Skip to main content
Environmental Health Perspectives logoLink to Environmental Health Perspectives
. 1994 Jan;102(Suppl 1):115–119. doi: 10.1289/ehp.94102s1115

Statistical characterization of negative control data in the Ames Salmonella/microsome test.

C Hamada 1, T Wada 1, Y Sakamoto 1
PMCID: PMC1566914  PMID: 8187699

Abstract

A statistical characterization of negative control data in the Ames Salmonella/microsome reverse mutation test was performed using data obtained at Takeda Analytical Research Laboratories during January 1989 to April 1990. The lot-to-lot variability of bacterial stock cultures and day-to-day variability of experiments were small for Salmonella typhimurium strains TA1535 and TA1537 and Escherichia coli WP2uvrA, but they were larger for S. typhimurium TA100. The number of revertant colonies for all test strains studied here followed Poisson distributions within the same day. The two-fold rule that is an empirical method to evaluate the Ames Salmonella/microsome test results has been widely used in Japan. This two-fold rule was evaluated statistically. The comparison-wise type I error rate was less than 0.05 for TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537, and WP2uvrA. Moreover, this rule is particularly conservative for TA100, for which the type I error rate was nearly 0.

Full text

PDF
119

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Margolin B. H., Kaplan N., Zeiger E. Statistical analysis of the Ames Salmonella/microsome test. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Jun;78(6):3779–3783. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.6.3779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Snee R. D., Irr J. D. A procedure for the statistical evaluation of Ames Salmonella assay results. Comparison of results among 4 laboratories. Mutat Res. 1984 Sep;128(2):115–125. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(84)90098-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Wahrendorf J., Mahon G. A., Schumacher M. A nonparametric approach to the statistical analysis of mutagenicity data. Mutat Res. 1985 Feb-Apr;147(1-2):5–13. doi: 10.1016/0165-1161(85)90012-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Environmental Health Perspectives are provided here courtesy of National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

RESOURCES