Abstract
OBJECTIVE--To evaluate the local use of written "Do not resuscitate" orders to designate inpatients unsuitable for cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the event of cardiac arrest. DESIGN--Point prevalence questionnaire survey of inpatients' medical and nursing records. SETTING--10 acute medical and six acute surgical wards of a district general hospital. PARTICIPANTS--Questionnaires were filled in anonymously by nurses and doctors working on the wards surveyed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Responses to questionnaire items concerning details about each patient, written orders not to resuscitate in the medical case notes and nursing records, whether prognosis had been discussed with patients' relatives, whether a "crash call" was perceived as appropriate for each patient, and whether the "crash team" would be called in the event of arrest. RESULTS--Information was obtained on 297 (93.7%) of 317 eligible patients. Prognosis had been discussed with the relatives of 32 of 88 patients perceived by doctors as unsuitable for resuscitation. Of these 88 patients, 24 had orders not to resuscitate in their medical notes, and only eight of these had similar orders in their nursing notes. CONCLUSIONS--In the absence of guidelines on decisions about resuscitation, orders not to resuscitate are rarely included in the notes of patients for whom cardiopulmonary resuscitation is thought to be inappropriate. Elective decisions not to resuscitate are not effectively communicated to nurses. There should be more discussion of patients' suitability for resuscitation between doctors, nurses, patients, and patients' relatives. Suitability for resuscitation should be reviewed on every consultant ward round.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Asplund K., Britton M. Do-not-resuscitate orders in Swedish medical wards. J Intern Med. 1990 Aug;228(2):139–145. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.1990.tb00207.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bedell S. E., Delbanco T. L., Cook E. F., Epstein F. H. Survival after cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the hospital. N Engl J Med. 1983 Sep 8;309(10):569–576. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198309083091001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dent T. H., Gillard J. H., Aarons E. J., Crimlisk H. L., Smyth-Pigott P. J. Preregistration house officers in the four Thames regions: I. Survey of education and workload. BMJ. 1990 Mar 17;300(6726):713–716. doi: 10.1136/bmj.300.6726.713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gleeson K., Wise S. The do-not-resuscitate order. Still too little too late. Arch Intern Med. 1990 May;150(5):1057–1060. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Halligan M., Hamel R. P. Ethics committee develops supportive care guidelines. Health Prog. 1985 Dec;66(10):26-30, 60. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kamer R. S., Dieck E. M., McClung J. A., White P. A., Sivak S. L. Effect of New York State's do-not-resuscitate legislation on in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation practice. Am J Med. 1990 Feb;88(2):108–111. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(90)90457-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Keatinge R. M. Exclusion from resuscitation. J R Soc Med. 1989 Jul;82(7):402–405. doi: 10.1177/014107688908200711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McClung J. A., Kamer R. S. Implications of New York's do-not-resuscitate law. N Engl J Med. 1990 Jul 26;323(4):270–272. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199007263230411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Peatfield R. C., Sillett R. W., Taylor D., McNicol M. W. Survival after cardiac arrest in hospital. Lancet. 1977 Jun 11;1(8024):1223–1225. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(77)92435-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stolman C. J., Gregory J. J., Dunn D., Levine J. L. Evaluation of patient, physician, nurse, and family attitudes toward do not resuscitate orders. Arch Intern Med. 1990 Mar;150(3):653–658. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wanzer S. H., Federman D. D., Adelstein S. J., Cassel C. K., Cassem E. H., Cranford R. E., Hook E. W., Lo B., Moertel C. G., Safar P. The physician's responsibility toward hopelessly ill patients. A second look. N Engl J Med. 1989 Mar 30;320(13):844–849. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198903303201306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]