Skip to main content
PMC home page
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 1977 Nov;20(2):221–232. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(77)85545-8

Light diffraction studies of sarcomere dynamics in single skeletal muscle fibers.

P J Paolini, K P Roos, R J Baskin
PMCID: PMC1473380  PMID: 303121

Abstract

A position-sensitive optical diffractometer has been used to examine the diffraction spectra produced by single skeletal muscle fibers during twitch and tetanic contraction. First-order diffraction lines were computer-analyzed for mean sarcomere length, line intensity, and percent dispersion in sarcomere length. Line intensity was observed to decrease rapidly by about 60 percent during a twitch, with an exponential recovery to resting intensity persisting well beyond cessation of sarcomere shortening; recovery was particularly prolonged at zero myofilament overlap. A number of single fibers at initial lengths from 2.5 to 3.5 MICRON EXHIBITED a splitting of the first-order line into two or more components during relaxation, with components merging back into a single peak by 200 ms after stimulation. This splitting reflects the asynchronous nature of myofibrillar relaxation within a single fiber. During tetanus, the dispersion decreased by more than 10 percent from onset to plateau, implying a gradual stabilization of sarcomeres.

Full text

PDF
221

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barry W. H., Carnay L. D. Changes in light scattered by striated muscle during excitation-contraction coupling. Am J Physiol. 1969 Nov;217(5):1425–1430. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1969.217.5.1425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bezanilla F., Horowicz P. Fluorescence intensity changes associated with contractile activation in frog muscle stained with Nile Blue A. J Physiol. 1975 Apr;246(3):709–735. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp010912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Borejdo J., Mason P. Sarcomere length changes during stimulation of frog semitendinosus muscle. J Mechanochem Cell Motil. 1976 Mar;3(3):155–161. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cleworth D., Edman K. A. Laser diffraction studies on single skeletal muscle fibers. Science. 1969 Jan 17;163(3864):296–298. doi: 10.1126/science.163.3864.296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. DELEZE J. B. The mechanical properties of the semitendinosus muscle at lengths greater than its length in the body. J Physiol. 1961 Sep;158:154–164. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ebashi S., Endo M. Calcium ion and muscle contraction. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 1968;18:123–183. doi: 10.1016/0079-6107(68)90023-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fujime S. Optical diffraction study of muscle fibers. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1975 Jan 30;379(1):227–238. doi: 10.1016/0005-2795(75)90026-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. HILL A. V. The mechanics of active muscle. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1953 Mar 11;141(902):104–117. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1953.0027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. HILL D. K. The effect of stimulation on the diffraction of light by striated muscle. J Physiol. 1953 Mar;119(4):501–512. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1953.sp004862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. HUXLEY A. F., GORDON A. M. Striation patterns in active and passive shortening of muscle. Nature. 1962 Jan 20;193:280–281. doi: 10.1038/193280b0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. HUXLEY A. F. Muscle structure and theories of contraction. Prog Biophys Biophys Chem. 1957;7:255–318. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. HUXLEY A. F., PEACHEY L. D. The maximum length for contraction in vertebrate straiated muscle. J Physiol. 1961 Apr;156:150–165. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1961.sp006665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Haugen P., Sten-Knudsen O. Sarcomere lengthening and tension drop in the latent period of isolated frog skeletal muscle fibers. J Gen Physiol. 1976 Sep;68(3):247–265. doi: 10.1085/jgp.68.3.247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hill D. K. Changes in transparency of muscle during a twitch. J Physiol. 1949 May 15;108(3):292–302. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kawai M., Kuntz I. D. Optical diffraction studies of muscle fibers. Biophys J. 1973 Sep;13(9):857–876. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(73)86031-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Krueger J. W., Pollack G. H. Myocardial sarcomere dynamics during isometric contraction. J Physiol. 1975 Oct;251(3):627–643. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp011112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Paolini P. J., Baskin R. J., Roos K. P., Cline J. W. Dual-channel diffractometer utilizing linear image sensor charge-coupled devices. Rev Sci Instrum. 1976 Jun;47(6):698–702. doi: 10.1063/1.1134711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Paolini P. J., Roos K. P. Length-dependent optical diffraction pattern changes in frog sartorius muscle. Physiol Chem Phys. 1975;7(3):235–254. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Paolini P. J., Sabbadini R., Roos K. P., Baskin R. J. Sarcomere length dispersion in single skeletal muscle fibers and fiber bundles. Biophys J. 1976 Aug;16(8):919–930. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(76)85742-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Pollack G. H., Krueger J. W. Sarcomere dynamics in intact cardiac muscle. Eur J Cardiol. 1976 May;4 (Suppl):53–65. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Rüdel R., Taylor S. R. The influence of stimulus parameters on contractions of isolated frog muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1969 Nov;205(2):499–513. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Tasaki I., Watanabe A., Sandlin R., Carnay L. Changes in fluorescence, turbidity, and birefringence associated with nerve excitation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1968 Nov;61(3):883–888. doi: 10.1073/pnas.61.3.883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Taylor E. W. Chemistry of muscle contraction. Annu Rev Biochem. 1972;41(10):577–616. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.41.070172.003045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES