Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 2003 Oct;165(2):895–900. doi: 10.1093/genetics/165.2.895

Large-scale adaptive hitchhiking upon high recombination in Drosophila simulans.

Humberto Quesada 1, Ursula E M Ramírez 1, Julio Rozas 1, Montserrat Aguadé 1
PMCID: PMC1462778  PMID: 14573496

Abstract

Natural selection is expected to leave a characteristic footprint on neighboring nucleotide variation through the effects of genetic linkage. The size of the region affected is proportional to the strength of selection and greatly reduced with the recombinational distance from the selected site. Thus, the genomic footprint of selection is generally believed to be restricted to a small DNA stretch in normal and highly recombining regions. Here, we study the effect of selection on linked polymorphism (hitchhiking effect) by surveying nucleotide variation across a highly recombining approximately 88-kb genomic fragment in an African population of Drosophila simulans. We find a core region of up to 38 kb with a major haplotype at intermediate frequency. The extended haplotype structure that gradually vanishes until disappearing is unusual for a highly recombining region. Both the presence in the structured genomic domain of a single major haplotype depleted of variability and the detected spatial pattern of variation along the approximately 88-kb fragment are incompatible with neutral predictions in a panmictic population. A major role of demographic effects could also be discarded. The observed pattern of variation clearly provides evidence that directional selection has acted recently on this region, sweeping out variation around a strongly adaptive mutation. Our findings suggest a major role of positive selection in shaping DNA variability even in highly recombining regions.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (106.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adams M. D., Celniker S. E., Holt R. A., Evans C. A., Gocayne J. D., Amanatides P. G., Scherer S. E., Li P. W., Hoskins R. A., Galle R. F. The genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster. Science. 2000 Mar 24;287(5461):2185–2195. doi: 10.1126/science.287.5461.2185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Andolfatto P. Adaptive hitchhiking effects on genome variability. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2001 Dec;11(6):635–641. doi: 10.1016/s0959-437x(00)00246-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Andolfatto P., Przeworski M. A genome-wide departure from the standard neutral model in natural populations of Drosophila. Genetics. 2000 Sep;156(1):257–268. doi: 10.1093/genetics/156.1.257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Andolfatto P., Wall J. D., Kreitman M. Unusual haplotype structure at the proximal breakpoint of In(2L)t in a natural population of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1999 Nov;153(3):1297–1311. doi: 10.1093/genetics/153.3.1297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Begun D. J., Aquadro C. F. Molecular variation at the vermilion locus in geographically diverse populations of Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans. Genetics. 1995 Jul;140(3):1019–1032. doi: 10.1093/genetics/140.3.1019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Charlesworth B., Morgan M. T., Charlesworth D. The effect of deleterious mutations on neutral molecular variation. Genetics. 1993 Aug;134(4):1289–1303. doi: 10.1093/genetics/134.4.1289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Depaulis F., Veuille M. Neutrality tests based on the distribution of haplotypes under an infinite-site model. Mol Biol Evol. 1998 Dec;15(12):1788–1790. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gilad Yoav, Rosenberg Shai, Przeworski Molly, Lancet Doron, Skorecki Karl. Evidence for positive selection and population structure at the human MAO-A gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Jan 22;99(2):862–867. doi: 10.1073/pnas.022614799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hudson R. R., Bailey K., Skarecky D., Kwiatowski J., Ayala F. J. Evidence for positive selection in the superoxide dismutase (Sod) region of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1994 Apr;136(4):1329–1340. doi: 10.1093/genetics/136.4.1329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hudson R. R., Kaplan N. L. Deleterious background selection with recombination. Genetics. 1995 Dec;141(4):1605–1617. doi: 10.1093/genetics/141.4.1605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kim Yuseob, Stephan Wolfgang. Detecting a local signature of genetic hitchhiking along a recombining chromosome. Genetics. 2002 Feb;160(2):765–777. doi: 10.1093/genetics/160.2.765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kirby D. A., Stephan W. Haplotype test reveals departure from neutrality in a segment of the white gene of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1995 Dec;141(4):1483–1490. doi: 10.1093/genetics/141.4.1483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kirby D. A., Stephan W. Multi-locus selection and the structure of variation at the white gene of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1996 Oct;144(2):635–645. doi: 10.1093/genetics/144.2.635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kumar S., Tamura K., Jakobsen I. B., Nei M. MEGA2: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis software. Bioinformatics. 2001 Dec;17(12):1244–1245. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.12.1244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Nurminsky D., Aguiar D. D., Bustamante C. D., Hartl D. L. Chromosomal effects of rapid gene evolution in Drosophila melanogaster. Science. 2001 Jan 5;291(5501):128–130. doi: 10.1126/science.291.5501.128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Olson Steve. Population genetics. Seeking the signs of selection. Science. 2002 Nov 15;298(5597):1324–1325. doi: 10.1126/science.298.5597.1324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Parsch J., Meiklejohn C. D., Hartl D. L. Patterns of DNA sequence variation suggest the recent action of positive selection in the janus-ocnus region of Drosophila simulans. Genetics. 2001 Oct;159(2):647–657. doi: 10.1093/genetics/159.2.647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Pritchard J. K., Przeworski M. Linkage disequilibrium in humans: models and data. Am J Hum Genet. 2001 Jun 14;69(1):1–14. doi: 10.1086/321275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Przeworski Molly. The signature of positive selection at randomly chosen loci. Genetics. 2002 Mar;160(3):1179–1189. doi: 10.1093/genetics/160.3.1179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Rozas J., Gullaud M., Blandin G., Aguadé M. DNA variation at the rp49 gene region of Drosophila simulans: evolutionary inferences from an unusual haplotype structure. Genetics. 2001 Jul;158(3):1147–1155. doi: 10.1093/genetics/158.3.1147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Sabeti Pardis C., Reich David E., Higgins John M., Levine Haninah Z. P., Richter Daniel J., Schaffner Stephen F., Gabriel Stacey B., Platko Jill V., Patterson Nick J., McDonald Gavin J. Detecting recent positive selection in the human genome from haplotype structure. Nature. 2002 Oct 9;419(6909):832–837. doi: 10.1038/nature01140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Smith J. M., Haigh J. The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene. Genet Res. 1974 Feb;23(1):23–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Smith Nick G. C., Eyre-Walker Adam. Adaptive protein evolution in Drosophila. Nature. 2002 Feb 28;415(6875):1022–1024. doi: 10.1038/4151022a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Tajima F. Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics. 1989 Nov;123(3):585–595. doi: 10.1093/genetics/123.3.585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Thompson J. D., Gibson T. J., Plewniak F., Jeanmougin F., Higgins D. G. The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997 Dec 15;25(24):4876–4882. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.24.4876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Wang Wen, Thornton Kevin, Berry Andrew, Long Manyuan. Nucleotide variation along the Drosophila melanogaster fourth chromosome. Science. 2002 Jan 4;295(5552):134–137. doi: 10.1126/science.1064521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Zurovcová Martina, Ayala Francisco J. Polymorphism patterns in two tightly linked developmental genes, Idgf1 and Idgf3, of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 2002 Sep;162(1):177–188. doi: 10.1093/genetics/162.1.177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES