Skip to main content
American Journal of Public Health logoLink to American Journal of Public Health
. 1998 Apr;88(4):667–671. doi: 10.2105/ajph.88.4.667

The impact of mammography quality improvement legislation in Michigan: implications for the National Mammography Quality Standards Act.

L Fintor 1, M Brown 1, R Fischer 1, O Suleiman 1, C Garlinghouse 1, J Camburn 1, E Frazier 1, F Houn 1
PMCID: PMC1508437  PMID: 9551016

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study examined the impact of state legislation on mammography quality and access in Michigan. METHODS: The impact of state legislation was analyzed with respect to utilization, numbers of machines and facilities, and image quality. RESULTS: The legislation had a positive effect on image quality improvement, had no impact on utilization by women aged 50 years and above, and resulted in few facility closures. CONCLUSIONS: Michigan's legislative intervention appears to have had a positive effect on efforts to improve mammography quality assurance with implications for other federal and state efforts to achieve quality assurance in health care delivery.

Full text

PDF
668

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Brown M. L., Kessler L. G., Rueter F. G. Is the supply of mammography machines outstripping need and demand? An economic analysis. Ann Intern Med. 1990 Oct 1;113(7):547–552. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-113-7-547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Conway B. J., Suleiman O. H., Rueter F. G., Antonsen R. G., Slayton R. J. National survey of mammographic facilities in 1985, 1988, and 1992. Radiology. 1994 May;191(2):323–330. doi: 10.1148/radiology.191.2.8153301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Fintor L., Alciati M. H., Fischer R. Legislative and regulatory mandates for mammography quality assurance. J Public Health Policy. 1995 Spring;16(1):81–107. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Houn F., Brown M. L. Current practice of screening mammography in the United States: data from the National Survey of Mammography Facilities. Radiology. 1994 Jan;190(1):209–215. doi: 10.1148/radiology.190.1.8259406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Osuch J. R., Camburn J. F., Sienko D. G., Potchen E. J. The history and the effect of the mammography quality assurance legislation in Michigan. Cancer. 1994 Jul 1;74(1 Suppl):263–270. doi: 10.1002/cncr.2820741310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Sienko D. G., Osuch J. R., Garlinghouse C., Rakowski V., Given B. The design and implementation of a community breast cancer screening project. CA Cancer J Clin. 1992 May-Jun;42(3):163–176. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.42.3.163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Public Health are provided here courtesy of American Public Health Association

RESOURCES