Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 2004 Aug;167(4):1759–1766. doi: 10.1534/genetics.104.028969

Detecting the footprint of positive selection in a european population of Drosophila melanogaster: multilocus pattern of variation and distance to coding regions.

Dorcas J Orengo 1, Montserrat Aguadé 1
PMCID: PMC1471015  PMID: 15342514

Abstract

The effects on nucleotide variation of adaptations to temperate habitats and of the possible bottleneck associated with the origin of European populations of Drosophila melanogaster should be detectable in DNA sequences given the short time elapsed relative to the species population size. We surveyed nucleotide variation in 109 fragments distributed across the X chromosome in a European population of D. melanogaster to detect the footprint of positive selection. Fragments were located primarily in large noncoding regions. Multilocus tests based on Tajima's D statistic revealed a significant departure from neutral expectations in a stationary panmictic population, with an important contribution from both positive and negative D values. A positive relationship between Tajima's D values and distance to coding region was detected, with a comparative excess of significantly negative D values in the subset of fragments closer to coding regions. Also, there was a significant heterogeneity in the polymorphism to divergence ratio, with 12 fragments contributing 42% to the test statistic. Moreover, these fragments were comparatively closer to coding regions. These findings would imply positive selection events, and thus selective sweeps, during the species expansion to Europe.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (102.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Andolfatto P. Contrasting patterns of X-linked and autosomal nucleotide variation in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. Mol Biol Evol. 2001 Mar;18(3):279–290. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Andolfatto P., Przeworski M. A genome-wide departure from the standard neutral model in natural populations of Drosophila. Genetics. 2000 Sep;156(1):257–268. doi: 10.1093/genetics/156.1.257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Begun D. J., Aquadro C. F. African and North American populations of Drosophila melanogaster are very different at the DNA level. Nature. 1993 Oct 7;365(6446):548–550. doi: 10.1038/365548a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Braverman J. M., Hudson R. R., Kaplan N. L., Langley C. H., Stephan W. The hitchhiking effect on the site frequency spectrum of DNA polymorphisms. Genetics. 1995 Jun;140(2):783–796. doi: 10.1093/genetics/140.2.783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Charlesworth D., Charlesworth B., Morgan M. T. The pattern of neutral molecular variation under the background selection model. Genetics. 1995 Dec;141(4):1619–1632. doi: 10.1093/genetics/141.4.1619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. David J. R., Capy P. Genetic variation of Drosophila melanogaster natural populations. Trends Genet. 1988 Apr;4(4):106–111. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(88)90098-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fu Y. X. Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations against population growth, hitchhiking and background selection. Genetics. 1997 Oct;147(2):915–925. doi: 10.1093/genetics/147.2.915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Glinka Sascha, Ometto Lino, Mousset Sylvain, Stephan Wolfgang, De Lorenzo David. Demography and natural selection have shaped genetic variation in Drosophila melanogaster: a multi-locus approach. Genetics. 2003 Nov;165(3):1269–1278. doi: 10.1093/genetics/165.3.1269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gordo Isabel, Navarro Arcadio, Charlesworth Brian. Muller's ratchet and the pattern of variation at a neutral locus. Genetics. 2002 Jun;161(2):835–848. doi: 10.1093/genetics/161.2.835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hey Jody, Kliman Richard M. Interactions between natural selection, recombination and gene density in the genes of Drosophila. Genetics. 2002 Feb;160(2):595–608. doi: 10.1093/genetics/160.2.595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hudson R. R., Kreitman M., Aguadé M. A test of neutral molecular evolution based on nucleotide data. Genetics. 1987 May;116(1):153–159. doi: 10.1093/genetics/116.1.153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kaplan N. L., Hudson R. R., Langley C. H. The "hitchhiking effect" revisited. Genetics. 1989 Dec;123(4):887–899. doi: 10.1093/genetics/123.4.887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kreitman M. Nucleotide polymorphism at the alcohol dehydrogenase locus of Drosophila melanogaster. Nature. 1983 Aug 4;304(5925):412–417. doi: 10.1038/304412a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Moriyama E. N., Powell J. R. Intraspecific nuclear DNA variation in Drosophila. Mol Biol Evol. 1996 Jan;13(1):261–277. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Przeworski M., Wall J. D., Andolfatto P. Recombination and the frequency spectrum in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. Mol Biol Evol. 2001 Mar;18(3):291–298. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Przeworski Molly. The signature of positive selection at randomly chosen loci. Genetics. 2002 Mar;160(3):1179–1189. doi: 10.1093/genetics/160.3.1179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Rozas Julio, Sánchez-DelBarrio Juan C., Messeguer Xavier, Rozas Ricardo. DnaSP, DNA polymorphism analyses by the coalescent and other methods. Bioinformatics. 2003 Dec 12;19(18):2496–2497. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Simonsen K. L., Churchill G. A., Aquadro C. F. Properties of statistical tests of neutrality for DNA polymorphism data. Genetics. 1995 Sep;141(1):413–429. doi: 10.1093/genetics/141.1.413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Smith J. M., Haigh J. The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene. Genet Res. 1974 Feb;23(1):23–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Tachida H. Molecular evolution in a multisite nearly neutral mutation model. J Mol Evol. 2000 Jan;50(1):69–81. doi: 10.1007/s002399910008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Tajima F. Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics. 1989 Nov;123(3):585–595. doi: 10.1093/genetics/123.3.585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Thompson J. D., Gibson T. J., Plewniak F., Jeanmougin F., Higgins D. G. The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997 Dec 15;25(24):4876–4882. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.24.4876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES