring parameters of mutation, selection and demography from patterns of synonymous site evolution in Drosophila. Genetics. 2001 Jan;157(1):245–257. doi: 10.1093/genetics/157.1.245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Moriyama E. N., Powell J. R. Intraspecific nuclear DNA variation in Drosophila. Mol Biol Evol. 1996 Jan;13(1):261–277. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Orr H. A., Betancourt A. J. Haldane's sieve and adaptation from the standing genetic variation. Genetics. 2001 Feb;157(2):875–884. doi: 10.1093/genetics/157.2.875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Przeworski M., Wall J. D., Andolfatto P. Recombination and the frequency spectrum in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. Mol Biol Evol. 2001 Mar;18(3):291–298. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Przeworski Molly. The signature of positive selection at randomly chosen loci. Genetics. 2002 Mar;160(3):1179–1189. doi: 10.1093/genetics/160.3.1179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Slatkin M., Hudson R. R. Pairwise comparisons of mitochondrial DNA sequences in stable and exponentially growing populations. Genetics. 1991 Oct;129(2):555–562. doi: 10.1093/genetics/129.2.555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Smith J. M., Haigh J. The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene. Genet Res. 1974 Feb;23(1):23–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Sniegowski P. D., Charlesworth B. Transposable element numbers in cosmopolitan inversions from a natural population of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1994 Jul;137(3):815–827. doi: 10.1093/genetics/137.3.815. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Tajima F. Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics. 1989 Nov;123(3):585–595. doi: 10.1093/genetics/123.3.585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Tajima F. The effect of change in population size on DNA polymorphism. Genetics. 1989 Nov;123(3):597–601. doi: 10.1093/genetics/123.3.597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Takano-Shimizu T. Local recombination and mutation effects on molecular evolution in Drosophila. Genetics. 1999 Nov;153(3):1285–1296. doi: 10.1093/genetics/153.3.1285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. True J. R., Mercer J. M., Laurie C. C. Differences in crossover frequency and distribution among three sibling species of Drosophila. Genetics. 1996 Feb;142(2):507–523. doi: 10.1093/genetics/142.2.507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Wall J. D. A comparison of estimators of the population recombination rate. Mol Biol Evol. 2000 Jan;17(1):156–163. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES