Skip to main content
Journal of Virology logoLink to Journal of Virology
. 2003 Jun;77(12):6620–6636. doi: 10.1128/JVI.77.12.6620-6636.2003

Complete Sequence and Genomic Analysis of Rhesus Cytomegalovirus

Scott G Hansen 1, Lisa I Strelow 1,2, David C Franchi 3, David G Anders 3,*, Scott W Wong 1,2,4,*
PMCID: PMC156187  PMID: 12767982

Abstract

The complete DNA sequence of rhesus cytomegalovirus (RhCMV) strain 68-1 was determined with the whole-genome shotgun approach on virion DNA. The RhCMV genome is 221,459 bp in length and possesses a 49% G+C base composition. The genome contains 230 potential open reading frames (ORFs) of 100 or more codons that are arranged colinearly with counterparts of previously sequenced betaherpesviruses such as human cytomegalovirus (HCMV). Of the 230 RhCMV ORFs, 138 (60%) are homologous to known HCMV proteins. The conserved ORFs include the structural, replicative, and transcriptional regulatory proteins, immune evasion elements, G protein-coupled receptors, and immunoglobulin homologues. Interestingly, the RhCMV genome also contains sequences with homology to cyclooxygenase-2, an enzyme associated with inflammatory processes. Closer examination identified a series of candidate exons with the capacity to encode a full-length cyclooxygenase-2 protein. Counterparts of cyclooxygenase-2 have not been found in other sequenced herpesviruses. The availability of the complete RhCMV sequence along with the ability to grow RhCMV in vitro will facilitate the construction of recombinant viral strains for identifying viral determinants of CMV pathogenicity in the experimentally infected rhesus macaque and to the development of CMV as a vaccine vector.


Cytomegaloviruses are the prototypic members of the betaherpesvirus subgroup. Like all herpesviruses, they share several characteristics with other viruses of the family, including virion structure and the ability to establish persistent and latent infections. What makes the betaherpesvirus subgroup unique among the herpesviruses is their tropism for the salivary gland, their species specificity, and their slow growth in culture systems (25). Weller et al. coined the term cytomegalovirus to reflect the cytopathic effect caused by virus infection and the virus's role in genitally acquired cytomegalic inclusion disease (75).

Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) infection is generally asymptomatic in immunocompetent hosts. Typically, HCMV is acquired subclinically during childhood and persists throughout the individual's life. Persistence is characterized by the presence of latent viral genomes that periodically reactivate to produce infectious virus that can be shed intermittently in saliva, urine, semen, cervical secretions, and breast milk (25). Data suggest that persistence is established not only by the virus's ability to infect various cell types within the host, but also by the virus's ability to differentially regulate gene expression and by virally encoded immunomodulators (23, 30, 32, 43, 44, 57, 60, 64). When primary HCMV infection is acquired during adulthood, the virus is capable of doing considerably more damage. In particular, primary infections during pregnancy can lead to congenital abnormalities in the fetus and morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised individuals, including transplant patients and persons with AIDS.

Thus, with advances in medical procedures such as organ allografting and immunosuppressive posttransplant therapies as well as with increasing numbers of people infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), HCMV is proving to be a significant pathogen. Currently, the only Food and Drug Administration-approved antiviral therapies include the drugs ganciclovir, foscarnet, and cidofovir, each of which targets the viral DNA polymerase, and Vitravene, a novel antisense compound used to treat CMV retinitis (38). Although helpful, these drugs have numerous drawbacks, which include limited efficacy and toxic side effects and frequent emergence of resistant viral isolates during long-term therapy (17, 19, 72).

Despite the growing information on HCMV gene products and pathogenesis, there is a limitation on the ability to develop effective treatments for primary HCMV infection or reactivation of latent infection. To address these limitations, four animal models are being evaluated for antiviral treatments against HCMV and for overall cytomegalovirus pathogenesis. These models are guinea pig cytomegalovirus, murine cytomegalovirus (MCMV), rat cytomegalovirus (RCMV), and more recently, rhesus cytomegalovirus (RhCMV). The guinea pig cytomegalovirus model is well suited for congenital cytomegalovirus infection because the virus can cross the placenta and produce infection in utero (31). Despite this advantage, the guinea pig cytomegalovirus model is not well suited to the analysis of drug therapy, as the virus is resistant to ganciclovir therapy (50). The genomes of MCMV and RCMV have been completely sequenced, and these models are providing valuable information on both cytomegalovirus pathogenicity and antiviral therapies (59, 73). However, MCMV and RCMV are evolutionarily far removed from HCMV, and the results obtained in these systems may not be applicable to treatment and prevention of HCMV infection (51, 61).

Over the past decade, researchers have been working to develop an RhCMV model to study HCMV pathogenesis and antiviral therapies (2, 3, 7, 8, 48, 49, 70, 74). RhCMV was first recognized 70 years ago as an incidental infection of rhesus macaques (15, 16). Several nonhuman primate cytomegaloviruses have been isolated since that time, each of which is different from HCMV in host range and DNA content (3, 18, 63, 69). RhCMV is ubiquitous in captive rhesus macaques, with infection rates of greater than 90% by the first year of life (39, 41, 74). Cytomegalovirus infections in macaques share several features with HCMV infections. The majority of RhCMV infections are subclinical, and healthy adults tend to shed virus in their urine, saliva, semen, cervical secretions, and breast milk for years. Experimental congenital central nervous system disease has been produced in rhesus macaques by inoculating fetuses in utero intracerebrally or intra-amniotically (49).

Like humans infected by HIV, rhesus macaques are susceptible to infection with simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV). Studies utilizing SIV-infected rhesus macaques have demonstrated that disseminated cytomegalovirus disease is quite similar to that observed in HIV-infected humans (8). These symptoms can include orchitis, encephalitis, and respiratory tract disease. In addition, cytomegalovirus infections have been seen in the bone marrow and lungs of rhesus macaques that have been immunosuppressed with antithymocyte globulin, cyclophosphamide, and cortisone and subsequently inoculated with varicella-zoster virus, which is similar to what has been observed in people who acquire HCMV infection after transplant surgery (53). Lastly, studies of the host immune response to RhCMV appear to parallel HCMV infection, as cytomegalovirus-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes are essential in controlling infection (40).

Studies of a nonhuman primate cytomegalovirus such as RhCMV are relevant to the study of HCMV, as this virus is evolutionarily closer to humans than the rodent cytomegalovirus isolates (51). Until now, only a limited number of reports have demonstrated the similarity of HCMV and RhCMV at the genomic level. In this study. we completely sequenced the RhCMV strain 68-1 genome and confirmed that the virus is significantly homologous to HCMV. Data generated for the sequence analysis revealed that the genome is over 200 kb in size and is structurally similar to previously reported cytomegaloviruses. Like HCMV, RhCMV encodes a complement of immunomodulatory genes as well as structural proteins and enzymes required for replication. Unique to RhCMV is a cyclooxygenase-2 (prostaglandin E2) homologue. Available sequence information on RhCMV will further the development of this virus as a model for HCMV pathogenesis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Preparation of viral DNA.

Primary rhesus fibroblasts were grown in two 850-cm2 roller bottles and infected with the 68-1 strain of RhCMV (ATCC VR-677) at a multiplicity of infection of 0.1, and the virus was harvested from the culture supernatant at 12 to 14 days postinfection as previously described (70). Briefly, infected-cell supernatants were clarified to remove cellular debris by centrifugation at 1,000 × g for 10 min. The clarified supernatants were collected and stored, and 10 ml of culture medium was added to the pelleted debris. To remove intracellular virus particles, the cell debris pellet was sonicated until resuspended. Sonication was followed by centrifugation at 1,000 × g for 10 min, after which clarified supernatants were combined.

RhCMV was pelleted from supernatants by centrifugation at 12,500 × g for 1 h at 4°C. The virus pellet was resuspended in 1 ml of 1 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0)-1 mM EDTA (TE) and added to the top of a six-step sorbitol gradient ranging from 20 to 70%. The gradients were spun in a Beckman SW41 rotor for 2 h at 18,000 rpm at 4°C. The virus-containing band at the 50 to 60% interface was collected and diluted with 15 ml of cold 1 mM Tris-HCl and then pelleted by centrifugation in the SW41 rotor for 50 min at 18,000 rpm at 4°C. The washed virus pellet was resuspended in 9.2 ml of TE (pH 8.0). Virus particles were digested at 37°C overnight with 0.6 ml of 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate and 0.2 ml of proteinase K (10 mg/ml) to release viral DNA. Viral DNA was isolated by CsCl2 gradient centrifugation in a Beckman Ti75 rotor at 38,400 rpm for 72 h. The viral DNA fraction, which routinely corresponds to refractive indices of 1.400 to 1.403, was collected and dialyzed in TE (pH 8.0) to remove CsCl2.

The isolated viral DNA was tested for infectivity by transfection into primary rhesus fibroblasts with the calcium phosphate method without dimethyl sulfoxide shock, and the cells were observed for cytopathic effects. As a negative control, primary rhesus fibroblasts were exposed to transfection reagents and conditions in the absence of viral DNA.

Cloning and DNA sequencing.

To facilitate DNA sequencing of the viral genome, a shotgun subclone library was generated. Briefly, purified genomic DNA was hydrodynamically sheared in a high-pressure liquid chromatograph and then separated on a standard 1% agarose gel. A fraction corresponding to fragments 3,000 to 3,500 bp in length was excised from the gel and purified by the GeneClean procedure (Bio101, Inc., Carlsbad, Calif.). The purified DNA fragments were blunt-ended with T4 DNA polymerase. The treated DNA was then ligated to unique BstXI linker adapters. These linkers are complementary to the pGTC vector (Genome Therapeutics Corporation, Waltham, Mass.), while the overhang is not self-complementary. Therefore, the linkers will not concatamerize, nor will the cut vector religate easily. The linker-adapted inserts were separated from the unincorporated linkers on a 1% agarose gel and again purified with GeneClean. The linker-adapted inserts were ligated to BstXI-cut vector to construct a shotgun subclone library.

The library was transformed into Escherichia coli DH10B competent cells (Gibco/Invitrogen, San Diego, Calif.) and assessed on plates containing ampicillin. Bacterial transformants were used for plating of clones and picked for sequencing. The cultures were grown overnight at 37°C, and the DNA was purified by standard methods.

The purified DNA samples were sequenced with ABI (Applied Biosystems Inc., Foster City, Calif.) dye terminator chemistry. All subsequent steps were based on sequencing by automated DNA sequencing methods. The ABI dye terminator sequence reads were run on MegaBace 1000 (Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, N.J.) machines, and the data were transferred to Unix machines. Base calls and quality scores were determined with the program Phred (21, 22). Reads were assembled with Phrap (29) with default program parameters and quality scores.

Computer-assisted analysis of the RhCMV ORFS and protein coding content.

Open reading frames (ORFs) were identified with MacVector version 6.5 (Accelrys, San Diego, Calif.). The target search criterion for an ORF was 100 codons on either the positive or negative strand. The ORFs that were identified in this manner were translated and saved as individual files for further analysis. Putative RhCMV proteins were then compared to GenBank files with the BlastP search engine to look for homology with other known proteins. Significant hits were compiled and are presented in Table 1. Homology with HCMV ORFs was analyzed further with the global alignment algorithm FastA (Table 2). Multiple sequence alignments were done with MacVector's ClustalW feature, with gap penalties of 10 (fixed) and 10 (floating).

TABLE 1.

Summary of the location and features of the 230 ORFs of the RhCMV 68-1 genomea

ORF Strand Position (nt)
Length (aa) Size (kDa) HCMV name Comments
From To
Rh01 W 1040 2566 508 56.4 TRL1
rh02 W 1486 2037 184 21.1
rh03 W 2618 3082 155 17.1
rh04 C 2703 3401 233 26.9
Rh05 W 3528 4349 274 30.2 UL153 Membrane protein; RL11 family
rh06 W 4710 5198 163 18.6
rh07 W 5325 5906 194 22.2
rh08 W 5881 6396 172 19.6
rh09 C 6724 7029 102 11.4
rh10 Ex6 C 8521 9027 169 17.9 Prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase; cyclooxygenase-2
rh10 Ex5 C 9270 9941 224 26.3 Prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase; cyclooxygenase-2
rh11 W 9462 9902 154 17.7
rh10 Ex4 C 10031 10216 62 6.9 Prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase; cyclooxygenase-2
rh10 Ex3 C 10289 10432 48 5.4 Prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase; cyclooxygenase-2
rh10 Ex2 C 10527 10661 45 5.5 Prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase; cyclooxygenase-2
rh10 Ex1 C 10762 10932 57 6.4 Prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase; cyclooxygenase-2
rh12 W 11225 11920 232 26.0
rh13 C 11233 11547 105 11.9
rh14 W 12506 13087 194 21.5 Membrane protein; RL11 family
rh15 C 12556 12879 108 11.4
rh16 C 12937 13458 174 20.1
Rh17 W 13525 14625 367 41.4 UL11 RL11 family (early glycoprotein)
rh18 C 13557 13922 122 13.6
Rh19 W 14707 15642 312 35.3 UL07 Membrane protein; RL11 family
Rh20 W 15700 16293 198 21.9 UL06 Membrane protein; RL11 family
Rh21 W 16327 17004 226 26.2 UL11 Membrane protein; RL11 family
Rh22 W 17111 17818 236 27.3 UL11 Membrane protein; RL11 family
Rh23 W 17716 18411 232 25.9 UL11 Membrane protein; RL11 family
rh24 W 18428 18817 130 14.9 Membrane protein; RL11 family
Rh25 W 18896 19570 225 24.8 UL09 Membrane protein; RL11 family
Rh26 W 19554 20402 283 32.1 UL11 Membrane protein; RL11 family
rh27 W 20547 21152 202 22.9 Membrane protein; RL11 family
rh28 W 21154 21777 849 96.2
Rh29 W 21854 23239 462 50.4 UL11 Membrane protein; RL11 family
rh30 C 23315 23638 108 11.7
Rh31 W 23355 24662 436 50.3 UL13
rh32 C 23577 24029 151 16.9
Rh33 W 24942 25838 299 34.7 UL14
rh34 C 26718 27041 108 12.4
Rh35 W 26778 27101 108 12.6 UL17
Rh36 W 27826 29172 449 50.6 UL20
rh37 C 29275 29640 122 13.9
rh38 W 29898 30251 118 12.8
rh39 C 29916 30380 155 18.0
Rh40 C 30731 31669 313 35.9 UL23 US22 family
rh41 W 31416 31796 127 14.6
Rh42 C 31726 32652 309 35.2 UL24 US22 family
Rh43 W 32719 34476 586 66.7 UL25 UL25 family
Rh44 C 34537 35283 249 27.8 UL26
rh45 W 34897 35328 144 15.2
Rh46 C 35237 36976 580 65.9 UL27
Rh47 C 37064 38077 338 38.6 UL28 US22 family
rh48 W 37289 37786 166 18.3
Rh49 W 38190 38588 133 15.4
Rh50 C 38208 39218 337 38.8 UL29 US22 family; immediate-early protein
rh51 C 38351 38755 135 15.3
rh52 W 38925 39395 157 17.8
rh53 C 39548 39979 144 17.1
Rh54 W 39865 41487 541 60.9 UL31
Rh55 C 41498 43615 706 78.8 UL32 pp150, ppUL32
Rh56 W 43983 44972 330 37.4 UL33 GpUL33; G protein-coupled receptor; 7TM family
Rh57 W 45177 45977 267 30.8 UL34
rh58 W 45491 45877 129 13.9 US22 family; IRS1
Rh59 W 46098 47870 591 66.9 UL35 UL25 family
Rh60 C 47988 49151 388 44.7 UL36 US22 family;
Rh61 C 49115 49480 122 13.8 UL36 US22 family/PICK>
Rh62 C 49578 50396 273 31.2 UL37 Immediate-early glycoprotein
rh63 W 50598 50981 128 13.6
Rh64 C 50702 51583 294 33.4 UL38
rh65 W 50768 51133 122 13.7
Rh66 C 51625 51930 102 11.6 UL37 Immediate-early protein; IE glycoprotein
rh67 C 52255 52785 177 18.9
Rh68 C 53229 53621 131 14.4 UL42 Glycoprotein (gpUL42)
Rh69 C 53605 54606 334 38.5 UL43 US22 family
Rh70 C 54730 55902 391 43.9 UL44 ppUL44; DNA polymerase processivity factor; early nuclear antigen p41
rh71 55132 55608 159 18.1
Rh72 C 56143 58692 850 96.7 UL45 Ribonucleotide reductase-1
rh73 W 56404 56829 142 16.1
rh74 W 58181 58483 101 11.3
Rh75 C 58711 59583 291 33.1 UL46 Minor capsid binding protein (mCBP)
Rh76 W 59582 62458 959 110.6 UL47 Capsid assembly protein;; HMW-BP; ppUL47
rh77 C 62052 62357 102 11.5
Rh78 W 62479 69012 2178 246.9 UL48 Very large tegument protein; large tegument protein (U31)
rh79 W 69181 69846 222 23.8 F fragment DNA
Rh80 W 69295 70764 490 56.2 UL49 Virion protein (LF3); capsid protein; ORF 66, Epstein-Barr virus BFRF2 homologue
Rh81 C 70703 71629 309 33.8 UL50 Virion protein
Rh82 C 71655 71990 112 12.3 UL51
Rh83 W 72069 73724 552 62.5 UL52 Virion protein
rh84 C 72179 72484 102 10.8
Rh85 W 73717 74583 289 33.1 UL53 Virion protein
rh86 C 74128 74559 144 16.0 F fragment DNA
Rh87 C 74561 77668 1036 116.6 UL54 DNA polymerase
Rh88 W 77489 77866 126 14.1 UL53
Rh89 C 77687 80071 795 91.5 UL55 Glycoprotein B; envelope glycoprotein
rh90 W 79376 79822 149 16.9
Rh91 C 80217 82523 769 88.2 UL56 Transport protein; transport/capsid assembly protein; pUL56
Rh92 C 82670 86152 1164 128.9 UL57 ppUL57; ssDNA-binding protein, major DNA-binding protein
rh93 C 87380 87694 105 11.5
rh94 W 87758 88315 186 19.5
rh95 C 88049 88750 234 24.1
rh96 W 88116 89006 297 30.3 Ig heavy chain
Rh97 C 90525 92858 778 85.9 UL69 ppUL69
rh98 W 91522 91830 103 11.7 Ig heavy chain
rh99 W 92073 92855 261 28.5
Rh100 C 92792 95644 951 109.8 UL70 DNA helicase-primase component
Rh101 C 96316 97347 344 39.3 UL72 dUTPase
Rh102 W 97342 97656 105 11.9 UL73 Glycoprotein N
Rh103 C 97637 98806 390 45.6 UL74 Glycoprotein O
Rh104 C 99023 101185 721 81.7 UL75 Glycoprotein H
Rh105 W 101318 102202 295 32.8 UL76 Virion protein
Rh106 W 101871 103658 596 67.3 UL77 Virion protein
Rh107 W 103785 104924 380 44.2 UL78 GCR homologue; 7TM family
Rh108 C 105020 105820 267 30.5 UL79
Rh109 W 105819 107663 615 66.6 UL80 Capsid assembly protein
Rh110 C 107776 109422 549 61.6 UL82 Major late antigen; pp71; UM; ppUL82; UL82 family
Rh111 C 109552 111171 540 62.1 UL83 Phosphorylated matrix protein (pp65); LM; ppUL83; UL82 family
Rh112 C 111240 112868 543 61.7 UL83 Phosphorylated matrix protein (pp65); LM; ppUL83; UL82 family
rh113 W 112041 112487 149 16.3
Rh114 C 112990 114528 513 57.3 UL84 Early nonstructural protein
rh115 W 113051 113419 123 13.3
rh116 W 114270 114728 153 16.1
Rh117 C 114443 115369 309 34.7 UL85 Minor capsid protein; mCP
Rh118 C 115430 119461 1344 151.3 UL86 Major capsid protein; MCP
rh119 W 115995 116309 105 11.8
rh120 C 116922 117656 245 28.8
rh121 W 117836 118309 158 17.5
Rh122 W 119476 122022 849 96.2 UL87 Virion protein
Rh123 W 122035 123237 401 45.5 UL88 Virion protein
Rh124 Ex2 C 123234 124181 316 35.8 UL89 DNA packaging protein (conserved spliced gene)
rh125 W 123897 124469 191 21.0
Rh126 W 124501 124803 101 10.7 UL91
Rh127 W 124697 125413 239 26.6 UL92 Virion protein
Rh128 W 125367 126932 522 59.9 UL93 Virion protein
Rh129 W 127435 127848 138 14.8 UL94 Virion protein
Rh124 Ex1 C 127845 128768 308 35.8 UL89 Virion protein
Rh130 W 128767 130047 427 46.6 UL95 Virion protein
Rh131 W 130044 130433 130 14.8 UL96 Virion protein
Rh132 W 130491 132323 611 67.9 UL97 Phosphotransferase; HCMV UL97; phosphorylates ganciclovir; ppUL97
rh133 C 131142 131456 105 11.8
Rh134 W 132374 134044 557 63.4 UL98 Dnase; exonuclease
rh135 C 132886 133287 134 14.6
Rh136 C 133325 133918 198 22.3 UL99 Phosphoprotein; pp28
rh137 W 133981 134436 152 16.6
Rh138 C 134603 135673 357 41.1 UL100 Glycoprotein M
Rh139 W 135862 138036 725 80.4 UL102 Helicase-primase component
Rh140 C 138058 138813 252 28.9 UL103
Rh141 C 138740 140707 656 75.3 UL104 Structural protein; virion protein
Rh142 W 140544 143123 860 97.5 UL105 DNA helicase
Rh143 W 146491 146958 156 17.9 UL111 IL-10-like protein; cmvIL-10
Rh144 Ex1 W 147820 148620 267 28.4 UL112 Early phosphoprotein; pp34
Rh145 W 148719 149600 294 30.5 UL113
Rh144 Ex2 W 148719 149600 294 30.5 UL112 Early phosphoprotein, pp34
Rh146 C 149714 150457 248 26.3 UL114 Uracil N-glycosylase
Rh147 C 150420 151196 259 29.3 UL115 Glycoprotein L
Rh148 C 151207 152277 357 37.9 UL116 Serine-alanine-rich glycoprotein
rh149 C 151952 152416 155 19.2
Rh150 C 152259 153407 383 42.5 UL117
Rh151 C 153432 154031 200 23.5 UL118 Large splice transcript
Rh152 C 154111 154782 224 22.2 UL119
rh153 C 154260 154577 106 11.6 Major immediate-early protein
Rh154 C 154831 155427 199 22.7 UL120
Rh155 C 155429 155977 183 21.1 UL121 Serine-alanine-rich glycoprotein
Rh156 Ex5 C 156229 157689 487 52.7 UL122 Immediate-early protein 2; pp80
Rh156 Ex4 C 158214 159383 390 44.0 UL123 Immediate-early protein 1; pp72
Rh156 Ex3 C 161559 162053 165 18.6 UL122/3 Immediate-early exon
Rh156 Ex2 C 161621 161708 29 3.5 UL122/3 Immediate-early exon
Rh156 Ex1 C 161778 161902 41 4.4 UL122/3 Immediate-early exon
rh157 W 161947 162489 181 21.6
Rh158 W 163705 164166 154 17.7 UL147 VCXC-2
Rh159 W 164371 165351 327 36.8 UL148
Rh160 W 165417 166082 222 24.4 UL132
rh161 C 167130 167570 147 16.0
Rh162 C 167655 167960 102 11.2 UL145
Rh163 C 168378 168893 172 18.7 UL144 TNF receptor homologue; immune evasion viroceptor; ppUL144
Rh164 C 169096 170388 431 48.9 UL141
rh165 C 170857 171288 144 16.5
Rh166 C 171333 171857 175 19.3 UL133
rh167 C 171988 172491 168 18.2
rh168 C 172745 173401 219 24.5
rh169 C 173501 174064 188 20.9
rh170 C 174198 174764 189 21.1
Rh171 C 174768 175607 280 30.6 UL133 Glycoprotein cercopithecine herpesvirus 5
rh172 C 175806 176336 177 19.8 Glycoprotein cercopithecine herpesvirus 5
rh173 C 176388 177515 376 40.9 Glycoprotein cercopithecine herpesvirus 5
rh174 C 178695 179774 360 39.7 Glycoprotein cercopithecine herpesvirus 5
rh175 W 180470 180922 151 16.4
rh176 C 180619 181260 214 23.3
rh177 C 181226 181669 148 16.5
rh178 C 181320 182060 247 27.3
rh179 W 183231 183746 172 18.5
rh180 C 183347 183670 108 10.6
Rh181 C 183766 184272 169 19.4 US1
Rh182 C 184502 185092 197 23.1 US2 gpUS2; US6 family
Rh183 W 185590 185952 121 13.6 US5 gpUS5
Rh184 C 185617 186159 181 20.6 US3 gpUS3;immediate-early; US6 family
Rh185 C 187133 187645 171 18.9 US6 US6 family
rh186 C 187934 188638 235 28.2 US6 family
Rh187 C 188879 189559 227 25.5 US8 US6 family
rh188 C 189657 190031 125 14.6 GTP binding protein
Rh189 C 190318 191163 282 32.9 US11 US6 family
Rh190 C 191367 192149 261 30.0 US12 US12 family
rh191 C 191524 191856 111 11.8
Rh192 C 192207 192971 255 29.7 US13 US12 family
rh193 C 192977 193462 162 18.5
Rh194 C 193084 193917 278 31.5 US14 US12 family
Rh195 C 194048 194791 248 27.9 US14 US12 family
Rh196 C 194864 195622 253 29.4 US14 US12 family
Rh197 C 195728 196453 242 27.9 US14 US12 family
Rh198 C 196431 197255 275 30.3 US17 US12 family
Rh199 C 197361 198216 202 22.8 US18 US12 family; pUS18
Rh200 C 198336 199121 262 21.1 US19 US12 family; pUS19
Rh201 C 199182 199943 253 67.8 US20 US12 family; pUS20
Rh202 C 199991 200677 228 11.5 US21 US12 family
Rh203 C 200797 202521 575 65.9 US22 US22 family; ICP22; pUS22
Rh204 C 202680 204548 622 37.5 US23 US22 family
rh205 W 202743 203504 254 29.9
rh206 C 202979 203326 116 13.9
rh207 W 203175 203504 110 13.1
rh208 W 204333 204650 106 11.5
rh209 C 204572 206002 477 56.5 US22 family
rh210 W 205019 205594 192 21.1
rh211 C 206363 208156 598 67.8 US22 family
rh212 C 206818 207132 105 11.5
rh213 W 206909 207424 172 19.1
Rh214 W 208328 209314 328 37.5 US28 Chemokine receptor homologue; 7TM family
Rh215 W 209660 210673 338 38.8 US28 Chemokine receptor homologue; 7TM family
Rh216 W 210809 211809 333 35.8 US28 Chemokine receptor homologue; 7TM family
Rh217 C 211704 212006 101 11.4
Rh218 W 211882 212901 340 39.0 US28 Chemokine receptor homologue; 7TM family
rh219 C 212671 212976 102 11.5
Rh220 W 213046 214659 393 43.2 US28 Chemokine receptor homologue; 7TM family
Rh221 W 214653 215978 442 49.4 US29
rh222 W 215128 215451 108 12.6
Rh223 W 215896 216717 274 30.7 US30
rh224 C 216579 217196 206 22.5
Rh225 W 216793 217278 162 18.5 US31 US1 family
Rh226 W 217405 217965 187 22.2 US32 US1 family
rh227 C 217463 217879 139 14.7
rh228 W 218098 218403 102 10.9
rh229 C 219051 219506 152 16.5
Rh230 C 219127 221214 696 77.6 TRS1 TRS1; US22 family; pTRS1
a

The ORF finder of MacVector was used to identify all 230 putative ORFs. Putative ORFs are numbered by the order in which they appear in the genome. ORFs with homology to HCMV were given an Rh designation, and ORFs unique to RhCMV were given an rh designation. ORFs that read left to right are designated W, whereas ORFs that read right to left are designated C. aa, amino acids; 7TM, seven-transmembrane; ssDNA, single-stranded DNA; Ig, immunoglobulin; GCR, G protein-coupled receptor.

TABLE 2.

Similarity between RhCMV genes with amino acid sequence homology to HCMVa

RhCMV gene Length (aa) HCMV homologue Homologue length (aa) Identity (%) Gaps (aa) Score (except value) RhCMV gene Length (aa) HCMV homologue Homologue length (aa) Identity (%) Gaps (aa) Score (except value)
Rh01 508 TRL1 311 37 35 304
Rh19 311 UL07 221 34 3 124
Rh20 197 UL06 284 26 31 228
Rh21 225 UL11 275 23 54 93
Rh22 235 UL11 275 25 10 110
Rh23 231 UL11 275 36 7 152
Rh25 224 UL09 228 23 14 125
Rh31 435 UL13 473 30 31 96
Rh33 298 UL14 343 31 17 343
Rh35 107 UL17 104 78 0 64
Rh36 448 UL20 340 30 17 291
Rh40 312 UL23 342 41 1 520
Rh42 308 UL24 358 53 1 869
Rh43 585 UL25 656 35 58 974
Rh44 248 UL26 188 45 5 414
Rh46 579 UL27 608 54 22 1559
Rh47 337 UL28 379 64 4 1207
Rh50 336 UL29 360 62 0 1107
Rh54 540 UL31 694 58 16 1515
Rh55 705 UL32 1,048 54 8 821
Rh56 329 UL33 390 60 7 953
Rh57 266 UL34 504 65 1 945
Rh59 590 UL35 640 39 60 1135
Rh61 121 UL36 476 63 52 233
Rh62 272 UL37 487 30 21 265
Rh64 293 UL38 331 51 3 754
Rh66 101 UL37 487 36 11 111
Rh68 130 UL42 158 44 39 148
Rh69 333 UL43 187 56 1 199
Rh70 390 UL44 433 67 49 1437
Rh72 849 UL45 906 61 16 2620
Rh75 290 UL46 290 72 0 11116
Rh76 958 UL47 982 41 32 1984
Rh78 2,177 UL48 2,241 37 181 3854
Rh80 489 UL49 570 71 46 2026
Rh81 308 UL50 397 76 3 788
Rh82 111 UL51 157 81 0 351
Rh83 551 UL52 668 54 77 1667
Rh85 288 UL53 376 80 0 1083
Rh87 1,035 UL54 1,242 59 219 3608
Rh89 794 UL55 906 57 28 2444
Rh91 768 UL56 850 70 80 2984
Rh92 1,163 UL57 1,235 68 41 4248
Rh97 777 UL69 744 57 14 1110
Rh100 950 UL70 1,062 46 75 3273
Rh101 343 UL72 388 57 24 1050
Rh102 104 UL73 138 56 41 203
Rh103 389 UL74 466 41 40 726
Rh104 720 UL75 743 48 11 1757
Rh105 294 UL76 325 52 9 663
Rh106 595 UL77 642 64 47 2117
Rh107 380 UL78 431 58 34 500
Rh108 266 UL79 295 38 25 797
Rh109 614 UL80 708 23 163 1006
Rh110 548 UL82 559 39 30 926
Rh111 539 UL83 561 32 30 781
Rh112 542 UL83 561 35 23 955
Rh114 512 UL84 586 47 76 1108
Rh117 308 UL85 306 67 5 1056
Rh118 1,343 UL86 1,370 75 27 5631
Rh122 848 UL87 941 65 60 2865
Rh123 400 UL88 429 47 30 972
Rh124 315 UL89 674 84 1 1425
Rh126 100 UL91 111 72 3 295
Rh127 234 UL92 234 90 188 946
Rh128 521 UL93 594 45 82 1166
Rh129 137 UL94 345 64 101 507
Rh124 307 UL89 674 86 2 1352
Rh130 426 UL95 531 65 72 1436
Rh131 129 UL96 115 57 1 319
Rh132 610 UL97 707 67 6 1649
Rh134 556 UL98 584 65 39 1890
Rh138 355 UL100 372 55 12 1112
Rh139 724 UL102 798 54 144 2059
Rh140 251 UL103 249 50 169 656
Rh141 655 UL104 697 64 39 2262
Rh142 859 UL105 956 69 97 3293
Rh144 266 UL112 864 48 2 333
Rh145 293 UL113 684 30 77 176
Rh146 247 UL114 250 69 1 933
Rh147 258 UL115 306 53 2 620
Rh148 356 UL116 344 27 27 144
Rh150 382 UL117 424 46 46 890
Rh151 199 UL118 209 32 18 266
Rh152 223 UL119 142 30 2 97
Rh154 198 UL120 201 43 12 322
Rh155 182 UL121 180 28 8 124
Rh156 486 UL122 411 46 30 850
Rh156 389 UL123 491 21 16 174
Rh160 221 UL132 270 52 5 221
Rh181 168 US01 212 43 16 323
Rh182 196 US02 199 23 4 148
Rh183 180 US05 186 23 7 86
Rh187 226 US08 227 22 11 76
Rh189 281 US11 215 21 6 242
Rh190 260 US12 281 33 6 353
Rh192 254 US13 261 24 10 268
Rh194 277 US14 310 23 11 242
Rh195 247 US14 310 23 17 132
Rh196 252 US14 310 29 9 238
Rh197 241 US14 310 23 22 93
Rh198 274 US17 293 36 6 383
Rh199 201 US18 274 32 2 320
Rh200 261 US19 240 29 19 178
Rh201 252 US20 357 40 149 540
Rh202 227 US21 239 58 1 646
Rh203 574 US22 593 51 6 1242
Rh204 621 US23 592 48 52 1615
Rh214 327 US28 323 27 7 255
Rh215 337 US28 323 24 4 261
Rh216 332 US28 323 34 0 109
Rh218 339 US28 323 25 7 325
Rh220 392 US28 323 37 7 463
Rh221 441 US29 462 22 14 565
Rh223 273 US30 349 24 41 144
Rh226 161 US31 197 44 1 226
Rh227 186 US32 183 38 3 274
Rh230 695 TRS1 788 34 96 819

