Skip to main content
PMC home page
Environmental Health Perspectives logoLink to Environmental Health Perspectives
. 1997 Dec;105(Suppl 6):1445–1449. doi: 10.1289/ehp.97105s61445

Ultramorphological sperm characteristics in the risk assessment of health effects after radiation exposure among salvage workers in Chernobyl.

A Fischbein 1, N Zabludovsky 1, F Eltes 1, V Grischenko 1, B Bartoov 1
PMCID: PMC1469951  PMID: 9467060

Abstract

We present a pilot study of individuals (liquidators) who were engaged in clean-up operations after the disaster at the nuclear power plant at Chernobyl in Ukraine. In the 10 years since the disaster, adverse health effects among exposed individuals have not been clearly defined. There is widespread fear of damage to the reproductive system, with implications for fertility problems and adverse effects on offspring. Bearing this in mind, methods to evaluate the potential for production of fertile semen have been applied using quantitative ultramorphological (QUM) analysis. QUM analysis examines the organization and integrity of sperm organelles by electron microscopy, using both transmission electron microscopy and scanning electron microscopy. Significant differences were observed between clean-up workers and controls of similar age regarding certain ultramorphological parameters of the sperm head. The results of this pilot study suggest that QUM analysis of human sperm is a feasible approach for evaluating the fertility potential of individuals who were exposed to ionizing radiation from the Chernobyl nuclear power plant accident.

Full text

PDF
1448

Images in this article

1448Figure 1. A
on p.1448
1448Figure 1. B
on p.1448
1448Figure 1. C
on p.1448

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Amann R. P., Howards S. S. Daily spermatozoal production and epididymal spermatozoal reserves of the human male. J Urol. 1980 Aug;124(2):211–215. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)55377-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Anspaugh L. R., Catlin R. J., Goldman M. The global impact of the Chernobyl reactor accident. Science. 1988 Dec 16;242(4885):1513–1519. doi: 10.1126/science.3201240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bartoov B., Eltes F., Pansky M., Langzam J., Reichart M., Soffer Y. Improved diagnosis of male fertility potential via a combination of quantitative ultramorphology and routine semen analyses. Hum Reprod. 1994 Nov;9(11):2069–2075. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bartoov B., Eltes F., Pansky M., Lederman H., Caspi E., Soffer Y. Estimating fertility potential via semen analysis data. Hum Reprod. 1993 Jan;8(1):65–70. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137876. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bartoov B., Eltes F., Weissenberg R., Lunenfeld B. Morphological characterization of abnormal human spermatozoa using transmission electron microscopy. Arch Androl. 1980 Dec;5(4):305–322. doi: 10.3109/01485018008987000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bartoov B, Zabludovsky N, Eltes F, Smirnov VV, Grischenko VI, VI, Fischbein A. Semen Quality of Workers Exposed to Ionizing Radiation in Decontamination Work after the Chernobyl Nuclear Reactor Accident. Int J Occup Environ Health. 1997 Jul;3(3):198–203. doi: 10.1179/oeh.1997.3.3.198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bases R., Hamori I., Piazza L., Maio J., Mendez F. DNA base and strand damage in X-irradiated monkey CV-1 cells: influence of pretreatment using small doses of radiation. Int J Radiat Biol. 1990 Jul;58(1):35–54. doi: 10.1080/09553009014551421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cheburakov Iu Iu, Cheburakova O. P. Narusheniia spermatogeneza u lits, uchastvovavshikh v likvidatsii posledstvii avarii na Chernobylśkoi AES. Radiats Biol Radioecol. 1993 Nov-Dec;33(6):771–774. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Clifton D. K., Bremner W. J. The effect of testicular x-irradiation on spermatogenesis in man. A comparison with the mouse. J Androl. 1983 Nov-Dec;4(6):387–392. doi: 10.1002/j.1939-4640.1983.tb00765.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Feichtinger W. Environmental factors and fertility. Hum Reprod. 1991 Sep;6(8):1170–1175. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gardner M. J., Snee M. P., Hall A. J., Powell C. A., Downes S., Terrell J. D. Results of case-control study of leukaemia and lymphoma among young people near Sellafield nuclear plant in West Cumbria. BMJ. 1990 Feb 17;300(6722):423–429. doi: 10.1136/bmj.300.6722.423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ginzburg H. M. The psychological consequences of the Chernobyl accident--findings from the International Atomic Energy Agency Study. Public Health Rep. 1993 Mar-Apr;108(2):184–192. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kato H., Brown C. C., Hoel D. G., Schull W. J. Studies of the mortality of A-bomb survivors. Report 7. Mortality, 1950-1978: Part II. Mortality from causes other than cancer and mortality in early entrants. Radiat Res. 1982 Aug;91(2):243–264. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kazakov V. S., Demidchik E. P., Astakhova L. N. Thyroid cancer after Chernobyl. Nature. 1992 Sep 3;359(6390):21–21. doi: 10.1038/359021a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lione A. Ionizing radiation and human reproduction. Reprod Toxicol. 1987;1(1):3–16. doi: 10.1016/0890-6238(87)90066-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Little J. The Chernobyl accident, congenital anomalies and other reproductive outcomes. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 1993 Apr;7(2):121–151. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.1993.tb00388.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. MACLEOD J., GOLD R. Z. The male factor in fertility and infertility. VI. Semen quality and certain other factors in relation to ease of conception. Fertil Steril. 1953 Jan-Feb;4(1):10–33. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)31142-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. MACLEOD J., HOTCHKISS R. S., SITTERSON B. W. RECOVERY OF MALE FERTILITY AFTER STERILIZATION BY NUCLEAR RADIATION. JAMA. 1964 Feb 29;187:637–641. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Mashiach R., Fisch B., Eltes F., Tadir Y., Ovadia J., Bartoov B. The relationship between sperm ultrastructural features and fertilizing capacity in vitro. Fertil Steril. 1992 May;57(5):1052–1057. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)55024-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Meistrich M. L., Samuels R. C. Reduction in sperm levels after testicular irradiation of the mouse: a comparison with man. Radiat Res. 1985 Apr;102(1):138–147. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Ogilvy-Stuart A. L., Shalet S. M. Effect of radiation on the human reproductive system. Environ Health Perspect. 1993 Jul;101 (Suppl 2):109–116. doi: 10.1289/ehp.93101s2109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Popescu H. I., Lancranjan I. Spermatogenesis alterations during protracted irradiation in man. Health Phys. 1975 May;28(5):567–573. doi: 10.1097/00004032-197505000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Rowley M. J., Leach D. R., Warner G. A., Heller C. G. Effect of graded doses of ionizing radiation on the human testis. Radiat Res. 1974 Sep;59(3):665–678. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Shimizu Y., Kato H., Schull W. J. Studies of the mortality of A-bomb survivors. 9. Mortality, 1950-1985: Part 2. Cancer mortality based on the recently revised doses (DS86). Radiat Res. 1990 Feb;121(2):120–141. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Ward J. F. DNA damage produced by ionizing radiation in mammalian cells: identities, mechanisms of formation, and reparability. Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol. 1988;35:95–125. doi: 10.1016/s0079-6603(08)60611-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Environmental Health Perspectives are provided here courtesy of National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

RESOURCES