Skip to main content
PMC home page
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 1978 Jan;21(1):93–98. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(78)85510-6

Myosin subfragment-1 attachment to actin. Expected effect on equatorial reflections.

R W Lymn
PMCID: PMC1473376  PMID: 620080

Abstract

The characteristic equatorial X-ray pattern from a relaxed vertebrate skeletal muscle changes when the muscle is activated. In particular, there is a simultaneous decrease in the intensity of the first reflection (I10) and increase in the intensity of the second (I11). This observed change is almost reciprocal. When compared with the predictions of computer modeling, it produces a strong argument that the intensity change is due to a redistribution of myosin heads (myosin subfragment-1 or S-1), which results from the formation and configuration changes of actin-myosin links. Computer modeling shows that different actin-S-1 configurations will give different numerical values for I10 and I11, assuming the same number of attachments. For a given configuration, the intensity changes are a nonlinear function of attachment number, so that direct scaling of force to reflection intensity may be difficult. Data from active muscle are consistent with the notion that in different states of active muscle, i.e. shortening or isometric, there are different average configurations of actin-myosin attachment and different numbers of actin-myosin links.

Full text

PDF
94

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. HUXLEY A. F. Muscle structure and theories of contraction. Prog Biophys Biophys Chem. 1957;7:255–318. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Haselgrove J. C., Huxley H. E. X-ray evidence for radial cross-bridge movement and for the sliding filament model in actively contracting skeletal muscle. J Mol Biol. 1973 Jul 15;77(4):549–568. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(73)90222-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Haselgrove J. C., Stewart M., Huxley H. E. Cross-bridge movement during muscle contraction. Nature. 1976 Jun 17;261(5561):606–608. doi: 10.1038/261606a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Huxley A. F., Simmons R. M. Proposed mechanism of force generation in striated muscle. Nature. 1971 Oct 22;233(5321):533–538. doi: 10.1038/233533a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Huxley H. E., Brown W. The low-angle x-ray diagram of vertebrate striated muscle and its behaviour during contraction and rigor. J Mol Biol. 1967 Dec 14;30(2):383–434. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(67)80046-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Huxley H. E. Structural difference between resting and rigor muscle; evidence from intensity changes in the lowangle equatorial x-ray diagram. J Mol Biol. 1968 Nov 14;37(3):507–520. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(68)90118-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Huxley H. E. The mechanism of muscular contraction. Science. 1969 Jun 20;164(3886):1356–1365. doi: 10.1126/science.164.3886.1356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lymn R. W. Equatorial X-ray reflections and cross arm movement in skeletal muscle. Nature. 1975 Dec 25;258(5537):770–772. doi: 10.1038/258770a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lymn R. W. Low-angle x-ray diagrams from skeletal muscle: the effect of AMP-PNP, a non-hydrolyzed analogue of ATP. J Mol Biol. 1975 Dec 25;99(4):567–582. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(75)80172-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Miller A., Tregear R. T. Structure of insect fibrillar flight muscle in the presence and absence of ATP. J Mol Biol. 1972 Sep 14;70(1):85–104. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(72)90165-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Moore P. B., Huxley H. E., DeRosier D. J. Three-dimensional reconstruction of F-actin, thin filaments and decorated thin filaments. J Mol Biol. 1970 Jun 14;50(2):279–295. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(70)90192-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Podolsky R. J., St Onge H., Yu L., Lymn R. W. X-ray diffraction of actively shortening muscle. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1976 Mar;73(3):813–817. doi: 10.1073/pnas.73.3.813. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Pringle J. W. The contractile mechanism of insect fibrillar muscle. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 1967;17:1–60. doi: 10.1016/0079-6107(67)90003-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Squire J. M. Muscle filament structure and muscle contraction. Annu Rev Biophys Bioeng. 1975;4(00):137–163. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.04.060175.001033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES