Skip to main content
American Journal of Public Health logoLink to American Journal of Public Health
. 1987 Dec;77(12):1544–1548. doi: 10.2105/ajph.77.12.1544

'Lumping it': the hidden denominator of the medical malpractice crisis.

A R Meyers 1
PMCID: PMC1647174  PMID: 3499825

Abstract

In a recent article, Miller has reminded us that medical malpractice litigation is not simply an economic problem which inhibits medical practice and increases health care costs. She argues that it has three broader "societal objectives": reparation, emotional vindication, and deterrence. Viewed in the broader perspective of social values, the Maine data suggest that our current approach to medical malpractice does not perform well. Significant numbers of respondents believe that they have been neither vindicated nor compensated for their own or their relatives' illness, injury, or death; and that they have not had the opportunity to protect others from harm. As Miller suggests in her review of British alternatives to medical malpractice litigation, there may be more efficient and effective means of reparation. There may also be more direct and less costly means to deter incompetent practitioners and vindicate those who are harmed. We shall never discover these alternatives if we view the medical malpractice "crisis" as a simple or straightforward problem of costs of premiums, costs of settlements, and costs of judgments; numerators. Medical malpractice litigation is the expression of deep and highly complicated problems, which cannot be solved or even significantly alleviated by false solutions motivated only by concerns of costs and cost containment. They can be addressed only by careful, thoughtful, and comprehensive analysis.

Full text

PDF
1547

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Harris J. E. Defensive medicine: it costs, but does it work? JAMA. 1987 May 22;257(20):2801–2802. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Kane R. L. Iatrogenesis: just what the doctor ordered. J Community Health. 1980 Spring;5(3):149–158. doi: 10.1007/BF01323987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Miller F. H. Medical malpractice litigation: do the British have a better remedy? Am J Law Med. 1986;11(4):433–463. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Reynolds R. A., Rizzo J. A., Gonzalez M. L. The cost of medical professional liability. JAMA. 1987 May 22;257(20):2776–2781. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. SCHIMMEL E. M. THE HAZARDS OF HOSPITALIZATION. Ann Intern Med. 1964 Jan;60:100–110. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-60-1-100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Steel K., Gertman P. M., Crescenzi C., Anderson J. Iatrogenic illness on a general medical service at a university hospital. N Engl J Med. 1981 Mar 12;304(11):638–642. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198103123041104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Wentworth D. N., Neaton J. D., Rasmussen W. L. An evaluation of the Social Security Administration master beneficiary record file and the National Death Index in the ascertainment of vital status. Am J Public Health. 1983 Nov;73(11):1270–1274. doi: 10.2105/ajph.73.11.1270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Public Health are provided here courtesy of American Public Health Association

RESOURCES