Skip to main content
PMC home page
Nucleic Acids Research logoLink to Nucleic Acids Research
. 1997 Apr 1;25(7):1419–1425. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.7.1419

Mathematical model to predict regions of chromatin attachment to the nuclear matrix.

G B Singh 1, J A Kramer 1, S A Krawetz 1
PMCID: PMC146595  PMID: 9060438

Abstract

The potentiation and subsequent initiation of transcription are complex biological phenomena. The region of attachment of the chromatin fiber to the nuclear matrix, known as the matrix attachment region or scaffold attachment region (MAR or SAR), are thought to be requisite for the transcriptional regulation of the eukaryotic genome. As expressed sequences should be contained in these regions, it becomes significant to answer the following question: can these regions be identified from the primary sequence data alone and subsequently used as markers for expressed sequences? This paper represents an effort toward achieving this goal and describes a mathematical model for the detection of MARs. The location of matrix associated regions has been linked to a variety of sequence patterns. Consequently, a list of these patterns is compiled and represented as a set of decision rules using an AND-OR formulation. The DNA sequence was then searched for the presence of these patterns and a statistical significance was associated with the frequency of occurrence of the various patterns. Subsequently, a mathematical potential value,MAR-Potential, was assigned to a sequence region as the inverse proportion to the probability that the observed pattern population occurred at random. Such a MAR detection process was applied to the analysis of a variety of known MAR containing sequences. Regions of matrix association predicted by the software essentially correspond to those determined experimentally. The human T-cell receptor and the DNA sequence from the Drosophila bithorax region were also analyzed. This demonstrates the usefulness of the approach described as a means to direct experimental resources.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (168.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bode J., Schlake T., Ríos-Ramírez M., Mielke C., Stengert M., Kay V., Klehr-Wirth D. Scaffold/matrix-attached regions: structural properties creating transcriptionally active loci. Int Rev Cytol. 1995;162A:389–454. doi: 10.1016/s0074-7696(08)61235-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bode J., Stengert-Iber M., Kay V., Schlake T., Dietz-Pfeilstetter A. Scaffold/matrix-attached regions: topological switches with multiple regulatory functions. Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr. 1996;6(2-3):115–138. doi: 10.1615/critreveukargeneexpr.v6.i2-3.20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Boulikas T. Nature of DNA sequences at the attachment regions of genes to the nuclear matrix. J Cell Biochem. 1993 May;52(1):14–22. doi: 10.1002/jcb.240520104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Deppert W. Binding of MAR-DNA elements by mutant p53: possible implications for its oncogenic functions. J Cell Biochem. 1996 Aug;62(2):172–180. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4644(199608)62:2<172::aid-jcb5>3.0.co;2-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dong S., Searls D. B. Gene structure prediction by linguistic methods. Genomics. 1994 Oct;23(3):540–551. doi: 10.1006/geno.1994.1541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Farache G., Razin S. V., Targa F. R., Scherrer K. Organization of the 3'-boundary of the chicken alpha globin gene domain and characterization of a CR 1-specific protein binding site. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990 Feb 11;18(3):401–409. doi: 10.1093/nar/18.3.401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Jarman A. P., Higgs D. R. Nuclear scaffold attachment sites in the human globin gene complexes. EMBO J. 1988 Nov;7(11):3337–3344. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1988.tb03205.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kramer J. A., Krawetz S. A. Nuclear matrix interactions within the sperm genome. J Biol Chem. 1996 May 17;271(20):11619–11622. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.20.11619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kramer J. A., Singh G. B., Krawetz S. A. Computer-assisted search for sites of nuclear matrix attachment. Genomics. 1996 Apr 15;33(2):305–308. doi: 10.1006/geno.1996.0198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Loc P. V., Strätling W. H. The matrix attachment regions of the chicken lysozyme gene co-map with the boundaries of the chromatin domain. EMBO J. 1988 Mar;7(3):655–664. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1988.tb02860.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Mural R. J., Einstein J. R., Guan X., Mann R. C., Uberbacher E. C. An artificial intelligence approach to DNA sequence feature recognition. Trends Biotechnol. 1992 Jan-Feb;10(1-2):66–69. doi: 10.1016/0167-7799(92)90173-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Nikolaev L. G., Tsevegiyn T., Akopov S. B., Ashworth L. K., Sverdlov E. D. Construction of a chromosome specific library of human MARs and mapping of matrix attachment regions on human chromosome 19. Nucleic Acids Res. 1996 Apr 1;24(7):1330–1336. doi: 10.1093/nar/24.7.1330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Prestridge D. S. Predicting Pol II promoter sequences using transcription factor binding sites. J Mol Biol. 1995 Jun 23;249(5):923–932. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1995.0349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Prestridge D. S. SIGNAL SCAN: a computer program that scans DNA sequences for eukaryotic transcriptional elements. Comput Appl Biosci. 1991 Apr;7(2):203–206. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/7.2.203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Rowen L., Koop B. F., Hood L. The complete 685-kilobase DNA sequence of the human beta T cell receptor locus. Science. 1996 Jun 21;272(5269):1755–1762. doi: 10.1126/science.272.5269.1755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Sander M., Hsieh T. S. Drosophila topoisomerase II double-strand DNA cleavage: analysis of DNA sequence homology at the cleavage site. Nucleic Acids Res. 1985 Feb 25;13(4):1057–1072. doi: 10.1093/nar/13.4.1057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Spitzner J. R., Muller M. T. A consensus sequence for cleavage by vertebrate DNA topoisomerase II. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988 Jun 24;16(12):5533–5556. doi: 10.1093/nar/16.12.5533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Staden R. Methods for calculating the probabilities of finding patterns in sequences. Comput Appl Biosci. 1989 Apr;5(2):89–96. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/5.2.89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Vogelstein B., Pardoll D. M., Coffey D. S. Supercoiled loops and eucaryotic DNA replicaton. Cell. 1980 Nov;22(1 Pt 1):79–85. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(80)90156-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. von Kries J. P., Phi-Van L., Diekmann S., Strätling W. H. A non-curved chicken lysozyme 5' matrix attachment site is 3' followed by a strongly curved DNA sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990 Jul 11;18(13):3881–3885. doi: 10.1093/nar/18.13.3881. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Nucleic Acids Research are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES