Skip to main content
PMC home page
British Medical Journal logoLink to British Medical Journal
. 1978 Jul 15;2(6131):159–162. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.6131.159

Comparison of performance of various sphygmomanometers with intra-arterial blood-pressure readings.

S N Hunyor, J M Flynn, C Cochineas
PMCID: PMC1606220  PMID: 678830

Abstract

Seven types of sphygmomanometer were used in random order on each of nine hypertensive patients and the readings compared with simultaneous intra-arterial blood-pressure recordings. All the devices gave significantly different values for systolic pressure, and only two measured diastolic pressure without significant error. Systolic pressure was consistently underestimated (range 31-7 mm Hg), and all but one instrument overestimated diastolic pressure (range 10-2 mm Hg). The variability of readings was least with the standard mercury sphygmomanometer and the random-zero machine, while with some of the more automated devices single readings were in error up to -68/33 mm Hg. The strong correlations found between intra-arterial and cuff systolic pressures with all devices tested and significant correlations for diastolic pressure with all but one device indicate that, with one possible exception, the sphygmomanometers would give accurate results where a change in blood pressure was the main concern.

Full text

PDF
161

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Breit S. N., O'Rourke M. F. Comparison of direct and indirect arterial pressure measurements in hospitalized patients. Aust N Z J Med. 1974 Oct;4(5):485–491. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.1974.tb03222.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brunner H. R., Gavras H., Ribeiro A. B., Posternak L. Angiotensin II blockade in normal man and patients with essential hypertension. Blood pressure effects depending on renin and sodium balance. Prog Biochem Pharmacol. 1976;12:145–162. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Feinleib M., Labarthe D., Shekelle R., Kuller L. Criteria for evaluation of automated blood pressure measuring devices for use in hypertensive screening programs. A report of the Committee on Criteria and Methods of the Council on Epidemiology, American Heart Association. Circulation. 1974 Mar;49(3 Suppl):6–11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gundersen J., Ahlgren I. Evaluation of an automatic device for measurement of the indirect systolic and diastolic blood pressure, arteriosonde 1217. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1973;17(3):203–207. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1973.tb00819.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. HOLLAND W. W., HUMERFELT S. MEASUREMENT OF BLOOD-PRESSURE: COMPARISON OF INTRA-ARTERIAL AND CUFF VALUES. Br Med J. 1964 Nov 14;2(5419):1241–1243. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5419.1241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kirkendall W. M., Burton A. C., Epstein F. H., Freis E. D. Recommendations for human blood pressure determination by sphygmomanometers. Circulation. 1967 Dec;36(6):980–988. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.36.6.980. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Labarthe D. R., Hawkins C. M., Remington R. D. Evaluation of performance of selected devices for measuring blood pressure. Am J Cardiol. 1973 Sep 20;32(4):546–553. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(73)80046-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Maurer A. H., Noordergraaf A. Korotkoff sound filtering for automated three-phase measurement of blood pressure. Am Heart J. 1976 May;91(5):584–591. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8703(76)80143-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. ROSE G. A., HOLLAND W. W., CROWLEY E. A. A SPHYGMOMANOMETER FOR EPIDEMIOLOGISTS. Lancet. 1964 Feb 8;1(7328):296–300. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(64)92408-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Raftery E. B., Ward A. P. The indirect method of recording blood pressure. Cardiovasc Res. 1968 Apr;2(2):210–218. doi: 10.1093/cvr/2.2.210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Sheppard L. C., Johnson T. S., Kirklin J. W. Controlled study of brachial artery blood pressure measured by a new indirect method. J Assoc Adv Med Instrum. 1971 Sep-Oct;5(5):297–301. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Steinfeld L., Alexander H., Cohen M. L. Editorials: Updating sphygmomanometry. Am J Cardiol. 1974 Jan;33(1):107–110. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(74)90745-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Wright B. M., Dore C. F. A random-zero sphygmomanometer. Lancet. 1970 Feb 14;1(7642):337–338. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(70)90709-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES