Skip to main content
Infection and Immunity logoLink to Infection and Immunity
. 2003 Aug;71(8):4563–4579. doi: 10.1128/IAI.71.8.4563-4579.2003

Genome-Based Bioinformatic Selection of Chromosomal Bacillus anthracis Putative Vaccine Candidates Coupled with Proteomic Identification of Surface-Associated Antigens

N Ariel 1,*, A Zvi 1, K S Makarova 2, T Chitlaru 1, E Elhanany 1, B Velan 1, S Cohen 1, A M Friedlander 3, A Shafferman 1,*
PMCID: PMC165985  PMID: 12874336

Abstract

Bacillus anthracis (Ames strain) chromosome-derived open reading frames (ORFs), predicted to code for surface exposed or virulence related proteins, were selected as B. anthracis-specific vaccine candidates by a multistep computational screen of the entire draft chromosome sequence (February 2001 version, 460 contigs, The Institute for Genomic Research, Rockville, Md.). The selection procedure combined preliminary annotation (sequence similarity searches and domain assignments), prediction of cellular localization, taxonomical and functional screen and additional filtering criteria (size, number of paralogs). The reductive strategy, combined with manual curation, resulted in selection of 240 candidate ORFs encoding proteins with putative known function, as well as 280 proteins of unknown function. Proteomic analysis of two-dimensional gels of a B. anthracis membrane fraction, verified the expression of some gene products. Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time-of-flight mass spectrometry analyses allowed identification of 38 spots cross-reacting with sera from B. anthracis immunized animals. These spots were found to represent eight in vivo immunogens, comprising of EA1, Sap, and 6 proteins whose expression and immunogenicity was not reported before. Five of these 8 immunogens were preselected by the bioinformatic analysis (EA1, Sap, 2 novel SLH proteins and peroxiredoxin/AhpC), as vaccine candidates. This study demonstrates that a combination of the bioinformatic and proteomic strategies may be useful in promoting the development of next generation anthrax vaccine.


Anthrax is a zoonotic disease, caused by the spore forming bacterium Bacillus anthracis (58). The disease occurs mostly in wild or domestic mammals and may occur in humans when exposed to infected animals, or upon direct exposure (1). B. anthracis is considered to be one of the most likely biological warfare agents due to the ability of its spores to be transmitted by the respiratory route, the high mortality associated with inhalation anthrax, and spore stability. Primary and secondary aerosolization of B. anthracis spores have been recently shown to be of major concern in bioterrorist acts involving deliberate release of B. anthracis spores (34, 70).

Fully virulent forms of B. anthracis carry two large plasmids: pXO1 and pXO2. The plasmids are considered major virulence determinants, as strains lacking either one are attenuated in animal hosts (58, 67, 68). Most of the documented B. anthracis virulence factors identified so far are encoded by plasmid derived genes including the two major virulence factors: the tripartite toxin and the antiphagocytic capsule, respectively. The tripartite toxin is encoded by the genes pagA, lef, and cya, which code for protective antigen (PA) and the lethal and edema factors, respectively (located on pXO1), whereas the genes encoding for the antiphagocytic capsule are located on pXO2. A battery of as-yet-undefined virulence factors probably resides on the B. anthracis chromosome (8, 9, 12, 58), the sequence of which has been recently completed (78).

The licensed human vaccine consists of the PA component of the anthrax toxin as the principal protective immunogen. However, for effective long-term protection, multiple immunizations are required. Studies in experimental animal models indicated that the efficacy of PA vaccines is far below that of the Sterne live spore vaccine (105). Therefore, it has been suggested that additional somatic antigens and/or cellular immunity may be required for full protection. Recent studies report that immune response directed against spore antigens, either through live vaccines (17) or by supplementing PA-based vaccine with formalin-inactivated spores (11), is indeed involved in enhanced protection. Identification of spore antigens or additional vegetative antigens as possible enhancers of vaccine efficacy, could permit development of improved vaccines for human use (8, 9, 17, 58).

Until recently, the major barrier to target-based screening of potential vaccine candidates has been the limited number of cloned and characterized bacterial genes. The currently available genomic sequences of numerous human pathogens facilitates the identification, analysis and cloning of genes of interest. Genome-based selection of vaccine candidates has been recently coined “reverse vaccinology” (73-75). In silico gene selection, in combination with functional genomics studies, have been applied towards novel vaccine generation for several human pathogens (e.g., Neisseria meningitis (69), Streptococcus pneumoniae (109), and Chlamydia pneumoniae (59) and recently also to the selection of potential vaccine candidates from the B. anthracis virulence plasmid pXO1 (7).

Here we describe results of a genome-based bioinformatic screening of the entire B. anthracis draft chromosome (sequenced by The Institute for Genomic Research [TIGR], Rockville, Md.; Feb. 2001 version, 460 contigs, 98% coverage [9], following its translation and function assignments), for putative vaccine candidates. This screening process comprised of search for gene products with recognizable sequence or structural features characteristic of proteins, which either confer protective immunity (consisting mostly of surface exposed or exported proteins), or are similar to documented microbial virulence factors. The in silico approach allowed for identification of 520 B. anthracis open reading frame (ORF) products (240 with putative function and 280 hypothetical proteins or proteins of unknown function), mostly exhibiting features of surface exposed or exported proteins. Proteomic analysis of a B. anthracis membrane fraction allowed for validation of the selection process, verifying the expression of several membrane-associated candidate ORF products, and assessment of their immunoreactivity (by immunoblotting with B. anthracis immune animal sera). The employed complementary strategies could provide the basis for subsequent experimental evaluation of a future generation of anthrax vaccines.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Computational analyses.

Computational analyses were conducted on an SGI server (Silicon Graphics, Inc.) at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) and on a Sun Enterprise 420R server equipped with a Sun Solaris operating system at the Israel Institute for Biological Research (IIBR). The DNA draft sequence of the B. anthracis chromosome (Ames strain, version of February 2001, 460 contigs) was downloaded upon agreement from TIGR (http://www.tigr.org).

Translation and assignment of ORFs was accomplished using the Wimklein module (SEALS package; NCBI [103]) a naive translator based on intrinsic properties of the sequence. A minimal length of 75 amino acids (aa) per ORF was imposed. The translation of the February version yielded 5,045 ORFs, with various lengths ranging from 75 to 5,017 aa.

Sequence similarity searches were conducted by running Blast analyses (3, 4), using the splishpgp module (SEALS package; NCBI), against the following databases: nonredundant (NCBI), unfinished microbial genomes (NCBI), Clostridium acetobutylicum genome (prior to its publication [65]), Bacillus halodurans genome (upon its publication [96]), and Bacillus cereus ATCC 14579 draft genome (Integrated Genomics, Ill.). The filtering program SEG (110) was applied to mask sequence segments exhibiting low compositional complexity. However, for ORFs longer than 200 aa, a nonfiltered analysis was carried out as well. Blast results were mapped according to taxonomy using the module tax_collector (SEALS, NCBI). Paralogs were identified by Blast analysis of each ORF against the B. anthracis genome database. ORFs were defined as paralogs, in cases where sequence similarity extends over 80% mutual coverage and the expectation value of the alignment is smaller than e−10. The Blast results were tabulated by the Btab program (NCBI) and further parsed by in-house Perl scripts.

Analyses of protein domains was carried out by searching against the Pfam (89), SMART (85), and CDD databases (107), using the HMM program installed on the NCBI SGI server. Orthology was assigned through analyses of the 5,045 ORFs (February version) against the COGs database (100) (carried out by R. Tatusov [NCBI]).

Cellular localization predictions, for each ORF, were carried out as follows: prediction of presence and location of signal peptides in the N-terminal 70 aa of an ORF, using the program SignalP (63) (run locally on the NCBI server; prediction of membrane-spanning regions, using the program Tmpred [29], run via the BCM Launcher batch client [87]); recognition of lipoprotein signatures by the Lipop program of the PSORT package (60) (installed locally on the IIBR server); identification of the presence of a typical sequence signature (32, 92), as well as identification of gram-positive specific anchoring motifs (13, 62), using the GREF module (SEALS, NCBI) and in-house scripts. Anchoring motifs probed include the tripartite sortase motif (32), a refined motif with increased sensitivity and specificity which includes the traditional LPXTG motif, iron-dependent sortase motif (48), choline-binding motifs (identified using the Pfam HMM PF01473), PKD (Pfam HMM PF00801), LysM (Pfam HMM PF01476) and SLH domains (Pfam HMM PF00395), (13). The draft chromosome-derived ORFs generated in this study were compared to ORFs derived from the full sequence of the B. anthracis Ames strain chromosome, obtained from TIGR (78), and to the recently deposited draft sequence of the Bacillus anthracis A2012 strain (79) (GenBank accession number NC_003995, gi|21397375), by Blast analysis. Table 1 incorporates the equivalent of TIGR ORF number and annotation, as well as the gi number of the A2012 strain ORF equivalent, for of each of our selected draft chromosome ORFs. Throughout the text, ORF products are referred to as the draft chromosome ORF number, and listed in Table 1.

TABLE 1.

List of selected B. anthracis potential vaccine candidates and virulence factorsa

Protein category and ORF no. Protein name TIGR's equivalent ORF A2012 strain equivalent ORF (GenBank)
S-layer homology domain proteins
    1 SLH amidase_2 [+]/BA0872 gi|21398829
    2 S-layer protein Sap [+]/BA0885 gi|21398844
    3 S-layer protein (EA1) [+]/BA0887 gi|21398845
    4 SLH amidase_3 [+]/BA0898
    5 SLH Transglutaminase/protease-like [+]/BA0981/S-layer protein, putative gi|21398925
    6 NEAT domain SLH protein [+]/BA1093/S-layer protein, putative gi|21399019
    7 SLH protein [+]/BA1127 gi|21399050
    8 SLH protein [+]/BA1129 gi|21399051
    9 SLH protein [+]/BA1130 gi|21399052
    10 SLH amidase_3 [+]/BA1817
    11 SLH amidase_4 [+]/BA1818 gi|21399697
    12 SLH AAA ATPase [+]/BA1926 gi|21399805
    13 SLH protein [+]/BA2315 gi|21400193
    14 SLH amidase_3 [+]/BA2528 gi|21400397
    15 SLH metallo-beta lactamase [+]/BA2803/S-layer protein, putative gi|21400699
    16 SLH protein [+]/BA3332 gi|21401209
    17 SLH protein [+]/BA3338 gi|21401213
    18 SLH protein [+]/BA3695
    19 SLH amidase_2 [+]/BA3737 gi|21401593
    20 SLH protein [+]/BA5054 gi|21402845
Adhesins/lipoproteins/autotransporters:
    21 ABC transporter, substrate binding protein [+]/BA0175 gi|21398133
    22 Lipoprotein_9 [+]/BA0314 gi|21398260
    23 ABC transporter, substrate-binding protein, SAND domain [+]/BA0382 gi|21398333
    24 Glutamine ABC transporter [+]/BA0642/amino-acid ABC transporter, permease protein gi|21398601
    25 Oligopeptide ABC transporter [+]/BA0656 gi|21398617
    26 Phosphate ABC transporter, phosphate binding protein PstS [+]/BA0715 gi|21398678
    27 Putative amino-acid binding transporter [+]/BA0855 gi|21398810
    28 Probable collagen adhesin LPXTG anchored repeat protein [+]/BA0871/LPXTG-motif cell wall anchor domain protein gi|21398828
    29 SBP_BAC_5 peptide binding protein [+]/BA1191 gi|21399103
    30 Spermidine/putrescine ABC transporter [+]/BA1300 gi|21399202
    31 Periplasmic binding protein-like II [+]/BA1735 gi|21399623
    32 Periplasmic binding protein-like I ANF-receptor binding domain [+]/BA1931/branched-chain amino acid ABC transporter gi|21399809
    33 SBP_bac_5 amino-acid binding protein [+]/BA2848/oligopeptide ABC transporter gi|21400746
    34 Bacterial periplasmic substrate-binding protein sulfur utilization [+]/BA2921/sulfonate ABC transporter gi|21400805
    35 Putative ABC superfamily (peri_perm) sugar transporter [+]/BA2975 gi|21400856
    36 PsaA-like protein [+]/BA3189/adhesion lipoprotein gi|21401074
    37 SPB_BAC_3/alkylphosphonate ABC tranporter [+]/BA3750 gi|21401605
    38 Fibronectin/fibrinogen-binding protein [+]/BA4013 gi|21401859
    39 Helical backbone metal receptor/ferrichrome ABC transporter [+]/BA4597 gi|21402412
    40 Iron(III) dicitrate transporter(fhud) [+]/BA4766/iron compound ABC transporter, iron binding
    41 ABC transporter, ATP-binding protein [+]/BA5003
    42 Outer membrane protein/Lipoprotein_9 [+]/BA5220/ABC transporter, substrate binding protein, putative gi|21397467
    43 Probable collagen adhesin anchored repeat protein [−]/BA5258/cell wall surface anchor family protein gi|21397496
    44 Iron(III) ABC transporter, periplasmic binding protein [+]/BA5330 gi|21397566
    45 AfuA-like protein, iron(III) ABC transporter, periplasmic [+]/BA5501/lipoprotein gi|21397724
Repeat proteins:
    46 Anchored repeat protein [+]/BA0397/LPXTG-motif cell wall anchor domain protein gi|21398347
    47 Family similar to phage tail protein [+]/BA0477/tape measure protein, putative gi|21398428
    48 Internalin-like protein [+]/BA0552
    49 Secreted ANK repeat protein [+]/BA0564 gi|21398517
    50 Repeat protein [−]/BA0881/hypothetical protein gi|21398840
    51 Repeat domain Tol-B C-terminal domain [+]/BA1311/lipoprotein, putative gi|21399212
    52 LRR repeat protein SLH protein [−]/BA1346/internalin, putative
    53 Bacterial neuraminidase repeat protein [+]/BA1755 gi|21399642
    54 Fibronectin-binding protein, putative [+]/BA1840 gi|21399720
    55 Contractile-protein like/enterotoxin A [+]/BA1887 gi|21399764
    56 Enterotoxin B [+]/BA1888 gi|21399765
    57 SH3_bac NLP/P60 family protein [+]/BA1952/NLP/P60 family protein gi|21399829
    58 Secreted repeat protein [−]/BA2029/hypothetical protein
    59 TPR repeat protein [−]/BA2179/hypothetical protein
    60 TPR repeat protein [+]/BA2180 gi|21400051
    61 TPR repeat protein [+]/BA2193
    62 Repeat protein [−]/BA3065/hypothetical protein gi|21400947
    63 Bacterial neuraminidase repeat protein [+]/BA3445 gi|21401316
    64 Ankyrin repeat protein, similar to ankyrin repeat domain of bcl-3 [+]/BA3478/ankyrin repeat domain protein gi|21401353
    65 Large repeat protein [−]/BA3725/conserved repeat domain protein gi|21401582
    66 Collagen-like protein [−]/BA3841/conserved hypothetical protein
    67 VrrA [−]/BA4510/missing sequence, authentic frameshift gi|21402333
    68 Repeat protein [−]/BA4659/LysM domain protein, gi|21402472
    69 Collagen-repeat and CBD domain protein [−]/BA4764/hypothetical protein gi|21402569
    70 NEAT-anchored protein [−]/BA4787/conserved hypothetical protein gi|21402590
    71 Secreted NEAT protein [−]/BA4788/conserved domain protein gi|21402591
    72 Secreted ANK repeat protein [+]/BA4922/ankyrin repeat domain protein
    73 Collagen triple-helix domain protein [+]/BA4978/collagen triple helix repeat domain protein
    74 VrrB [+]/BA4989
    75 Secreted repeat protein [−]/BA5058/lipoprotein, putative gi|21402849
    76 Secreted repeat protein [−]/BA5326/lipoprotein, putative gi|21397561
Enzymes
    77 Peptidase_S9 prolyl oligopeptidase family [+]/BA0165 gi|21398122
    78 FAA hydrolase/lyase [+]/BA0241 gi|21398183
    79 GDSL-like lipase/acetylhydrolase [−]/BA0242/homogentisate 1,2-dioxygenase, putative
    80 ALDH-like/delta-1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate dehydrogenase [+]/BA0309 gi|21398255
    81 Polysaccharide deacetylase-like protein [+]/BA0331 gi|21398276
    82 Alkyl hydroperoxide reductase, subunit C [+]/BA0345 gi|21398291
    83 Transglycosylase with Fn3 and cellulose-binding domains [+]/BA0385/chitinase B gi|21398336
    84 Endolysin [+]/BA0485/glycosyl hydrolase, family 25, putative gi|21398435
    85 Peptidase M9, collagenase [+]/BA0555 gi|21398504
    86 PLDc [+]/BA0625 gi|21398583
    87 Immune inhibitor A metalloprotease [+]/BA0672 gi|21398634
    88 Phospholipase C/cereolysin [+]/BA0677
    89 Sphingomyelinase C [+]/BA0678
    90 Putative sortase [+]/BA0688
    91 Spore germination protein GerLC [+]/BA0711 gi|21398674
    92 Purple acid-phosphatase Fn3 and laminin-binding domains [+]/BA0815/purple-acid phosphatase gi|21398776
    93 Proline racemase [+]/BA0901 gi|21398858
    94 5-Methycytosine-specific restriction-related enzyme [−]/BA0928/conserved domain protein gi|21398882
    95 Phospholipase A2 family protein /PAF acetyl hydrolase [−]/BA0950/conserved hypothetical protein gi|21398901
    96 Dihydroxyacetone kinase family protein [+]/BA0965 gi|21398915
    97 Alcohol dehydrogenase, zinc containing [+]/BA1004 gi|21398944
    98 α/β-hydrolase [+]/BA1019
    99 PrsA [+]/BA1041 gi|21398974
    100 Isocitrate lyase [+]/BA1132
    101 Catalase [+]/BA1159 gi|21399079
    102 PrsA [+]/BA1169 gi|21399086
    103 Metalloproteases (“zinctins”) peptidase M3 family [+]/BA1206/oligoendopeptidase F gi|21399117
    104 Probable O-methyltransferase [+]/BA1221 gi|21399132
    105 Immune inhibitor A [+]/BA1295 gi|21399197
    106 α/β-hydrolase PhaC(polyhydroxyalkanoic acid synthase) [+]/BA1331 gi|21399229
    107 PLP-dependent transferases [+]/BA1341/aminotransferase, class V gi|21399241
    108 Peptidase M3 family [+]/BA1353/oligoendopeptidase F, putative
    109 Diaminopimelate decarboxylase [+]/BA1438 gi|21399334
    110 Secreted peptidase M23/M37 LysM domain [+]/BA1500/peptidase, M23/M37 family
    111 Amidase 2/autolysin [+]/BA1514 gi|21399412
    112 Putative metallo-dependent phosphatase/CapA [−]/BA1855/conserved hypothetical protein
    113 α/β Hydrolase [+]/BA1860 gi|21399739
    114 Putative lipase/haloperoxidase [−]/BA1866/conserved hypothetical protein gi|21399746
    115 Secreted peptidase, M23/M37 [+]/BA1879
    116 Multicopper oxidase/Cupredoxins [+]/BA1902 gi|21399781
    117 Secreted peptidase, M23/M37 with SH3b domains [+]/BA1903/peptidase, M23/M37 family gi|21399782
    118 PLDc [+]/BA2054 gi|21399928
    119 ScdA [+]/BA2147
    120 Aspartate/glutamate racemase [+]/BA2223 gi|21400101
    121 Had-like hydrolase [+]/BA2231 gi|21400110
    122 Penicillin-binding protein 2x and transpeptidase [+]/BA2238
    123 Secreted FtsK/SpoIIIE family protein [+]/BA2321 gi|21400199
    124 Dependent dsDNA exonuclease SbcC [+]/BA2360/exonuclease, SbcC family, putative
    125 Inosine-uridine preferring nucleoside hydrolase family [+]/BA2400 gi|21400272
    126 Secreted Metallo-hydrolase/oxidoreductase betalactamase [+]/BA2472 gi|21400341
    127 P-loop containing nucleotide triphosphate hydrolase family [−]/BA2556/hypothetical protein gi|21400433
    128 α/β-hydrolases/lipase [+]/BA2607 gi|21400493
    129 Metallo-hydrolase/oxidoreductase [−]/BA2688/conserved hypothetical protein gi|21400582
    130 Aromatic-l-amino-acid decarboxylase [+]/BA2724/decarboxylase, pyridoxal-dependent gi|21400621
    131 Secreted metalloproteinase/thermolysin-like [−]/BA2730/neutral protease gi|21400627
    132 Spore cortex lytic enzyme [+]/BA2748 gi|21400649
    133 Kynureninase (PLP dependent transferase) [+]/BA2753 gi|21400654
    134 Endolysin [Phage bastille] [+]/BA2805/glycosyl hydrolase, family 25, putative gi|21400701
    135 Putative diaminopimelate epimerase [−]/BA2833/hypothetical protein gi|21400729
    136 B-cell mitogen [+]/BA2834 gi|21400730
    137 X-Pro dipeptidyl-peptidase (S15 family)/cocaine esterase [+]/BA2860/hydrolase, CocE/NonD family gi|21400756
    138 Fumble protein/Panthetoate kinase [−]/BA2901/conserved hypothetical protein gi|21400792
    139 Putative glutathionylspermidine synthase [+]/BA2932
    140 Polysaccharide deacetylase [+]/BA2944 gi|21400827
    141 Secreted SH3b domain protein, putative metallohydrolase [−]/BA2967/conserved domain protein gi|21400849
    142 Histidinol-phosphate aminotransferase [−]/BA2995/pyrroline-5-carboxylate reductase
    143 Alkaline phosphatase [+]/BA3001 gi|21400884
    144 Peptidase [+]/BA3033 gi|21400917
    145 Probable methyl transferase [−]/BA3085/conserved hypothetical protein gi|21400965
    146 Pyrrolidone carboxyl peptidase [+]/BA3090 gi|21400970
    147 Aminoglycoside phosphotransferase [+]/BA3111 gi|21400988
    148 Pyrroline-5-carboxylate reductase [+]/BA3143 gi|21401019
    149 Isochorismatase family protein [+]/BA3166 gi|21401049
    150 Isochorismatase family protein [+]/BA3167 gi|21401050
    151 Lactamase class C domain (PBPX family) [+]/BA3214/penicillin-binding protein, putative gi|21401102
    152 Metallo-hydrolase/oxidoreductase [−]/BA3247/conserved hypothetical protein gi|21401131
    153 3-beta hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase/isomerase family protein [+]/BA3248 gi|21401132
    154 Secreted peptidase_P9 (collagenase) PKD domain [+]/BA3299
    155 Isochorismatase family protein [+]/BA3315 gi|21401191
    156 Secreted beta-lactamase/d-ala carboxypeptidase [+]/BA3346/6-aminohexanoate-dimer hydrolase, putative gi|21401221
    157 Perfringolysin O [+]/BA3355/thiol-activated cytolysin gi|21401229
    158 Protein-tyrosine phosphatase-like protein [+]/BA3394 gi|21401268
    159 Peptidase M4 (metalloproteinase) [−]/BA3442/neutral protease
    160 Viral enhancin [metalloproteinase] [+]/BA3443/enhancin family protein gi|21401314
    161 Cyclopropane-fatty-acyl-phospholipid synthase [+]/BA3460 gi|21401332
    162 Metallo-beta-lactamase family protein [+]/BA3514 gi|21401388
    163 Metalloprotease family protein [+]/BA3553/oligoendopeptidase F gi|21401418
    164 Microbial collagenase PKD domain [+]/BA3584
    165 Oxidoreductase family NAD binding Rossman fold [+]/BA3655/oxidoreductase, Gfo/Idh/MocA family gi|21401519
    166 Serine protease PDZ domain [+]/BA3660/serine protease gi|21401523
    167 Anaerobic ribonucleotide triphosphate reductase phage [+]/BA3663 gi|21401527
    168 Spore peptidoglycan hydrolase with LysM domains [+]/BA3668/Glycosyl hydrolase, family 18 gi|21401531
    169 Amidase_2 and peptidoglycan recognition domain [+]/BA3698/N-acetylmuramoyl-l-alanine amidase gi|21401556
    170 Amidase_2 with SH3b domains [+]/BA3767/N-acetylmuramoyl-l-alanine amidase, family 2
    171 Secreted exochitinase Chi36 [+]/BA3854 gi|21401702
    172 α/β-hydrolase [+]/BA3877 gi|21401726
    173 Phosphoinositol specific phospholipase C [+]/BA3891/1-phosphatidylinositol phosphodiesterase gi|21401737
    174 Secreted peptidase S8 (subtilisin-like) [+]/BA3892
    175 Secreted LysM repeats protein [+]/BA3893/cell wall hydrolase, putative gi|21401739
    176 Thermostable dipeptidase (Zn dependent) [+]/BA3911/renal dipeptidase family protein gi|21401756
    177 Amidase 2 [+]/BA4073 gi|21401919
    178 Clp protease family protein [+]/BA4092 gi|21401939
    179 Carbon-nitrogen hydrolase [+]/BA4253 gi|21402087
    180 Peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase (PPlase) [+]/BA4283/peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase, cyclophilin-ty gi|21402116
    181 Metallo-dependent phosphatase secreted and LPXTG anchored [+]/BA4346/2′,3′-cyclic-nucleotide 2′-phosphodiesterase gi|21402178
    182 Prolyl 4-hydroxylase alpha subunit homologue [+]/BA4459/prolyl 4-hydroxylase-alpha subunit domain gi|21402285
    183 Pterin-4a-carbinolamine dehydratase [+]/BA4587 gi|21402401
    184 FKBP-like prolyl isomerase [+]/BA4705/trigger factor gi|21402519
    185 Class I glutamine amidotransferase-like protein [+]/BA4720/ThiJ/PfpI family protein gi|21402528
    186 Spore cortex lytic enzyme [+]/BA3668/Glycosyl hydrolase gi|21401531
    187 Metallo-dependent hydrolase/putative deaminase [+]/BA4727/N-acyl-d-amino-acid deacylase family
    188 Secreted oxidoreductase/putative acid phosphatase [+]/BA4746/acid phosphatase gi|21402552
    189 d-Alanyl-d-alanine-carboxypeptidase family protein [+]/BA4750 gi|21402556
    190 Lysophospholipase homolog [−]/BA5009/conserved hypothetical protein gi|21402804
    191 LPXTG-site transpeptidase family protein [+]/BA5069
    192 Cu,Zn superoxide dismutase secreted [+]/BA5139 gi|21397388
    193 Phosphoglycerate mutase-like protein [+]/BA5203 gi|21397451
    194 Acid phosphatase [+]/BA5238/PAP2 family protein gi|21397479
    195 Secreted peptidase M4 bacillolysin [+]/BA5282/neutral protease B gi|21397519
    196 NLP/P60 family peptidase M27/37 [+]/BA5427/endopeptidase LytE, putative gi|21397656
    197 UDP-N-acetyl-d-mannosamine dehydrogenase Cap5O [+]/BA5512
    198 Heparinase III protein homolog [−]/BA5513/conserved domain protein
    199 NADH dehydrogenase I, H subunit [+]/BA5538 gi|21397767
    200 Cell-wall associated hydrolase [+]/BA2849/NLPP60 family protein gi|21400747
    201 Secreted phospholipase D/nuclease [+]/BA5591/cardiolipin synthase domain protein gi|21397822
    202 UDP-glycosyltransferase/glycogen phosphorylase [+]/BA5670/glycosyl transferase 1, group 1 gi|21397904
    203 Methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein [+]/BA5673 gi|21397907
    204 Secreted metalloprotease [+]/BA5706/oligoendopeptidase F, putative gi|21397939
Others
    205 Secreted putative α/β-hydrolase [−]/BA0177/lipoprotein, putative gi|21398135
    206 Transglycosylase [−]/BA0543/penicillin-binding domain protein gi|21398490
    207 Outer surface protein [−]/BA0789/conserved hypothetical protein
    208 Outer surface protein [−]/BA0795/conserved hypothetical protein gi|21398756
    209 Sensor histidine kinase/response regulator [+]/BA0996 gi|21398939
    210 Siderophore biosynthesis protein [+]/BA1981 gi|21399857
    211 Large anchored repeat protein with FN3 and CBM domains [+]/BA1094/wall-associated protein, putative gi|21399020
    212 Wall-associated domain protein [+]/BA1098
    213 PlcR [+]/BA1163/DNA-binding protein
    214 Spore coat-associated protein, putative [+]/BA1290 gi|21399194
    215 Flagellar motor switch protein, putative/SpoA [+]/BA1662 gi|21399552
    216 Flagellar hook-associated FliD [+]/BA1671 gi|21399562
    217 Flagellar basal-body rod protein [+]/BA1674/FlgB gi|21399565
    218 FligG/C [+]/BA1679/flagellar motor switch protein FliG gi|21399570
    219 Similar to flagellar hook assembly protein [+]/BA1685 gi|21399576
    220 Flagellin/IL-4-like [+]/BA1706 gi|21399593
    221 SpoA/flagellin B chain [−]/BA1710/flagellar motor switch protein FliN, putative gi|21399598
    222 Microcin immunity protein MccF [+]/BA1949 gi|21399826
    223 Bacterial SH3 domain homolog [+]/BA5481/conserved domain protein gi|21397703
    224 Siderophore biosynthesis protein [+]/BA1982 gi|21399858
    225 ErfK family protein [−]/BA3232/conserved hypothetical protein gi|21401118
    226 LPXTG-anchored coiled coil protein [+]/BA3254/LPXTG motif cell wall anchor domain protein gi|21401137
    227 Secreted repeat protein [+]/BA3366/lipoprotein, putative gi|21401240
    228 LPXTG-anchored repeat protein similar to VLPE prolipoprotein [+]/BA3367/LPXTG motif cell wall anchor domain protein gi|21401241
    229 TPR repeat/HTH 3 protein [+]/BA3373/DNA-binding protein gi|21401248
    230 Toxin secretion/phage lysis holin [+]/BA4074 gi|21401920
    231 Wall-associated domain protein [+]/BA5303/Conserved domain protein gi|21397539
    232 CheY-homologous receiver domain/spo0A [+]/BA4394/stage 0 sporulation protein A gi|21402223
    233 Wall-associated domain protein [+]/BA4742 gi|21402548
    234 NEAT domain anchored protein [−]/BA4789/LPXTG motif cell wall anchor domain protein gi|21402592
    235 HlyD family secretion protein, probably MDR protein [−]/BA4813/conserved hypothetical protein gi|21402613
    236 PhoR [+]/BA4832/sensory box histidine kinase PhoR gi|21402631
    237 Cell surface anchor family protein [+]/BA5070 gi|21402863
    238 Putative membrane protein [+]/BA5324 gi|21397559
    239 VWA [−]/BA0623/hypothetical protein gi|21398581
    240 Probable hemolysin [+]/BA5701/channel protein, hemolysin III family gi|21397934
a

Putative candidate vaccine ORFs are grouped in categories, as described in the text. Preliminary functional annotation of the chromosome draft sequence-derived ORF products, is compared to the complete chromosome homologs (78). For easy future reference, ORF products are numbered sequentially (rather than by contig allocation, column 1) and listed side by side with draft genome-based annotation (column 2). Agreement between the chromosome draft sequence-based annotation and TIGR's data is marked in column 3, where identical annotations are marked as [+]. In cases of either discrepancy or disagreement in annotation (marked as [−]), TIGR's annotation is provided as well (column 3). The gi numbers of the A2012 strain equivalent ORF products are given in column 4 (79).

Bacterial cultures and sample preparation.

B. anthracis cells (ATCCΔ14185, pXO1, pXO2 strain [17]) were cultured to late stationary stage in Luria broth medium for 48 h at 37°C with vigorous agitation. Preliminary sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and Western blot analysis (data not shown) of cell membranes taken from various culture growth phases (6, 12, 24, and 48 h) established that the 48-h cells contain the largest number of polypeptides which cross-react with B. anthracis immune sera (see below). This preparation was therefore selected for the subsequent proteomic analysis of membrane proteins. The protein signature of the B. anthracis strain under study (pXO1, pXO2) reflects the expression of chromosomal ORFs only. However, one should keep in mind that expression of some chromosomal genes may be affected by pXO1 or pXO2 encoded regulators, as demonstrated recently for the sap gene (54). Cells were collected by centrifugation and washed twice with PBS and once in 50 mM Tris base (pH 8), followed by resuspension in 2 ml of 50 mM Tris base buffer (pH 8) at a concentration of 1010 cells/ml and sonication for 30 s. The insoluble material was collected by Eppendorf centrifugation (15 min), washed twice with Tris base buffer (pH 8) and incubated in a tube rotator for 30 min at room temperature in an extraction solution consisting of 8 M urea, 4% (wt/vol) 3-[(cholamidopropyl)-dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonate (CHAPS), 40 mM Tris, and 0.2 (wt/vol) Bio-Lyte 3/10 (Bio-Rad). Following centrifugation, the supernatant representing a fraction enriched in membrane proteins was stored at −70°C until use. The protein concentration of this fraction was 1.5 mg/ml.

Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2-DE) and serological analysis.

Four hundred micrograms of the membrane protein mixture was separated first by isoelectric focusing (IEF) on ready-made 17-cm, pH 3 to 10 nonlinear immobilized pH gradient (IPG) strips (Immobiline DryStrips, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) and applied to a Protean IEF cell (Bio-Rad). IEF was carried out at 10,000 V to a total 50,000 V · h, initiated by a slow step at 250 V for 30 min. Strips were then processed for the second dimension separation by a 10-min incubation in a solution containing 6 M urea, 2% SDS, 0.375 M Tris-HCl (pH 8.8), 20% glycerol, and 2% (wt/vol) dithiothreitol, and this was followed by a 10-min incubation in a similar solution in which the dithiothreitol was replaced by 2% iodoacetamide. Strips were applied to 12.5% polyacrylamide SDS gels and electrophoresis was carried out on an Ettan DALT II System (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Gels were stained with Coomassie blue and spots detected and analyzed by scanning on a Bio-Rad GS-800 Calibrated Densitometer assisted by the PDQuest 2-D Gel Analysis Software (Bio-Rad). Western blots were probed with immune guinea pig serum taken 9 weeks post-first immunization, from animals inoculated with four doses (two weeks apart) of 5 × 107 B. anthracis MASC-10 spores (17). The ELISA-determined anti B. anthracis (total cellular extract) titer of the immune serum, was 1:12,800.

In-gel trypsin digestion and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) protein identification.

Protein spots were cut from 2-DE gels and destained for 1 h in 30% acetonitrile (CH3CN)-50 mM ammonium bicarbonate and subjected to in-gel overnight digestion with 10 μl of trypsin (6.25 μg/ml; Promega). Gel fragments were washed twice with double-distilled water followed by peptide elution with 1% trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) (20 min, room temperature) and 50% CH3CN (20 min, room temperature). Finally, eluted tryptic peptides were dried under vacuum and resuspended in 10 μl of 25% CH3CN-0.1% TFA. Two microliters was mixed with an equal volume of 10-mg/ml α-cyano solution containing 50% ethanol, 25% CH3CN, and 0.1% TFA, applied to a MALDI-TOF MS target and allowed to crystallize in vacuum. Mass spectra were obtained on Micromass TofSpec 2E in positive ion reflectron mode, using source voltage of 20,000 V, pulse voltage of 2,600 to 3,000, and laser intensity of 20%. External calibration using standard peptides was applied. Spectra were compared to theoretical tryptic digestion fragments of all ORFs derived from the B. anthracis (pXO1, pXO2) Ames strain (78) genomic DNA sequence. Identification of proteins was based on peptide coverage of more than 30% and peptide mass deviation between observed and calculated values of less than 100 ppm.

RESULTS

In silico selection strategy.

Preliminary function assignment (“rough” annotation) to the 5,045 ORFs of the B. anthracis chromosome (draft sequence, February 2001 version) was the first step towards the selection of vaccine candidate genes. The steps employed were: sequence similarity searches against public databases as well as against genomic databases of interest (B. cereus ATCC 14579 draft genome, C. acetobutylicum annotated genome [prior to its publication]), and B. halodurans genome domain assignments and protein localization prediction studies (see Materials and Methods). The rationale for candidate selection was based on a rational approach comprising of the following criteria: (i) surface-exposed proteins, whether secreted and/or membrane-anchored (see below), as potential immunogens; (ii) ORF products with putative known function, similar to documented virulence factors in other bacteria or containing motifs known to affect virulence, such as repeats; (iii) ORF products with no sequence similarity to proteins present in a nonpathogenic bacteria, particularly bacilli-related, as proteins potentially responsible for the unique attributes of B. anthracis virulence.

Sequence similarity searches and taxonomical classification.

Blast analysis against the nonredundant database (NCBI) resulted in a preliminary categorization of the 5,045 ORF products into three groups. The first group comprised of ∼3,000 ORF products (Fig. 1, right lane), for which a putative function could be assigned based on significant similarity (expectation values smaller than e−3) to a known protein in the databank. The second group comprised of ∼800 ORF products assigned as hypothetical, uncharacterized or putative proteins (Fig. 1 middle lane). The third group included ∼1,200 ORF products for which no function could be assigned (including ORF products similar to a protein with an unknown function as well as B. anthracis unique ORFs, Fig. 1 left lane).

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1.

Strategy for reductive selection of vaccine candidates from the B. anthracis chromosome draft sequence (version of February 2001). Flowchart of the computational analysis and the filtering steps, of the B. anthracis chromosome candidate selection (left panel). Filtering steps are noted by letters (a through d, as detailed in the right panel), and the resulting number of ORF products at each step is noted in a shaded box.

As the first step toward defining chromosome-derived vaccine candidates, the Blast results of the 5,045 ORF products were mapped according to the taxon of hits with expectation value <e−3. This mapping enabled us to perform a first round of subtraction of ORF products for which the similarity to a protein in a nonpathogenic organism (e.g., B. subtilis and B. halodurans) and/or an organism unrelated in terms of evolution (e.g., Aquificales, Thermotogales, and Cyanobacteria) was more significant than the hits to other taxa (expectation values at least 100 times lower than that of the nearest competitor). However, ORF products with hits to pathogenic bacteria from unrelated taxa or from eukaryotic organisms were retained.

Selection of potential vaccine candidates and virulence factors, from the ORF product set with putatively assigned function.

Taxonomy-based subtraction of B. anthracis ORFs exhibiting sequence similarity to proteins from nonpathogenic bacteria, from the 3,000 “known” ORFs (first group) resulted in ∼2,000 ORF products with sequence similarity to known proteins from pathogenic or eukaryotic organisms. We initially scanned the list of the 2,000 ORFs (Fig. 1) for putative housekeeping genes; all genes representing ribosomal proteins, phage proteins and fragmented genes, were subsequently removed. Due to possible future experimental restrictions, which may be imposed by the presence of more than one copy of a selected gene (complementation), ORF products with more than two paralogs in the genome were excluded as well. Similarly, in order to avoid possible cloning problems, putative proteins with more than four predicted trans-membrane segments were also removed. ORF products predicted by protein localization algorithms to code for surface associated or secreted components were selected, as well as proteins with sequence similarity to those described as surface exposed proteins in other bacteria, independent of the in silico prediction. ORF products resembling virulence-associated proteins, irrespective of their cellular location, were retained. The resulting ∼450 ORF products were subjected to comparative genomics analysis, removing ORF products with significant similarity (not necessarily as first Blast hit) to proteins from the nonpathogenic bacilli B. subtilis and B. halodurans (upon completion and publication of the genome sequence). The remaining ORF products were inspected individually by manual curation, leaving 240 putative ORF products with potential vaccine and/or virulence relevance as listed in Table 1. For a schematic representation of the reductive strategy, see Fig. 1.

The B. anthracis chromosome-derived list of putative vaccine candidates or virulence factors (Table 1) includes, as expected, multiple virulence-related subfamilies, namely, toxins, S-layer homology domain proteins, repeat proteins, adhesions/colonization factors, lytic enzymes, and zinc proteases, etc. All subfamilies were implicated in microbial pathogenesis in different organisms.

S-layer homology domain proteins.

The B. anthracis cell surface, in the vegetative nonencapsulated state as well as the capsulated state, is covered by a cell wall polymer, known as the surface layer (or S-layer [23, 50, 52, 84]). Various functions have been assigned to the S-layer, ranging from shape maintenance to virulence, host recognition evasion, cell adhesion and resistance to phagocytosis (52, 58, 84). B. anthracis is known to synthesize two surface layer (S-layer) proteins, EA1 (extractable antigen 1) and Sap (surface array protein), which account for 5 to 10% of total cellular proteins (52). Both proteins contain a standard signal-peptide followed by three SLH (S-layer homology) anchoring motifs (50). Both proteins are considered major surface antigens and vaccine carriers in vivo (50, 52, 53). Mock and Fouet (58) were the first to report that the B. anthracis genome harbors additional genes coding for SLH proteins (other than the two SLH proteins on pXO1 previously identified by Okinaka [66]) which may constitute potential vaccine candidates (7); an amidase on pXO2 (51) and several unidentified genes located on the bacterial chromosome (58)). Inspection of the B. anthracis draft version of the chromosome for ORFs containing at least one SLH domain, revealed the presence of 20 putative S-layer homology domain proteins (including Sap and EA1, products of ORFs 2 and 3). These include cell surface-targeted enzymes such as N-acetyl-muramoyl-l-alanine-amidases (e.g., products of ORFs 4 and 10) and proteins of unknown function (Table 1, 1st category).

Adhesins.

Adhesins, bacterial surface proteins which interact with receptors on the eukaryotic cell, have been studied as targets for vaccine development for many years, since blocking the primary stages of infection could be an effective strategy to prevent bacterial infections (19, 37, 108). Whole-genome sequence of a pathogen could allow for identification of putative novel adhesins based on sequence and/or structural properties shared by bacterial and intracellular human adhesins. Examples for known adhesin families include fibronectin or fibrinogen-binding proteins, collagen adhesins, etc. The B. anthracis draft chromosome was found to contain several putative fibronectin-binding proteins, ranging in size from 213 to 1,102 aa (Table 1). The product of ORF 38 is the only member of the group identified as COG 1293 (COGs database [99]) fibronectin-binding proteins and is similar to a fibronectin-binding protein from Streptococcus pyogenes, reported to confer protective immunity in mice (35). It also exhibits sequence similarity to putative fibronectin-binding proteins from B. subtilis, B. halodurans as well as the S. pneumoniae adherence and virulence protein A (42% identity). Streptococcal fibronectin-binding proteins (in particular pavA from S. pneumoniae) were shown to be essential for extra-cellular targeting and efficient cellular invasion (2, 30, 47, 49, 97, 102, 104).

The B. anthracis genome harbors one ORF product (ORF 43), which represents another type of putative adhesin: collagen-adhesin, a peptidoglycan anchored protein. Vaccination with a recombinant fragment of the S. aureus collagen adhesin, and passive transfer of collagen adhesin-specific antibodies was shown to protect mice against sepsis-induced death (64). Recently it has been reported that human-derived antibodies to the collagen adhesin, such as the ace-encoded protein from Enterococcus faecalis, expressed during infection in humans, block microbial adherence (61).

Lipoprotein adhesins and autotransporters.

A different type of so-called adhesins are lipoproteins, implicated in modulation of the immune system (93). A prototypical adhesin belonging to this group is ORF 36, encoding a 311-aa protein with both secretory and lipoprotein signals and a typical metal-binding site. This ORF product was identified as belonging to COG0830—a zinc-binding lipoprotein of the ABC type (surface adhesin A), involved in zinc uptake. This ORF exhibits extensive sequence similarity to streptococcal adhesins PsaA (pneumococcal surface antigen A) and colonization factors of other gram-positive organisms. The streptococcal adhesin PsaA was shown to play an essential role in virulence (10, 98). Induction of antibody response by immunization with purified PsaA protein or as a DNA vaccine, correlates with protection of mice against otherwise fatal infection with S. pneumoniae (56). Although PsaA was originally considered to be an adhesin, it was subsequently shown that the psa operon encodes a manganese permease complex (21). Recently, Marra et al. (46) have identified the psa promoter, which drives the expression of the psaBCA operon, as one of the promoters expressed during lung infection of mice (with S. pneumoniae). A similar operon appears to be present in the B. anthracis chromosome. In vivo analysis of the psa genes demonstrated the importance of this manganese transporter to S. pneumoniae virulence. Based on its properties, the product of ORF 36 may be considered a B. anthracis vaccine candidate.

Repeat-containing proteins.

Many surface-proteins of gram-positive bacteria contain tandem repeat domains that can vary in size from several amino acids to several hundred amino acids. The importance of repeats in understanding protein function, resides not only in their ability to confer multiple binding and structural roles on proteins (6), but also in their possible role in antigenic variation, phase variation (documented mostly for gram-negative organisms and resulting in differential gene expression) and subsequent immune escape (6, 16, 20, 31, 38, 45). The B. anthracis genome harbors several proteins (Table 1) with tandem repeats such as TPR-like (e.g., the product of ORF 59), Ankyrin (e.g., the product of ORF 49), Collagen-like (e.g., the product of ORF 73), LRR (leucine rich repeats, e.g., the product of ORF 48) and diverse internal repeats (Table 1). Although certain repeat proteins may have a structural role, others could be involved in B. anthracis pathogenesis. Four B. anthracis ORF products harbor collagen-like repeats (multiple copies of G-X-X units that form a right-handed triple helix). Of these, the product of ORF 73 was also recently identified as a collagen-like surface glycoprotein and a structural component of the B. anthracis exosporium (95). This ORF product, like that of ORF 66, exhibits general sequence similarity to the Streptococcal collagen-like protein SclB (76, 106) but also include unique regions. Streptococcal collagen-like proteins were shown to participate in adherence to host cells and soft tissue pathology (43, 44, 76, 77). Collagen-like proteins may also be one of the examples for molecular mimicry of host proteins, exploited by many pathogens as a means for the manipulation of host response (90). In eukaryotes they act as membrane bound defense proteins, and are part of the macrophage scavenger receptor and of soluble proteins such as C1q and collectins (101).

Enzymes.

The vaccine candidate list includes several enzymes (lytic enzymes, racemases, etc., Table. 1). One example is immune inhibitor A (InhA), a zinc metalloprotease, a putative virulence factor in B. thuringiensis known to inhibit the immune system of insects, by specifically cleaving antibacterial proteins produced by the insect host (41, 42). The draft sequence of the B. anthracis chromosome contains 2 paralogs (products of ORFs 87 and 105, Table 1), both secreted proteins, annotated as inhA. Blast analysis also shows significant sequence similarity to immune inhibitor-like proteins from Bacillus stearothermophilus, Vibrio cholera O1, C. acetobutylicum, and Streptomyces coelicolor (expect values ranging from 0 to e−79). Putative functional significance of this enzyme in B. anthracis-related bacilli, was first described by Charlton et al. (15), who reported its presence in the exosporium of B. cereus strain ATCC 10876. InhA gene was also shown to exist in a majority of the 23 B. cereus strains and the 3 B. anthracis strains (26). Regulation of inhA expression depends on the transition state regulator AbrB recently shown to be responsible for the timing of toxin expression in B. anthracis (83). InhA's presence on the spore surface in bacilli of the B. cereus group, suggests that it could play a role in bacterial survival in the host, as reported for other microbial zinc proteases of human microbial pathogens (57). In a recent study, one of the two Bacillus thuringiensis inh genes was shown to be required for pathogenicity via the oral route.

Another class of enzymes are prolyl racemases. Proline racemases were implicated in the virulence of organisms from several genera: Legionella (Mip macrophage infectivity potentiator [81]), Salmonella (SurA mutants are effective attenuated live oral vaccines [94]), and Trypanosoma (80). The B. anthracis draft sequence contains three ORF products with sequence similarity to a eukaryoric (Trypanosoma cruzi) B-cell mitogen and microbial (Clostridium difficile, Clostridium stricklandi, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa) proline racemases. The product of the ORF 93 is the closest sequence neighbor of the trypanosomal enzyme, maintaining the residues necessary for both catalytic and B-cell mitogenic activity of the Trypanosoma. In Trypanosoma, this enzyme is considered as a target for the development of vaccines/anti-Chagas' disease drugs (36). Mutants show attenuated virulence and reduced adhesion, and antibodies raised against the Trypanosoma enzyme reduce infectivity. The same family of enzymes has been reported as having chaperone activity facilitating preferentially maturation of outer membrane proteins and thus, proline racemases may play a dual role (71). Although these enzymes do not harbor any signal/anchoring motifs, they have been reported to be present on the surface and hence immuno-accessible (80). Their precise putative contribution to B. anthracis pathogenesis (whether direct or via a chaperone-like putative activity) needs to be evaluated experimentally.

Yet another example of enzymes with documented evidence of immunogenicity, are autolysins. Autolysins are members of a widely distributed group of enzymes that naturally digest the cell wall peptidoglycan backbone of bacterial organisms, resulting in cell lysis, death and release of inflammatory cell-wall components and cytoplasmic bacterial proteins. These enzymes are located in the cell envelope and are also presumed to play a role in a variety of cellular functions (40). According to their hydrolytic bond specificity, they are classified as muraminidases, glucosaminidases, N-acetylmuramoyl-l-alanine-amidases, amidases, and endopeptidases (88). The B. anthracis genome contains several ORFs with sequence similarity to autolysins and amidases (Table 1). The product of ORF 11 is the only amidase/autolysin that resembles a documented virulence associated autolysin (lytB S. pneumoniae autolysin). This is a 459-aa putative protein with three S-layer homology (SLH) domain anchoring domains in its N terminus (aa 1 to 201), followed by a LytB-like C-terminal domain. Most B. anthracis amidases seem to be anchored via SLH domains (either at their N terminus or C terminus [Table 1]) including a recently identified autolysin in pXO2; others are probably anchored via peptidoglycan recognition motifs (e.g., ORF 169) or SH3b domains (e.g., ORF 170); and for some, no anchoring signals were identified (e.g., ORF 84). There is growing evidence of the contribution of autolysins to microbial virulence (55). For example, LytA amidase from Streptococcus pneumoniae (82), was shown to induce a protective response when inoculated into the lungs of mice (33). The three Streptococcal cell wall hydrolases (LytA, LytB, and LytC), anchored to the membrane via teichoic acid residues, were recently shown to affect colonization in the nasopharynx in S. pneumoniae. Results of a genome-based approach to identify vaccine molecules affording protection against S. pneumoniae revealed that two out of the six proteins conferring protection are autolysins (LytB and LytC [109]).

Vaccine candidates selected from ORF products with unknown function.

The blast analysis carried out on the 5,045 ORF products resulted in ∼2,000 ORF products for which a function could not be assigned (Fig. 1 left and middle lanes). This finding is similar to observations in other bacterial genomes, where in spite of the increasing number of sequenced genomes, the assignment of a function to a sequence remains in many cases a challenge: ∼20% of the predicted ORF products in a bacterial genome do not match any entry in the databases and an additional 15 to 20% are similar to genes with no known function (24, 25).

Of the 2,000 ORF products with no clues as to their function, ∼1,200 had no matches in the databanks whatsoever (“totally unknown”) and ∼800 were similar to proteins annotated in the databanks as hypothetical, uncharacterized or putative proteins. The first step towards reduction of number of candidate ORF products was identification of genes common to B. anthracis and to its taxonomically related yet nonpathogenic B. halodurans, irrespective of their putative function. This step resulted in removal of ∼500 ORFs, 100 from the category of unknown ORFs and 400 from the category of hypothetical ORFs (see Fig. 1). In an attempt to further reduce the number of candidates to a tangible number, filtering criteria were applied (as described above for ORF products exhibiting sequence similarity to known proteins): selection of candidates was targeted to genes encoding surface-exposed and/or secreted proteins, with less than two paralogs in the chromosome and up to four trans-membrane segments. These reductions resulted in a total of 475 unknown and 138 hypothetical ORF products satisfying the above criteria (see Fig. 1). Considering the difficulty in distinguishing short noncoding ORF products from real genes, and given the bias towards short proteins in data sets of ORF products having no matches to proteins in databases (86), a further reduction of the unknown ORF product group, based on ORF length, was carried out. A total of 138 unknown ORF products remain upon filtering out ORF products shorter than 150 aa. The resulting number of unannotated ORF products is still rather large (∼280 ORF products); therefore, further reduction is necessary prior to their experimental evaluation (Fig. 1).

Serological proteomic analysis of B. anthracis membranes.

The proteomic analysis of a B. anthracis membrane-associated fraction was employed as a means to verify expression of the predicted membrane-associated candidates. A partial 2-DE proteomic map, representing the membrane-associated chromosomally encoded protein repertoire of a B. anthracis late stationary culture, derived from a strain devoid of the two virulence plasmids, was generated (see Materials and Methods and Fig. 2). Close to 100 protein spots (appearing either as unique or as multiple isoforms) were extracted from the gel, digested with trypsin, analyzed by MALDI-TOF MS and identified by comparing their MALDI-TOF spectra with the hypothetical tryptic digests of the B. anthracis chromosomal (draft sequence) ORFs data set. The comprehensive proteomic study, including detailed information pertaining to the proteinous composition of the B. anthracis cell membrane, will be reported elsewhere (Chitlaru et al., submitted for publication). In order to assess the immunogenic potential of the verified gene products and to identify immunorelevant antigens, a Western blot analysis of the two-dimensional gels with immune anti-B. anthracis antiserum was carried out (Fig. 2). By comparing the Coomassie blue-stained 2-DE gels with their respective immunoblots, it appears that at least 38 protein spots (numbered 1 to 38 in Fig. 2) are recognized by the immune sera. Following MALDI-TOF MS analysis of their tryptic digest fragments, it was found that these 38 spots represent isoforms of proteins encoded by 8 distinct ORFs, as detailed in Table 2. The seropositive proteins include four SLH proteins (products of ORF 2, ORF 3, ORF 8, and ORF 19) and four enzymes, one of which (AhpC, ORF 82) exhibits a putative membranal localization lipobox signal. Apart from the two S-layer proteins EA1 and Sap, none of the other seropositive proteins (Table 2) were previously described in B. anthracis. Furthermore, with the exception of the two S-layer proteins mentioned above, which were previously reported to cross-react with B. anthracis immune sera (58), none of the proteins distinguished by the present serological proteomic analysis, were shown to elicit an immune response in B. anthracis exposed animals (see Discussion). Most notably, five out of the eight seropositive proteins (products of ORF 2, ORF 3, ORF 8, ORF 19, and ORF 82 [Table 2]) were predicted to be potential immunogens (Table 1) by the present bioinformatic analysis.

FIG. 2.

FIG. 2.

Serological proteome analysis of B. anthracis membranal proteins. B. anthracis ATCC Δ14185 (pXO1, pXO2) membranal proteins were separated by 2-DE (IEF on a pH 3 to 10 IPG strip). The gel was stained with Coomassie blue, for total protein spot detection. Twin gels were transferred to nitrocellulose membranes and probed with guinea-pig anti-B. anthracis immune sera (whole-cell lysate titer of 1:12,800). The Coomassie blue stain is shown on the left and the respective Western blot, on the right. The complete 2-DE gel (A) and enlarged sections (B through E) are shown. Western blots in panels A and regions B through D were probed with 1:1,000 diluted antiserum. For better resolution, the region depicted in E is taken from a 2-DE gel run on a pH 4 to 7 IPG strip (first dimension) and its respective Western blot developed with 1:300-diluted antiserum. The seropositive protein spots, are identified by running numbers. See Table 2 for the complete list of identified seropositive proteins detected in these experiments.

TABLE 2.

Seroreactive proteins identified by MALDI-TOF-MS in the B. anthracis membranal fraction

Spot no.a Protein name Draft genome ORF no.c Functiond
1-15, 21-27 EA1b 3 S-layer protein
16-20 Sap 2 S-layer protein
28-30 Dhas Aldehyde dehydrogenase (BA3609, gi|21401476)
31 MmgE/PrpD Methylcitrate dehydratase (BA2349, gi|21400220)
34-36 AhpC 82 Hydroxyperoxide reductase
32 19 Novel SLH protein-amidase_2
33 GlpX Fructose 1-6 biphosphatase classII (BA5576, gi|21397809e)
37, 38 8 Novel SLH protein-unknown function
a

Spot numbers are as marked in the gels shown in Fig. 2.

b

Protein EA1 appears in multiple isoelectric forms as well as in several molecular weight variants. All forms share the same N-terminal amino acid sequence.

c

Draft genome ORF numbers are as in Table 1.

d

All functions are noted based on our draft genome annotation. For proteins that were not pre-selected by the bioinformatic approach (Table 1), we provide both TIGR's identification number and A2102 strain gi number.

e

Appears as a truncated ORF product in the A2102 strain draft sequence.

DISCUSSION

The efforts directed towards the development of an improved human anthrax vaccine have been, so far, limited to vaccines based on anthrax toxin components. Availability of the B. anthracis chromosomal draft sequence (Ames strain chromosome), allows for in silico identification of putative antigens selected from the complete protein repertoire, thus overcoming preceding limitations, in terms of antigen number and nature, of target based screening for vaccine candidates.

In the study reported herein, B. anthracis putative vaccine candidates, representing proteins likely to be surface exposed, and/or similar to documented virulence related proteins, and/or contain sequence motifs characteristic of virulence factors or immunogens, were selected by a multistep computational analysis (Fig. 1) of the draft version of the B. anthracis Ames strain chromosome (February 2001, 460 contigs). Integration of the results, together with careful manual curation, resulted in identification of 520 potential antigenic proteins (240 proteins with putatively assigned function and 280 unknown/hypothetical proteins). As shown in Table 1, the 240 proteins with putatively assigned function and relevance to virulence/pathogenicity, could be grouped to several functional categories: SLH proteins, adhesins, repeat proteins, enzymes and “others.” Obviously, the assignment of an ORF product to a specific group is not always unequivocal, as larger proteins frequently comprise of more than a single functional domain. However, grouping of the candidates by their putative function, facilitates selection of candidate ORF products from each group, as representatives of families documented to be involved in microbial pathogenesis. For example, the protein products of ORF 1 and ORF 4 are amidases, anchored to the peptidoglycan layer of the bacterial membrane via their SLH domains. These ORF products could be grouped either as SLH proteins or as enzymes. The rationale behind choosing these putative proteins as vaccine candidates, lies in the fact that amidases and autolysins have been shown to be involved in virulence, confer protective immunity and/or act as adhesins (e.g., see reference 109). Moreover, amidases and autolysins are modular enzymes, which probably make use of different membrane anchoring modalities (SLH and choline binding, etc.) as a means of adaptation to a particular biological niche and thus may also act as adhesins (55).

Certain microbial pathogens produce virulence factors expressed only during infection (phase variation), which harbor in their primary sequence patterns known collectively as tandem repeats (Table 1). This group of repeat proteins contains both surface anchored proteins and proteins without obvious secretion and/or anchoring signals (e.g., the most recently documented group of gram-positive virulence determinants named anchorless adhesins [16]). In addition to their reported participation in adhesion, invasion or immune-evasion, repeat proteins have been recently implicated to be involved in Fe3+ siderophore regulation (NEAT [near transporter repeat] repeat proteins [5]) and thus may affect the survival of the bacteria within the host. Examples of such putative Fe3+ siderophore regulatory proteins are the B. anthracis NEAT protein products of ORF 70, ORF 71, ORF 234, and probably also ORF 6. In particular, the products of ORFs 70 and 71, which are anchored proteins harboring several copies of the NEAT domain, are the best matches to the siderophore regulatory proteins described by Andrade et al. (5), to be present in gram-positive organisms (mostly pathogenic). As mentioned by Andrade et al., in the B. anthracis chromosome, these ORFs are indeed located adjacent to iron ABC transporters.

The candidate gene list also includes proteins of unknown function, which are anchored to the bacterial membrane by diverse gram-positive specific anchoring modes. Representatives include sortase-anchored proteins (both iron dependent and independent [13, 18, 48]). Sortases are membrane proteins, which cleave the polypeptide chain between two amino acids within a characteristic C-terminal motif and subsequently catalyze the formation of an amide bond between the carboxyl group of the cleaved polypeptide and the amino group of peptidoglycan cross-bridges. Since most sortase-anchored proteins are considered essential for bacteria to establish successful infection (39), such proteins could be relevant candidates. An example for this group is the product of ORF 228, an anchored repeat protein, relatively unique to B. anthracis, exhibiting weak similarity to a protein involved in immune evasion of Mycoplasma.

The remaining large number of candidates, selected by the bioinformatic analyses (520 putative proteins), necessitates implementation of additional filtering strategies. Reducing the number of candidates to be evaluated experimentally, to a manageable number, would involve application of a high throughput biological screening system (such as proteomic-based analysis of in vivo-expressed immunogens or in vitro-in vivo expression systems [7, 14, 25]); and/or application of additional computational steps directed toward selection of microorganism-specific genes.

B. anthracis, B. cereus, and B. thuringiensis are considered essentially one genetic species and members of the B. cereus group of bacteria (28). In spite of the overall genetic similarity, the fact that these species differ significantly in pathogenesis may imply the presence of B. anthracis-specific virulence determinants. Subtraction of genes common to B. anthracis and B. cereus 14579 (gapped genome, Integrated Genomics, Inc.) could reveal the presence of B. anthracis-specific genes. Preliminary subtraction, from the group of putative proteins with assigned functions (known proteins), of ORF products exhibiting significant overall sequence similarity to B. cereus orthologs, results in ∼80 B. anthracis-specific ORF products, leaving out most of the classical B. cereus group virulence factors. As for the unknown protein subgroup, ∼100 ORF products did not exhibit extensive sequence similarity to B. cereus 14579 proteins. Such subtraction was not performed only on the basis of threshold values (mutual coverage of 85%, expectation values smaller than e−10), but included other considerations regarding specific sequence variations (e.g., extent of insertions, divergence etc). In view of the fact that differences may also be ascribed to differences in genomic context, and in view of the limitations imposed by the quality of draft genomes versus complete genomes, this reduction should be carried out more carefully once sequencing of the more closely related B. cereus 10987 is finished. One should also keep in mind that effective immunogens may not necessarily be B. anthracis specific; thus, this type of subtraction should be probably applied only as an optional reductive measure.

In order to demonstrate the expression and cellular location of the in silico selected chromosomal gene products and in order to expedite the identification of B. anthracis immunogenic membrane and/or outer surface proteins, a direct proteomic inspection of B. anthracis membrane protein fraction was carried out. The proteomic analysis involved separation of a B. anthracis Δ14185 (pXO1, pXO2) subcellular membranal fraction by 2-DE, and identification of the most abundant protein spots by MALDI-TOF MS analysis of their fingerprint tryptic digestion products. Close to 100 spots from the 2-DE gel were analyzed and found to represent 32 proteins (detailed results of the analysis are documented in another report [Chitlaru et al., submitted]). In interpreting the proteomic data, one should take into account the fact that the proteomic approach is characterized by inherent underestimation of gene products due to (i) bias toward identification of abundant proteins (this effect is even more pronounced when one particular protein species prevails in the preparation as is the case in the membrane fraction of B. anthracis and the S-layer protein EA1 (e.g., Fig. 1, box B); (ii) differential proteins expression, depending on the origin of the membrane fraction (culture conditions and in vitro versus in vivo gene expression); (iii) sample preparation procedure. Membrane proteins are notoriously difficult to separate by 2-DE due to solubilization constraints and may not be represented in the two-dimensional map, despite their abundance. It should be noted that the bioinformatic approach may circumvent the above limitations and therefore may result in identification of gene candidates representing the complete gene repertoire of each organism, which following further individual exploration of their immunogenic potential will aid in developing improved protective and therapeutic measures.

Here we report on a serological proteome analysis carried out in order to address the issue of in vivo immunogenicity of the B. anthracis membrane proteins identified. Thirty-eight spots were found to cross-react with sera from B. anthracis infected animals (Fig. 2). The analysis also established that the cross-reactive spots, which represent the products of 8 ORFs, are indeed expressed in vivo (in guinea pigs) during exposure to B. anthracis, and are able to elicit an immune response (Fig. 2 and Table 2). Most notably, five out of these eight proteins (four SLH proteins and the AhpC/peroxiredoxin) were predicted to be potentially antigenic by the present independent in silico survey. It is worth noting that although antibodies against S-layer proteins EA1 and Sap (ORFs 3 and 2, respectively) were described before in infected animals (22, 58), neither the expression nor the in vivo immunogenicity of the other 2 novel SLH proteins (ORFs 8 and 19) was noted before. Humoral response against AhpC (ORF 82) was reported in other virulent bacterial systems such as Legionella pneumophila and Helicobacter pylori (27, 72, 91) but not for B. anthracis or B. cereus. The seropositive methylcitrate dehydrates MngE/PrpD (gi|21400220, Table2) was not previously invoked as a potential immunogen in other systems, yet it was shown to be necessary for survival of Legionella in the macrophage (72, 91). It is worth noting that about 50% of the immunogenic proteins identified in the Western blot of the 2-DE gel, are S-layer homology domain proteins (Table 2). Nevertheless, comparison of the Coomassie blue-stained 2-DE gels and their respective Western blots (Fig. 2), appears to reveal a differential order of immunopotencies among these seropositive proteins. For example, AhpC (spots 34 to 36) appears to be an exceptionally strong immunogen, since in the Coomassie blue-stained gel it appears as a weak signal while in the Western blot it appears as an intense signal.

In conclusion, as demonstrated in this study, combining bioinformatic chromosome screening with serological proteome analysis allows for judicious selection of in vivo immunogens. While the bioinformatic strategy resulted in identification of 240 vaccine candidates with putative functions (out of the 5,045 assigned and annotated ORFs derived from the chromosome B. anthracis draft sequence), the serological proteome analysis enables to focus on putative anthrax vaccine candidate genes by confirming their in vivo expression and antigenicity.

Acknowledgments

We thank E. V. Koonin for fruitful scientific discussion and D. Lipman, S. Bryant, A. Marchler-Bauer, A. Panchenko, and J. Fleshman from the NCBI for their interest and support. We are deeply indebted to T. D. Read (TIGR, Rockville, Md.) for his cooperation from the beginning of this project and for providing access (prior to publication) to TIGR's complete genome derived chromosomal ORFs sequence (78). We also thank Menachem Lion and Dror Bar-Natan from the IIBR for their help in genome-based tryptic peptide fingerprint screening and for performing local and remote computational analyses.

Editor: D. L. Burns

REFERENCES

  • 1.Abramova, F. A., L. M. Grinberg, O. V. Yampolskaya, and D. H. Walker. 1993. Pathology of inhalational anthrax in 42 cases from the Sverdlovsk outbreak of 1979. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:2291-2294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ahmed, S., S. Meghji, R. J. Williams, B. Henderson, J. H. Brock, and S. P. Nair. 2001. Staphylococcus aureus fibronectin binding proteins are essential for internalization by osteoblasts but do not account for differences in intracellular levels of bacteria. Infect. Immun. 69:2872-2877. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Altschul, S. F., W. Gish, W. Miller, E. W. Myers, and D. J. Lipman. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215:403-410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Altschul, S. F., and E. V. Koonin. 1998. Iterated profile searches with PSI-BLAST—a tool for discovery in protein databases. Trends Biochem. Sci. 23:444-447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Andrade, M. A., F. D. Ciccarelli, C. Perez-Iratxeta, and P. Bork. 2002. NEAT: a domain duplicated in genes near the components of a putative Fe3+ siderophore transporter from Gram-positive pathogenic bacteria. Genome Biol. 3:1-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Andrade, M. A., C. Perez-Iratxeta, and C. P. Ponting. 2001. Protein repeats: structures, functions, and evolution. J. Struct. Biol. 134:117-131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ariel, N., A. Zvi, H. Grosfeld, O. Gat, Y. Inbar, B. Velan, S. Cohen, and A. Shafferman. 2002. Search for potential vaccine candidate open reading frames in the Bacillus anthracis virulence plasmid pXO1: in silico and in vitro screening. Infect. Immun. 70:6817-6827. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Baillie, L. 2001. The development of new vaccines against Bacillus anthracis. J. Appl. Microbiol. 91:609-613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Baillie, L., and T. D. Read. 2001. Bacillus anthracis, a bug with attitude! Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 4:78-81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Berry, A. M., and J. C. Paton. 2000. Additive attenuation of virulence of Streptococcus pneumoniae by mutation of the genes encoding pneumolysin and other putative pneumococcal virulence proteins. Infect. Immun. 68:133-140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Brossier, F., M. Levy, and M. Mock. 2002. Anthrax spores make an essential contribution to vaccine efficacy. Infect. Immun. 70:661-664. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Brossier, F., and M. Mock. 2001. Toxins of Bacillus anthracis. Toxicon 39:1747-1755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Cabanes, D., P. Dehoux, O. Dussurget, L. Frangeul, and P. Cossart. 2002. Surface proteins and the pathogenic potential of Listeria monocytogenes. Trends Microbiol. 10:238-245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Chakravarti, D. N., M. J. Fiske, L. D. Fletcher, and R. J. Zagursky. 2000. Application of genomics and proteomics for identification of bacterial gene products as potential vaccine candidates. Vaccine 19:601-612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Charlton, S., A. J. Moir, L. Baillie, and A. Moir. 1999. Characterization of the exosporium of Bacillus cereus. J. Appl. Microbiol. 87:241-245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Chhatwal, G. S. 2002. Anchorless adhesins and invasins of Gram-positive bacteria: a new class of virulence factors. Trends Microbiol. 10:205-208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Cohen, S., I. Mendelson, Z. Altboum, D. Kobiler, E. Elhanany, T. Bino, M. Leitner, I. Inbar, H. Rosenberg, Y. Gozes, R. Barak, M. Fisher, C. Kronman, B. Velan, and A. Shafferman. 2000. Attenuated nontoxinogenic and nonencapsulated recombinant Bacillus anthracis spore vaccines protect against anthrax. Infect. Immun. 68:4549-4558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Cossart, P., and R. Jonquieres. 2000. Sortase, a universal target for therapeutic agents against gram-positive bacteria? Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:5013-5015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Cunningham, M. W. 2000. Pathogenesis of group A streptococcal infections. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 13:470-511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.De Bolle, X., C. D. Bayliss, D. Field, T. van de Ven, N. J. Saunders, D. W. Hood, and E. R. Moxon. 2000. The length of a tetranucleotide repeat tract in Haemophilus influenzae determines the phase variation rate of a gene with homology to type III DNA methyltransferases. Mol. Microbiol. 35:211-222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Dintilhac, A., G. Alloing, C. Granadel, and J. P. Claverys. 1997. Competence and virulence of Streptococcus pneumoniae: Adc and PsaA mutants exhibit a requirement for Zn and Mn resulting from inactivation of putative ABC metal permeases. Mol. Microbiol. 25:727-739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Fouet, A., and S. Mesnage. 2002. Bacillus anthracis cell envelope components. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 271:87-113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Fouet, A., S. Mesnage, E. Tosi-Couture, P. Gounon, and M. Mock. 1999. Bacillus anthracis surface: capsule and S-layer. J. Appl. Microbiol. 87:251-255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Fraser, C. M. 2000. Microbial genome sequencing: new insights into physiology and evolution. Novartis Found. Symp. 229:54-62. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Grandi, G. 2001. Antibacterial vaccine design using genomics and proteomics. Trends Biotechnol. 19:181-188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Guttmann, D. M., and D. J. Ellar. 2000. Phenotypic and genotypic comparisons of 23 strains from the Bacillus cereus complex for a selection of known and putative B. thuringiensis virulence factors. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 188:7-13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Haas, G., G. Karaali, K. Ebermayer, W. G. Metzger, S. Lamer, U. Zimny-Arndt, S. Diescher, U. B. Goebel, K. Vogt, A. B. Roznowski, B. J. Wiedenmann, T. F. Meyer, T. Aebischer, and P. R. Jungblut. 2002. Immunoproteomics of Helicobacter pylori infection and relation to gastric disease. Proteomics 2:313-324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Helgason, E., O. A. Okstad, D. A. Caugant, H. A. Johansen, A. Fouet, M. Mock, I. Hegna, and Kolsto. 2000. Bacillus anthracis, Bacillus cereus, and Bacillus thuringiensis: one species on the basis of genetic evidence. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66:2627-2630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hoffman, K., and W. Stoffel. 1993. TMbase—a database for membrane spanning protein segments. Biol. Chem. Hoppe-Seyler 374:166-186. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Holmes, A. R., R. McNab, K. W. Millsap, M. Rohde, S. Hammerschmidt, J. L. Mawdsley, and H. F. Jenkinson. 2001. The pavA gene of Streptococcus pneumoniae encodes a fibronectin-binding protein that is essential for virulence. Mol. Microbiol. 41:1395-1408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Hood, D. W., M. E. Deadman, M. P. Jennings, M. Bisercic, R. D. Fleischmann, J. C. Venter, and E. R. Moxon. 1996. DNA repeats identify novel virulence genes in Haemophilus influenzae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:11121-11125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Janulczyk, R., and M. Rasmussen. 2001. Improved pattern for genome-based screening identifies novel cell wall-attached proteins in gram-positive bacteria. Infect. Immun. 69:4019-4026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Jedrzejas, M. J. 2001. Pneumococcal virulence factors: structure and function. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 65:187-207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Jernigan, J. A., D. S. Stephens, D. A. Ashford, C. Omenaca, M. S. Topiel, M. Galbraith, M. Tapper, T. L. Fisk, S. Zaki, T. Popovic, R. F. Meyer, C. P. Quinn, S. A. Harper, S. K. Fridkin, J. J. Sejvar, C. W. Shepard, M. McConnell, J. Guarner, W. J. Shieh, J. M. Malecki, J. L. Gerberding, J. M. Hughes, and B. A. Perkins. 2001. Bioterrorism-related inhalational anthrax: the first 10 cases reported in the United States. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 7:933-944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kawabata, S., E. Kunitomo, Y. Terao, I. Nakagawa, K. Kikuchi, K. Totsuka, and S. Hamada. 2001. Systemic and mucosal immunizations with fibronectin-binding protein FBP54 induce protective immune responses against Streptococcus pyogenes challenge in mice. Infect. Immun. 69:924-930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kelly, J. M. 2000. A B-cell activator in Chagas disease. Nat. Med. 6:865-866. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Klemm, P., and M. A. Schembri. 2000. Bacterial adhesins: function and structure. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 290:27-35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Kobe, B., and A. V. Kajava. 2001. The leucine-rich repeat as a protein recognition motif. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 11:725-732. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Lee, S. G., V. Pancholi, and V. A. Fischetti. 2002. Characterization of a unique glycosylated anchor endopeptidase that cleaves the LPXTG sequence motif of cell surface proteins of Gram-positive bacteria. J. Biol. Chem. 277:46912-46922. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Lopez, R., M. P. Gonzalez, E. Garcia, J. L. Garcia, and P. Garcia. 2000. Biological roles of two new murein hydrolases of Streptococcus pneumoniae representing examples of module shuffling. Res. Microbiol. 151:437-443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Lovgren, A., C. R. Carlson, K. Eskils, and A. B. Kolsto. 1998. Localization of putative virulence genes on a physical map of the bacillus thuringiensis subsp. gelechiae chromosome. Curr. Microbiol. 37:245-250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Lovgren, A., M. Zhang, A. Engstrom, G. Dalhammar, and R. Landen. 1990. Molecular characterization of immune inhibitor A, a secreted virulence protease from Bacillus thuringiensis. Mol. Microbiol. 4:2137-2146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Lukomski, S., K. Nakashima, I. Abdi, V. J. Cipriano, R. M. Ireland, S. D. Reid, G. G. Adams, and J. M. Musser. 2000. Identification and characterization of the scl gene encoding a group A Streptococcus extracellular protein virulence factor with similarity to human collagen. Infect. Immun. 68:6542-6553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Lukomski, S., K. Nakashima, I. Abdi, V. J. Cipriano, B. J. Shelvin, E. A. Graviss, and J. M. Musser. 2001. Identification and characterization of a second extracellular collagen-like protein made by group A Streptococcus: control of production at the level of translation. Infect. Immun. 69:1729-1738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Marcotte, E. M., M. Pellegrini, T. O. Yeates, and D. Eisenberg. 1999. A census of protein repeats. J. Mol. Biol. 293:151-160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Marra, A., J. Asundi, M. Bartilson, S. Lawson, F. Fang, J. Christine, C. Wiesner, D. Brigham, W. P. Schneider, and A. E. Hromockyj. 2002. Differential fluorescence induction analysis of Streptococcus pneumoniae identifies genes involved in pathogenesis. Infect. Immun. 70:1422-1433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Massey, R. C., M. N. Kantzanou, T. Fowler, N. P. Day, K. Schofield, E. R. Wann, A. R. Berendt, M. Hook, and S. J. Peacock. 2001. Fibronectin-binding protein A of Staphylococcus aureus has multiple, substituting, binding regions that mediate adherence to fibronectin and invasion of endothelial cells. Cell. Microbiol. 3:839-851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Mazmanian, S. K., H. Ton-That, K. Su, and O. Schneewind. 2002. An iron-regulated sortase anchors a class of surface protein during Staphylococcus aureus pathogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:2293-2298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Meehan, M., Y. Lynagh, C. Woods, and P. Owen. 2001. The fibrinogen-binding protein (FgBP) of Streptococcus equi subsp. equi additionally binds IgG and contributes to virulence in a mouse model. Microbiology 147:3311-3322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Mesnage, S., T. Fontaine, T. Mignot, M. Delepierre, M. Mock, and A. Fouet. 2000. Bacterial SLH domain proteins are non-covalently anchored to the cell surface via a conserved mechanism involving wall polysaccharide pyruvylation. EMBO J. 19:4473-4484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Mesnage, S., and A. Fouet. 2002. Plasmid-encoded autolysin in Bacillus anthracis: modular structure and catalytic properties. J. Bacteriol. 184:331-334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Mesnage, S., E. Tosi-Couture, M. Mock, and A. Fouet. 1999. The S-layer homology domain as a means for anchoring heterologous proteins on the cell surface of Bacillus anthracis. J. Appl. Microbiol. 87:256-260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Mesnage, S., E. Tosi-Couture, M. Mock, P. Gounon, and A. Fouet. 1997. Molecular characterization of the Bacillus anthracis main S-layer component: evidence that it is the major cell-associated antigen. Mol. Microbiol. 23:1147-1155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Mignot, T., M. Mock, and A. Fouet. 2003. A plasmid-encoded regulator couples the synthesis of toxins and surface structures in Bacillus anthracis. Mol. Microbiol. 47:917-927. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Milohanic, E., R. Jonquieres, P. Cossart, P. Berche, and J. L. Gaillard. 2001. The autolysin Ami contributes to the adhesion of Listeria monocytogenes to eukaryotic cells via its cell wall anchor. Mol. Microbiol. 39:1212-1224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Miyaji, E. N., W. O. Dias, M. Gamberini, V. C. Gebara, R. P. Schenkman, J. Wild, P. Riedl, J. Reimann, R. Schirmbeck, and L. C. Leite. 2001. PsaA (pneumococcal surface adhesin A) and PspA (pneumococcal surface protein A) DNA vaccines induce humoral and cellular immune responses against Streptococcus pneumoniae. Vaccine 20:805-812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Miyoshi, S., and S. Shinoda. 