Abstract
In 1978, supporters of denturism in Oregon succeeded in passing an initiative which allows denturists to provide dentures directly to the public. The steps which led to the referendum included three unsuccessful attempts to have the state legislature enact a law legalizing denturism. After capturing broad-based consumer support, the issue was placed on the ballot and passed by an overwhelming margin. Both the denturists and the dentists in Oregon adopted strategies similar to those used in Canada over 20 years ago when the issue was raised in a number of provinces. As was the case in Canada, the denturists prevailed. Denturists stressed the price differential and the issue of freedom of choice. Dentists stressed health and safety issues. The public perceived the dentists' campaign as negative and self-serving. This perception may have contributed to the election results. In order to avoid this tarnished image, dentists must anticipate the public's needs, and formulate strategies to meet such needs.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Accardo J. A. Reflections on "denturism" in Maine. N Y State Dent J. 1977 Nov;43(9):520–521. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fee A. D. The dental mechanics of Canada. J Prosthet Dent. 1974 Jan;31(1):10–21. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(74)90215-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fletcher C. F. Combating the illegal practice of dentistry. J Prosthet Dent. 1976 Jan;35(1):92–96. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(76)90121-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Resnick N. The illegal dental mechanic movement. J Am Dent Assoc. 1975 Aug;91(2):330–337. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1975.0391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ryan J. E. The profession, the mechanics, the Canadian government, and the delivery of removable dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 1976 Jan;35(1):89–91. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(76)90120-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]