Skip to main content
PMC home page
The BMJ logoLink to The BMJ
. 1993 Oct 16;307(6910):977–981. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6910.977

Intensive Care Society's APACHE II study in Britain and Ireland--II: Outcome comparisons of intensive care units after adjustment for case mix by the American APACHE II method.

K M Rowan 1, J H Kerr 1, E Major 1, K McPherson 1, A Short 1, M P Vessey 1
PMCID: PMC1679167  PMID: 8241909

Abstract

OBJECTIVES--To compare outcome between intensive care units in Britain and Ireland both before and after adjustment for case mix with the American APACHE II method and to validate the American APACHE II method in Britain and Ireland. DESIGN--Prospective, cohort study of consecutive admissions to intensive care units. SETTING--26 general intensive care units in Britain and Ireland. SUBJECTS--8796 admissions to the study intensive care units. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE--Death or survival at discharge from intensive care unit and hospital. RESULTS--At discharge from both intensive care unit and hospital there was a greater than twofold variation in crude mortality between the 26 units. After adjustment for case mix, variations in mortality were still apparent. For four intensive care units the observed numbers of deaths were significantly different from the number predicted by the American APACHE II equation. The overall goodness of fit, or predictive ability, of the APACHE II equation for the British and Irish data was good, being only slightly inferior to that obtained when the equation was tested on the data from which it had been derived. When patients were grouped by various factors such as age and diagnosis, the equation did not adjust across the subgroups in a uniform manner. CONCLUSIONS--The American APACHE II equation did not fit the British and Irish data. Use of the American equation could be of advantage or disadvantage to individual intensive care units, depending on the mix of patients treated.

Full text

PDF
979

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Chisakuta A. M., Alexander J. P. Audit in intensive care. The APACHE II classification of severity of disease. Ulster Med J. 1990 Oct;59(2):161–167. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Daley J., Jencks S., Draper D., Lenhart G., Thomas N., Walker J. Predicting hospital-associated mortality for Medicare patients. A method for patients with stroke, pneumonia, acute myocardial infarction, and congestive heart failure. JAMA. 1988 Dec 23;260(24):3617–3624. doi: 10.1001/jama.260.24.3617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hanley J. A., McNeil B. J. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology. 1982 Apr;143(1):29–36. doi: 10.1148/radiology.143.1.7063747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Knaus W. A., Draper E. A., Wagner D. P., Zimmerman J. E. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med. 1985 Oct;13(10):818–829. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Knaus W. A., Draper E. A., Wagner D. P., Zimmerman J. E. An evaluation of outcome from intensive care in major medical centers. Ann Intern Med. 1986 Mar;104(3):410–418. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-104-3-410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Lemeshow S., Hosmer D. W., Jr A review of goodness of fit statistics for use in the development of logistic regression models. Am J Epidemiol. 1982 Jan;115(1):92–106. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Marsh H. M., Krishan I., Naessens J. M., Strickland R. A., Gracey D. R., Campion M. E., Nobrega F. T., Southorn P. A., McMichan J. C., Kelly M. P. Assessment of prediction of mortality by using the APACHE II scoring system in intensive-care units;. Mayo Clin Proc. 1990 Dec;65(12):1549–1557. doi: 10.1016/s0025-6196(12)62188-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Rowan K. M., Kerr J. H., Major E., McPherson K., Short A., Vessey M. P. Intensive Care Society's APACHE II study in Britain and Ireland--I: Variations in case mix of adult admissions to general intensive care units and impact on outcome. BMJ. 1993 Oct 16;307(6910):972–977. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6910.972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Sirio C. A., Tajimi K., Tase C., Knaus W. A., Wagner D. P., Hirasawa H., Sakanishi N., Katsuya H., Taenaka N. An initial comparison of intensive care in Japan and the United States. Crit Care Med. 1992 Sep;20(9):1207–1215. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199209000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Turner J. S., Mudaliar Y. M., Chang R. W., Morgan C. J. Acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE II) scoring in a cardiothoracic intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 1991 Oct;19(10):1266–1269. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Turner J. S., Potgieter P. D., Linton D. M. Severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med. 1991 Feb;19(2):301–302. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199102000-00037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Zimmerman J. E., Knaus W. A., Judson J. A., Havill J. H., Trubuhovich R. V., Draper E. A., Wagner D. P. Patient selection for intensive care: a comparison of New Zealand and United States hospitals. Crit Care Med. 1988 Apr;16(4):318–326. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMJ : British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES