Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 2004 Feb;166(2):823–833. doi: 10.1534/genetics.166.2.823

A bacterial genetic screen identifies functional coding sequences of the insect mariner transposable element Famar1 amplified from the genome of the earwig, Forficula auricularia.

Elizabeth G Barry 1, David J Witherspoon 1, David J Lampe 1
PMCID: PMC1470758  PMID: 15020471

Abstract

Transposons of the mariner family are widespread in animal genomes and have apparently infected them by horizontal transfer. Most species carry only old defective copies of particular mariner transposons that have diverged greatly from their active horizontally transferred ancestor, while a few contain young, very similar, and active copies. We report here the use of a whole-genome screen in bacteria to isolate somewhat diverged Famar1 copies from the European earwig, Forficula auricularia, that encode functional transposases. Functional and nonfunctional coding sequences of Famar1 and nonfunctional copies of Ammar1 from the European honey bee, Apis mellifera, were sequenced to examine their molecular evolution. No selection for sequence conservation was detected in any clade of a tree derived from these sequences, not even on branches leading to functional copies. This agrees with the current model for mariner transposon evolution that expects neutral evolution within particular hosts, with selection for function occurring only upon horizontal transfer to a new host. Our results further suggest that mariners are not finely tuned genetic entities and that a greater amount of sequence diversification than had previously been appreciated can occur in functional copies in a single host lineage. Finally, this method of isolating active copies can be used to isolate other novel active transposons without resorting to reconstruction of ancestral sequences.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (146.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adams M. D., Celniker S. E., Holt R. A., Evans C. A., Gocayne J. D., Amanatides P. G., Scherer S. E., Li P. W., Hoskins R. A., Galle R. F. The genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster. Science. 2000 Mar 24;287(5461):2185–2195. doi: 10.1126/science.287.5461.2185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ali S. A., Steinkasserer A. PCR-ligation-PCR mutagenesis: a protocol for creating gene fusions and mutations. Biotechniques. 1995 May;18(5):746–750. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Capy P., David J. R., Hartl D. L. Evolution of the transposable element mariner in the Drosophila melanogaster species group. Genetica. 1992;86(1-3):37–46. doi: 10.1007/BF00133709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Coates C. J., Jasinskiene N., Miyashiro L., James A. A. Mariner transposition and transformation of the yellow fever mosquito, Aedes aegypti. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Mar 31;95(7):3748–3751. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.7.3748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Coates C. J., Jasinskiene N., Morgan D., Tosi L. R., Beverley S. M., James A. A. Purified mariner (Mos1) transposase catalyzes the integration of marked elements into the germ-line of the yellow fever mosquito, Aedes aegypti. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2000 Nov;30(11):1003–1008. doi: 10.1016/s0965-1748(00)00110-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Garcia-Fernàndez J., Bayascas-Ramírez J. R., Marfany G., Muñoz-Mármol A. M., Casali A., Baguñ J., Saló E. High copy number of highly similar mariner-like transposons in planarian (Platyhelminthe): evidence for a trans-phyla horizontal transfer. Mol Biol Evol. 1995 May;12(3):421–431. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gomulski L. M., Torti C., Malacrida A. R., Gasperi G. Ccmar1, a full-length mariner element from the Mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratitis capitata. Insect Mol Biol. 1997 Aug;6(3):241–253. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2583.1997.00179.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gueiros-Filho F. J., Beverley S. M. Trans-kingdom transposition of the Drosophila element mariner within the protozoan Leishmania. Science. 1997 Jun 13;276(5319):1716–1719. doi: 10.1126/science.276.5319.1716. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Guzman L. M., Belin D., Carson M. J., Beckwith J. Tight regulation, modulation, and high-level expression by vectors containing the arabinose PBAD promoter. J Bacteriol. 1995 Jul;177(14):4121–4130. doi: 10.1128/jb.177.14.4121-4130.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hanahan D. Studies on transformation of Escherichia coli with plasmids. J Mol Biol. 1983 Jun 5;166(4):557–580. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(83)80284-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hartl D. L., Lohe A. R., Lozovskaya E. R. Modern thoughts on an ancyent marinere: function, evolution, regulation. Annu Rev Genet. 1997;31:337–358. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genet.31.1.337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hartl D. L., Lohe A. R., Lozovskaya E. R. Regulation of the transposable element mariner. Genetica. 1997;100(1-3):177–184. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Huisman O., Kleckner N. A new generalizable test for detection of mutations affecting Tn10 transposition. Genetics. 1987 Jun;116(2):185–189. doi: 10.1093/genetics/116.2.185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ivics Z., Hackett P. B., Plasterk R. H., Izsvák Z. Molecular reconstruction of Sleeping Beauty, a Tc1-like transposon from fish, and its transposition in human cells. Cell. 1997 Nov 14;91(4):501–510. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80436-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Jacobson J. W., Medhora M. M., Hartl D. L. Molecular structure of a somatically unstable transposable element in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Nov;83(22):8684–8688. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.22.8684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Jeanmougin F., Thompson J. D., Gouy M., Higgins D. G., Gibson T. J. Multiple sequence alignment with Clustal X. Trends Biochem Sci. 1998 Oct;23(10):403–405. doi: 10.1016/s0968-0004(98)01285-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Johnson R. C., Reznikoff W. S. Copy number control of Tn5 transposition. Genetics. 1984 May;107(1):9–18. doi: 10.1093/genetics/107.1.9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Johnson R. C., Yin J. C., Reznikoff W. S. Control of Tn5 transposition in Escherichia coli is mediated by protein from the right repeat. Cell. 1982 Oct;30(3):873–882. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90292-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Krebs M. P., Reznikoff W. S. Use of a Tn5 derivative that creates lacZ translational fusions to obtain a transposition mutant. Gene. 1988 Mar 31;63(2):277–285. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(88)90531-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lampe D. J., Akerley B. J., Rubin E. J., Mekalanos J. J., Robertson H. M. Hyperactive transposase mutants of the Himar1 mariner transposon. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Sep 28;96(20):11428–11433. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.20.11428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lampe D. J., Churchill M. E., Robertson H. M. A purified mariner transposase is sufficient to mediate transposition in vitro. EMBO J. 1996 Oct 1;15(19):5470–5479. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lampe D. J., Grant T. E., Robertson H. M. Factors affecting transposition of the Himar1 mariner transposon in vitro. Genetics. 1998 May;149(1):179–187. doi: 10.1093/genetics/149.1.179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Lampe D. J., Walden K. K., Robertson H. M. Loss of transposase-DNA interaction may underlie the divergence of mariner family transposable elements and the ability of more than one mariner to occupy the same genome. Mol Biol Evol. 2001 Jun;18(6):954–961. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003896. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Lampe David J., Witherspoon David J., Soto-Adames Felipe N., Robertson Hugh M. Recent horizontal transfer of mellifera subfamily mariner transposons into insect lineages representing four different orders shows that selection acts only during horizontal transfer. Mol Biol Evol. 2003 Mar 5;20(4):554–562. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msg069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lander E. S., Linton L. M., Birren B., Nusbaum C., Zody M. C., Baldwin J., Devon K., Dewar K., Doyle M., FitzHugh W. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature. 2001 Feb 15;409(6822):860–921. doi: 10.1038/35057062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Lohe A. R., De Aguiar D., Hartl D. L. Mutations in the mariner transposase: the D,D(35)E consensus sequence is nonfunctional. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Feb 18;94(4):1293–1297. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.4.1293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Lohe A. R., Hartl D. L. Autoregulation of mariner transposase activity by overproduction and dominant-negative complementation. Mol Biol Evol. 1996 Apr;13(4):549–555. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Lohe A. R., Hartl D. L. Germline transformation of Drosophila virilis with the transposable element mariner. Genetics. 1996 May;143(1):365–374. doi: 10.1093/genetics/143.1.365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Lohe A. R., Sullivan D. T., Hartl D. L. Subunit interactions in the mariner transposase. Genetics. 1996 Nov;144(3):1087–1095. doi: 10.1093/genetics/144.3.1087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Makris J. C., Nordmann P. L., Reznikoff W. S. Mutational analysis of insertion sequence 50 (IS50) and transposon 5 (Tn5) ends. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Apr;85(7):2224–2228. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.7.2224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Medhora M., Maruyama K., Hartl D. L. Molecular and functional analysis of the mariner mutator element Mos1 in Drosophila. Genetics. 1991 Jun;128(2):311–318. doi: 10.1093/genetics/128.2.311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Robertson H. M., Lampe D. J. Recent horizontal transfer of a mariner transposable element among and between Diptera and Neuroptera. Mol Biol Evol. 1995 Sep;12(5):850–862. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Robertson H. M., Martos R. Molecular evolution of the second ancient human mariner transposon, Hsmar2, illustrates patterns of neutral evolution in the human genome lineage. Gene. 1997 Dec 31;205(1-2):219–228. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1119(97)00471-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Robertson H. M., Zumpano K. L. Molecular evolution of an ancient mariner transposon, Hsmar1, in the human genome. Gene. 1997 Dec 31;205(1-2):203–217. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1119(97)00472-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Rubin E. J., Akerley B. J., Novik V. N., Lampe D. J., Husson R. N., Mekalanos J. J. In vivo transposition of mariner-based elements in enteric bacteria and mycobacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Feb 16;96(4):1645–1650. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.4.1645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Waterhouse P. M., Wang M. B., Lough T. Gene silencing as an adaptive defence against viruses. Nature. 2001 Jun 14;411(6839):834–842. doi: 10.1038/35081168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Witherspoon David J., Robertson Hugh M. Neutral evolution of ten types of mariner transposons in the genomes of Caenorhabditis elegans and Caenorhabditis briggsae. J Mol Evol. 2003 Jun;56(6):751–769. doi: 10.1007/s00239-002-2450-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Yang Z. PAML: a program package for phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Comput Appl Biosci. 1997 Oct;13(5):555–556. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/13.5.555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Zhang J. K., Pritchett M. A., Lampe D. J., Robertson H. M., Metcalf W. W. In vivo transposon mutagenesis of the methanogenic archaeon Methanosarcina acetivorans C2A using a modified version of the insect mariner-family transposable element Himar1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Aug 15;97(17):9665–9670. doi: 10.1073/pnas.160272597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES