Skip to main content
PMC home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 2003 Jun;164(2):781–787. doi: 10.1093/genetics/164.2.781

Likelihood-based estimation of microsatellite mutation rates.

John C Whittaker 1, Roger M Harbord 1, Nicola Boxall 1, Ian Mackay 1, Gary Dawson 1, Richard M Sibly 1
PMCID: PMC1462577  PMID: 12807796

Abstract

Microsatellites are widely used in genetic analyses, many of which require reliable estimates of microsatellite mutation rates, yet the factors determining mutation rates are uncertain. The most straightforward and conclusive method by which to study mutation is direct observation of allele transmissions in parent-child pairs, and studies of this type suggest a positive, possibly exponential, relationship between mutation rate and allele size, together with a bias toward length increase. Except for microsatellites on the Y chromosome, however, previous analyses have not made full use of available data and may have introduced bias: mutations have been identified only where child genotypes could not be generated by transmission from parents' genotypes, so that the probability that a mutation is detected depends on the distribution of allele lengths and varies with allele length. We introduce a likelihood-based approach that has two key advantages over existing methods. First, we can make formal comparisons between competing models of microsatellite evolution; second, we obtain asymptotically unbiased and efficient parameter estimates. Application to data composed of 118,866 parent-offspring transmissions of AC microsatellites supports the hypothesis that mutation rate increases exponentially with microsatellite length, with a suggestion that contractions become more likely than expansions as length increases. This would lead to a stationary distribution for allele length maintained by mutational balance. There is no evidence that contractions and expansions differ in their step size distributions.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (174.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Amos W., Rubinstzein D. C. Microsatellites are subject to directional evolution. Nat Genet. 1996 Jan;12(1):13–14. doi: 10.1038/ng0196-13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bell G. I., Jurka J. The length distribution of perfect dimer repetitive DNA is consistent with its evolution by an unbiased single-step mutation process. J Mol Evol. 1997 Apr;44(4):414–421. doi: 10.1007/pl00006161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brinkmann B., Klintschar M., Neuhuber F., Hühne J., Rolf B. Mutation rate in human microsatellites: influence of the structure and length of the tandem repeat. Am J Hum Genet. 1998 Jun;62(6):1408–1415. doi: 10.1086/301869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cooper G., Burroughs N. J., Rand D. A., Rubinsztein D. C., Amos W. Markov chain Monte Carlo analysis of human Y-chromosome microsatellites provides evidence of biased mutation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Oct 12;96(21):11916–11921. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.21.11916. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dib C., Fauré S., Fizames C., Samson D., Drouot N., Vignal A., Millasseau P., Marc S., Hazan J., Seboun E. A comprehensive genetic map of the human genome based on 5,264 microsatellites. Nature. 1996 Mar 14;380(6570):152–154. doi: 10.1038/380152a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dobbs DA, Vanhessche KP, Brazi E, Rautenstrauch V, V, Lenoir JY, Genêt JP, Wiles J, Bergens SH. Industrial Synthesis of (+)-cis-Methyl Dihydrojasmonate by Enantioselective Catalytic Hydrogenation; Identification of the Precatalyst. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2000 Jun 2;39(11):1992–1995. doi: 10.1002/1521-3773(20000602)39:11<1992::aid-anie1992>3.0.co;2-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ellegren H. Heterogeneous mutation processes in human microsatellite DNA sequences. Nat Genet. 2000 Apr;24(4):400–402. doi: 10.1038/74249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ellegren H. Microsatellite mutations in the germline: implications for evolutionary inference. Trends Genet. 2000 Dec;16(12):551–558. doi: 10.1016/s0168-9525(00)02139-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ewen K. R., Bahlo M., Treloar S. A., Levinson D. F., Mowry B., Barlow J. W., Foote S. J. Identification and analysis of error types in high-throughput genotyping. Am J Hum Genet. 2000 Aug 2;67(3):727–736. doi: 10.1086/303048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Harr B., Schlötterer C. Long microsatellite alleles in Drosophila melanogaster have a downward mutation bias and short persistence times, which cause their genome-wide underrepresentation. Genetics. 2000 Jul;155(3):1213–1220. doi: 10.1093/genetics/155.3.1213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Huang Qing-Yang, Xu Fu-Hua, Shen Hui, Deng Hong-Yi, Liu Yong-Jun, Liu Yao-Zhong, Li Jin-Long, Recker Robert R., Deng Hong-Wen. Mutation patterns at dinucleotide microsatellite loci in humans. Am J Hum Genet. 2002 Jan 15;70(3):625–634. doi: 10.1086/338997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kayser M., Roewer L., Hedman M., Henke L., Henke J., Brauer S., Krüger C., Krawczak M., Nagy M., Dobosz T. Characteristics and frequency of germline mutations at microsatellite loci from the human Y chromosome, as revealed by direct observation in father/son pairs. Am J Hum Genet. 2000 Apr 6;66(5):1580–1588. doi: 10.1086/302905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kruglyak L., Daly M. J., Reeve-Daly M. P., Lander E. S. Parametric and nonparametric linkage analysis: a unified multipoint approach. Am J Hum Genet. 1996 Jun;58(6):1347–1363. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kruglyak S., Durrett R. T., Schug M. D., Aquadro C. F. Equilibrium distributions of microsatellite repeat length resulting from a balance between slippage events and point mutations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Sep 1;95(18):10774–10778. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.18.10774. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kruglyak S., Durrett R., Schug M. D., Aquadro C. F. Distribution and abundance of microsatellites in the yeast genome can Be explained by a balance between slippage events and point mutations. Mol Biol Evol. 2000 Aug;17(8):1210–1219. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Leeflang E. P., Zhang L., Tavaré S., Hubert R., Srinidhi J., MacDonald M. E., Myers R. H., de Young M., Wexler N. S., Gusella J. F. Single sperm analysis of the trinucleotide repeats in the Huntington's disease gene: quantification of the mutation frequency spectrum. Hum Mol Genet. 1995 Sep;4(9):1519–1526. doi: 10.1093/hmg/4.9.1519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. O'Connell J. R., Weeks D. E. PedCheck: a program for identification of genotype incompatibilities in linkage analysis. Am J Hum Genet. 1998 Jul;63(1):259–266. doi: 10.1086/301904. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ohta T., Kimura M. A model of mutation appropriate to estimate the number of electrophoretically detectable alleles in a finite population. Genet Res. 1973 Oct;22(2):201–204. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300012994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Presant C. A., Multhauf P., Klein L., Chan C., Chang F. F., Hum G., Joseph R., Opfell R., Lemkin S., Shiftan T. Thymidine and 5-FU: a Phase II pilot study in colorectal and breast carcinomas. Cancer Treat Rep. 1983 Jul-Aug;67(7-8):735–736. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Schlötterer C., Ritter R., Harr B., Brem G. High mutation rate of a long microsatellite allele in Drosophila melanogaster provides evidence for allele-specific mutation rates. Mol Biol Evol. 1998 Oct;15(10):1269–1274. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Sibly R. M., Whittaker J. C., Talbot M. A maximum-likelihood approach to fitting equilibrium models of microsatellite evolution. Mol Biol Evol. 2001 Mar;18(3):413–417. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Sibly Richard M., Meade Andrew, Boxall Nicola, Wilkinson Michael J., Corne Dave W., Whittaker John C. The structure of interrupted human AC microsatellites. Mol Biol Evol. 2003 Mar;20(3):453–459. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msg056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Wierdl M., Dominska M., Petes T. D. Microsatellite instability in yeast: dependence on the length of the microsatellite. Genetics. 1997 Jul;146(3):769–779. doi: 10.1093/genetics/146.3.769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Xu X., Peng M., Fang Z. The direction of microsatellite mutations is dependent upon allele length. Nat Genet. 2000 Apr;24(4):396–399. doi: 10.1038/74238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES