Abstract
In community surveys of hypertension control the diagnosis is often based on blood pressure measurements taken on only one visit. The clinical diagnosis of hypertension requires demonstration of sustained blood pressure elevation. We conducted a survey that contrasted the results of these two approaches to determining the prevalence of hypertension and the extent to which hypertension is detected and treated. A multistage random sample of 2737 people was selected, examined and interviewed on up to three occasions. Rates of hypertension prevalence and control were computed from data from one, two and three visits. The prevalence of hypertension was overestimated by 30% when the diagnosis was based on data from one rather than three visits, the rates being 149 and 115/1000. The prevalence of undetected hypertension was overestimated by 350%, the rates being 27 and 6/1000. The proportion of subjects with controlled hypertension was underestimated by 23%, at 56%, compared with 73%. These results confirm the need for follow-up measurements to provide a valid assessment of hypertension control in the community.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Birkett N. J., Donner A. P., Maynard M. Prevalence and control of hypertension in an Ontario county. Can Med Assoc J. 1985 May 1;132(9):1019–1024. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Carey R. M., Reid R. A., Ayers C. R., Lynch S. S., McLain W. L., 3rd, Vaughan E. D., Jr The Charlottesville Blood-Pressure Survey. Value of repeated blood-pressure measurements. JAMA. 1976 Aug 16;236(7):847–851. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Colditz G. A., Martin P., Stampfer M. J., Willett W. C., Sampson L., Rosner B., Hennekens C. H., Speizer F. E. Validation of questionnaire information on risk factors and disease outcomes in a prospective cohort study of women. Am J Epidemiol. 1986 May;123(5):894–900. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fick G. H., Rademaker A. W., Donner A., Bull S. A comparison of plans for hypertension screening. J Chronic Dis. 1984;37(5):365–367. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(84)90102-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Haynes R. B., Logan A. G., Flanagan P. T., Milne B. J. The effect of patient 'familiarity' with blood pressure assessment on the accuracy of follow-up readings. J Hypertens. 1983 Jun;1(1):91–94. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Logan A. G. Report of the Canadian Hypertension Society's consensus conference on the management of mild hypertension. Can Med Assoc J. 1984 Nov 1;131(9):1053–1057. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- ROSE G. STANDARDISATION OF OBSERVERS IN BLOOD-PRESSURE MEASUREMENT. Lancet. 1965 Mar 27;1(7387):673–674. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(65)91827-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rosner B., Polk B. F. Predictive values of routine blood pressure measurements in screening for hypertension. Am J Epidemiol. 1983 Apr;117(4):429–442. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rosner B., Polk B. F. The implications of blood pressure variability for clinical and screening purposes. J Chronic Dis. 1979;32(6):451–461. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(79)90105-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shepard D. S. Reliability of blood pressure measurements: implications for designing and evaluating programs to control hypertension. J Chronic Dis. 1981;34(5):191–209. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(81)90064-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wright B. M., Dore C. F. A random-zero sphygmomanometer. Lancet. 1970 Feb 14;1(7642):337–338. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(70)90709-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]