Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 2002 Dec;162(4):1837–1847. doi: 10.1093/genetics/162.4.1837

Vanishing GC-rich isochores in mammalian genomes.

Laurent Duret 1, Marie Semon 1, Gwenaël Piganeau 1, Dominique Mouchiroud 1, Nicolas Galtier 1
PMCID: PMC1462357  PMID: 12524353

Abstract

To understand the origin and evolution of isochores-the peculiar spatial distribution of GC content within mammalian genomes-we analyzed the synonymous substitution pattern in coding sequences from closely related species in different mammalian orders. In primate and cetartiodactyls, GC-rich genes are undergoing a large excess of GC --> AT substitutions over AT --> GC substitutions: GC-rich isochores are slowly disappearing from the genome of these two mammalian orders. In rodents, our analyses suggest both a decrease in GC content of GC-rich isochores and an increase in GC-poor isochores, but more data will be necessary to assess the significance of this pattern. These observations question the conclusions of previous works that assumed that base composition was at equilibrium. Analysis of allele frequency in human polymorphism data, however, confirmed that in the GC-rich parts of the genome, GC alleles have a higher probability of fixation than AT alleles. This fixation bias appears not strong enough to overcome the large excess of GC --> AT mutations. Thus, whatever the evolutionary force (neutral or selective) at the origin of GC-rich isochores, this force is no longer effective in mammals. We propose a model based on the biased gene conversion hypothesis that accounts for the origin of GC-rich isochores in the ancestral amniote genome and for their decline in present-day mammals.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (199.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Akashi H., Schaeffer S. W. Natural selection and the frequency distributions of "silent" DNA polymorphism in Drosophila. Genetics. 1997 May;146(1):295–307. doi: 10.1093/genetics/146.1.295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Andreozzi L., Federico C., Motta S., Saccone S., Sazanova A. L., Sazanov A. A., Smirnov A. F., Galkina S. A., Lukina N. A., Rodionov A. V. Compositional mapping of chicken chromosomes and identification of the gene-richest regions. Chromosome Res. 2001;9(7):521–532. doi: 10.1023/a:1012436900788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Aïssani B., D'Onofrio G., Mouchiroud D., Gardiner K., Gautier C., Bernardi G. The compositional properties of human genes. J Mol Evol. 1991 Jun;32(6):493–503. doi: 10.1007/BF02102651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bernardi G., Bernardi G. Compositional transitions in the nuclear genomes of cold-blooded vertebrates. J Mol Evol. 1990 Oct;31(4):282–293. doi: 10.1007/BF02101123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bernardi G. Isochores and the evolutionary genomics of vertebrates. Gene. 2000 Jan 4;241(1):3–17. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1119(99)00485-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bernardi G., Olofsson B., Filipski J., Zerial M., Salinas J., Cuny G., Meunier-Rotival M., Rodier F. The mosaic genome of warm-blooded vertebrates. Science. 1985 May 24;228(4702):953–958. doi: 10.1126/science.4001930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bird A. P. DNA methylation and the frequency of CpG in animal DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1980 Apr 11;8(7):1499–1504. doi: 10.1093/nar/8.7.1499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cargill M., Altshuler D., Ireland J., Sklar P., Ardlie K., Patil N., Shaw N., Lane C. R., Lim E. P., Kalyanaraman N. Characterization of single-nucleotide polymorphisms in coding regions of human genes. Nat Genet. 1999 Jul;22(3):231–238. doi: 10.1038/10290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Clay O., Cacciò S., Zoubak S., Mouchiroud D., Bernardi G. Human coding and noncoding DNA: compositional correlations. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 1996 Feb;5(1):2–12. doi: 10.1006/mpev.1996.0002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Coulondre C., Miller J. H., Farabaugh P. J., Gilbert W. Molecular basis of base substitution hotspots in Escherichia coli. Nature. 1978 Aug 24;274(5673):775–780. doi: 10.1038/274775a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. D'Onofrio G., Mouchiroud D., Aïssani B., Gautier C., Bernardi G. Correlations between the compositional properties of human genes, codon usage, and amino acid composition of proteins. J Mol Evol. 1991 Jun;32(6):504–510. doi: 10.1007/BF02102652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Duret L., Mouchiroud D., Gautier C. Statistical analysis of vertebrate sequences reveals that long genes are scarce in GC-rich isochores. J Mol Evol. 1995 Mar;40(3):308–317. doi: 10.1007/BF00163235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Duret L., Mouchiroud D., Gouy M. HOVERGEN: a database of homologous vertebrate genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994 Jun 25;22(12):2360–2365. doi: 10.1093/nar/22.12.2360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Eyre-Walker A. Evidence of selection on silent site base composition in mammals: potential implications for the evolution of isochores and junk DNA. Genetics. 1999 Jun;152(2):675–683. doi: 10.1093/genetics/152.2.675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Eyre-Walker A., Hurst L. D. The evolution of isochores. Nat Rev Genet. 2001 Jul;2(7):549–555. doi: 10.1038/35080577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Eyre-Walker A. Problems with parsimony in sequences of biased base composition. J Mol Evol. 1998 Dec;47(6):686–690. doi: 10.1007/pl00006427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Eyre-Walker A. Recombination and mammalian genome evolution. Proc Biol Sci. 1993 Jun 22;252(1335):237–243. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1993.0071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Francino M. P., Ochman H. Isochores result from mutation not selection. Nature. 1999 Jul 1;400(6739):30–31. doi: 10.1038/21804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Fryxell K. J., Zuckerkandl E. Cytosine deamination plays a primary role in the evolution of mammalian isochores. Mol Biol Evol. 2000 Sep;17(9):1371–1383. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Fullerton S. M., Bernardo Carvalho A., Clark A. G. Local rates of recombination are positively correlated with GC content in the human genome. Mol Biol Evol. 2001 Jun;18(6):1139–1142. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003886. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Galtier N., Boursot P. A new method for locating changes in a tree reveals distinct nucleotide polymorphism vs. divergence patterns in mouse mitochondrial control region. J Mol Evol. 2000 Mar;50(3):224–231. doi: 10.1007/s002399910025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Galtier N., Gouy M. Inferring pattern and process: maximum-likelihood implementation of a nonhomogeneous model of DNA sequence evolution for phylogenetic analysis. Mol Biol Evol. 1998 Jul;15(7):871–879. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Galtier N., Mouchiroud D. Isochore evolution in mammals: a human-like ancestral structure. Genetics. 1998 Dec;150(4):1577–1584. doi: 10.1093/genetics/150.4.1577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Galtier N., Piganeau G., Mouchiroud D., Duret L. GC-content evolution in mammalian genomes: the biased gene conversion hypothesis. Genetics. 2001 Oct;159(2):907–911. doi: 10.1093/genetics/159.2.907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Hartl D. L., Moriyama E. N., Sawyer S. A. Selection intensity for codon bias. Genetics. 1994 Sep;138(1):227–234. doi: 10.1093/genetics/138.1.227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Hill R., Rich P. R. A physical interpretation for the natural photosynthetic process. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Feb;80(4):978–982. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.4.978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Hughes S., Zelus D., Mouchiroud D. Warm-blooded isochore structure in Nile crocodile and turtle. Mol Biol Evol. 1999 Nov;16(11):1521–1527. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Jabbari K., Bernardi G. CpG doublets, CpG islands and Alu repeats in long human DNA sequences from different isochore families. Gene. 1998 Dec 11;224(1-2):123–127. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1119(98)00474-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Kaback D. B. Chromosome-size dependent control of meiotic recombination in humans. Nat Genet. 1996 May;13(1):20–21. doi: 10.1038/ng0596-20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Kricker M. C., Drake J. W., Radman M. Duplication-targeted DNA methylation and mutagenesis in the evolution of eukaryotic chromosomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Feb 1;89(3):1075–1079. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.3.1075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Lander E. S., Linton L. M., Birren B., Nusbaum C., Zody M. C., Baldwin J., Devon K., Dewar K., Doyle M., FitzHugh W. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature. 2001 Feb 15;409(6822):860–921. doi: 10.1038/35057062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. McQueen H. A., Siriaco G., Bird A. P. Chicken microchromosomes are hyperacetylated, early replicating, and gene rich. Genome Res. 1998 Jun;8(6):621–630. doi: 10.1101/gr.8.6.621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Mouchiroud D., Bernardi G. Compositional properties of coding sequences and mammalian phylogeny. J Mol Evol. 1993 Aug;37(2):109–116. doi: 10.1007/BF02407345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Mouchiroud D., D'Onofrio G., Aïssani B., Macaya G., Gautier C., Bernardi G. The distribution of genes in the human genome. Gene. 1991 Apr;100:181–187. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(91)90364-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Mouchiroud D., Gautier C. High codon-usage changes in mammalian genes. Mol Biol Evol. 1988 Mar;5(2):192–194. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Nekrutenko A., Li W. H. Assessment of compositional heterogeneity within and between eukaryotic genomes. Genome Res. 2000 Dec;10(12):1986–1995. doi: 10.1101/gr.10.12.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Perry J., Ashworth A. Evolutionary rate of a gene affected by chromosomal position. Curr Biol. 1999 Sep 9;9(17):987–989. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(99)80430-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Piganeau Gwenaël, Mouchiroud Dominique, Duret Laurent, Gautier Christian. Expected relationship between the silent substitution rate and the GC content: implications for the evolution of isochores. J Mol Evol. 2002 Jan;54(1):129–133. doi: 10.1007/s00239-001-0011-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Robinson M., Gautier C., Mouchiroud D. Evolution of isochores in rodents. Mol Biol Evol. 1997 Aug;14(8):823–828. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Shetty S., Griffin D. K., Graves J. A. Comparative painting reveals strong chromosome homology over 80 million years of bird evolution. Chromosome Res. 1999;7(4):289–295. doi: 10.1023/a:1009278914829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Smith N. G., Eyre-Walker A. Synonymous codon bias is not caused by mutation bias in G+C-rich genes in humans. Mol Biol Evol. 2001 Jun;18(6):982–986. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003899. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Varlet I., Radman M., Brooks P. DNA mismatch repair in Xenopus egg extracts: repair efficiency and DNA repair synthesis for all single base-pair mismatches. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Oct;87(20):7883–7887. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.20.7883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Venter J. C., Adams M. D., Myers E. W., Li P. W., Mural R. J., Sutton G. G., Smith H. O., Yandell M., Evans C. A., Holt R. A. The sequence of the human genome. Science. 2001 Feb 16;291(5507):1304–1351. doi: 10.1126/science.1058040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES