Skip to main content
Clinical and Experimental Immunology logoLink to Clinical and Experimental Immunology
. 1974 Nov;18(3):337–346.

Function of surface-adherent cells in the induction of the human mixed leucocyte reaction. I. The transient surface adherence of responding lymphocytes in the human mixed leucocyte response

Annmarie Demus, W S Walker, L Borella
PMCID: PMC1537985  PMID: 4283365

Abstract

The aim of this study was to establish the temporal requirement for adherent cells in the mixed leucocyte reaction (MLR). At various intervals after co-cultivation, mixed leucocytes from two unrelated donors were separated into adherent and nonadherent cells and the MLR response of each population assayed on day 6. After 1 hr of co-cultivation adherent cells had a high MLR response, whereas the nonadherent cells were unresponsive and could not be restimulated by the addition of allogeneic leucocytes or syngeneic adherent cells. In contrast, the MLR was positive when syngeneic adherent cells were added to nonadherent cells which had not been co-cultured prior to the initiation of culture. The MLR of adherent cells declined progressively as a function of time of co-cultivation prior to separation. Conversely, there was a progressive increase in the MLR of nonadherent cells obtained after 12, 18 and 24 hr of co-cultivation. Morphological studies revealed a higher number of lymphocytes in the early adherent cell population than at later times. We conclude that during the first few hours of co-cultivation lymphocytes with the potential of responding to allogeneic stimulation are retained in the adherent cell population. These lymphocytes are released from the adherent cells and can generate a positive MLR without further support from adherent cells. The transient adherence of responding lymphocytes after short exposure to allogeneic cells could provide a mean of separating a subpopulation of lymphocytes capable of reacting to allogeneic stimuli.

Full text

PDF
337

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BACH F., HIRSCHHORN K. LYMPHOCYTE INTERACTION: A POTENTIAL HISTOCOMPATIBILITY TEST IN VITRO. Science. 1964 Feb 21;143(3608):813–814. doi: 10.1126/science.143.3608.813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BAIN B., VAS M. R., LOWENSTEIN L. THE DEVELOPMENT OF LARGE IMMATURE MONONUCLEAR CELLS IN MIXED LEUKOCYTE CULTURES. Blood. 1964 Jan;23:108–116. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bach F. H., Alter B. J., Solliday S., Zoschke D. C., Janis M. Lymphocyte reactivity in vitro. II. Soluble reconstituting factor permitting response of purified lymphocyte. Cell Immunol. 1970 Jul;1(2):219–227. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(70)90009-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Borella L., Webster R. G. The immunosuppressive effects of long-term combination chemotherapy in children with acute leukemia in remission. Cancer Res. 1971 Apr;31(4):420–426. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cline M. J., Swett V. C. The interaction of human monocytes and lymphocytes. J Exp Med. 1968 Dec 1;128(6):1309–1325. doi: 10.1084/jem.128.6.1309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Harris G. Studies of the mechanism of antigen stimulation of DNA synthesis in rabbit spleen cultures. Immunology. 1965 Dec;9(6):529–541. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Janis M., Back F. H. Potentiation of in vitro lymphocyte reactivity. Nature. 1970 Jan 17;225(5229):238–239. doi: 10.1038/225238a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lipsky P. E., Rosenthal A. S. Macrophage-lymphocyte interaction. I. Characteristics of the antigen-independent-binding of guinea pig thymocytes and lymphocytes to syngeneic macrophages. J Exp Med. 1973 Oct 1;138(4):900–924. doi: 10.1084/jem.138.4.900. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. MCFARLAND W., HEILMAN D. H. LYMPHOCYTE FOOT APPENDAGE: ITS ROLE IN LYMPHOCYTE FUNCTION AND IN IMMUNOLOGICAL REACTIONS. Nature. 1965 Feb 27;205:887–888. doi: 10.1038/205887a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. McFarland W., Heilman D. H., Moorhead J. F. Functional anatomy of the lymphocyte in immunological reactions in vitro. J Exp Med. 1966 Nov 1;124(5):851–858. doi: 10.1084/jem.124.5.851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Mosier D. E. Cell interactions in the primary immune response in vitro: a requirement for specific cell clusters. J Exp Med. 1969 Feb 1;129(2):351–362. doi: 10.1084/jem.129.2.351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Nossal G. J., Abbot A., Mitchell J. Antigens in immunity. XIV. Electron microscopic radioautographic studies of antigen capture in the lymph node medulla. J Exp Med. 1968 Feb 1;127(2):263–276. doi: 10.1084/jem.127.2.263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Rode H. N., Gordon J. The mixed leukocyte culture: a three component system. J Immunol. 1970 Jun;104(6):1453–1457. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Roseman J. X-ray resistant cell required for the induction of in vitro antibody formation. Science. 1969 Sep 12;165(3898):1125–1127. doi: 10.1126/science.165.3898.1125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. SCHOENBERG M. D., MUMAW V. R., MOORE R. D., WEISBERGER A. S. CYTOPLASMIC INTERACTION BETWEEN MACROPHAGES AND LYMPHOCYTIC CELLS IN ANTIBODY SYNTHESIS. Science. 1964 Feb 28;143(3609):964–965. doi: 10.1126/science.143.3609.964. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Sen L., Borella L. Expression of cell surface markers on T and B lymphocytes after long-term chemotherapy of acute leukemia. Cell Immunol. 1973 Oct;9(1):84–95. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(73)90170-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Twomey J. J., Sharkey O., Jr, Brown J. A., Laughter A. H., Jordan P. H., Jr Cellular requirements for the mitotic response in allogeneic mixed leukocyte cultures. J Immunol. 1970 Apr;104(4):845–853. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Zoschke D. C., Bach F. H. Specificity of allogeneic cell recognition by human lymphocytes in vitro. Science. 1971 Jun 25;172(3990):1350–1352. doi: 10.1126/science.172.3990.1350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical and Experimental Immunology are provided here courtesy of British Society for Immunology

RESOURCES