Skip to main content
PMC home page
American Journal of Public Health logoLink to American Journal of Public Health
. 1985 Oct;75(10):1186–1189. doi: 10.2105/ajph.75.10.1186

Does participation in prenatal courses lead to heavier babies?

Y Robitaille, M S Kramer
PMCID: PMC1646385  PMID: 4037161

Abstract

In a prospective epidemiologic survey of 1,676 primiparous women delivering in four Montreal hospitals during an eight-month period, we studied the impact of prenatal courses on birthweight, maternal weight gain, and cigarette smoking. Women who participated in prenatal courses were older and of higher socioeconomic status and were less likely to be smokers than non-participants. After adjustment for these differences, newborns of course participants had similar mean birthweights compared to those of non-participants (3286 grams vs 3271 grams), and the difference for maternal weight gain was substantially reduced. Most of the reduction in cigarette consumption occurred during the first three months of pregnancy, even among later participants, suggesting that something other than prenatal courses influenced cigarette smoking reduction in course participants. We conclude that as far as the birthweight objective is concerned, the format and content of prenatal courses (as currently constituted in the Montreal region) require re-examination, and new ideas and interventions need to be developed and tested.

Full text

PDF
1187

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BERGSTROEM-WALAN M. B. EFFICACY OF EDUCATION FOR CHILDBIRTH. J Psychosom Res. 1963 Oct;7:131–146. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(63)90024-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Beck N. C., Hall D. Natural childbirth. A review and analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 1978 Sep;52(3):371–379. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Charles A. G., Norr K. L., Block C. R., Meyering S., Meyers E. Obstetric and psychological effects of psychoprophylactic preparation for childbirth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1978 May 1;131(1):44–52. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(78)90472-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. DAVIS C. D., MORRONE F. A. An objective evaluation of a prepared childbirth program. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1962 Nov 1;84:1196–1206. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(62)90511-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Donovan J. W. Randomised controlled trial of anti-smoking advice in pregnancy. Br J Prev Soc Med. 1977 Mar;31(1):6–12. doi: 10.1136/jech.31.1.6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Graham S. Studies of behavior change to enhance public health. Am J Public Health. 1973 Apr;63(4):327–334. doi: 10.2105/ajph.63.4.327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Green L. W. Manual for scoring socioeconomic status for research on health behavior. Public Health Rep. 1970 Sep;85(9):815–827. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. HOGAN M., LAIRD M. D. An elective program on preparation for childbirth at the Sloane Hospital for Women, May, 1951, to June, 1953. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1956 Sep;72(3):641–647. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(56)90389-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Huttel F. A., Mitchell I., Fischer W. M., Meyer A. E. A quantitative evaluation of psycho-prophylaxis in childbirth. J Psychosom Res. 1972 Apr;16(2):81–92. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(72)90048-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Scott J. R., Rose N. B. Effect of psychoprophylaxis (Lamaze preparation) on labor and delivery in primiparas. N Engl J Med. 1976 May 27;294(22):1205–1207. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197605272942203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Sexton M., Hebel J. R. A clinical trial of change in maternal smoking and its effect on birth weight. JAMA. 1984 Feb 17;251(7):911–915. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Sharley C. B. The value of physiotherapy in obstetrics. Med J Aust. 1970 Jun 6;1(23):1159–1162. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Smith P. B., Wait R. B., Mumford D. M., Nenney S. W., Hollins B. T. The medical impact of an antepartum program for pregnant adolescents: a statistical analysis. Am J Public Health. 1978 Feb;68(2):169–172. doi: 10.2105/ajph.68.2.169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. TUPPER C. Conditioning for childbirth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1956 Apr;71(4):733–740. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(56)90566-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Thordarson L., Costanzo G. A. An evaluation of the effectiveness of an educational program for expectant parents. Can J Public Health. 1976 Mar-Apr;67(2):117–121. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. VAN AUKEN W. B., TOMLINSON D. R. An appraisal of patient training for childbirth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1953 Jul;66(1):100–105. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(53)90291-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Zax M., Sameroff A. J., Farnum J. E. Childbirth education, maternal attitudes, and delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1975 Sep 15;123(2):185–190. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(75)90525-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Public Health are provided here courtesy of American Public Health Association

RESOURCES