Skip to main content
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 1996 May;111(1):179–185. doi: 10.1104/pp.111.1.179

Dynamics of Changing Intercellular CO2 Concentration (ci) during Drought and Determination of Minimum Functional ci.

T Brodribb 1
PMCID: PMC157824  PMID: 12226283

Abstract

Nine conifer species with narrow (<5 mm), single-veined leaves were selected for the purpose of examining changes in intercellular CO2 concentration (ci) during drought. Due to the leaf morphology of the study plants, the confounding effects of nonhomogenous photosynthesis common to most reticulate-veined angiosperms were largely avoided, giving a clear picture of ci dynamics under increasing drought. A characteristic biphasic response was observed in all species, with an initial stomatal control phase resulting in a substantial reduction in ci as stomatal conductance (gs) decreased. As gs reached low levels, a strong nonstomatal limitation phase was observed, causing ci to increase as gs approached a minimum. This nonstomatal phase was linked to a concomitant rapid decrease in the fluorescence parameter quantum efficiency, indicating the onset of nonreversible photoinhibition. The ratio of internal to atmospheric CO2 concentration (ci/ca) decreased from values of between 0.68 and 0.57 in undroughted plants to a minimum, (ci/ca)min, which was well defined in each species, ranging from 0.10 in Actinostrobus acuminatus to 0.36 in Acmopyle pancheri. A high correlation was found to exist between (ci/ca)min and leaf water potential measured at (ci/ca)min. Species developing high maximum intrinsic water use efficiencies (low [ci/ca]min), such as A. acuminatus, did so at lower leaf water potentials (-4.5 MPa) than more mesic species (-1.75 MPa for A. pancheri). It is concluded that in the absence of patchy stomatal closure, (ci/ca)min gives a good representation of the drought tolerance of foliage.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (671.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Boyer J. S. Nonstomatal inhibition of photosynthesis in sunflower at low leaf water potentials and high light intensities. Plant Physiol. 1971 Nov;48(5):532–536. doi: 10.1104/pp.48.5.532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cardon Z. G., Berry J. A., Woodrow I. E. Dependence of the Extent and Direction of Average Stomatal Response in Zea mays L. and Phaseolus vulgaris L. on the Frequency of Fluctuations in Environmental Stimuli. Plant Physiol. 1994 Jul;105(3):1007–1013. doi: 10.1104/pp.105.3.1007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ehleringer J. R., Cook C. S. Photosynthesis in Encelia farinosa Gray in Response to Decreasing Leaf Water Potential. Plant Physiol. 1984 Jul;75(3):688–693. doi: 10.1104/pp.75.3.688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fahl N., Jr, Denehy G. E., Jackson R. D. Protocol for predictable restoration of anterior teeth with composite resins. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent. 1995 Oct;7(8):13–22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Genty B., Briantais J. M., Da Silva J. B. Effects of drought on primary photosynthetic processes of cotton leaves. Plant Physiol. 1987 Feb;83(2):360–364. doi: 10.1104/pp.83.2.360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gunasekera D., Berkowitz G. A. Heterogenous stomatal closure in response to leaf water deficits is not a universal phenomenon. Plant Physiol. 1992 Feb;98(2):660–665. doi: 10.1104/pp.98.2.660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gunasekera D., Berkowitz G. A. Use of Transgenic Plants with Ribulose-1,5-Bisphosphate Carboxylase/Oxygenase Antisense DNA to Evaluate the Rate Limitation of Photosynthesis under Water Stress. Plant Physiol. 1993 Oct;103(2):629–635. doi: 10.1104/pp.103.2.629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Wong S. C., Cowan I. R., Farquhar G. D. Leaf Conductance in Relation to Rate of CO(2) Assimilation: III. Influences of Water Stress and Photoinhibition. Plant Physiol. 1985 Aug;78(4):830–834. doi: 10.1104/pp.78.4.830. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES