Skip to main content
PMC home page
CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal logoLink to CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal
. 1996 Feb 15;154(4):491–500.

Has laparoscopic cholecystectomy changed patterns of practice and patient outcome in Ontario?

M M Cohen 1, W Young 1, M E Thériault 1, R Hernandez 1
PMCID: PMC1487619  PMID: 8630838

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) on patterns of practice (number of cholecystectomy procedures, case-mix and length of hospital stay) and patient outcomes in Ontario. DESIGN: Cross-sectional population-based time trends using hospital discharge data. SETTING: All acute care hospitals in Ontario where cholecystectomy was provided. PATIENTS: All 119,821 Ontario residents who underwent cholecystectomy between 1989-90 and 1993-94. After exclusions (initial bile duct exploration, cancer, incidental cholecystectomy, or missing codes for age, sex or residence) 108,442 patients remained. OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of cholecystectomy procedures, proportion of patients with acute or chronic gallstone disease, length of hospital stay, and rates of death, readmission, and bile duct injury and other in-hospital complications after cholecystectomy by year. RESULTS: The number of cholecystectomy procedures increased by 30.4% between 1989-90 and 1993-94. The number of patients with chronic gallstone disease increased by 33.6%, and the number who underwent elective surgery increased by 48.3%. The proportion of procedures performed as LC increased from 1.0% in 1990-91 to 85.6% in 1993-94. Patients who received LC tended to be younger female patients with chronic gallstone disease with no coexisting conditions undergoing elective operations. The mean length of stay, adjusted for case-mix differences, was significantly lower in 1993-94 than in 1989-90 (2.6 days v. 7.5 days) (p < 0.05); the values for LC and open cholecystectomy in 1993-94 were 1.8 days and 7.3 days respectively. The decrease in the crude death rate over the study period (0.3% to 0.2%) was not significant (relative odds 1.10, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72 to 1.69). In 1993-94 the adjusted risk of readmission to hospital within 30 days was 1.38 (95% CI 1.19 to 1.58) as compared with 1989-90. Over the 5 years the rate of bile duct injuries tripled (0.3% in 1989-90 v. 0.9% in 1993-94). The adjusted risk of having at least one complication after cholecystectomy in 1993-94 was 1.90 (95% CI 1.75 to 2.07) as compared with 1989-90. CONCLUSIONS: LC has had a substantial effect on the number of cholecystectomy procedures performed, the type of patient having the gallbladder removed and the length of hospital stay. Death rates are unchanged, but the odds of readmission and in-hospital complications are both increased. Future research should be directed toward determining the reasons for the overall increase in rates, developing methods to reduce bile duct injuries and identifying other relevant outcomes, such as patient satisfaction with the procedure.

Full text

PDF
500

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Anderson G., Steinberg E. P., Whittle J., Powe N. R., Antebi S., Herbert R. Development of clinical and economic prognoses from Medicare claims data. JAMA. 1990 Feb 16;263(7):967–972. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barkun J. S., Barkun A. N., Sampalis J. S., Fried G., Taylor B., Wexler M. J., Goresky C. A., Meakins J. L. Randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic versus mini cholecystectomy. The McGill Gallstone Treatment Group. Lancet. 1992 Nov 7;340(8828):1116–1119. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(92)93148-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cuschieri A., Berci G., McSherry C. K. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg. 1990 Mar;159(3):273–273. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(05)81214-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Davidoff A. M., Pappas T. N., Murray E. A., Hilleren D. J., Johnson R. D., Baker M. E., Newman G. E., Cotton P. B., Meyers W. C. Mechanisms of major biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg. 1992 Mar;215(3):196–202. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199203000-00002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. DesHarnais S., Hogan A. J., McMahon L. F., Jr, Fleming S. Changes in rates of unscheduled hospital readmissions and changes in efficiency following the introduction of the Medicare prospective payment system. An analysis using risk-adjusted data. Eval Health Prof. 1991 Jun;14(2):228–252. doi: 10.1177/016327879101400206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Diehl A. K. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Too much of a good thing? JAMA. 1993 Sep 22;270(12):1469–1470. doi: 10.1001/jama.270.12.1469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Escarce J. J., Bloom B. S., Hillman A. L., Shea J. A., Schwartz J. S. Diffusion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy among general surgeons in the United States. Med Care. 1995 Mar;33(3):256–271. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199503000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Escarce J. J., Chen W., Schwartz J. S. Falling cholecystectomy thresholds since the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JAMA. 1995 May 24;273(20):1581–1585. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Harrison M. L., Graff L. A., Roos N. P., Brownell M. D. Discharging patients earlier from Winnipeg hospitals: does it adversely affect quality of care? CMAJ. 1995 Sep 15;153(6):745–751. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Henderson J., Goldacre M. J., Graveney M. J., Simmons H. M. Use of medical record linkage to study readmission rates. BMJ. 1989 Sep 16;299(6701):709–713. doi: 10.1136/bmj.299.6701.709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hofer T. P., Hayward R. A. Can early re-admission rates accurately detect poor-quality hospitals? Med Care. 1995 Mar;33(3):234–245. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199503000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Jencks S. F., Williams D. K., Kay T. L. Assessing hospital-associated deaths from discharge data. The role of length of stay and comorbidities. JAMA. 1988 Oct 21;260(15):2240–2246. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Johnson A. G. Laparoscopic surgery: more facts, less fancy. Arch Surg. 1993 May;128(5):600–601. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1993.01420170136025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kesteloot K., Penninckx F. The costs and effects of open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Health Econ. 1993 Dec;2(4):303–312. doi: 10.1002/hec.4730020403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lave J. R. The effect of the Medicare prospective payment system. Annu Rev Public Health. 1989;10:141–161. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pu.10.050189.001041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Legorreta A. P., Silber J. H., Costantino G. N., Kobylinski R. W., Zatz S. L. Increased cholecystectomy rate after the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JAMA. 1993 Sep 22;270(12):1429–1432. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. MICHIE W., GUNN A. BILE-DUCT INJURIES. A NEW SUGGESTION FOR THEIR REPAIR. Br J Surg. 1964 Feb;51:96–100. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800510204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Macintyre I. M., Wilson R. G. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 1993 May;80(5):552–559. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800800505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Marshall D., Clark E., Hailey D. The impact of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Canada and Australia. Health Policy. 1994 Jan 15;26(3):221–230. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(94)90041-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. McSherry C. K. Cholecystectomy: the gold standard. Am J Surg. 1989 Sep;158(3):174–178. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(89)90246-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Peters J. H., Krailadsiri W., Incarbone R., Bremner C. G., Froes E., Ireland A. P., Crookes P., Ortega A. E., Anthone G. A., Stain S. A. Reasons for conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy in an urban teaching hospital. Am J Surg. 1994 Dec;168(6):555–559. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(05)80121-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Pink G. H., Bolley H. B. Physicians in health care management: 4. Case Mix Groups and Resource Intensity Weights: physicians and hospital funding. CMAJ. 1994 Apr 15;150(8):1255–1261. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Ransohoff D. F., Gracie W. A. Treatment of gallstones. Ann Intern Med. 1993 Oct 1;119(7 Pt 1):606–619. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-119-7_part_1-199310010-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Ransohoff D. F., McSherry C. K. Why are cholecystectomy rates increasing? JAMA. 1995 May 24;273(20):1621–1622. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Riley G., Lubitz J., Gornick M., Mentnech R., Eggers P., McBean M. Medicare beneficiaries: adverse outcomes after hospitalization for eight procedures. Med Care. 1993 Oct;31(10):921–949. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199310000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Romano P. S., Roos L. L., Jollis J. G. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative data: differing perspectives. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993 Oct;46(10):1075–1090. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(93)90103-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Roos L. L., Jr, Cageorge S. M., Roos N. P., Danzinger R. Centralization, certification, and monitoring. Readmissions and complications after surgery. Med Care. 1986 Nov;24(11):1044–1066. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198611000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Roos L. L., Jr, Wajda A., Sharp S. M., Nicol J. P. Software for health care analysts: a modular approach. J Med Syst. 1987 Dec;11(6):445–464. doi: 10.1007/BF00993011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Roos N. P., Danzinger R. Assessing surgical risks in a population: patient histories before and after cholecystectomy. Soc Sci Med. 1986;22(5):571–578. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(86)90024-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Silber J. H., Williams S. V., Krakauer H., Schwartz J. S. Hospital and patient characteristics associated with death after surgery. A study of adverse occurrence and failure to rescue. Med Care. 1992 Jul;30(7):615–629. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199207000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Soper N. J., Stockmann P. T., Dunnegan D. L., Ashley S. W. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The new 'gold standard'? Arch Surg. 1992 Aug;127(8):917–923. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1992.01420080051008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Steiner C. A., Bass E. B., Talamini M. A., Pitt H. A., Steinberg E. P. Surgical rates and operative mortality for open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Maryland. N Engl J Med. 1994 Feb 10;330(6):403–408. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199402103300607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Warner M. A., Shields S. E., Chute C. G. Major morbidity and mortality within 1 month of ambulatory surgery and anesthesia. JAMA. 1993 Sep 22;270(12):1437–1441. doi: 10.1001/jama.270.12.1437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Zucker K. A., Bailey R. W., Gadacz T. R., Imbembo A. L. Laparoscopic guided cholecystectomy. Am J Surg. 1991 Jan;161(1):36–44. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(91)90358-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal are provided here courtesy of Canadian Medical Association

RESOURCES