Skip to main content
PMC home page
American Journal of Public Health logoLink to American Journal of Public Health
. 1998 Jan;88(1):125–129. doi: 10.2105/ajph.88.1.125

Preventing scientific misconduct.

D L Weed 1
PMCID: PMC1508392  PMID: 9584019

Full text

PDF
128

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Alberts B., Shine K. Scientists and the integrity of research. Science. 1994 Dec 9;266(5191):1660–1661. doi: 10.1126/science.7992048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson C. Survey tracks misconduct, to an extent. Science. 1993 Nov 19;262(5137):1203–1204. doi: 10.1126/science.8235644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Angell M., Kassirer J. P. Setting the record straight in the breast-cancer trials. N Engl J Med. 1994 May 19;330(20):1448–1450. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199405193302010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Angell M. Publish or perish: a proposal. Ann Intern Med. 1986 Feb;104(2):261–262. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-104-2-261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Angell M., Relman A. S. Fraud in biomedical research: a time for congressional restraint. N Engl J Med. 1988 Jun 2;318(22):1462–1463. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198806023182210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Buzzelli D. E. The definition of misconduct in science: a view from NSF. Science. 1993 Jan 29;259(5095):584-5, 647-8. doi: 10.1126/science.8430300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chalmers I. Underreporting research is scientific misconduct. JAMA. 1990 Mar 9;263(10):1405–1408. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Danforth W. H., Schoenhoff D. M. Fostering integrity in scientific research. Acad Med. 1992 Jun;67(6):351–356. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199206000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dingell J. D. Shattuck Lecture--misconduct in medical research. N Engl J Med. 1993 Jun 3;328(22):1610–1615. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199306033282207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Edsall J. T. Two aspects of scientific responsibility. Science. 1981 Apr 3;212(4490):11–14. doi: 10.1126/science.7209513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Friedman P. J. Research ethics, due process, and common sense. JAMA. 1988 Oct 7;260(13):1937–1938. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gunsalus C. K. Institutional structure to ensure research integrity. Acad Med. 1993 Sep;68(9 Suppl):S33–S38. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199309000-00031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gurudevan S. V., Mower W. R. Misrepresentation of research publications among emergency medicine residency applicants. Ann Emerg Med. 1996 Mar;27(3):327–330. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(96)70268-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Huth E. J. Irresponsible authorship and wasteful publication. Ann Intern Med. 1986 Feb;104(2):257–259. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-104-2-257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kaiser J. Scientific misconduct. Panels look for common ground. Science. 1996 Apr 26;272(5261):476–476. doi: 10.1126/science.272.5261.476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kassirer J. P. The frustrations of scientific misconduct. N Engl J Med. 1993 Jun 3;328(22):1634–1636. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199306033282212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kennedy T. J., Jr Scientific fraud. J Med Educ. 1988 Oct;63(10):806–808. doi: 10.1097/00001888-198810000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Klein D. F. Should the government assure scientific integrity? Acad Med. 1993 Sep;68(9 Suppl):S56–S59. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199309000-00035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lock S. Misconduct in medical research: does it exist in Britain? BMJ. 1988 Dec 10;297(6662):1531–1535. doi: 10.1136/bmj.297.6662.1531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Needleman H. L. Salem comes to the National Institutes of Health: notes from inside the crucible of scientific integrity. Pediatrics. 1992 Dec;90(6):977–981. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Pellegrino E. D. Toward a virtue-based normative ethics for the health professions. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1995 Sep;5(3):253–277. doi: 10.1353/ken.0.0044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Pellegrino Edmund D. Character and the ethical conduct of research. Account Res. 1992;2(1):1–11. doi: 10.1080/08989629208573802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Petersdorf R. G. The pathogenesis of fraud in medical science. Ann Intern Med. 1986 Feb;104(2):252–254. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-104-2-252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Poole C. Exposure opportunity in case-control studies. Am J Epidemiol. 1986 Feb;123(2):352–358. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Reiser S. J. Overlooking ethics in the search for objectivity and misconduct in science. Acad Med. 1993 Sep;68(9 Suppl):S84–S87. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199309000-00040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Rennie D. Breast cancer: how to mishandle misconduct. JAMA. 1994 Apr 20;271(15):1205–1207. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Rennie D., Gunsalus C. K. Scientific misconduct. New definition, procedures, and office--perhaps a new leaf. JAMA. 1993 Feb 17;269(7):915–917. doi: 10.1001/jama.269.7.915. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Schachman H. K. What is misconduct in science? Science. 1993 Jul 9;261(5118):148-9, 183. doi: 10.1126/science.8305005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Sekas G., Hutson W. R. Misrepresentation of academic accomplishments by applicants for gastroenterology fellowships. Ann Intern Med. 1995 Jul 1;123(1):38–41. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-123-1-199507010-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Shapiro M. F., Charrow R. P. The role of data audits in detecting scientific misconduct. Results of the FDA program. JAMA. 1989 May 5;261(17):2505–2511. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Silbergeld E. K. Annotation: protection of the public interest, allegations of scientific misconduct, and the Needleman case. Am J Public Health. 1995 Feb;85(2):165–166. doi: 10.2105/ajph.85.2.165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Taubes G. Plagiarism suit wins; experts hope it won't set a trend. Science. 1995 May 26;268(5214):1125–1125. doi: 10.1126/science.7794410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Woolf P. K. Pressure to publish and fraud in science. Ann Intern Med. 1986 Feb;104(2):254–256. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-104-2-254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Woolf P. Fraud in science: how much, how serious? Hastings Cent Rep. 1981 Oct;11(5):9–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. de Lacey G., Record C., Wade J. How accurate are quotations and references in medical journals? Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1985 Sep 28;291(6499):884–886. doi: 10.1136/bmj.291.6499.884. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Public Health are provided here courtesy of American Public Health Association

RESOURCES