Skip to main content
American Journal of Public Health logoLink to American Journal of Public Health
. 1994 Dec;84(12):1960–1964. doi: 10.2105/ajph.84.12.1960

Contraceptive efficacy and acceptability of the female condom.

G Farr 1, H Gabelnick 1, K Sturgen 1, L Dorflinger 1
PMCID: PMC1615396  PMID: 7998637

Abstract

OBJECTIVES. The purpose of the study was to determine the contraceptive efficacy of the female condom and to provide data about the device to the US Food and Drug Administration. METHODS. The clinical trial was conducted at six US sites and three sites in Latin America. Eligible subjects were in mutually monogamous relationships and agreed to use the female condom as their only means of contraception for 6 months. RESULTS. A total of 328 subjects contributed to the analysis of contraceptive efficacy. Twenty-two US subjects and 17 Latin American subjects became pregnant, yielding 6-month gross cumulative accidental pregnancy rates of 12.4 and 22.2, respectively. During perfect (consistent and correct) use of the method, the 6-month accidental pregnancy rates were 2.6 and 9.5 for the US and Latin American centers, respectively. There were no serious adverse events related to the use of the method. CONCLUSIONS. The female condom provides contraceptive efficacy in the same range as other barrier methods, particularly when used consistently and correctly, and has the added advantage of helping protect against sexually transmitted diseases.

Full text

PDF
1963

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Leeper M. A., Conrardy M. Preliminary evaluation of REALITY, a condom for women to wear. Adv Contracept. 1989 Dec;5(4):229–235. doi: 10.1007/BF01890894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Trussell J., Hatcher R. A., Cates W., Jr, Stewart F. H., Kost K. A guide to interpreting contraceptive efficacy studies. Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Sep;76(3 Pt 2):558–567. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Trussell J. Methodological pitfalls in the analysis of contraceptive failure. Stat Med. 1991 Feb;10(2):201–220. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780100206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Trussell J., Sturgen K., Strickler J., Dominik R. Comparative contraceptive efficacy of the female condom and other barrier methods. Fam Plann Perspect. 1994 Mar-Apr;26(2):66–72. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Public Health are provided here courtesy of American Public Health Association

RESOURCES