Skip to main content
PMC home page
American Journal of Public Health logoLink to American Journal of Public Health
. 1985 Jun;75(6):625–629. doi: 10.2105/ajph.75.6.625

The incidence of duodenal and gastric ulcers in a large health maintenance organization.

J H Kurata, G D Honda, H Frankl
PMCID: PMC1646212  PMID: 4003625

Abstract

We report the incidence of peptic ulcers (duodenal, pyloric canal, gastric, and combined) verified by radiologic, endoscopic, or surgical evidence in a large Health Maintenance Organization (HMO) in Los Angeles, California. For members age 15 and above, the peptic ulcer incidence rate was 0.86 per 1,000 person-years (p-y) (males 1.10, females 0.63). The male to female sex ratio was 1.7. Two hundred twenty-two duodenal, 17 pyloric canal, 89 gastric, and 21 combined first-time diagnosed ulcer cases were located. For duodenal and pyloric canal ulcer, the incidence rate for members age 15 and above was 0.58 per 1,000 p-y (males 0.76, females 0.40). For gastric ulcer, the incidence rate for members age 15 and above was 0.21 per 1,000 p-y (males 0.23, females 0.18). The combined ulcer rate was 0.05 per 1,000 p-y (males 0.07, females 0.02). Gastric ulcer rates were two times higher in 1980 than in 1977. Peptic ulcer age-specific incidence rates increased with age. Incidence rates were much lower than those reported in previous studies, but the gastric to duodenal ulcer ratio and the age and sex relation to ulcer incidence were similar to those previously reported.

Full text

PDF
626

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bonnevie O. The incidence of duodenal ulcer in Copenhagen county. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1975;10(4):385–393. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bonnevie O. The incidence of gastric ulcer in Copenhagen county. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1975;10(3):231–239. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Coggon D., Lambert P., Langman M. J. 20 years of hospital admissions for peptic ulcer in England and Wales. Lancet. 1981 Jun 13;1(8233):1302–1304. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(81)92470-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cotton P. B. Fibreoptic endoscopy and the barium meal--results and implications. Br Med J. 1973 Apr 21;2(5859):161–165. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5859.161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Elashoff J. D., Grossman M. I. Trends in hospital admissions and death rates for peptic ulcer in the United States from 1970 to 1978. Gastroenterology. 1980 Feb;78(2):280–285. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fineberg H. V., Pearlman L. A. Surgical treatment of peptic ulcer in the United States. Trends before and after the introduction of cimetidine. Lancet. 1981 Jun 13;1(8233):1305–1307. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(81)92471-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ihamäki T., Varis K., Siurala M. Morphological, functional and immunological state of the gastric mucosa in gastric carcinoma families. Comparison with a computer-matched family sample. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1979;14(7):801–812. doi: 10.3109/00365527909181408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kurata J. H., Elashoff J. D., Haile B. M., Honda G. D. A reappraisal of time trends in ulcer disease: factors related to changes in ulcer hospitalization and mortality rates. Am J Public Health. 1983 Sep;73(9):1066–1072. doi: 10.2105/ajph.73.9.1066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kurata J. H., Honda G. D., Frankl H. Hospitalization and mortality rates for peptic ulcers: a comparison of a large health maintenance organization and United States data. Gastroenterology. 1982 Nov;83(5):1008–1016. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Laufer I., Mullens J. E., Hamilton J. The diagnostic accuracy of barium studies of the stomach and duodenum--correlation with endoscopy. Radiology. 1975 Jun;115(3):569–573. doi: 10.1148/15.3.569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Luft H. S. Assessing the evidence on HMO performance. Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc. 1980 Fall;58(4):501–536. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Luft H. S. How do health-maintenance organizations achieve their "savings"? N Engl J Med. 1978 Jun 15;298(24):1336–1343. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197806152982404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Monson R. R., MacMahon B. Peptic ulcer in Massachusetts physicians. N Engl J Med. 1969 Jul 3;281(1):11–15. doi: 10.1056/NEJM196907032810103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. PULVERTAFT C. N. Peptic ulcer in twon and country. Br J Prev Soc Med. 1959 Jul;13:131–138. doi: 10.1136/jech.13.3.131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Susser M. Period effects, generation effects and age effects in peptic ulcer mortality. J Chronic Dis. 1982;35(1):29–40. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(82)90027-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Vogt T. M., Johnson R. E. Recent changes in the incidence of duodenal and gastric ulcer. Am J Epidemiol. 1980 Jun;111(6):713–720. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112949. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Wylie C. M. The complex wane of peptic ulcer. I. Recent national trends in deaths and hospital care in the United States. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1981 Dec;3(4):327–332. doi: 10.1097/00004836-198112000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Wylie C. M. The complex wane of peptic ulcer. II. Trends in duodenal and gastric ulcer admissions to 790 hospitals, 1974-1979. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1981 Dec;3(4):333–339. doi: 10.1097/00004836-198112000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Wyllie J. H., Clark C. G., Alexander-Williams J., Bell P. R., Kennedy T. L., Kirk R. M., MacKay C. Effect of cimetidine on surgery for duodenal ulcer. Lancet. 1981 Jun 13;1(8233):1307–1308. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(81)92472-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Public Health are provided here courtesy of American Public Health Association

RESOURCES