Abstract
Ever since the concept of value for money in health care was introduced into the NHS, economic terms and jargon have become part of our everyday lives--but do we understand what the different types of economic evaluation all mean, particularly those that sound similar to the uninitiated? This article introduces readers to the purpose of economic evaluation, and briefly explains the differences between cost-minimisation analysis (used when the outcomes of the procedures being compared are the same); cost-effectiveness analysis (used when the outcomes may vary, but can be expressed in common natural units, such as mm Hg for treatments of hypertension); cost-utility analysis (used when outcomes do vary--for example, quality of life scales); and cost-benefit analysis (used when a monetary value is being placed on services received). Further articles will deal with each one in more detail.
Full text
PDF
Images in this article
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Drummond M. F., Davies L. Economic analysis alongside clinical trials. Revisiting the methodological issues. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1991;7(4):561–573. doi: 10.1017/s0266462300007121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hull R., Hirsh J., Sackett D. L., Stoddart G. Cost effectiveness of clinical diagnosis, venography, and noninvasive testing in patients with symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis. N Engl J Med. 1981 Jun 25;304(26):1561–1567. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198106253042602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sintonen H., Alander V. Comparing the cost-effectiveness of drug regimens in the treatment of duodenal ulcers. J Health Econ. 1990 Jun;9(1):85–101. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(90)90042-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thompson M. S. Willingness to pay and accept risks to cure chronic disease. Am J Public Health. 1986 Apr;76(4):392–396. doi: 10.2105/ajph.76.4.392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]