Skip to main content
PMC home page
American Journal of Human Genetics logoLink to American Journal of Human Genetics
. 1984 Sep;36(5):1092–1102.

Incidence and significance of supernumerary marker chromosomes in prenatal diagnosis.

P A Benn, L Y Hsu
PMCID: PMC1684529  PMID: 6594043

Abstract

The finding of a supernumerary marker chromosome in amniotic fluid cells poses a considerable counseling dilemma. In 6,500 cases referred to our laboratory over a 4 1/2-year period, eight such cases were identified (0.123% of all cases). In five of the eight cases, a diagnosis of true mosaicism between cells with 46 and 47 chromosomes was made. In the remaining three cases, the marker was present in 100% of the cells. In three cases, the marker was determined to be familial in nature with mosaicism present in the parents of two of these cases. Detailed cytogenetic findings for each case are provided. In no cases were abnormalities noted in either abortuses or live borns. The high incidence of mosaicism in these cases seems to indicate a propensity for supernumerary chromosomes to be lost. Familial markers may not be passed on for many generations, and they may arise as new mutations relatively frequently. There is an urgent need for more information on the risks associated with the prenatal detection of supernumerary chromosomes. We recommend that in considering the implications of the prenatal detection of marker chromosomes cases be considered in at least four distinct groups: type 1--familial and nonmosaic; type 2--familial with mosaicism in either the amniotic fluid cells, a parent, or both; type 3--de novo markers and nonmosaic; and type 4--de novo with mosaicism present in the amniotic fluid cells.

Full text

PDF
1096

Images in this article

1096Fig. 1
on p.1096
1097Fig. 2
on p.1097
1098Fig. 3
on p.1098
1099Fig. 4
on p.1099

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barnard A. H., Smart R. D. The implications of detecting an extra metacentric microchromosome on amniotic fluid cell culture. S Afr Med J. 1980 Sep 20;58(12):485–488. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bartsch H. D., de Azevedo Moreira L. M., Röhrborn G., Claussen U., Gebauer H. J. Possible origin of a small bisatellited additional chromosome. Hum Genet. 1980;54(3):319–322. doi: 10.1007/BF00291576. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Benn P., Hsu L. Y., Perlis T., Schonhaut A. Prenatal diagnosis of chromosome mosaicism. Prenat Diagn. 1984 Jan-Feb;4(1):1–9. doi: 10.1002/pd.1970040102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bernstein R., Hakim C., Hardwick B., Nurse G. T. Significance of detection of extra metacentric microchromosome in amniotic cell culture. J Med Genet. 1978 Apr;15(2):136–142. doi: 10.1136/jmg.15.2.136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chen H., Harris J. Prenatal diagnosis in the presence of an extra small chromosome in amniotic cell culture. Ann Genet. 1980;23(2):97–99. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chudley A. E., Zheng H. Z., Pabello P. D., Shia G., Wang H. C. Familial supernumerary microchromosome mosaicism: phenotypic effects and an attempt at characterization. Am J Med Genet. 1983 Sep;16(1):89–97. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320160114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Crandall B. F., Lebherz T. B., Rubinstein L., Robertson R. D., Sample W. F., Sarti D., Howard J. Chromosome findings in 2,500 second trimester amniocenteses. Am J Med Genet. 1980;5(4):345–356. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320050405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Daniel A., Stewart L., Saville T., Brookwell R., Paull H., Purvis-Smith S., Lam-Po-Tang P. R. Prenatal diagnosis in 3,000 women for chromosome, X-linked, and metabolic disorders. Am J Med Genet. 1982 Jan;11(1):61–75. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320110109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fitzgerald P. H., Mercer J. M. Elimination of an abnormal cell line from blood lymphocytes during post-natal growth. Clin Genet. 1980 Jun;17(6):433–436. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.1980.tb00176.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fryns J. P., Kleczkowska A., Van den Berghe H. Small accessory chromosomes (SAC) and their genotype--phenotype correlation. J Genet Hum. 1982 Oct;30(3):215–232. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Goodpasture C., Bloom S. E. Visualization of nucleolar organizer regions im mammalian chromosomes using silver staining. Chromosoma. 1975 Nov 20;53(1):37–50. doi: 10.1007/BF00329389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gutierrez A. C., Salamanca F., Lisker R., Segovia A. Supernumerary bisatellited chromosome in a family ascertained through a patient with Sturge-Weber syndrome. Ann Genet. 1975 Mar;18(1):45–49. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Haas-Andela H., Hansen S., Foerster W., Fuhrmann W. Familial additional chromosomal fragment ascertained in amniotic cell culture. Clin Genet. 1981 Jan;19(1):46–50. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.1981.tb00666.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hook E. B., Schreinemachers D. M., Willey A. M., Cross P. K. Rates of mutant structural chromosome rearrangements in human fetuses: data from prenatal cytogenetic studies and associations with maternal age and parental mutagen exposure. Am J Hum Genet. 1983 Jan;35(1):96–109. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hsu L. Y., Benn P. A. The centralized prenatal genetics screening program of New York City: II. Establishment of prenatal diagnosis laboratory. Am J Med Genet. 1981;8(3):331–339. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320080312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kohn G., Shaham M., Ornoy A., Beyth Y., Cohen M. M. Small marker chromosome mosaicism confirmed in two cases ascertained prenatally. Am J Med Genet. 1978;2(2):167–173. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320020208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Leddet-Chevallier I., Sparkes R. S. Inherited 13/14 translocation and metacentric microchromosome associated with trisomy 21: report of 2 cases. Clin Genet. 1983 May;23(5):386–390. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.1983.tb00451.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lee M. l., Schneider J., Wasant P., Yu C. Y., Trpis L., Liang Y. W., Lewis B. M., Borkowf S., Borgaonkar D. S. Supernumerary small chromosomal anomaly: report of three cases including one with a familial inversion of chromosome 5. J Genet Hum. 1978 Sep;26(3):275–285. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lieber E., Shah P., Hack M. Hazards of amniocentesis: an unidentifiable fragment. Clin Genet. 1978 Sep;14(3):130–132. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.1978.tb02117.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Neri G., Malvezzi D. C., Serra A., Bova R., Pelino A., Maugiatti L. Properties and significance of a small marker chromosome in amniotic fluid cells. Clin Genet. 1980 Oct;18(4):253–256. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.1980.tb00882.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Nielsen K. B., Dyggve H., Friedrich U., Hobolth N., Lyngbye T., Mikkelsen M. Small metacentric nonsatellited extra chromosome: report of five mentally retarded individuals and review of literature. Contribution to further delineation of a new syndrome. Hum Genet. 1978 Oct 19;44(1):59–69. doi: 10.1007/BF00283575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Pescia G., Jotterand-Bellomo M., Flury R. Extra microchromosome mosaicism in amniotic cells confirmed in fetal tissues. J Genet Hum. 1981 Feb;28(5):175–183. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Romain D. R., Columbano-Green L., Smythe R. H., Dukes P. C. Discovery of an inherited bisatellited metacentric microchromosome in amniotic cell culture. Clin Genet. 1979 Sep;16(3):183–190. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.1979.tb00989.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Salamanca F., Armendares S. C bands in human metaphase chromosomes treated by barium hydroxide. Ann Genet. 1974 Jun;17(2):135–136. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Soudek D. Accessory small chromosomes in amniotic fluid cells. Clin Genet. 1979 Jun;15(6):543–543. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.1979.tb00840.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Soudek D., McCreary B. D., Laraya P., Dill F. J. Two kinships with accessory bisatellited chromosomes. Ann Genet. 1973 Jun;16(2):101–107. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Soudek D., Sroka H. C-bands in seven cases of accessory small chromosomes. Clin Genet. 1977 Nov;12(5):285–289. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.1977.tb00942.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Squire J. A., Nauth L., Ridler M. A., Sutton S., Timberlake C. Prenatal diagnosis and outcome of pregnancy in 2036 women investigated by amniocentesis. Hum Genet. 1982;61(3):215–222. doi: 10.1007/BF00296445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Sutherland G. R., Bowser-Riley S. M., Bain A. D. Chromosomal mosaicism in amniotic fluid cell cultures. Clin Genet. 1975 May-Jun;7(5):400–404. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.1975.tb00348.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Wisniewski L., Hassold T., Heffelfinger J., Higgins J. V. Cytogenetic and clinical studies in five cases of inv dup(15). Hum Genet. 1979 Sep;50(3):259–270. doi: 10.1007/BF00399391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Human Genetics are provided here courtesy of American Society of Human Genetics

RESOURCES