Skip to main content
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 1993 Nov;103(3):783–791. doi: 10.1104/pp.103.3.783

Submergence-Induced Ethylene Synthesis, Entrapment, and Growth in Two Plant Species with Contrasting Flooding Resistances.

LACJ Voesenek 1, M Banga 1, R H Thier 1, C M Mudde 1, FJM Harren 1, GWM Barendse 1, CWPM Blom 1
PMCID: PMC159048  PMID: 12231979

Abstract

Submergence-induced ethylene synthesis and entrapment were studied in two contrasting Rumex species, one flood-resistant (Rumex palustris) and the other flood-sensitive (Rumex acetosa). The application of a photoacoustic method to determine internal ethylene concentrations in submerged plants is discussed. A comparison with an older technique (vacuum extraction) is described. For the first time ethylene production before, during, and after submergence and the endogenous concentration during submergence were continuously measured on a single intact plant without physical perturbation. Both Rumex species were characterized by enhanced ethylene concentrations in the shoot after 24 h of submergence. This was not related to enhanced synthesis but to continued production and physical entrapment. In R. palustris, high endogenous ethylene levels correlated with enhanced petiole and lamina elongation. No dramatic change in leaf growth rate was observed in submerged R. acetosa shoots. After desubmergence both species showed an increase in ethylene production, the response being more pronounced in R. palustris. This increase was linked to the enhanced postsubmergence growth rate of leaves of R. palustris. Due to the very rapid escape of ethylene out of desubmerged plants to the atmosphere (90% disappeared within 1 min), substantial underestimation of internal ethylene concentrations can be expected using more conventional vacuum extraction techniques.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (968.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Beyer E. M., Morgan P. W. A method for determining the concentration of ethylene in the gas phase of vegetative plant tissues. Plant Physiol. 1970 Aug;46(2):352–354. doi: 10.1104/pp.46.2.352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cohen E., Kende H. In vivo 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate synthase activity in internodes of deepwater rice : enhancement by submergence and low oxygen levels. Plant Physiol. 1987 Jun;84(2):282–286. doi: 10.1104/pp.84.2.282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hsiao T. C., Acevedo E., Henderson D. W. Maize leaf elongation: continuous measurements and close dependence on plant water status. Science. 1970 May 1;168(3931):590–591. doi: 10.1126/science.168.3931.590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Métraux J. P., Kende H. The role of ethylene in the growth response of submerged deep water rice. Plant Physiol. 1983 Jun;72(2):441–446. doi: 10.1104/pp.72.2.441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Voesenek L. A., Harren F. J., Bögemann G. M., Blom C. W., Reuss J. Ethylene production and petiole growth in rumex plants induced by soil waterlogging: the application of a continuous flow system and a laser driven intracavity photoacoustic detection system. Plant Physiol. 1990 Nov;94(3):1071–1077. doi: 10.1104/pp.94.3.1071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES