Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 2003 Apr;163(4):1273–1286. doi: 10.1093/genetics/163.4.1273

Crossover interference in Saccharomyces cerevisiae requires a TID1/RDH54- and DMC1-dependent pathway.

Miki Shinohara 1, Kazuko Sakai 1, Akira Shinohara 1, Douglas K Bishop 1
PMCID: PMC1462529  PMID: 12702674

Abstract

Two RecA-like recombinases, Rad51 and Dmc1, function together during double-strand break (DSB)-mediated meiotic recombination to promote homologous strand invasion in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Two partially redundant proteins, Rad54 and Tid1/Rdh54, act as recombinase accessory factors. Here, tetrad analysis shows that mutants lacking Tid1 form four-viable-spore tetrads with levels of interhomolog crossover (CO) and noncrossover recombination similar to, or slightly greater than, those in wild type. Importantly, tid1 mutants show a marked defect in crossover interference, a mechanism that distributes crossover events nonrandomly along chromosomes during meiosis. Previous work showed that dmc1Delta mutants are strongly defective in strand invasion and meiotic progression and that these defects can be partially suppressed by increasing the copy number of RAD54. Tetrad analysis is used to show that meiotic recombination in RAD54-suppressed dmc1Delta cells is similar to that in tid1; the frequency of COs and gene conversions is near normal, but crossover interference is defective. These results support the proposal that crossover interference acts at the strand invasion stage of recombination.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (246.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Allers T., Lichten M. Differential timing and control of noncrossover and crossover recombination during meiosis. Cell. 2001 Jul 13;106(1):47–57. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00416-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Arbel A., Zenvirth D., Simchen G. Sister chromatid-based DNA repair is mediated by RAD54, not by DMC1 or TID1. EMBO J. 1999 May 4;18(9):2648–2658. doi: 10.1093/emboj/18.9.2648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bishop D. K., Nikolski Y., Oshiro J., Chon J., Shinohara M., Chen X. High copy number suppression of the meiotic arrest caused by a dmc1 mutation: REC114 imposes an early recombination block and RAD54 promotes a DMC1-independent DSB repair pathway. Genes Cells. 1999 Aug;4(8):425–444. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2443.1999.00273.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bishop D. K., Park D., Xu L., Kleckner N. DMC1: a meiosis-specific yeast homolog of E. coli recA required for recombination, synaptonemal complex formation, and cell cycle progression. Cell. 1992 May 1;69(3):439–456. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90446-j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cao L., Alani E., Kleckner N. A pathway for generation and processing of double-strand breaks during meiotic recombination in S. cerevisiae. Cell. 1990 Jun 15;61(6):1089–1101. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90072-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Christianson T. W., Sikorski R. S., Dante M., Shero J. H., Hieter P. Multifunctional yeast high-copy-number shuttle vectors. Gene. 1992 Jan 2;110(1):119–122. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(92)90454-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chua P. R., Roeder G. S. Tam1, a telomere-associated meiotic protein, functions in chromosome synapsis and crossover interference. Genes Dev. 1997 Jul 15;11(14):1786–1800. doi: 10.1101/gad.11.14.1786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Conrad M. N., Dominguez A. M., Dresser M. E. Ndj1p, a meiotic telomere protein required for normal chromosome synapsis and segregation in yeast. Science. 1997 May 23;276(5316):1252–1255. doi: 10.1126/science.276.5316.1252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cross F. R. 'Marker swap' plasmids: convenient tools for budding yeast molecular genetics. Yeast. 1997 Jun 15;13(7):647–653. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0061(19970615)13:7<647::AID-YEA115>3.0.CO;2-#. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Egel R. Synaptonemal complex and crossing-over: structural support or interference? Heredity (Edinb) 1978 Oct;41(2):233–237. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1978.92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Foss E., Lande R., Stahl F. W., Steinberg C. M. Chiasma interference as a function of genetic distance. Genetics. 1993 Mar;133(3):681–691. doi: 10.1093/genetics/133.3.681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gietz R. D., Sugino A. New yeast-Escherichia coli shuttle vectors constructed with in vitro mutagenized yeast genes lacking six-base pair restriction sites. Gene. 1988 Dec 30;74(2):527–534. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(88)90185-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hunter N., Kleckner N. The single-end invasion: an asymmetric intermediate at the double-strand break to double-holliday junction transition of meiotic recombination. Cell. 2001 Jul 13;106(1):59–70. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00430-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kaback D. B., Barber D., Mahon J., Lamb J., You J. Chromosome size-dependent control of meiotic reciprocal recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: the role of crossover interference. Genetics. 1999 Aug;152(4):1475–1486. doi: 10.1093/genetics/152.4.1475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. King J. S., Mortimer R. K. A polymerization model of chiasma interference and corresponding computer simulation. Genetics. 1990 Dec;126(4):1127–1138. doi: 10.1093/genetics/126.4.1127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kohli J., Bähler J. Homologous recombination in fission yeast: absence of crossover interference and synaptonemal complex. Experientia. 1994 Mar 15;50(3):295–306. doi: 10.1007/BF01924013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Maguire M. P. Crossover site determination and interference. J Theor Biol. 1988 Oct 21;134(4):565–570. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(88)80058-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Nassif N., Penney J., Pal S., Engels W. R., Gloor G. B. Efficient copying of nonhomologous sequences from ectopic sites via P-element-induced gap repair. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Mar;14(3):1613–1625. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.3.1613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Novak J. E., Ross-Macdonald P. B., Roeder G. S. The budding yeast Msh4 protein functions in chromosome synapsis and the regulation of crossover distribution. Genetics. 2001 Jul;158(3):1013–1025. doi: 10.1093/genetics/158.3.1013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Padmore R., Cao L., Kleckner N. Temporal comparison of recombination and synaptonemal complex formation during meiosis in S. cerevisiae. Cell. 1991 Sep 20;66(6):1239–1256. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90046-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Page S. L., Hawley R. S. c(3)G encodes a Drosophila synaptonemal complex protein. Genes Dev. 2001 Dec 1;15(23):3130–3143. doi: 10.1101/gad.935001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Passy S. I., Yu X., Li Z., Radding C. M., Masson J. Y., West S. C., Egelman E. H. Human Dmc1 protein binds DNA as an octameric ring. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Sep 14;96(19):10684–10688. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.19.10684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Petukhova G., Stratton S., Sung P. Catalysis of homologous DNA pairing by yeast Rad51 and Rad54 proteins. Nature. 1998 May 7;393(6680):91–94. doi: 10.1038/30037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Petukhova G., Sung P., Klein H. Promotion of Rad51-dependent D-loop formation by yeast recombination factor Rdh54/Tid1. Genes Dev. 2000 Sep 1;14(17):2206–2215. doi: 10.1101/gad.826100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Pâques F., Haber J. E. Multiple pathways of recombination induced by double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1999 Jun;63(2):349–404. doi: 10.1128/mmbr.63.2.349-404.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Rockmill B., Roeder G. S. The yeast med1 mutant undergoes both meiotic homolog nondisjunction and precocious separation of sister chromatids. Genetics. 1994 Jan;136(1):65–74. doi: 10.1093/genetics/136.1.65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Rockmill B., Sym M., Scherthan H., Roeder G. S. Roles for two RecA homologs in promoting meiotic chromosome synapsis. Genes Dev. 1995 Nov 1;9(21):2684–2695. doi: 10.1101/gad.9.21.2684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Shinohara A., Gasior S., Ogawa T., Kleckner N., Bishop D. K. Saccharomyces cerevisiae recA homologues RAD51 and DMC1 have both distinct and overlapping roles in meiotic recombination. Genes Cells. 1997 Oct;2(10):615–629. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2443.1997.1480347.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Shinohara M., Gasior S. L., Bishop D. K., Shinohara A. Tid1/Rdh54 promotes colocalization of rad51 and dmc1 during meiotic recombination. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Sep 26;97(20):10814–10819. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.20.10814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Shinohara M., Shita-Yamaguchi E., Buerstedde J. M., Shinagawa H., Ogawa H., Shinohara A. Characterization of the roles of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD54 gene and a homologue of RAD54, RDH54/TID1, in mitosis and meiosis. Genetics. 1997 Dec;147(4):1545–1556. doi: 10.1093/genetics/147.4.1545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Smith A. V., Roeder G. S. The yeast Red1 protein localizes to the cores of meiotic chromosomes. J Cell Biol. 1997 Mar 10;136(5):957–967. doi: 10.1083/jcb.136.5.957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Snow R. Maximum likelihood estimation of linkage and interference from tetrad data. Genetics. 1979 May;92(1):231–245. doi: 10.1093/genetics/92.1.231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Storlazzi A., Xu L., Schwacha A., Kleckner N. Synaptonemal complex (SC) component Zip1 plays a role in meiotic recombination independent of SC polymerization along the chromosomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Aug 20;93(17):9043–9048. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.17.9043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Sung P. Catalysis of ATP-dependent homologous DNA pairing and strand exchange by yeast RAD51 protein. Science. 1994 Aug 26;265(5176):1241–1243. doi: 10.1126/science.8066464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Sym M., Engebrecht J. A., Roeder G. S. ZIP1 is a synaptonemal complex protein required for meiotic chromosome synapsis. Cell. 1993 Feb 12;72(3):365–378. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90114-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Sym M., Roeder G. S. Crossover interference is abolished in the absence of a synaptonemal complex protein. Cell. 1994 Oct 21;79(2):283–292. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90197-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Sym M., Roeder G. S. Zip1-induced changes in synaptonemal complex structure and polycomplex assembly. J Cell Biol. 1995 Feb;128(4):455–466. doi: 10.1083/jcb.128.4.455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Szostak J. W., Orr-Weaver T. L., Rothstein R. J., Stahl F. W. The double-strand-break repair model for recombination. Cell. 1983 May;33(1):25–35. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90331-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Wach A., Brachat A., Pöhlmann R., Philippsen P. New heterologous modules for classical or PCR-based gene disruptions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast. 1994 Dec;10(13):1793–1808. doi: 10.1002/yea.320101310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Xu L., Kleckner N. Sequence non-specific double-strand breaks and interhomolog interactions prior to double-strand break formation at a meiotic recombination hot spot in yeast. EMBO J. 1995 Oct 16;14(20):5115–5128. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb00194.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Zenvirth D., Loidl J., Klein S., Arbel A., Shemesh R., Simchen G. Switching yeast from meiosis to mitosis: double-strand break repair, recombination and synaptonemal complex. Genes Cells. 1997 Aug;2(8):487–498. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2443.1997.1370335.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Zickler D., Kleckner N. Meiotic chromosomes: integrating structure and function. Annu Rev Genet. 1999;33:603–754. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genet.33.1.603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES