Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 2004 Jan;166(1):373–388. doi: 10.1534/genetics.166.1.373

Multilocus analysis of variation and speciation in the closely related species Arabidopsis halleri and A. lyrata.

Sebastián E Ramos-Onsins 1, Barbara E Stranger 1, Thomas Mitchell-Olds 1, Montserrat Aguadé 1
PMCID: PMC1470697  PMID: 15020431

Abstract

Nucleotide variation in eight effectively unlinked genes was surveyed in species-wide samples of the closely related outbreeding species Arabidopsis halleri and A. lyrata ssp. petraea and in three of these genes in A. lyrata ssp. lyrata and A. thaliana. Significant genetic differentiation was observed more frequently in A. l. petraea than in A. halleri. Average estimates of nucleotide variation were highest in A. l. petraea and lowest in A. l. lyrata, reflecting differences among species in effective population size. The low level of variation in A. l. lyrata is concordant with a bottleneck effect associated with its origin. The A. halleri/A. l. petraea speciation process was studied, considering the orthologous sequences of an outgroup species (A. thaliana). The high number of ancestral mutations relative to exclusive polymorphisms detected in A. halleri and A. l. petraea, the significant results of the multilocus Fay and Wu H tests, and haplotype sharing between the species indicate introgression subsequent to speciation. Average among-population variation in A. halleri and A. l. petraea was approximately 1.5- and 3-fold higher than that in the inbreeder A. thaliana. The detected reduction of variation in A. thaliana is less than that expected from differences in mating system alone, and therefore from selective processes related to differences in the effective recombination rate, but could be explained by differences in population structure.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (190.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baudry E., Kerdelhué C., Innan H., Stephan W. Species and recombination effects on DNA variability in the tomato genus. Genetics. 2001 Aug;158(4):1725–1735. doi: 10.1093/genetics/158.4.1725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Charlesworth B., Morgan M. T., Charlesworth D. The effect of deleterious mutations on neutral molecular variation. Genetics. 1993 Aug;134(4):1289–1303. doi: 10.1093/genetics/134.4.1289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Clark A. G. Neutral behavior of shared polymorphism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Jul 22;94(15):7730–7734. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.15.7730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Clauss M. J., Cobban H., Mitchell-Olds T. Cross-species microsatellite markers for elucidating population genetic structure in Arabidopsis and Arabis (Brassicaeae). Mol Ecol. 2002 Mar;11(3):591–601. doi: 10.1046/j.0962-1083.2002.01465.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Clauss M. J., Mitchell-Olds T. Population genetics of tandem trypsin inhibitor genes in Arabidopsis species with contrasting ecology and life history. Mol Ecol. 2003 May;12(5):1287–1299. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2003.01832.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fay J. C., Wu C. I. Hitchhiking under positive Darwinian selection. Genetics. 2000 Jul;155(3):1405–1413. doi: 10.1093/genetics/155.3.1405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fu Y. X., Li W. H. Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations. Genetics. 1993 Mar;133(3):693–709. doi: 10.1093/genetics/133.3.693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fu Y. X. New statistical tests of neutrality for DNA samples from a population. Genetics. 1996 May;143(1):557–570. doi: 10.1093/genetics/143.1.557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Golding G. B., Strobeck C. Linkage disequilibrium in a finite population that is partially selfing. Genetics. 1980 Mar;94(3):777–789. doi: 10.1093/genetics/94.3.777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hey J., Kliman R. M. Population genetics and phylogenetics of DNA sequence variation at multiple loci within the Drosophila melanogaster species complex. Mol Biol Evol. 1993 Jul;10(4):804–822. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hey J., Wakeley J. A coalescent estimator of the population recombination rate. Genetics. 1997 Mar;145(3):833–846. doi: 10.1093/genetics/145.3.833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hudson R. R. A new statistic for detecting genetic differentiation. Genetics. 2000 Aug;155(4):2011–2014. doi: 10.1093/genetics/155.4.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hudson R. R., Kreitman M., Aguadé M. A test of neutral molecular evolution based on nucleotide data. Genetics. 1987 May;116(1):153–159. doi: 10.1093/genetics/116.1.153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ingvarsson Pär K. A metapopulation perspective on genetic diversity and differentiation in partially self-fertilizing plants. Evolution. 2002 Dec;56(12):2368–2373. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb00162.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kaplan N. L., Hudson R. R., Langley C. H. The "hitchhiking effect" revisited. Genetics. 1989 Dec;123(4):887–899. doi: 10.1093/genetics/123.4.887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kliman R. M., Andolfatto P., Coyne J. A., Depaulis F., Kreitman M., Berry A. J., McCarter J., Wakeley J., Hey J. The population genetics of the origin and divergence of the Drosophila simulans complex species. Genetics. 2000 Dec;156(4):1913–1931. doi: 10.1093/genetics/156.4.1913. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Koch M. A., Haubold B., Mitchell-Olds T. Comparative evolutionary analysis of chalcone synthase and alcohol dehydrogenase loci in Arabidopsis, Arabis, and related genera (Brassicaceae). Mol Biol Evol. 2000 Oct;17(10):1483–1498. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kuittinen H., Aguadé M. Nucleotide variation at the CHALCONE ISOMERASE locus in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics. 2000 Jun;155(2):863–872. doi: 10.1093/genetics/155.2.863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kumar S., Tamura K., Nei M. MEGA: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis software for microcomputers. Comput Appl Biosci. 1994 Apr;10(2):189–191. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/10.2.189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Laporte Valérie, Charlesworth Brian. Effective population size and population subdivision in demographically structured populations. Genetics. 2002 Sep;162(1):501–519. doi: 10.1093/genetics/162.1.501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Liu F., Charlesworth D., Kreitman M. The effect of mating system differences on nucleotide diversity at the phosphoglucose isomerase locus in the plant genus Leavenworthia. Genetics. 1999 Jan;151(1):343–357. doi: 10.1093/genetics/151.1.343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Liu F., Zhang L., Charlesworth D. Genetic diversity in Leavenworthia populations with different inbreeding levels. Proc Biol Sci. 1998 Feb 22;265(1393):293–301. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Machado Carlos A., Kliman Richard M., Markert Jeffrey A., Hey Jody. Inferring the history of speciation from multilocus DNA sequence data: the case of Drosophila pseudoobscura and close relatives. Mol Biol Evol. 2002 Apr;19(4):472–488. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a004103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Macnair M. R., Bert V., Huitson S. B., Saumitou-Laprade P., Petit D. Zinc tolerance and hyperaccumulation are genetically independent characters. Proc Biol Sci. 1999 Nov 7;266(1434):2175–2179. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. McDonald J. H., Kreitman M. Adaptive protein evolution at the Adh locus in Drosophila. Nature. 1991 Jun 20;351(6328):652–654. doi: 10.1038/351652a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Mitchell-Olds Thomas, Clauss Maria J. Plant evolutionary genomics. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2002 Feb;5(1):74–79. doi: 10.1016/s1369-5266(01)00231-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Nei M., Gojobori T. Simple methods for estimating the numbers of synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitutions. Mol Biol Evol. 1986 Sep;3(5):418–426. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Nordborg M., Donnelly P. The coalescent process with selfing. Genetics. 1997 Jul;146(3):1185–1195. doi: 10.1093/genetics/146.3.1185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Nordborg M. Structured coalescent processes on different time scales. Genetics. 1997 Aug;146(4):1501–1514. doi: 10.1093/genetics/146.4.1501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Rozas J., Aguadé M. Transfer of genetic information in the rp49 region of Drosophila subobscura between different chromosomal gene arrangements. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Sep 1;90(17):8083–8087. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.17.8083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Saitou N., Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 1987 Jul;4(4):406–425. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Savolainen O., Langley C. H., Lazzaro B. P., Fr H. Contrasting patterns of nucleotide polymorphism at the alcohol dehydrogenase locus in the outcrossing Arabidopsis lyrata and the selfing Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Biol Evol. 2000 Apr;17(4):645–655. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Sharbel T. F., Haubold B., Mitchell-Olds T. Genetic isolation by distance in Arabidopsis thaliana: biogeography and postglacial colonization of Europe. Mol Ecol. 2000 Dec;9(12):2109–2118. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2000.01122.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Smith J. M., Haigh J. The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene. Genet Res. 1974 Feb;23(1):23–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Tajima F. Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics. 1989 Nov;123(3):585–595. doi: 10.1093/genetics/123.3.585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Thompson J. D., Higgins D. G., Gibson T. J. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994 Nov 11;22(22):4673–4680. doi: 10.1093/nar/22.22.4673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Tiffin P., Gaut B. S. Sequence diversity in the tetraploid Zea perennis and the closely related diploid Z. diploperennis: insights from four nuclear loci. Genetics. 2001 May;158(1):401–412. doi: 10.1093/genetics/158.1.401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Wakeley J., Aliacar N. Gene genealogies in a metapopulation. Genetics. 2001 Oct;159(2):893–905. doi: 10.1093/genetics/159.2.893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Wakeley J., Hey J. Estimating ancestral population parameters. Genetics. 1997 Mar;145(3):847–855. doi: 10.1093/genetics/145.3.847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Wakeley J. The coalescent in an island model of population subdivision with variation among demes. Theor Popul Biol. 2001 Mar;59(2):133–144. doi: 10.1006/tpbi.2000.1495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Wang R. L., Wakeley J., Hey J. Gene flow and natural selection in the origin of Drosophila pseudoobscura and close relatives. Genetics. 1997 Nov;147(3):1091–1106. doi: 10.1093/genetics/147.3.1091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Whitlock M. C., Barton N. H. The effective size of a subdivided population. Genetics. 1997 May;146(1):427–441. doi: 10.1093/genetics/146.1.427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. van Treuren R., Kuittinen H., Kärkkäinen K., Baena-Gonzalez E., Savolainen O. Evolution of microsatellites in Arabis petraea and Arabis lyrata, outcrossing relatives of Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Biol Evol. 1997 Mar;14(3):220–229. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025758. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES