Skip to main content
PMC home page
American Journal of Public Health logoLink to American Journal of Public Health
. 1979 Sep;69(9):864–870. doi: 10.2105/ajph.69.9.864

Cesarean section, fetal monitoring, and perinatal mortality in California.

R L Williams, W E Hawes
PMCID: PMC1619226  PMID: 474842

Abstract

The rate of cesarean section in California has been growing at a compound rate of about 10 per cent per annum since 1969, coinciding with the advent of fetal monitoring. It is of interest, therefore, to study the distribution and efficacy of obstetric interventions. Information derived from the 1977 California birth cohort and a survey questionnaire was used to study the factors associated with the rate of cesarean section in 323 hospitals. Significant positive correlations were observed between the cesarean rate (CSR) and hospital factors indicative of a high degree of technology, including the proportion of labors electronically monitored. Significant negative correlations were observed between the CSR and hospital-specific variables suggestive of socioeconomically underprivileged patient populations. Other factors being constant, hospitals characterized by prepayment health care financing also had lower CSRs. A standaridized mortality ratio (SMR) based on 2.3 million births in the 1970--1976 cohorts was used to adjust the 1977 hospital specific perinatal mortality rates for birth weight, gestational age, sex, race, and plurality. The results show that hospitals which intervene technologically in a large proportion of births have lower risk adjusted perinatal mortality rates.

Full text

PDF
864

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Amato J. C. Fetal monitoring in a community hospital. A statistical analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 1977 Sep;50(3):269–274. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baker R. A. Technologic intervention in obstetrics. Has the pendulum swung too far? Obstet Gynecol. 1978 Feb;51(2):241–244. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Green S. L., Sarubbi F. A., Jr Risk factors associated with post cesarean section febrile morbidity. Obstet Gynecol. 1977 Jun;49(6):686–690. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hack M., Fanaroff A. A., Klaus M. H., Mendelawitz B. D., Merkatz I. R. Neonatal respiratory distress following elective delivery. A preventable disease? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1976 Sep 1;126(1):43–47. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(76)90462-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hagen D. Maternal febrile morbidity associated with fetal monitoring and cesarean section. Obstet Gynecol. 1975 Sep;46(3):260–262. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Haverkamp A. D., Thompson H. E., McFee J. G., Cetrulo C. The evaluation of continuous fetal heart rate monitoring in high-risk pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1976 Jun 1;125(3):310–320. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(76)90565-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hibbard L. T. Changing trends in cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1976 Jul 15;125(6):798–804. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(76)90852-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hughey M. J., LaPata R. E., McElin T. W., Lussky R. The effect of fetal monitoring on the incidence of cesarean section. Obstet Gynecol. 1977 May;49(5):513–518. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Johnell H. E., Ostberg H., Wåhlstrand T. Increasing caesarean section rate. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1976;55(2):95–100. doi: 10.3109/00016347609156793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Maisels M. J., Rees R., Marks K., Friedman Z. Elective delivery of the term fetus. An obstetrical hazard. JAMA. 1977 Nov 7;238(19):2036–2039. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Neutra R. R., Fienberg S. E., Greenland S., Friedman E. A. Effect of fetal monitoring on neonatal death rates. N Engl J Med. 1978 Aug 17;299(7):324–326. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197808172990702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Paul R. H., Hon E. H. Clinical fetal monitoring. V. Effect on perinatal outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1974 Feb 15;118(4):529–533. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(16)33695-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Petitti D., Olson R. O., Williams R. L. Cesarean section in California--1960 through 1975. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1979 Feb 15;133(4):391–397. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(79)90058-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Reed D. M., Bakketeig L. S., Nugent R. P. The epidemiology of respiratory distress syndrome in Norway. Am J Epidemiol. 1978 Apr;107(4):299–310. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Tutera G., Newman R. L. Fetal monitoring: its effect on the perinatal mortality and cesarean section rates and its complications. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1975 Jul 15;122(6):750–754. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(75)90582-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Williams R. L. Measuring the effectiveness of perinatal medical care. Med Care. 1979 Feb;17(2):95–110. doi: 10.1097/00005650-197902000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Public Health are provided here courtesy of American Public Health Association

RESOURCES