2000. Microbial metalloproteases and pathogenesis. Microbes Infect. 2:91-98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Mock, M., and A. Fouet. 2001. Anthrax. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 55:647-671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Montigiani, S., F. Falugi, M. Scarselli, O. Finco, R. Petracca, G. Galli, M. Mariani, R. Manetti, M. Agnusdei, R. Cevenini, M. Donati, R. Nogarotto, N. Norais, I. Garaguso, S. Nuti, G. Saletti, D. Rosa, G. Ratti, and G. Grandi. 2002. Genomic approach for analysis of surface proteins in Chlamydia pneumoniae. Infect. Immun. 70:368-379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Nakai, K., and P. Horton. 1999. PSORT: a program for detecting sorting signals in proteins and predicting their subcellular localization. Trends Biochem. Sci. 24:34-36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Nallapareddy, S. R., X. Qin, G. M. Weinstock, M. Hook, and B. E. Murray. 2000. Enterococcus faecalis adhesin, ace, mediates attachment to extracellular matrix proteins collagen type IV and laminin as well as collagen type I. Infect. Immun. 68:5218-5224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Navarre, W. W., and O. Schneewind. 1999. Surface proteins of gram-positive bacteria and mechanisms of their targeting to the cell wall envelope. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 63:174-229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Nielsen, H., J. Engelbrecht, S. Brunak, and G. von Heijne. 1997. Identification of prokaryotic and eukaryotic signal peptides and prediction of their cleavage sites. Protein Eng. 10:1-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Nilsson, I. M., J. M. Patti, T. Bremell, M. Hook, and A. Tarkowski. 1998. Vaccination with a recombinant fragment of collagen adhesin provides protection against Staphylococcus aureus-mediated septic death. J. Clin. Investig. 101:2640-2649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Nolling, J., G. Breton, M. V. Omelchenko, K. S. Makarova, Q. Zeng, R. Gibson, H. M. Lee, J. Dubois, D. Qiu, J. Hitti, Y. I. Wolf, R. L. Tatusov, F. Sabathe, L. Doucette-Stamm, P. Soucaille, M. J. Daly, G. N. Bennett, E. V. Koonin, and D. R. Smith. 2001. Genome sequence and comparative analysis of the solvent-producing bacterium Clostridium acetobutylicum. J. Bacteriol. 183:4823-4838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Okinaka, R., K. Cloud, O. Hampton, A. Hoffmaster, K. Hill, P. Keim, T. Koehler, G. Lamke, S. Kumano, D. Manter, Y. Martinez, D. Ricke, R. Svensson, and P. Jackson. 1999. Sequence, assembly and analysis of pX01 and pX02. J. Appl. Microbiol. 87:261-262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Pezard, C., P. Berche, and M. Mock. 1991. Contribution of individual toxin components to virulence of Bacillus anthracis. Infect. Immun. 59:3472-3477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Pezard, C., E. Duflot, and M. Mock. 1993. Construction of Bacillus anthracis mutant strains producing a single toxin component. J. Gen. Microbiol. 139:2459-2463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Pizza, M., V. Scarlato, V. Masignani, M. M. Giuliani, B. Arico, M. Comanducci, G. T. Jennings, L. Baldi, E. Bartolini, B. Capecchi, C. L. Galeotti, E. Luzzi, R. Manetti, E. Marchetti, M. Mora, S. Nuti, G. Ratti, L. Santini, S. Savino, M. Scarselli, E. Storni, P. Zuo, M. Broeker, E. Hundt, B. Knapp, E. Blair, T. Mason, H. Tettelin, D. W. Hood, A. C. Jeffries, N. J. Saunders, D. M. Granoff, J. C. Venter, E. R. Moxon, G. Grandi, and R. Rappuoli. 2000. Identification of vaccine candidates against serogroup B meningococcus by whole-genome sequencing. Science 287:1816-1820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Plotkin, S. A., P. S. Brachman, M. Utell, F. H. Bumford, and M. M. Atchison. 2002. An epidemic of inhalation anthrax, the first in the twentieth century. I. Clinical features. Am. J. Med. 112:4-12. [Reprint of Am. J. Med. 29:992-1001, 1960.] [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 71.Ramm, K., and A. Pluckthun. 2001. High enzymatic activity and chaperone function are mechanistically related features of the dimeric E. coli peptidyl-prolyl-isomerase FkpA. J. Mol. Biol. 310:485-498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Rankin, S., Z. Li, and R. R. Isberg. 2002. Macrophage-induced genes of Legionella pneumophila: protection from reactive intermediates and solute imbalance during intracellular growth. Infect. Immun. 70:3637-3648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Rappuoli, R. 2001. Conjugates and reverse vaccinology to eliminate bacterial meningitis. Vaccine 19:2319-2322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Rappuoli, R. 2000. Reverse vaccinology. Curr Opin. Microbiol. 3:445-450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Rappuoli, R. 2001. Reverse vaccinology, a genome-based approach to vaccine development. Vaccine 19:2688-2691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Rasmussen, M., and L. Bjorck. 2001. Unique regulation of SclB: a novel collagen-like surface protein of Streptococcus pyogenes. Mol. Microbiol. 40:1427-1438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Rasmussen, M., A. Eden, and L. Bjorck. 2000. SclA, a novel collagen-like surface protein of Streptococcus pyogenes. Infect. Immun. 68:6370-6377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Read, T. D., S. N. Peterson, N. Tourasse, L. W. Baillie, I. T. Paulsen, K. E. Nelson, H. Tettelin, D. E. Fouts, J. A. Eisen, S. R. Gill, E. K. Holtzapple, O. A. Okstad, E. Helgason, J. Rilstone, M. Wu, J. K. Kolonay, M. J. Beanan, R. J. Dodson, L. M. Brinkac, M. Gwinn, R. T. DeBoy, R. Madpu, S. C. Daugherty, A. S. Durkin, D. H. Haft, W. C. Nelson, J. D. Peterson, M. Pop, H. M. Khouri, D. Radune, J. L. Benton, Y. Mahamoud, L. Jiang, I. R. Hance, J. F. Weidman, K. J. Berry, R. D. Plaut, A. M. Wolf, K. L. Watkins, W. C. Nierman, A. Hazen, R. Cline, C. Redmond, J. E. Thwaite, O. White, S. L. Salzberg, B. Thomason, A. M. Friedlander, T. M. Koehler, P. C. Hanna, A. B. Kolsto, and C. M. Fraser. 2003. The genome sequence of Bacillus anthracis Ames and comparison to closely related bacteria. Nature 423:81-86. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 79.Read, T. D., S. L. Salzberg, M. Pop, M. Shumway, L. Umayam, L. Jiang, E. Holtzapple, J. D. Busch, K. L. Smith, J. M. Schupp, D. Solomon, P. Keim, and C. M. Fraser. 2002. Comparative genome sequencing for discovery of novel polymorphisms in Bacillus anthracis. Science 296:2028-2033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Reina-San-Martin, B., W. Degrave, C. Rougeot, A. Cosson, N. Chamond, A. Cordeiro-Da-Silva, M. Arala-Chaves, A. Coutinho, and P. Minoprio. 2000. A B-cell mitogen from a pathogenic trypanosome is a eukaryotic proline racemase. Nat. Med. 6:890-897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Riboldi-Tunnicliffe, A., B. Konig, S. Jessen, M. S. Weiss, J. Rahfeld, J. Hacker, G. Fischer, and R. Hilgenfeld. 2001. Crystal structure of Mip, a prolylisomerase from Legionella pneumophila. Nat. Struct. Biol. 8:779-783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Ronda, C., J. L. Garcia, E. Garcia, J. M. Sanchez-Puelles, and R. Lopez. 1987. Biological role of the pneumococcal amidase. Cloning of the lytA gene in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Eur. J. Biochem. 164:621-624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Saile, E., and T. M. Koehler. 2002. Control of anthrax toxin gene expression by the transition state regulator abrB. J. Bacteriol. 184:370-380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Sara, M., and U. B. Sleytr. 2000. S-layer proteins. J. Bacteriol. 182:859-868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Schultz, J., R. R. Copley, T. Doerks, C. P. Ponting, and P. Bork. 2000. SMART: a web-based tool for the study of genetically mobile domains. Nucleic Acids Res. 28:231-234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Skovgaard, M., L. J. Jensen, S. Brunak, D. Ussery, and A. Krogh. 2001. On the total number of genes and their length distribution in complete microbial genomes. Trends Genet. 17:425-428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Smith, R. F., B. A. Wiese, M. K. Wojzynski, D. B. Davison, and K. C. Worley. 1996. BCM Search Launcher—an integrated interface to molecular biology data base search and analysis services available on the World Wide Web. Genome Res. 6:454-462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Smith, T. J., S. A. Blackman, and S. J. Foster. 2000. Autolysins of Bacillus subtilis: multiple enzymes with multiple functions. Microbiology 146:249-262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Sonnhammer, E. L., S. R. Eddy, E. Birney, A. Bateman, and R. Durbin. 1998. Pfam: multiple sequence alignments and HMM-profiles of protein domains. Nucleic Acids Res. 26:320-322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Stebbins, C. E., and J. E. Galan. 2001. Structural mimicry in bacterial virulence. Nature 412:701-705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Stone, B. J., A. Brier, and Y. A. Kwaik. 1999. The Legionella pneumophila prp locus; required during infection of macrophages and amoebae. Microb. Pathog. 27:369-376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Sutcliffe, I. C., and D. J. Harrington. 2002. Pattern searches for the identification of putative lipoprotein genes in Gram-positive bacterial genomes. Microbiology 148:2065-2077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Sutcliffe, I. C., and R. R. Russell. 1995. Lipoproteins of gram-positive bacteria. J. Bacteriol. 177:1123-1128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Sydenham, M., G. Douce, F. Bowe, S. Ahmed, S. Chatfield, and G. Dougan. 2000. Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium surA mutants are attenuated and effective live oral vaccines. Infect. Immun. 68:1109-1115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Sylvestre, P., E. Couture-Tosi, and M. Mock. 2002. A collagen-like surface glycoprotein is a structural component of the Bacillus anthracis exosporium. Mol. Microbiol. 45:169-178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Takami, H., K. Nakasone, Y. Takaki, G. Maeno, R. Sasaki, N. Masui, F. Fuji, C. Hirama, Y. Nakamura, N. Ogasawara, S. Kuhara, and K. Horikoshi. 2000. Complete genome sequence of the alkaliphilic bacterium Bacillus halodurans and genomic sequence comparison with Bacillus subtilis. Nucleic Acids Res. 28:4317-4331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Talay, S. R., A. Zock, M. Rohde, G. Molinari, M. Oggioni, G. Pozzi, C. A. Guzman, and G. S. Chhatwal. 2000. Co-operative binding of human fibronectin to Sfbl protein triggers streptococcal invasion into respiratory epithelial cells. Cell. Microbiol. 2:521-535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Talkington, D. F., B. G. Brown, J. A. Tharpe, A. Koenig, and H. Russell. 1996. Protection of mice against fatal pneumococcal challenge by immunization with pneumococcal surface adhesin A (PsaA). Microb. Pathog. 21:17-22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Tatusov, R. L., M. Y. Galperin, D. A. Natale, and E. V. Koonin. 2000. The COG database: a tool for genome-scale analysis of protein functions and evolution. Nucleic Acids Res. 28:33-36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Tatusov, R. L., D. A. Natale, I. V. Garkavtsev, T. A. Tatusova, U. T. Shankavaram, B. S. Rao, B. Kiryutin, M. Y. Galperin, N. D. Fedorova, and E. V. Koonin. 2001. The COG database: new developments in phylogenetic classification of proteins from complete genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 29:22-28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Tenner, A. J. 1999. Membrane receptors for soluble defense collagens. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 11:34-41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Terao, Y., S. Kawabata, E. Kunitomo, J. Murakami, I. Nakagawa, and S. Hamada. 2001. Fba, a novel fibronectin-binding protein from Streptococcus pyogenes, promotes bacterial entry into epithelial cells, and the fba gene is positively transcribed under the Mga regulator. Mol. Microbiol. 42:75-86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Walker, D. R., and E. V. Koonin. 1997. SEALS: a system for easy analysis of lots of sequences. Proc. Int. Conf. Intell. Syst. Mol. Biol. 5:333-339. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Wann, E. R., S. Gurusiddappa, and M. Hook. 2000. The fibronectin-binding MSCRAMM FnbpA of Staphylococcus aureus is a bifunctional protein that also binds to fibrinogen. J. Biol. Chem. 275:13863-13871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Welkos, S. L., and A. M. Friedlander. 1988. Comparative safety and efficacy against Bacillus anthracis of protective antigen and live vaccines in mice. Microb. Pathog. 5:127-139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Whatmore, A. M. 2001. Streptococcus pyogenes sclB encodes a putative hypervariable surface protein with a collagen-like repetitive structure. Microbiology 147:419-429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Wheeler, D. L., D. M. Church, A. E. Lash, D. D. Leipe, T. L. Madden, J. U. Pontius, G. D. Schuler, L. M. Schriml, T. A. Tatusova, L. Wagner, and B. A. Rapp. 2001. Database resources of the National Center for Bio/Technology Information. Nucleic Acids Res. 29:11-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Wizemann, T. M., J. E. Adamou, and S. Langermann. 1999. Adhesins as targets for vaccine development. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 5:395-403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Wizemann, T. M., J. H. Heinrichs, J. E. Adamou, A. L. Erwin, C. Kunsch, G. H. Choi, S. C. Barash, C. A. Rosen, H. R. Masure, E. Tuomanen, A. Gayle, Y. A. Brewah, W. Walsh, P. Barren, R. Lathigra, M. Hanson, S. Langermann, S. Johnson, and S. Koenig. 2001. Use of a whole genome approach to identify vaccine molecules affording protection against Streptococcus pneumoniae infection. Infect. Immun. 69:1593-1598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Wootton, J. C., and S. Federhen. 1996. Analysis of compositionally biased regions in sequence databases. Methods Enzymol. 266:554-571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Infection and Immunity are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES