Abstract
Several different sources of data, including statutory notifications, were used to identify cases of acute bacterial meningitis in childhood in a defined population. Only half the cases of meningococcal meningitis and less than one quarter of ofther types of bacterial meningitis had been notified. Notified cases differed from the remainder with respect to causative organism, age, outcome, and type of hospital of admission. Thus notifications are an unreliable measure of incidence for this disease, and studies of infectious disease based on notified cases alone should be interpreted with considerable reserve. It is suggested that infectious-disease surveillance should be both clinical and microbiological and that data from different sources need to co-ordinated. The reason for reporting each disease (or organism) should be specified and and reviewed periodically.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Goldacre M. J. Acute bacterial meningitis in childhood. Incidence and mortality in a defined population. Lancet. 1976 Jan 3;1(7949):28–31. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(76)92921-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grist N. R. Letter: Psittacosis and surveillance. Lancet. 1974 Jan 5;1(7845):30–30. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(74)93025-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Haward R. A. Scale of undernotification of infectious diseases by general practitioners. Lancet. 1973 Apr 21;1(7808):873–874. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(73)91433-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McKendrick G. D. Letter: Psittacosis. Lancet. 1974 Jan 19;1(7847):91–91. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(74)92305-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]