Abstract
Genetic variability of the non-marine ostracod species Darwinula stevensoni was estimated by sequencing part of the nuclear and the mitochondrial genome. As Darwinulidae are believed to be ancient asexuals, accumulation of mutations should have occurred, both between alleles within lineages and between lineages, during the millions of years of parthenogenetic reproduction. However, our sequence data show the opposite: no variability in the nuclear ITS1 region was observed within or among individuals of D. stevensoni, despite sampling a geographical range from Finland to South Africa. Lack of allelic divergence might be explained by concerted evolution of rDNA repeats. Homogeneity among individuals may be caused either by slow molecular evolution in ITS1 or by a recent selective sweep. Variability of mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase (COI) was similar to intraspecific levels in other invertebrates, thus weakening the latter hypothesis. Calibrating interspecific, genetic divergences among D. stevensoni and other Darwinulidae using their fossil record enabled us to estimate rates of molecular evolution. Both COI and ITS1 evolve half as fast, at most, in darwinulids as in other invertebrates, and molecular evolution has significantly slowed down in ITS1 of D. stevensoni relative to other darwinulids. A reduced ITS1 mutation rate might explain this inconsistency between nuclear and mitochondrial evolution in D. stevensoni.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (403.8 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Birky C. W., Jr Heterozygosity, heteromorphy, and phylogenetic trees in asexual eukaryotes. Genetics. 1996 Sep;144(1):427–437. doi: 10.1093/genetics/144.1.427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Charlesworth B., Morgan M. T., Charlesworth D. The effect of deleterious mutations on neutral molecular variation. Genetics. 1993 Aug;134(4):1289–1303. doi: 10.1093/genetics/134.4.1289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Charlesworth B. The effect of background selection against deleterious mutations on weakly selected, linked variants. Genet Res. 1994 Jun;63(3):213–227. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300032365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Folmer O., Black M., Hoeh W., Lutz R., Vrijenhoek R. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol. 1994 Oct;3(5):294–299. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Funk D. J., Futuyma D. J., Ortí G., Meyer A. Mitochondrial DNA sequences and multiple data sets: a phylogenetic study of phytophagous beetles (Chrysomelidae: Ophraella). Mol Biol Evol. 1995 Jul;12(4):627–640. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hillis D. M., Dixon M. T. Ribosomal DNA: molecular evolution and phylogenetic inference. Q Rev Biol. 1991 Dec;66(4):411–453. doi: 10.1086/417338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Knowlton N., Weigt L. A., Solórzano L. A., Mills D. K., Bermingham E. Divergence in proteins, mitochondrial DNA, and reproductive compatibility across the isthmus of Panama. Science. 1993 Jun 11;260(5114):1629–1632. doi: 10.1126/science.8503007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kondrashov A. S. Classification of hypotheses on the advantage of amphimixis. J Hered. 1993 Sep-Oct;84(5):372–387. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a111358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lively C. M., Johnson S. G. Brooding and the evolution of parthenogenesis: strategy models and evidence from aquatic invertebrates. Proc Biol Sci. 1994 Apr 22;256(1345):89–95. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1994.0054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McLain D. K., Wesson D. M., Collins F. H., Oliver J. H., Jr Evolution of the rDNA spacer, ITS 2, in the ticks Ixodes scapularis and I. pacificus (Acari: Ixodidae). Heredity (Edinb) 1995 Sep;75(Pt 3):303–319. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1995.139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moran N. A. Accelerated evolution and Muller's rachet in endosymbiotic bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Apr 2;93(7):2873–2878. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.7.2873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Okamoto M., Bessho Y., Kamiya M., Kurosawa T., Horii T. Phylogenetic relationships within Taenia taeniaeformis variants and other taeniid cestodes inferred from the nucleotide sequence of the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I gene. Parasitol Res. 1995;81(6):451–458. doi: 10.1007/BF00931785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Perez M. L., Valverde J. R., Batuecas B., Amat F., Marco R., Garesse R. Speciation in the Artemia genus: mitochondrial DNA analysis of bisexual and parthenogenetic brine shrimps. J Mol Evol. 1994 Feb;38(2):156–168. doi: 10.1007/BF00166162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Prioreschi P., Babin D. Ancient use of cannabis. Nature. 1993 Aug 19;364(6439):680–680. doi: 10.1038/364680b0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Redfield R. J. Male mutation rates and the cost of sex for females. Nature. 1994 May 12;369(6476):145–147. doi: 10.1038/369145a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Satta Y., Takahata N. Evolution of Drosophila mitochondrial DNA and the history of the melanogaster subgroup. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Dec;87(24):9558–9562. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.24.9558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schlötterer C., Hauser M. T., von Haeseler A., Tautz D. Comparative evolutionary analysis of rDNA ITS regions in Drosophila. Mol Biol Evol. 1994 May;11(3):513–522. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sharp P. M., Li W. H. On the rate of DNA sequence evolution in Drosophila. J Mol Evol. 1989 May;28(5):398–402. doi: 10.1007/BF02603075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Walsh P. S., Metzger D. A., Higuchi R. Chelex 100 as a medium for simple extraction of DNA for PCR-based typing from forensic material. Biotechniques. 1991 Apr;10(4):506–513. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]