Skip to main content
American Journal of Public Health logoLink to American Journal of Public Health
. 1981 Apr;71(4):413–416. doi: 10.2105/ajph.71.4.413

High blood pressure diagnosis and treatment: consensus recommendations vs actual practice.

G E Thomson, M H Alderman, S Wassertheil-Smoller, J G Rafter, R Samet
PMCID: PMC1619676  PMID: 7468884

Abstract

Diagnostic and treatment practices of institutional facilities treating high blood pressure in New York City were surveyed by mail in 1978. Respondents were adhering to the treatment recommendations of the Joint National Committee on Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Ninety-two per cent of respondents reported 90-104 mm Hg as the diastolic blood pressure level at which drug therapy was initiated, indicating a more aggressive approach than was warranted by the information available at the time of the survey.

Full text

PDF
415

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Alderman M., Rafter J., Samet R., Thomson G., Wassertheil-Smoller S. High blood pressure treatment facilities. Survey in greater New York area. N Y State J Med. 1979 Apr;79(5):754–757. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Public Health are provided here courtesy of American Public Health Association

RESOURCES