Nomenclature and phylogenetic analysis.

The nomenclature used for the RhCMV genes is based on the same strategy used in designating both the MCMV and RCMV genomes. This system numbers the ORFs from left to right starting at the first open reading frame on the coding or complementary strand. RhCMV genes homologous to HCMV genes are indicated by uppercase prefixes (e.g., Rh88), whereas ORFs without sequence similarity to HCMV genes are indicated by lowercase prefixes (e.g., rh06).

Sequence data from ClustalW alignments were analyzed with ClustalX version 1.8 and the draw tree feature with bootstrapping. Tree data generated with this method were viewed with the phylogenetic tree-generating software TreeView version 1.6.1 (Logiciels & Duhem, Paris, France). The measure of divergence is presented as a scale at the bottom of each tree. Viral sequences for phylogenetic analysis were acquired from GenBank. The viruses and their accession numbers are as follows: herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1), NC001806; Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV), NC003409; MCMV, U68299; RCMV, AF232689; chimpanzee cytomegalovirus (ChCMV), NC003521; and HCMV, NC001347. The proteins used for phylogenetic analysis were DNA polymerase, glycoprotein B (gB), helicase, major capsid protein, single-stranded-DNA-binding protein, and uracil N-glycosylase.

Nucleotide sequence accession number.

RhCMV 68-1 nucleotide sequence data have been deposited in the GenBank database and assigned accession number AY186194.

RESULTS

Features of nucleotide sequence of RhCMV.

The genome of RhCMV 68-1 is 221,459 bp in length, which is less than HCMV at 229,354 bp (52). The overall G+C content is 49% and is evenly distributed throughout the length of the genome. The only exception is a short stretch of sequence from nucleotides 15000 to 20000 (Fig. 1). . This region has a lower G+C content (20 to 40%) and represents ORFs Rh20 through Rh27 inclusive. These proteins have significant homology to the HCMV RL11 family members.

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1.

G+C content of RhCMV 68-1 genome. The distribution of G+C versus A+T content was analyzed over the entire genome. Results are presented as histograms.

Like all herpesviruses, the RhCMV genome is a long, double-stranded unique sequence. There are two PacI homologies (virion packaging sites) as defined by HCMV, one found at the start of the genome and the other between what would be the UL and US regions of HCMV. Although our sequence data did not reveal large internal or terminal repeats like those present in the HCMV genome, Southern analysis with probes specific for the termini detected variable copies of a roughly 500-bp terminal direct repeat sequence that may be analogous to the a sequence of HCMV and other herpesviruses (13).

Restriction analysis of RhCMV genomic DNA.

To verify the genomic structure of RhCMV DNA, purified viral DNA was digested with the restriction enzymes BamHI and HindIII (Fig. 2). . Both digests produced a large number of distinguishable fragments. The resultant bands correspond to predicted restriction digest patterns (Fig. 2A and B and Table 3). The combination of sequence and restriction digest data, along with data from Chang and Barry (13), supports the hypothesis that the organization presented in this paper is the correct structure for RhCMV and that the virus does not isomerize, unlike HCMV.

FIG. 2.

FIG. 2.

Restriction analysis of RhCMV genome. (A) Restriction digests of the RhCMV 68-1 genome. Purified genomic DNA (10 μg) was digested overnight with 25 U of either BamHI (lane B) or HindIII (lane H) at 37°C. Digests were supplemented with an additional 25 U of enzyme the following day for 4 h prior to separation on a 0.7% agarose gel. Bands were resolved at 20 V overnight. Lanes MW, size markers. (B) Deduced BamHI and HindIII restriction maps. Digested products were numbered based on the sizes shown in Table 3.

TABLE 3.

Predicted fragment sizes

Endonuclease Fragment no. Fragment size (bp)
BamHI 1 25,743
2 19,539
3 11,138
4 10,445
5 9,746
6 9,496
7 8,965
8 8,468
9 8,355
10 7,738
11 7,180
12 6,665
13 6,304
14 6,243
15 6,240
16 6,181
17 5,092
18 4,994
19 4,136
20 3,885
21 3,484
22 3,457
23 3,167
24 3,114
25 2,819
26 2,661
27 2,415
28 2,415
29 2,305
30 2,161
31 1,955
32 1,856
33 1,616
34 1,551
35 1,352
36 1,226
37 1,184
38 1,004
39 919
40 841
41 801
42 686
43 600
44 528
45 293
46 165
47 132
48 78
49 66
50 30
51 25
HindIII 1 18,969
2 17,516
3 17,139
4 15,818
5 15,135
6 13,257
7 13,144
8 11,186
9 9,370
10 9,169
11 7,978
12 7,469
13 6,589
14 5,772
15 5,281
16 4,677
17 4,567
18 4,368
19 3,512
20 3,413
21 3,040
22 2,762
23 2,509
24 2,498
25 2,218
26 2,217
27 2,204
28 2,105
29 2,004
30 1,916
31 1,401
32 1,347
33 487
34 264
35 135
36 32

Protein coding content.

The arrangement of the RhCMV genes is shown in Fig. 3. The genome contains 230 ORFs that are arranged colinearly with those of previously sequenced betaherpesviruses, including HCMV, MCMV, and RCMV. All of the conserved herpesvirus gene blocks are retained in RhCMV in both position and orientation. Of the 230 ORFs, 138 (60%) encode products that are homologous to HCMV proteins (Table 2). These homologues are dispersed throughout the genome. Less than half of the ORFs are predicted to encode genes unique to RhCMV; these ORFs are possibly host range specific. Unlike MCMV, RhCMV encodes almost all classified HCMV gene families, including RL11, UL25, UL82, seven transmembrane, US1, US2/6, US12, and US22 families.

FIG. 3.

FIG. 3.

Map of RhCMV genome. Map of the RhCMV 68-1 genome showing the ORFs on the coding strand (dark arrows) and the noncoding strand (light arrows). Putative RhCMV genes are numbered as shown in Table 1 from Rh01 to Rh236. A selected number of HCMV homologues are listed: pp150, large structural phosphoprotein (UL32); DNA pol, DNA-dependent DNA polymerase (UL54); gB, glycoprotein B (UL55); MDBP, major DNA-binding protein (UL57); pp71, phosphoprotein 71 (UL82); pp65, phosphoprotein 65 (UL83); MCP, major capsid protein (UL86).

Genome and individual ORFs. (i) Proteins essential for origin-dependent replication.

RhCMV encodes six of the seven proteins necessary for HSV-1 replication. These proteins are the DNA polymerase (Rh87), the polymerase accessory protein (Rh70), the single-stranded-DNA-binding protein (Rh92), and the helicase-primase complex (Rh100, Rh139, and Rh142). The DNA helicase (Rh142) contains the six motifs required for function in congruent positions described for HSV and HCMV (77). RhCMV lacks the origin-binding protein (UL9) of HSV-1 that is required for HSV replication. The only betaherpesvirus known to encode an HSV-1 UL9-like protein is human herpesvirus 6 (28). RhCMV does encode all of the remaining trans-activating factors required for transient complementation of HCMV origin of lytic replication-dependent DNA replication (54). These include UL36 to 38 (Rh61, Rh62, Rh64, and Rh66), TRS1 (Rh230), and IE1/IE2 (Rh156 exons 4 and 5, respectively), which are known regulatory proteins, and ORFs UL84 (Rh114) and UL112/UL113 (Rh144/Rh145), which encode early temporal class nucleus-associated proteins. HCMV UL84 and IE2 have been shown to interact and are thought to be responsible for transcriptional control (65). The DNase gene (Rh134) shown to be required for HSV-1 replication in vitro is 65% conserved with HCMV UL98 (Table 2) (51).

An RhCMV origin of replication (ori) is situated between homologues of HCMV UL57 and UL69 (between nucleotides 88161 and 90525). The ori shares several structural features with HCMV oriLyt, most notably the Y-R element (78), and mediates RhCMV-dependent replication in transient assays (David Anders, unpublished results).

(ii) Other genes involved in DNA and nucleotide metabolism.

RhCMV encodes all of the enzymes found in HCMV that are required for nucleotide metabolism, replication, and repair. These are uracil-DNA glycosylase (Rh146), ribonucleotide reductase (Rh72), and dUTPase (Rh101). The enzymes all have very high homologies to their HCMV counterparts, UL114 (69%), UL45 (61%), and UL72 (57%), respectively (Table 2). The ribonucleotide reductase homologue is structurally identical in size (97 kDa) to both the HCMV and MCMV proteins. This is in contrast to HSV-1, which encodes a functional protein of 124 kDa. The RhCMV protein lacks a homologue of the small subunit of ribonucleotide reductase and thus may not be functional. Also, like HCMV and MCMV, the RhCMV genome does not have an ORF that encodes a thymidylate synthetase or a thymidine kinase.

RhCMV ORF Rh132 is the HCMV UL97 homologue. The UL97 protein of HCMV is a phosphotransferase and has been shown to phosphorylate ganciclovir (47). Unlike the alphaherpesviruses, RhCMV does not encode any additional protein kinases. However, RhCMV does encode a homologue to the pyruvoyl decarboxylase gene (Rh106) found in HCMV. Consistent with HCMV, the putative protein homologue contains a single pyruvoyl decarboxylase enzyme prosthetic group represented by the sequence ALGSSLFN (single-amino-acid code) from amino acids 566 to 574.

(iii) Regulatory genes.

Examination of RhCMV ORFs for viral regulatory genes involved in the control of viral gene expression reveals that the virus encodes homologues of the major immediate-early region (Rh156), the UL36 to UL38 region (Rh60 to Rh66), one of the TRS1 transactivator genes (Rh230), the UL69 gene (Rh97), and the US3 transcription unit (Rh184). The major immediate-early region is colinear with that of HCMV and has matching splicing patterns (7). Transcription for the HCMV major immediate-early genes is controlled by a strong enhancer or promoter sequence at positions −733 to +625 (relative to the start site of transcription at +1) (2). In HCMV, TRS1 and IRS transactivate UL44 as well as other early genes (9, 37, 66).

(iv) Structural proteins.

Capsid assembly proteins are very similar among the betaherpesviruses. RhCMV is no exception, encoding homologues to the major capsid protein (Rh118), the large tegument protein (Rh78), and a minor capsid protein (Rh75). Also present in RhCMV is a UL80 (Rh109) homologue that is thought to be involved in assembly and packaging of DNA into the virion. RhCMV also encodes other structural proteins common to the betaherpesvirus group, including the upper matrix protein pp71 (Rh110), the lower matrix protein pp65 (Rh111 and Rh112), the large phosphoprotein pp150 (Rh55), and the small phosphoprotein pp28 (Rh136). Rh91 is homologous to the HCMV UL56 gene product. However, the predicted size of Rh91 is 88.2 kDa, compared with 130 kDa for HCMV. Although gaps are found throughout the protein, accounting for the size difference, the protein is still highly conserved at 70% identity. The HCMV UL56 gene product has been found associated with the nucleocapsid tegument fraction and is thought to be involved in capsid maturation (10).

(v) Glycoproteins.

A total of 21 glycoproteins were found within the RhCMV genome. These predictions were based on known homologies within GenBank. RhCMV encodes homologues to the gB (Rh89), gH (Rh104), gL (Rh147), gM (Rh138), gN (Rh102), and gO (Rh103) glycoproteins. In addition, homologues to UL37 (Rh62), UL42 (Rh68), UL116 (Rh148), UL121 (Rh155), US02 (Rh182), US03 (Rh184), and US11 (Rh189) are present in RhCMV. No homologues to HCMV glycoproteins gpUL04, gpUL16, or gpUS10 were found. Glycoprotein B (gB) is a prominent component of the viral envelope and is involved in virus attachment, penetration, and cellular spread (12). Many gB homologues carry the motif RXK/RR, which is the specific recognition motif for cleavage by the cellular protease furin. The gB homologues of varizella-zoster virus, bovine herpesvirus type 1, pseudorabies virus, equine herpesvirus, Marek's disease virus, and all known betaherpesviruses, including HCMV and human herpesvirus 6, contain this cleavage site (reviewed in reference 68). The RhCMV gB sequence contains several potential furin sites; however, none of these sites is an exact match to the sequence RXK/RR.

In HCMV, glycoprotein O (gO) is encoded by the UL74 gene (36). gO has homologues only among the betaherpesviruses (36). Similar to HCMV, the RhCMV gO homologue has numerous putative N- and O-linked glycosylation sites. gO has been shown to be dispensable for growth of the virus; however, a gO knockout virus is severely attenuated in growth and spread in culture (33). A tripartite complex of glycoproteins H, L, and O (gH/gL/gO) forms through disulfide bonds and has been implicated in viral entry (via membrane fusion), cell-to-cell spread, and virion maturation (36, 55, 71). Recent studies have found that gO represents a hypervariable region of the genome, with some sequences varying from each other by as much as 45% (55, 58). Currently, we do not know if RhCMV gO is a hypervariable region. Sequencing of primary isolates will indicate if RhCMV is similar to HCMV in this respect.

HCMV gH remains membrane bound and is the anchor for the gH/gL/gO fusion complex. RhCMV gL has two putative N-linked glycosylation sites defined by the motif NXT/S, where X is any amino acid (46). HCMV gL has one glycosylation site, whereas MCMV is predicted to have five. The RhCMV gM homologue (Rh138) is predicted to have eight putative transmembrane domains, based on the hydrophobicity plot. A similar profile is seen with both HCMV and MCMV gM proteins. The HCMV gM protein has five putative glycosylation sites, only one of which is present in RhCMV gM. However, the characteristic HCMV gM acidic C-terminal tail is present in Rh138. Unlike MCMV, RhCMV encodes a gN protein. Therefore, the gM/gN structural complex is preserved in RhCMV. In HCMV, gN has been designated a hypervariable region, with at least four distinct subtypes identified (reviewed in reference 56).

(vi) Immunomodulators.

Like most DNA viruses, RhCMV encodes a total of 13 putative immunomodulators. Six of these show significant homology to known HCMV immunomodulatory proteins, including UL111 (Rh143), UL144 (Rh163), US02 (Rh182), US03 (Rh184), and US11 (Rh189). The UL36 gene of HCMV encodes a cell death suppressor, denoted vICA (62). Immediately downstream of the HCMV UL36 gene locus is a mitochondrion-localized inhibitor of apoptosis (vMIA), a product of the UL37 gene (27). RhCMV ORFs Rh62 and Rh66 show homology to UL37. Recently, the HCMV UL118/119 spliced transcripts have been found to encode viral Fcγ receptor homologues (4). RhCMV potentially encodes these receptors through the Rh151 and Rh152 ORFs. RhCMV encodes two genes that show homology to the HCMV UL36 genes, Rh60 and Rh61. Rh60 and Rh61 may be spliced to form a functional RNA transcript. The putative ORFs rh96 and rh98 show homology with the immunoglobulin heavy chain. While rh186 is structurally similar to the US6 family members, the protein does not have an HCMV homologue by Blast analysis. Rh143 is an interleukin-10 (IL-10) homologue that has previously been shown to be expressed and may act as a cytokine synthesis inhibitory factor in vivo (48). Rh163 has homology to a tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor, which may play a role in preventing apoptosis. The US2, US3, US8, and US11 homologues have been shown to downregulate major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I (24).

(vii) Unique to RhCMV.

RhCMV encodes a putative cyclooxygenase-2 or prostaglandin E2 homologue. A total of six exons make the putative cyclooxygenase-2 transcript. RhCMV has several gene duplications, one of which is a duplication of the pp65 homologue. In addition, the UL11 gene appears to be present in three copies (Rh21 to Rh23), the US14 homologue has four copies (Rh194 to Rh197), and the US28 gene homologue has six copies (Rh214 to Rh216, Rh218, and Rh220).

RhCMV gene families.

RhCMV encodes eight different gene families that are also present in HCMV (Table 4).

TABLE 4.

RhCMV gene families homologous with HCMV genes

Index ORF of gene family Members of gene family Family characteristicsa Homologous HCMV family Reference(s)
Rh22 Rh05, Rh17, Rh21, Rh22, Rh23, Rh24, Rh26 Genome location, structure, glycosylation sites RL11
Rh43 Rh43, Rh59 Genome location, structure UL25 58
Rh56 Rh56, Rh107, Rh214, Rh215, Rh216, Rh218, Rh220 GPCR motif, 7-transmembrane domains, S-T-rich carboxy terminus 7TM 59-62
Rh110 Rh110, Rh111, Rh112 Genome location, structure, phosphoprotein UL82
Rh181 Rh181, Rh225, Rh226 Genome location, structure US01
Rh185 Rh182, Rh184, Rh185, Rh187, Rh189 Structure, function US06
Rh190 Rh190, Rh192, Rh194, Rh195, Rh196, Rh197, Rh198, Rh199, Rh200, Rh201, Rh202 Genome location, structure US12
Rh203 Rh40, Rh42, Rh47, Rh50, Rh60, Rh61, Rh69, Rh203, Rh204, Rh230 OCCXD/EX1-40XxoG, two stretches of hydrophobicity, carboxy-terminal acidic residues US22 65, 66
a

GPCR, G protein-coupled receptor; 7TM, seven-transmembrane.

(i) RL11 family.

The RL11 family is represented by seven putative ORFs. The RL11 family of membrane glycoproteins is represented by RhCMV ORFs Rh05 (UL153), Rh17 (UL11), Rh20 (UL06), Rh21 (UL11), Rh22 (UL11), Rh23 (UL11), and Rh25 (UL09). The function of these proteins in HCMV has not been completely elucidated. However, the RL11 sequences are fairly conserved within the long repeat sequence of herpesviruses.

(ii) UL25.

The UL25 family of proteins is represented by two RhCMV ORFs that are also conserved in MCMV and RCMV. These are RhCMV ORFs Rh43 (UL25) and Rh59 (UL35). The HCMV UL25 family members may be virion associated, although the data are controversial (6, 79).

(iii) Seven-transmembrane family.

Proteins within this family have seven transmembrane domains; some family members have been shown to act as G protein-coupled receptor homologues (67). Family members include UL33 (Rh56), UL78 (Rh107), and US28 (Rh214, Rh215, Rh216, Rh218, and Rh220). There is no apparent RhCMV homologue to HCMV US27, also a seven-transmembrane family member.

(iv) UL82 family.

HCMV UL82 family members comprise the upper and lower matrix proteins pp71 and pp65. RhCMV homologues to these proteins are Rh110 (pp71) and Rh111/Rh112 (pp65). The RhCMV pp71 protein has 39% identity with HCMV pp71. The two pp65 copies of RhCMV have 32% (Rh111) and 35% (Rh112) identity with the HCMV protein and 39% identity between themselves. Immunologically, the pp65 homologue encoded by Rh112 ORF elicits a greater T-cell response than that generated against Rh111 (L. Picker, personal communication).

(v) US01 family.

The US01 family of proteins has three members in HCMV and includes the US01, US31, and US32 proteins. RhCMV encodes homologues to all three of these proteins (Rh181, Rh225 and Rh226, respectively) that are at colinear positions within the genome.

(vi) US06 family.

The HCMV US06 family of proteins show both structural and functional similarities with one another. The majority of these family members are glycoproteins, although US06 proteins have been shown to function as downregulators of MHC class I on the cell surface. RhCMV encodes five potential US06 family members capable of immunomodulation: US02 (Rh182), US03 (Rh184), US06 (Rh185), US08 (Rh187), and US11 (Rh189). Historically, US02 and US03 were considered US02 family members, but we have chosen to classify the RhCMV proteins as US06 family proteins due to structural and functional features in common with US06.

(vii) US12 family.

There are 11 US12 family members within the US region of RhCMV; four of these (Rh194, Rh195, Rh196, and Rh197) are duplications of US14. The remaining seven ORFs include Rh190 (US12), Rh192 (US13), Rh198 (US17), Rh199 (US18), Rh200 (US19), Rh201 (US20), and Rh202 (US21). Family classification is based on structural similarities among the proteins. The function of these proteins has yet to be elucidated.

(viii) US22 family.

US22 family members are found throughout the genomes of both RhCMV and HCMV. RhCMV encodes 10 homologues to HCMV ORFs. These include Rh40, Rh42, Rh47, Rh50, Rh60, Rh61, Rh69, Rh203, Rh204, and Rh230. Proteins of the US22 family have two stretches of hydrophobic sequences and predominantly acidic carboxy termini; the RhCMV proteins meet both of these criteria.

Phylogenetic analysis.

A phylogenetic analysis of the relationship of RhCMV to other herpesviruses is shown in Fig. 4. Six ORFs found in HSV-1, KSHV, MCMV, RCMV, and ChCMV were examined by bootstrap analysis with the maximum parsimony method. Alignments were performed with ClustalW and analyzed to ensure that sequences were properly aligned. ClustalW data were then used to generate a phylogenetic tree for DNA polymerase, glycoprotein B, helicase, major capsid protein, single-stranded-DNA-binding protein, and uracil N-glycosylase. The HCMV proteins were used as the root for the analysis, and thus the figure shows divergence from these proteins. The tree indicates that the virus most closely related to HCMV is ChCMV, followed by RhCMV, MCMV, RCMV, KSHV, and finally HSV-1.

FIG. 4.

FIG. 4.

Phylogenetic analysis. Phylogenetic trees for alpha-, beta-, and gammaherpesviruses. Six proteins were selected for phylogenetic analysis with the ClustalX program. Proteins were aligned by ClustalW. The alignments were adjusted to remove any unnecessary gaps, and then tree data was calculated. Trees were drawn with the TreeView program. The measure of divergence is presented as a scale at the bottom of each tree. Proteins used for the analysis were DNA polymerase, glycoprotein B (gB), helicase, major capsid protein, single-stranded-DNA-binding protein, and uracil N-glycosylase.

DISCUSSION

The RhCMV genome has now been completely sequenced. The RhCMV strain 68-1 genome is 221,459 bp in length and potentially encodes over 200 proteins. Like the other sequenced betaherpesviruses, RhCMV contains ORFs that are homologous to genes from both the unique long (UL) and unique short (US) regions, similar to other viruses within the herpesvirus family. However, unlike human and chimpanzee CMVs, RhCMV does not have repeats between the putative UL and US regions. Restriction analysis of the RhCMV genome further indicated that the genome does not isomerize, which is not uncommon within the betaherpesvirus family. Consistent with this finding, probes specific for each terminus failed to detect the altered terminal fragments that would be predicted by isomerization on Southern blots of RhCMV genomic DNA (13). Moreover, the closely related simian CMV strain Colburn was likewise found by restriction analysis not to isomerize (45). Thus, based on the organization of the RhCMV genome, the genome is most similar to the tupaia herpesvirus, which was recently sequenced and is the prototypic member of the F group of herpesvirus genomes (5).

The complete DNA sequence of RhCMV was compared to all of the published herpesviruses genomes within GenBank. From this analysis, we found that RhCMV and the other herpesvirus genomes are very similar at the genetic and nucleotide levels (34). For HCMV, the G+C content is about 57%, whereas for RhCMV the G+C content is around 49%; however, slight differences are seen at the termini, possibly due to the lack of repeats. Even so, homologous proteins are found within terminal regions, suggesting that host determinants may account for these differences at the nucleotide level.

The sequence analysis revealed that RhCMV encodes homologues to four regions of HCMV that are transcribed at immediate-early times: the major immediate-early transcripts (IE-1 and IE-2), which have been described previously (7), UL36 to UL38, US3, and TRS1. In HCMV infection, these proteins are expressed early during infection and are involved in the regulation of gene expression throughout the virus's life cycle. MCMV does not contain a US3 homologue; however, the US3 locus is dispensable for growth in tissue culture (42). In addition, MCMV does not appear to encode the second transcript of the UL37 gene, which may not be functional. RhCMV encodes both transcripts of the UL37 gene. RhCMV UL37 therefore may function like its HCMV counterpart (1, 14). The TRS1 homologue in RhCMV shows significant homology to the HCMV protein (35% identity). TRS1 in HCMV has been shown to be expressed at immediate-early times and to act as a transactivator of several early promoters (46, 66).

At least two additional RhCMV gene homologues may have regulatory functions. The UL121 homologue Rh155 is located colinearly with the HCMV protein and has homology to the ICP0 protein of HSV-1. ICP0 has been implicated in viral switching between latent and lytic infection and has been shown to transactivate other herpesvirus promoters (20). However, the Rh155 protein does not contain a zinc finger motif and may not function in the same manner as ICP0. Rh155 does contain a highly charged carboxy terminus, which is a feature of some trans-acting transcriptional activators. Rh97 encodes a homologue of the UL69 transactivator of HCMV and is also highly conserved at 59% identity. Taken together, regulatory proteins and transactivators are highly conserved between HCMV and RhCMV.

Examination of the enzyme-coding capacity of RhCMV indicates that the virus encodes the same enzymes as HCMV and, like HCMV, lacks an identifiable thymidine kinase gene. The RhCMV DNA polymerase has been reported previously and has a sequence identical to the one described here (70). Present within the RhCMV genome is a homologue of the UL97 gene of HCMV. The UL97 product has protein kinase activity and has been shown to phosphorylate the nucleoside analog ganciclovir (47). Previous studies have shown that RhCMV is sensitive to ganciclovir treatment (70). Homologues to the HCMV DNA helicase-primase and the DNA repair enzymes dUTPase and DNase were present in RhCMV. The RhCMV enzymes are highly conserved with the HCMV proteins (Table 2). [Unique to the betaherpesviruses are homologues to the UL77 protein.] UL77 is a pyruvoyl decarboxylase homologue that can be found in HCMV virions. Pyruvoyl decarboxylase enzymes are involved in the synthesis of cellular polyamines, which is increased during HCMV infection in vitro (35). When polyamines are decreased, so are the number of HCMV particles released from infected cells (26).

Another group of proteins that are highly conserved between HCMV and RhCMV are the structural proteins. As expected, RhCMV encodes homologues to the major capsid protein, the minor capsid protein, and the capsid assembly protein. In addition to the capsid proteins, there are homologues to most of the known tegument proteins, including UL32 (pp150), UL48 (large tegument protein), UL82 (pp71), UL83 (pp65), and UL99 (pp28). RhCMV does not encode a copy of the UL65 protein, which is also absent in MCMV. Interestingly, RhCMV encodes an additional copy of the UL83 ORF (pp65). Current data are lacking on whether both proteins are present in virions, but immunological data indicate that there is a T-cell response to both proteins, suggesting that each is expressed (L. Picker, personal communication). The identity between the two RhCMV copies is 39%, while Rh111 has 32% identity and Rh112 has 35% identity to HCMV UL83. Such a low identity score suggests that either a gene duplication event occurred during the evolution of the virus or that these two genes are distinct and have separate functions.

The sequenced betaherpesviruses all contain gene families, although this feature is not common to all herpesviruses. Sequence analysis determined that RhCMV encodes gene homologues to all the HCMV families. Within the HCMV genome, nine gene families have been described; we have described eight for RhCMV. In HCMV, two families that are similar in structure, US2 and US6, have both been shown to downregulate MHC class I expression on the cell surface. We have chosen to classify US02-like family members as US06 family members due to structural similarities.

Immunomodulation is responsible for a large part of a virus's survival and propagation within a host. Herpesviruses encode numerous immunomodulatory proteins that are thought to be involved in immune evasion. The genomic analysis of RhCMV demonstrates that the virus encodes numerous immunomodulators. On average, the identity of these proteins with their HCMV counterparts is 21%. This may reflect host adaptation and not imply a lack of function. A recent publication has shown that RhCMV encodes and expresses an IL-10 homologue (48). The function of the RhCMV protein has yet to be elucidated, but it may function as a cytokine synthesis inhibitory factor. Like HCMV, RhCMV encodes a TNF receptor homologue. A TNF receptor homologue may be used as a mechanism to prevent the cells' progression towards apoptosis. However, there is insufficient evidence to determine if the RhCMV TNF receptor homologues are expressed and if the protein binds cytokines.

Viral infection may induce apoptosis within the cells they infect. In addition to the TNF receptor, HCMV encodes the apoptosis inhibitors vICA (UL36) and vMIA (UL37). The product of the vICA ORF inhibits apoptosis by binding to the prodomain of caspase-8, preventing activation (62). RhCMV has two potential ORFs that show homology to the UL36 gene. However, it is not known if these genes are spliced to yield one message or if they function independently of one another. HCMV's vMIA protein acts by inhibiting Fas-mediated apoptosis at a point downstream of caspase-8 activation and Bid cleavage but upstream of cytochrome c release (27). Rh62 and Rh66 are homologous to vMIA; however, the function of these proteins is not known.

RhCMV potentially encodes spliced transcripts homologous to the Fcγ receptor glycoproteins (4). The Fcγ receptors have recently been identified in HCMV. The HCMV proteins belong to the immunoglobulin gene superfamily and represent a diverse group of Fcγ receptor structures. As mentioned above, RhCMV encodes several homologues to US06 family members. US06 proteins are present in HCMV, in other herpesviruses, and in poxviruses. Many of these have been characterized and shown to downregulate MHC class I on the cell surface. MHC class I presentation of antigen is a significant host defense directed towards the clearance of pathogens. RhCMV also encodes two ORFs that show low sequence homology to the immunoglobulin heavy chain (rh96 and rh98). These RhCMV proteins may prove to be additional herpesvirus immunomodulators or the equivalent of the HCMV UL16 protein.

The viral cyclooxygenase-2 homologue may also have an immunomodulatory function. Cellular cyclooxygenase-2 is produced during an inflammatory response when immunoglobulin molecules are cross-linked. This triggers a rapid permeabilization of the lipid membrane through the production of arachidonic acid and releases inflammatory mediators into the surrounding area. Many anti-inflammatory drugs such as aspirin are inhibitors of arachidonic acid metabolism. Recently, Zhu et al. demonstrated that cyclooxygenase-2 is induced during HCMV infection and performs an important function supporting viral replication (76). Increased cyclooxygenase-2 activity early in infection promotes accumulation of the viral transcriptional regulatory protein IE-2, which is in turn required for subsequent viral transcription and DNA replication. RhCMV-encoded cyclooxygenase-2 could play an analogous role. RhCMV cyclooxygenase-2 could also possibly function as a transcriptional control molecule or be involved in latency by slowing viral replication. It remains to be established whether the RhCMV homologue is active and, if so, how the gene's expression is regulated.

The seven-transmembrane family member proteins are G protein-coupled receptors that are present on the cell surface and couple to G proteins to activate extracellular ligands (11). Once activated, the G proteins transduce signals from the cell surface to an effector molecule in order to modulate intracellular functions. RhCMV encodes all but one of the G protein-coupled receptors found in HCMV. However, RhCMV does encode five potential copies of the US28 protein, which has been shown to function as a chemokine receptor and to elicit cell migration in vitro. (68). Structurally, the G protein-coupled receptor homologues are very similar to their HCMV counterparts, although identity between the proteins is about 36%. All of the G protein-coupled receptors in HCMV are transcribed. It will be an interesting point of study in RhCMV to determine whether the seven-transmembrane family members are transcribed and whether they function.

Phylogenetic analysis of HCMV and comparison with ChCMV, RhCMV, MCMV, RCMV, KSHV, and HSV-1 for several different conserved genes revealed that the primate cytomegaloviruses are most closely related to HCMV. The analysis also demonstrates that both MCMV and RCMV are very distant from HCMV on the evolutionary tree and therefore may not be the best model with which to study HCMV pathogenesis and host immune response to the virus. Although chimpanzees are most closely related to humans evolutionarily, limited numbers of chimpanzees in the wild make ChCMV infection of chimps an unsuitable study model. With the availability of the genomic sequence, RhCMV will offer significant advantages over the other cytomegalovirus model systems. RhCMV is highly homologous to HCMV, encodes many of the same proteins, and has a similar genomic structure, and there is a relevant animal model with which to study both cytomegalovirus and cytomegalovirus/SIV infections in the natural host.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by NIH grants RR15094 (D.G.A. and S.W.W.), AI31249 (D.G.A.), RR00163 (L.I.S. and S.W.W.), and CA75922 (S.W.W.).

We thank Robert P. Searles, Jay A. Nelson, and Heather Meyers for contributions and preliminary analysis of the sequence; Klaus Früh and Peter Barry for helpful discussions during the annotation of the genome; Don Siess for technical assistance; the Wadsworth Center Molecular Genetics Core for sequencing; Andrew Townsend for graphics expertise; and Lori Boshears for proofreading the manuscript.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Al-Barazi, H. O., and A. M. Colberg-Poley. 1996. The human cytomegalovirus UL37 immediate-early regulatory protein is an integral membrane N-glycoprotein which traffics through the endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi apparatus. J. Virol. 70:7198-7208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Alcendor, D. J., P. A. Barry, E. Pratt-Lowe, and P. A. Luciw. 1993. Analysis of the rhesus cytomegalovirus immediate-early gene promoter. Virology 194:815-821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Asher, D. M., C. J. Gibbs, Jr., D. J. Lang, D. C. Gajdusek, and R. M. Chanock. 1974. Persistent shedding of cytomegalovirus in the urine of healthy Rhesus monkeys. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 145:794-801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Atalay, R., A. Zimmermann, M. Wagner, E. Borst, C. Benz, M. Messerle, and H. Hengel. 2002. Identification and expression of human cytomegalovirus transcription units coding for two distinct Fcγ receptor homologs. J. Virol. 76:8596-8608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bahr, U., and G. Darai. 2001. Analysis and characterization of the complete genome of tupaia (tree shrew) herpesvirus. J. Virol. 75:4854-4870. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Baldick, C. J., Jr., and T. Shenk. 1996. Proteins associated with purified human cytomegalovirus particles. J. Virol. 70:6097-6105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Barry, P. A., D. J. Alcendor, M. D. Power, H. Kerr, and P. A. Luciw. 1996. Nucleotide sequence and molecular analysis of the rhesus cytomegalovirus immediate-early gene and the UL121-117 open reading frames. Virology 215:61-72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Baskin, G. B. 1987. Disseminated cytomegalovirus infection in immunodeficient rhesus monkeys. Am. J. Pathol. 129:345-352. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Boccuni, M. C., F. Campanini, M. C. Battista, G. Bergamini, P. Dal Monte, A. Ripalti, and M. P. Landini. 1998. Human cytomegalovirus product UL44 downregulates the transactivation of HIV-1 long terminal repeat. AIDS 12:365-372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bogner, E., M. Reschke, B. Reis, T. Mockenhaupt, and K. Radsak. 1993. Identification of the gene product encoded by ORF UL56 of the human cytomegalovirus genome. Virology 196:290-293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bourne, H. R., D. A. Sanders, and F. McCormick. 1990. The GTPase superfamily: a conserved switch for diverse cell functions. Nature 348:125-132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Britt, W. S., and C. A. Alford. 1996. Cytomegalovirus, p. 2493-2523. In B. Fields et al. (ed.), Field's virology, 3rd ed. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, Pa.
  • 13.Chang, W. L., and P. A. Barry. 2003. Cloning of the full-length rhesus cytomegalovirus genome as an infectious and self-excisable bacterial artificial chromosome for analysis of viral pathogenesis. J. Virol. 77:5073-5083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 14.Colberg-Poley, A. M. 1996. Functional roles of immediate early proteins encoded by the human cytomegalovirus UL36-38, UL115-119, TRS1/IRS1 and US3 loci. Intervirology 39:350-360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Covell, W. 1932. Occurrence of intranuclear inclusions of monkeys unaccompanied by specific signs of disease. Am. J. Pathol. 8:151-158. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Cowdy, W., and G. Scott. 1935. Nuclear inclusions in kidneys of macaque rhesus monkeys. Am. J. Pathol. 11:649-658. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Drew, W. L., R. C. Miner, D. F. Busch, S. E. Follansbee, J. Gullett, S. G. Mehalko, S. M. Gordon, W. F. Owen, Jr., T. R. Matthews, W. C. Buhles, et al. 1991. Prevalence of resistance in patients receiving ganciclovir for serious cytomegalovirus infection. J. Infect. Dis. 163:716-719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Eizuru, Y., K. Tsuchiya, R. Mori, and Y. Minamishima. 1989. Immunological and molecular comparison of simian cytomegaloviruses isolated from African green monkey (Cercopithecus aethiops) and Japanese macaque (Macaca fuscata). Arch. Virol. 107:65-75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Erice, A., S. Chou, K. K. Biron, S. C. Stanat, H. H. Balfour, Jr., and M. C. Jordan. 1989. Progressive disease due to ganciclovir-resistant cytomegalovirus in immunocompromised patients. N. Engl. J. Med. 320:289-293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Everett, R. D. 1984. Trans activation of transcription by herpes virus products: requirement for two HSV-1 immediate-early polypeptides for maximum activity. EMBO J. 3:3135-3141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ewing, B., and P. Green. 1998. Base-calling of automated sequencer traces with phred. II. Error probabilities. Genome Res. 8:186-194. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ewing, B., L. Hillier, M. C. Wendl, and P. Green. 1998. Base-calling of automated sequencer traces with Phred. I. Accuracy assessment. Genome Res. 8:175-185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Fish, K. N., C. Soderberg-Naucler, L. K. Mills, S. Stenglein, and J. A. Nelson. 1998. Human cytomegalovirus persistently infects aortic endothelial cells. J. Virol. 72:5661-5668. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Fruh, K., and Y. Yang. 1999. Antigen presentation by MHC class I and its regulation by interferon gamma. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 11:76-81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Geginat, G., W. Hampl, and T. Mertens. 1992. Human cytomegalovirus—biology and infection. Med. Klin. 87:3-10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Gibson, W., R. van Breemen, A. Fields, R. LaFemina, and A. Irmiere. 1984. d,l-α-Difluoromethylornithine inhibits human cytomegalovirus replication. J. Virol. 50:145-154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Goldmacher, V. S., L. M. Bartle, A. Skaletskaya, C. A. Dionne, N. L. Kedersha, C. A. Vater, J. W. Han, R. J. Lutz, S. Watanabe, E. D. Cahir McFarland, E. D. Kieff, E. S. Mocarski, and T. Chittenden. 1999. A cytomegalovirus-encoded mitochondria-localized inhibitor of apoptosis structurally unrelated to Bcl-2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:12536-12541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Gompels, U. A., J. Nicholas, G. Lawrence, M. Jones, B. J. Thomson, M. E. Martin, S. Efstathiou, M. Craxton, and H. A. Macaulay. 1995. The DNA sequence of human herpesvirus-6: structure, coding content, and genome evolution. Virology 209:29-51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Green, P. 1996. DOE Human Genome Program Contractor, p. 157. Grantee Workshop V. Department of Energy, Washington, D.C.
  • 30.Grefte, A., M. C. Harmsen, M. van der Giessen, S. Knollema, W. J. van Son, and T. H. The. 1994. Presence of human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) immediate early mRNA but not ppUL83 (lower matrix protein pp65) mRNA in polymorphonuclear and mononuclear leukocytes during active HCMV infection. J. Gen. Virol. 75:1989-1998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Griffith, B. P., and M. J. Aquino-de Jesus. 1991. Guinea pig model of congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Transplant Proc. 23:29-31, discussion 31. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Hahn, G., R. Jores, and E. S. Mocarski. 1998. Cytomegalovirus remains latent in a common precursor of dendritic and myeloid cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:3937-3942. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hobom, U., W. Brune, M. Messerle, G. Hahn, and U. H. Koszinowski. 2000. Fast screening procedures for random transposon libraries of cloned herpesvirus genomes: mutational analysis of human cytomegalovirus envelope glycoprotein genes. J. Virol. 74:7720-7729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Honess, R. W. 1984. Herpes simplex and 'the herpes complex': diverse observations and a unifying hypothesis. The eighth Fleming lecture. J. Gen. Virol. 65:2077-2107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Honess, R. W., U. A. Gompels, B. G. Barrell, M. Craxton, K. R. Cameron, R. Staden, Y. N. Chang, and G. S. Hayward. 1989. Deviations from expected frequencies of CpG dinucleotides in herpesvirus DNAs may be diagnostic of differences in the states of their latent genomes. J. Gen. Virol. 70:837-855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Huber, M. T., and T. Compton. 1998. The human cytomegalovirus UL74 gene encodes the third component of the glycoprotein H-glycoprotein L-containing envelope complex. J. Virol. 72:8191-8197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Iskenderian, A. C., L. Huang, A. Reilly, R. M. Stenberg, and D. G. Anders. 1996. Four of eleven loci required for transient complementation of human cytomegalovirus DNA replication cooperate to activate expression of replication genes. J. Virol. 70:383-392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Jabs, D. A., and P. D. Griffiths. 2002. Fomivirsen for the treatment of cytomegalovirus retinitis. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 133:552-556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kalter, S. S., and R. L. Heberling. 1990. Primate viral diseases in perspective. J. Med. Primatol. 19:519-535. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Kerry, J. A., M. A. Priddy, T. Y. Jervey, C. P. Kohler, T. L. Staley, C. D. Vanson, T. R. Jones, A. C. Iskenderian, D. G. Anders, and R. M. Stenberg. 1996. Multiple regulatory events influence human cytomegalovirus DNA polymerase (UL54) expression during viral infection. J. Virol. 70:373-382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Kessler, M. J., W. T. London, D. L. Madden, J. M. Dambrosia, J. K. Hilliard, K. F. Soike, and R. G. Rawlins. 1989. Serological survey for viral diseases in the Cayo Santiago rhesus macaque population. P. R. Health Sci. J. 8:95-97. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Kollert-Jons, A., E. Bogner, and K. Radsak. 1991. A 15-kilobase-pair region of the human cytomegalovirus genome which includes US1 through US13 is dispensable for growth in cell culture. J. Virol. 65:5184-5189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kondo, K., H. Kaneshima, and E. S. Mocarski. 1994. Human cytomegalovirus latent infection of granulocyte-macrophage progenitors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:11879-11883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Kondo, K., J. Xu, and E. S. Mocarski. 1996. Human cytomegalovirus latent gene expression in granulocyte-macrophage progenitors in culture and in seropositive individuals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:11137-11142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.LaFemina, R. L., and G. S. Hayward. 1980. Structural organization of the DNA molecules from human cytomegalovirus. ICN-UCLA Symp. Mol. Biol. 18:39-55. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Leatham, M. P., P. R. Witte, and M. F. Stinski. 1991. Alternate promoter selection within a human cytomegalovirus immediate-early and early transcription unit (UL119-115) defines true late transcripts containing open reading frames for putative viral glycoproteins. J. Virol. 65:6144-6153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Littler, E., A. D. Stuart, and M. S. Chee. 1992. Human cytomegalovirus UL97 open reading frame encodes a protein that phosphorylates the antiviral nucleoside analogue ganciclovir. Nature 358:160-162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Lockridge, K. M., S. S. Zhou, R. H. Kravitz, J. L. Johnson, E. T. Sawai, E. L. Blewett, and P. A. Barry. 2000. Primate cytomegaloviruses encode and express an IL-10-like protein. Virology 268:272-280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.London, W. T., A. J. Martinez, S. A. Houff, W. C. Wallen, B. L. Curfman, R. G. Traub, and J. L. Sever. 1986. Experimental congenital disease with simian cytomegalovirus in rhesus monkeys. Teratology 33:323-331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Matthews, T., and R. Boehme. 1988. Antiviral activity and mechanism of action of ganciclovir. Rev. Infect. Dis. 10:S490-S494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.McGeoch, D. J., S. Cook, A. Dolan, F. E. Jamieson, and E. A. Telford. 1995. Molecular phylogeny and evolutionary timescale for the family of mammalian herpesviruses. J. Mol. Biol. 247:443-458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Nicholas, J. 1996. Determination and analysis of the complete nucleotide sequence of human herpesvirus. J. Virol. 70:5975-5989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Ohtaki, S., H. Kodama, R. Hondo, and T. Kurata. 1986. Activation of cytomegalovirus infection in immunosuppressed cynomolgus monkeys inoculated with varicella-zoster virus. Acta Pathol. Jpn. 36:1537-1552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Pari, G. S., and D. G. Anders. 1993. Eleven loci encoding trans-acting factors are required for transient complementation of human cytomegalovirus oriLyt-dependent DNA replication. J. Virol. 67:6979-6988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Paterson, D. A., A. P. Dyer, R. S. Milne, E. Sevilla-Reyes, and U. A. Gompels. 2002. A role for human cytomegalovirus glycoprotein O (gO) in cell fusion and a new hypervariable locus. Virology 293:281-294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Pignatelli, S., P. Dal Monte, G. Rossini, S. Chou, T. Gojobori, K. Hanada, J. J. Guo, W. Rawlinson, W. Britt, M. Mach, and M. P. Landini. 2003. Human cytomegalovirus glycoprotein N (gpUL73-gN) genomic variants: identification of a novel subgroup, geographical distribution and evidence of positive selective pressure. J. Gen. Virol. 84:647-655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Plachter, B., C. Sinzger, and G. Jahn. 1996. Cell types involved in replication and distribution of human cytomegalovirus. Adv. Virus Res. 46:195-261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Rasmussen, L., A. Geissler, C. Cowan, A. Chase, and M. Winters. 2002. The genes encoding the gCIII complex of human cytomegalovirus exist in highly diverse combinations in clinical isolates. J. Virol. 76:10841-10848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Rawlinson, W. D., H. E. Farrell, and B. G. Barrell. 1996. Analysis of the complete DNA sequence of murine cytomegalovirus. J. Virol. 70:8833-8849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Rice, G. P., R. D. Schrier, and M. B. Oldstone. 1984. Cytomegalovirus infects human lymphocytes and monocytes: virus expression is restricted to immediate-early gene products. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81:6134-6138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Shanley, J. D., J. Morningstar, and M. C. Jordan. 1985. Inhibition of murine cytomegalovirus lung infection and interstitial pneumonitis by acyclovir and 9-(1,3-dihydroxy-2-propoxymethyl)guanine. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 28:172-175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Skaletskaya, A., L. M. Bartle, T. Chittenden, A. L. McCormick, E. S. Mocarski, and V. S. Goldmacher. 2001. A cytomegalovirus-encoded inhibitor of apoptosis that suppresses caspase-8 activation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:7829-7834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Smith, K. O., J. F. Thiel, J. T. Newman, E. Harvey, M. D. Trousdale, W. D. Gehle, and G. Clark. 1969. Cytomegaloviruses as common adventitious contaminants in primary African green monkey kidney cell cultures. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 42:489-496. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Soderberg-Naucler, C., K. N. Fish, and J. A. Nelson. 1997. Reactivation of latent human cytomegalovirus by allogeneic stimulation of blood cells from healthy donors. Cell 91:119-126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Spector, D. J., and M. J. Tevethia. 1994. Protein-protein interactions between human cytomegalovirus IE2-580aa and pUL84 in lytically infected cells. J. Virol. 68:7549-7553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Stasiak, P. C., and E. S. Mocarski. 1992. Transactivation of the cytomegalovirus ICP36 gene promoter requires the alpha gene product TRS1 in addition to IE1 and IE2. J. Virol. 66:1050-1058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Streblow, D. N., C. Soderberg-Naucler, J. Vieira, P. Smith, E. Wakabayashi, F. Ruchti, K. Mattison, Y. Altschuler, and J. A. Nelson. 1999. The human cytomegalovirus chemokine receptor US28 mediates vascular smooth muscle cell migration. Cell 99:511-520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Strive, T., E. Borst, M. Messerle, and K. Radsak. 2002. Proteolytic processing of human cytomegalovirus glycoprotein B is dispensable for viral growth in culture. J. Virol. 76:1252-1264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Swack, N. S., O. C. Liu, and G. D. Hsiung. 1971. Cytomegalovirus infections of monkeys and baboons. Am. J. Epidemiol. 94:397-402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Swanson, R., E. Bergquam, and S. W. Wong. 1998. Characterization of rhesus cytomegalovirus genes associated with antiviral susceptibility. Virology 240:338-348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Theiler, R. N., and T. Compton. 2001. Characterization of the signal peptide processing and membrane association of human cytomegalovirus glycoprotein O. J. Biol. Chem. 276:39226-39231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Uwaydat, S. H., and H. K. Li. 2002. Pigmentary retinopathy associated with intravitreal fomivirsen. Arch. Ophthalmol. 120:854-857. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Vink, C., E. Beuken, and C. A. Bruggeman. 2000. Complete DNA sequence of the rat cytomegalovirus genome. J. Virol. 74:7656-7665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Vogel, P., B. J. Weigler, H. Kerr, A. G. Hendrickx, and P. A. Barry. 1994. Seroepidemiologic studies of cytomegalovirus infection in a breeding population of rhesus macaques. Lab. Anim. Sci. 44:25-30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Weller, T. H. 1968. Serological differentiation of viruses responsible for cytomegalovirus inclusion disease. Virology 12:130-132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Zhu, H., J. P. Cong, D. Yu, W. A. Bresnahan, and T. E. Shenk. 2002. Inhibition of cyclooxygenase 2 blocks human cytomegalovirus replication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:3932-3937. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Zhu, L. A., and S. K. Weller. 1992. The six conserved helicase motifs of the UL5 gene product, a component of the herpes simplex virus type 1 helicase-primase, are essential for its function. J. Virol. 66:469-479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Zhu, Y., L. Huang, and D. G. Anders. 1998. Human cytomegalovirus oriLyt sequence requirements. J. Virol. 72:4989-4996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Zini, N., M. C. Battista, S. Santi, M. Riccio, G. Bergamini, M. P. Landini, and N. M. Maraldi. 1999. The novel structural protein of human cytomegalovirus, pUL25, is localized in the viral tegument. J. Virol. 73:6073-6075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Virology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES