Skip to main content
PMC home page
American Journal of Human Genetics logoLink to American Journal of Human Genetics
. 1993 May;52(5):854–865.

Rapid prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal aneuploidies by fluorescence in situ hybridization: clinical experience with 4,500 specimens.

B E Ward 1, S L Gersen 1, M P Carelli 1, N M McGuire 1, W R Dackowski 1, M Weinstein 1, C Sandlin 1, R Warren 1, K W Klinger 1
PMCID: PMC1682052  PMID: 8488836

Abstract

Detection of chromosome aneuploidies in uncultured amniocytes is possible using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). We herein describe the results of the first clinical program which utilized FISH for the rapid detection of chromosome aneuploidies in uncultured amniocytes. FISH was performed on physician request, as an adjunct to cytogenetics in 4,500 patients. Region-specific DNA probes to chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X, and Y were used to determine ploidy by analysis of signal number in hybridized nuclei. A sample was considered to be euploid when all autosomal probes generated two hybridization signals and when a normal sex chromosome pattern was observed in greater than or equal to 80% of hybridized nuclei. A sample was considered to be aneuploid when greater than or equal to 70% of hybridized nuclei displayed the same abnormal hybridization pattern for a specific probe. Of the attempted analyses, 90.2% met these criteria and were reported as informative to referring physicians within 2 d of receipt. Based on these reporting parameters, the overall detection rate for aneuploidies was 73.3% (107/146), with an accuracy of informative results for aneuploidies of 93.9% (107/114). Compared to cytogenetics, the accuracy of all informative FISH results, euploid and aneuploid, was 99.8%, and the specificity was 99.9%. In those pregnancies where fetal abnormalities had been observed by ultrasound, referring physicians requested FISH plus cytogenetics at a significantly higher rate than they requested cytogenetics alone. The current prenatal FISH protocol is not designed to detect all chromosome abnormalities and should only be utilized as an adjunctive test to cytogenetics. This experience demonstrates that FISH can provide a rapid and accurate clinical method for prenatal identification of chromosome aneuploidies.

Full text

PDF
865

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Abuelo D. N., Hopmann M. R., Barsel-Bowers G., Goldstein A. Anxiety in women with low maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein screening results. Prenat Diagn. 1991 Jun;11(6):381–385. doi: 10.1002/pd.1970110607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bajalica S., Bui T. H., Koch J., Bröndum-Nielsen K. Prenatal investigation of a 45,X/46,X,r(?) karyotype in amniocytes using fluorescence in situ hybridization with an X-centromeric probe. Prenat Diagn. 1992 Jan;12(1):61–64. doi: 10.1002/pd.1970120109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Caccia N., Johnson J. M., Robinson G. E., Barna T. Impact of prenatal testing on maternal-fetal bonding: chorionic villus sampling versus amniocentesis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Oct;165(4 Pt 1):1122–1125. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(91)90484-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Canick J. A., Palomaki G. E., Osathanondh R. Prenatal screening for trisomy 18 in the second trimester. Prenat Diagn. 1990 Aug;10(8):546–548. doi: 10.1002/pd.1970100813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Christensen B., Bryndorf T., Philip J., Lundsteen C., Hansen W. Rapid prenatal diagnosis of trisomy 18 and triploidy in interphase nuclei of uncultured amniocytes by non-radioactive in situ hybridization. Prenat Diagn. 1992 Apr;12(4):241–250. doi: 10.1002/pd.1970120403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cremer T., Landegent J., Brückner A., Scholl H. P., Schardin M., Hager H. D., Devilee P., Pearson P., van der Ploeg M. Detection of chromosome aberrations in the human interphase nucleus by visualization of specific target DNAs with radioactive and non-radioactive in situ hybridization techniques: diagnosis of trisomy 18 with probe L1.84. Hum Genet. 1986 Dec;74(4):346–352. doi: 10.1007/BF00280484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cremer T., Lichter P., Borden J., Ward D. C., Manuelidis L. Detection of chromosome aberrations in metaphase and interphase tumor cells by in situ hybridization using chromosome-specific library probes. Hum Genet. 1988 Nov;80(3):235–246. doi: 10.1007/BF01790091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Evers-Kiebooms G., Swerts A., van den Berghe H. Psychological aspects of amniocentesis: anxiety feelings in three different risk groups. Clin Genet. 1988 Mar;33(3):196–206. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.1988.tb03437.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ferguson-Smith M. A. Early prenatal diagnosis. Prenat Diagn. 1991 Aug;11(8):489–491. doi: 10.1002/pd.1970110802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Klever M., Grond-Ginsbach C. J., Hager H. D., Schroeder-Kurth T. M. Chorionic villus metaphase chromosomes and interphase nuclei analysed by chromosomal in situ suppression (CISS) hybridization. Prenat Diagn. 1992 Jan;12(1):53–59. doi: 10.1002/pd.1970120108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Klinger K., Landes G., Shook D., Harvey R., Lopez L., Locke P., Lerner T., Osathanondh R., Leverone B., Houseal T. Rapid detection of chromosome aneuploidies in uncultured amniocytes by using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Am J Hum Genet. 1992 Jul;51(1):55–65. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kuo W. L., Tenjin H., Segraves R., Pinkel D., Golbus M. S., Gray J. Detection of aneuploidy involving chromosomes 13, 18, or 21, by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to interphase and metaphase amniocytes. Am J Hum Genet. 1991 Jul;49(1):112–119. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Landegent J. E., Jansen in de Wal N., Dirks R. W., Baao F., van der Ploeg M. Use of whole cosmid cloned genomic sequences for chromosomal localization by non-radioactive in situ hybridization. Hum Genet. 1987 Dec;77(4):366–370. doi: 10.1007/BF00291428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lebo R. V., Flandermeyer R. R., Diukman R., Lynch E. D., Lepercq J. A., Golbus M. S. Prenatal diagnosis with repetitive in situ hybridization probes. Am J Med Genet. 1992 Jul 15;43(5):848–854. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320430519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ledbetter D. H. The 'colorizing' of cytogenetics: is it ready for prime time? Hum Mol Genet. 1992 Aug;1(5):297–299. doi: 10.1093/hmg/1.5.297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lichter P., Cremer T., Borden J., Manuelidis L., Ward D. C. Delineation of individual human chromosomes in metaphase and interphase cells by in situ suppression hybridization using recombinant DNA libraries. Hum Genet. 1988 Nov;80(3):224–234. doi: 10.1007/BF01790090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lichter P., Cremer T., Tang C. J., Watkins P. C., Manuelidis L., Ward D. C. Rapid detection of human chromosome 21 aberrations by in situ hybridization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Dec;85(24):9664–9668. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.24.9664. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lichter P., Ward D. C. Is non-isotopic in situ hybridization finally coming of age? Nature. 1990 May 3;345(6270):93–94. doi: 10.1038/345093a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. McNeil J. A., Johnson C. V., Carter K. C., Singer R. H., Lawrence J. B. Localizing DNA and RNA within nuclei and chromosomes by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Genet Anal Tech Appl. 1991 Apr;8(2):41–58. doi: 10.1016/1050-3862(91)90049-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Penketh R. J., Delhanty J. D., van den Berghe J. A., Finklestone E. M., Handyside A. H., Malcolm S., Winston R. M. Rapid sexing of human embryos by non-radioactive in situ hybridization: potential for preimplantation diagnosis of X-linked disorders. Prenat Diagn. 1989 Jul;9(7):489–499. doi: 10.1002/pd.1970090706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Pinkel D., Landegent J., Collins C., Fuscoe J., Segraves R., Lucas J., Gray J. Fluorescence in situ hybridization with human chromosome-specific libraries: detection of trisomy 21 and translocations of chromosome 4. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Dec;85(23):9138–9142. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.23.9138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Rhoads G. G., Jackson L. G., Schlesselman S. E., de la Cruz F. F., Desnick R. J., Golbus M. S., Ledbetter D. H., Lubs H. A., Mahoney M. J., Pergament E. The safety and efficacy of chorionic villus sampling for early prenatal diagnosis of cytogenetic abnormalities. N Engl J Med. 1989 Mar 9;320(10):609–617. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198903093201001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Robinson A., Puck M., Pennington B., Borelli J., Hudson M. Abnormalities of the sex chromosomes: a prospective study on randomly identified newborns. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser. 1979;15(1):203–241. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Sawyer J. R., Johnson M. P., Miller O. J. Traditional and molecular cytogenetics. J Reprod Med. 1992 Jun;37(6):485–498. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Tkachuk D. C., Pinkel D., Kuo W. L., Weier H. U., Gray J. W. Clinical applications of fluorescence in situ hybridization. Genet Anal Tech Appl. 1991 Apr;8(2):67–74. doi: 10.1016/1050-3862(91)90051-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Trask B. J. Fluorescence in situ hybridization: applications in cytogenetics and gene mapping. Trends Genet. 1991 May;7(5):149–154. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(91)90378-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Wald N. J., Cuckle H. S., Densem J. W., Nanchahal K., Royston P., Chard T., Haddow J. E., Knight G. J., Palomaki G. E., Canick J. A. Maternal serum screening for Down's syndrome in early pregnancy. BMJ. 1988 Oct 8;297(6653):883–887. doi: 10.1136/bmj.297.6653.883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Waye J. S., Willard H. F. Chromosome-specific alpha satellite DNA: nucleotide sequence analysis of the 2.0 kilobasepair repeat from the human X chromosome. Nucleic Acids Res. 1985 Apr 25;13(8):2731–2743. doi: 10.1093/nar/13.8.2731. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. West J. D., Gosden C. M., Gosden J. R., West K. M., Davidson Z., Davidson C., Nicolaides K. H. Sexing the human fetus and identification of polyploid nuclei by DNA-DNA in situ hybridisation in interphase nuclei. Mol Reprod Dev. 1989;1(2):129–137. doi: 10.1002/mrd.1080010208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Wolfe J., Darling S. M., Erickson R. P., Craig I. W., Buckle V. J., Rigby P. W., Willard H. F., Goodfellow P. N. Isolation and characterization of an alphoid centromeric repeat family from the human Y chromosome. J Mol Biol. 1985 Apr 20;182(4):477–485. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(85)90234-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Zahed L., Murer-Orlando M., Vekemans M. In situ hybridization studies for the detection of common aneuploidies in CVS. Prenat Diagn. 1992 Jun;12(6):483–493. doi: 10.1002/pd.1970120603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Zheng Y. L., Ferguson-Smith M. A., Warner J. P., Ferguson-Smith M. E., Sargent C. A., Carter N. P. Analysis of chromosome 21 copy number in uncultured amniocytes by fluorescence in situ hybridization using a cosmid contig. Prenat Diagn. 1992 Nov;12(11):931–943. doi: 10.1002/pd.1970121113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Human Genetics are provided here courtesy of American Society of Human Genetics

RESOURCES