Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Canadian Veterinary Journal logoLink to The Canadian Veterinary Journal
. 1988 May;29(5):438–443.

Comparison of Penicillin, Oxytetracycline, and Trimethoprim-Sulfadoxine in the Treatment of Acute Undifferentiated Bovine Respiratory Disease

Gerald D Mechor, G Kee Jim, Eugene D Janzen
PMCID: PMC1680624  PMID: 17423045

Abstract

Penicillin, oxytetracycline, and a trimethoprimsulfadoxine combination were compared as first choice antibiotics for the treatment of acute bovine respiratory disease in weaned beef calves. There was no statistical difference in the mortality losses due to respiratory disease; however, the case fatality rate in the trimethoprim-sulfadoxine treatment group (3%) was markedly lower than in the penicillin (10%) and oxytetracycline (8%) treatment groups. The trimethoprim-sulfadoxine group also had statistically fewer treatment days compared to the penicillin and oxytetracycline groups (p < 0.05). Inclusion of mortality costs in the calculation of treatment costs demonstrated that treatment of the trimethoprimsulfadoxine group was appreciably less costly than treatment of the other groups. Temperature response abnormalities, defined as either an elevation in temperature or a failure of temperature to drop from one treatment day to the next, were associated with a relapse rate of approximately 50%. In vitro antibiotic sensitivity testing of Pasteurella haemolytica isolated from pretreatment nasal swabs was not a useful predictor of treatment success of antimicrobials.

Full text

PDF
440

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Allan E. M., Wiseman A., Gibbs H. A., Selman I. E. Pasteurella species isolated from the bovine respiratory tract and their antimicrobial sensitivity patterns. Vet Rec. 1985 Dec 14;117(24):629–631. doi: 10.1136/vr.117.24.629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ames T. R., Larson V. L., Stowe C. M. Oxytetracycline concentrations in healthy and diseased calves. Am J Vet Res. 1983 Jul;44(7):1354–1357. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Burrows G. E. Effects of experimentally induced Pasteurella haemolytica pneumonia on the pharmacokinetics of erythromycin in the calf. Am J Vet Res. 1985 Apr;46(4):798–803. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bushby S. R. Sulfonamide and trimethoprim combinations. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1980 May 15;176(10 Spec No):1049–1053. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Church T. L., Radostits O. M. A retrospective survey of diseases of feedlot cattle in Alberta. Can Vet J. 1981 Feb;22(2):27–30. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. HOERLEIN A. B., SAXENA S. P., MANSFIELD M. E. Studies on shipping fever of cattle. II. Prevalence of Pasteurella species in nasal secretions from normal calves and calves with shipping fever. Am J Vet Res. 1961 May;22:470–472. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hamdy A. H., Trapp A. L. Investigation of nasal microflora of feedlot calves before and after weaning. Am J Vet Res. 1967 Jul;28(125):1019–1025. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hirsh D. C., Ruehl W. W. A rational approach to the selection of an antimicrobial agent. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1984 Nov 15;185(10):1058–1061. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Libal M. C. Comparison of minimal inhibitory concentration and disk-diffusion antimicrobic sensitivity testing of bacterial pathogens isolated from food animals. Am J Vet Res. 1985 May;46(5):1200–1205. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Magwood S. E., Barnum D. A., Thomson R. G. Nasal bacterial flora of calves in healthy and in pneumonia-prone herds. Can J Comp Med. 1969 Oct;33(4):237–243. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Martin S. W., Meek A. H., Curtis R. A. Antimicrobial use in feedlot calves: its association with culture rates and antimicrobial susceptibility. Can J Comp Med. 1983 Jan;47(1):6–10. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Martin S. W., Meek A. H., Davis D. G., Thomson R. G., Johnson J. A., Lopez A., Stephens L., Curtis R. A., Prescott J. F., Rosendal S. Factors associated with mortality in feedlot cattle: the Bruce County Beef Cattle Project. Can J Comp Med. 1980 Jan;44(1):1–10. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Martin S. W., Meek A. H. The interpretation of antimicrobial susceptibility patterns. Can J Comp Med. 1981 Apr;45(2):199–202. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Piercy D. W. Distribution of trimethoprim/sulphadiazine in plasma, tissue and synovial fluids. Vet Rec. 1978 Jun 17;102(24):523–524. doi: 10.1136/vr.102.24.523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Powers T. E., Varma K. J., Powers J. D. Selecting therapeutic concentrations: minimum inhibitory concentrations vs subminimum or supraminimum inhibitory concentrations. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1984 Nov 15;185(10):1062–1067. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Prescott J. F., Baggot J. D. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing and antimicrobial drug dosage. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1985 Aug 15;187(4):363–368. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Rehm W. F., White G. A field trial with trimethoprim and sulfadoxine in bacterial diseases of cattle and pigs. Vet Rec. 1970 Jul 11;87(2):39–42. doi: 10.1136/vr.87.2.39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Thomson R. G., Chander S., Savan M., Fox M. L. Investigation of factors of probable significance in the pathogenesis of pneumonic pasteurellosis in cattle. Can J Comp Med. 1975 Apr;39(2):194–207. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Woolcock J. B., Mutimer M. D. Antibiotic susceptibility testing: caeci caecos ducentes? Vet Rec. 1983 Aug 6;113(6):125–128. doi: 10.1136/vr.113.6.125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Canadian Veterinary Journal are provided here courtesy of Canadian Veterinary Medical Association

RESOURCES