Skip to main content
The Canadian Veterinary Journal logoLink to The Canadian Veterinary Journal
. 1985 Feb;26(2):74–80.

Abdominocentesis in Cattle: Technique and Criteria for Diagnosis of Peritonitis

AD Wilson, VM Hirsch, AD Osborne
PMCID: PMC1680079  PMID: 17422506

Abstract

A reliable method for the collection of peritoneal fluid from cattle using a trocar and cannula is described. Peritoneal fluid was collected from three groups of cattle: periparturient, normal and with peritonitis. The fluid was examined by white cell count, differential cell count, total protein concentration and bacteriology. The results were analysed to determine the best criteria for peritonitis. Greater than 10% eosinophils were typical of normal peritoneal fluid. Peritoneal fluid with a relative neutrophil count greater than 40% and a relative eosinophil count of less than 10% was frequently associated with the diagnosis of peritonitis. Parturient cattle had large volumes of peritoneal fluid with low total protein and white cell counts. Growth of Gram-negative or anaerobic organisms was associated with mortality.

Keywords: Peritoneal fluid, peritonitis, eosinophils

Full text

PDF
76

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Becklund W. W., Walker M. L. Taxonomy, hosts, and geographic distribution of the Setaria (Nematoda: Filarioidea) in the United States and Canada. J Parasitol. 1969 Apr;55(2):359–368. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Gleich G. J., Loegering D. Selective stimulation and purification of eosinophils and neutrophils from guinea pig peritoneal fluids. J Lab Clin Med. 1973 Sep;82(3):522–528. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hirsch V. M., Townsend H. G. Peritoneal fluid analysis in the diagnosis of abdominal disorders in cattle: a retrospective study. Can Vet J. 1982 Dec;23(12):348–354. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kay A. B. The role of the eosinophil. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1979 Aug;64(2):90–104. doi: 10.1016/0091-6749(79)90042-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. McSherry B. J., Horney F. D., DeGroot J. J. Plasma fibrinogen levels in normal and sick cows. Can J Comp Med. 1970 Jul;34(3):191–197. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Oehme F. W. Cytologic examination of the peritoneal fluid in the diagnosis of cattle disease. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1969 Dec 15;155(12):1923–1927. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Oehme F. W., Noordsy J. L. Examination of peritoneal fluid in differential diagnosis of bovine diseases. Vet Med Small Anim Clin. 1970 Jan;65(1):54–59. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Sard D. M. Dealing with data: the practical use of numerical information--(10) Analysis by rank. Vet Rec. 1979 Feb 24;104(8):160–163. doi: 10.1136/vr.104.8.160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Tavassoli M. Eosinophil, eosinophilia, and eosinophilic disorders. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 1981;16(1):35–83. doi: 10.3109/10408368109107025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Canadian Veterinary Journal are provided here courtesy of Canadian Veterinary Medical Association

RESOURCES