Skip to main content
PMC home page
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 1998 Feb 22;265(1393):293–301. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0295

Genetic diversity in Leavenworthia populations with different inbreeding levels.

F Liu 1, L Zhang 1, D Charlesworth 1
PMCID: PMC1688884  PMID: 9523432

Abstract

Levels of neutral genetic diversity within and between populations were compared between outcrossing (self-incompatible) and inbreeding populations in the annual plant genus Leavenworthia. Two taxonomically independent comparisons are possible, since self-incompatibility has been lost twice in the group of species studied. Within inbred populations of L.uniflora and L.crassa, no DNA sequence variants were seen among the alleles sampled, but high diversity was seen in alleles from populations of the outcrosser L. stylosa, and in self-incompatible L. crassa populations. Diversity between populations was seen in all species. Although total diversity values were lower in the sets of inbreeding populations, between-population values were as high or higher, than those in the outcrossing taxa. Possible reasons for these diversity patterns are discussed. As the effect of inbreeding appears to be a greater than twofold reduction in diversity, we argue that some process such as selection for advantageous mutations, or against deleterious mutations, or bottlenecks occurring predominantly in the inbreeders, appears necessary to account for the findings. If selection for advantageous mutations is responsible, it appears that it must be some form of local adaptive selection, rather than substitution of alleles that are advantageous throughout the species. This is consistent with the finding of high between-population diversity in the inbreeding taxa.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (357.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aguade M., Miyashita N., Langley C. H. Reduced variation in the yellow-achaete-scute region in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1989 Jul;122(3):607–615. doi: 10.1093/genetics/122.3.607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Awadalla P., Ritland K. Microsatellite variation and evolution in the Mimulus guttatus species complex with contrasting mating systems. Mol Biol Evol. 1997 Oct;14(10):1023–1034. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Banks J. A., Birky C. W., Jr Chloroplast DNA diversity is low in a wild plant, Lupinus texensis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Oct;82(20):6950–6954. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.20.6950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Begun D. J., Aquadro C. F. Levels of naturally occurring DNA polymorphism correlate with recombination rates in D. melanogaster. Nature. 1992 Apr 9;356(6369):519–520. doi: 10.1038/356519a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Braverman J. M., Hudson R. R., Kaplan N. L., Langley C. H., Stephan W. The hitchhiking effect on the site frequency spectrum of DNA polymorphisms. Genetics. 1995 Jun;140(2):783–796. doi: 10.1093/genetics/140.2.783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chang C., Meyerowitz E. M. Molecular cloning and DNA sequence of the Arabidopsis thaliana alcohol dehydrogenase gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Mar;83(5):1408–1412. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.5.1408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Charlesworth B., Morgan M. T., Charlesworth D. The effect of deleterious mutations on neutral molecular variation. Genetics. 1993 Aug;134(4):1289–1303. doi: 10.1093/genetics/134.4.1289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Charlesworth B., Nordborg M., Charlesworth D. The effects of local selection, balanced polymorphism and background selection on equilibrium patterns of genetic diversity in subdivided populations. Genet Res. 1997 Oct;70(2):155–174. doi: 10.1017/s0016672397002954. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Charlesworth D., Charlesworth B., Morgan M. T. The pattern of neutral molecular variation under the background selection model. Genetics. 1995 Dec;141(4):1619–1632. doi: 10.1093/genetics/141.4.1619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Di Rienzo A., Peterson A. C., Garza J. C., Valdes A. M., Slatkin M., Freimer N. B. Mutational processes of simple-sequence repeat loci in human populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Apr 12;91(8):3166–3170. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.8.3166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Estoup A., Garnery L., Solignac M., Cornuet J. M. Microsatellite variation in honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) populations: hierarchical genetic structure and test of the infinite allele and stepwise mutation models. Genetics. 1995 Jun;140(2):679–695. doi: 10.1093/genetics/140.2.679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hanfstingl U., Berry A., Kellogg E. A., Costa J. T., 3rd, Rüdiger W., Ausubel F. M. Haplotypic divergence coupled with lack of diversity at the Arabidopsis thaliana alcohol dehydrogenase locus: roles for both balancing and directional selection? Genetics. 1994 Nov;138(3):811–828. doi: 10.1093/genetics/138.3.811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Henry A. M., Damerval C. High rates of polymorphism and recombination at the Opaque-2 locus in cultivated maize. Mol Gen Genet. 1997 Sep;256(2):147–157. doi: 10.1007/s004380050556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hongyo T., Buzard G. S., Calvert R. J., Weghorst C. M. 'Cold SSCP': a simple, rapid and non-radioactive method for optimized single-strand conformation polymorphism analyses. Nucleic Acids Res. 1993 Aug 11;21(16):3637–3642. doi: 10.1093/nar/21.16.3637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hudson R. R., Bailey K., Skarecky D., Kwiatowski J., Ayala F. J. Evidence for positive selection in the superoxide dismutase (Sod) region of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1994 Apr;136(4):1329–1340. doi: 10.1093/genetics/136.4.1329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hudson R. R., Kaplan N. L. The coalescent process in models with selection and recombination. Genetics. 1988 Nov;120(3):831–840. doi: 10.1093/genetics/120.3.831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hudson R. R., Kreitman M., Aguadé M. A test of neutral molecular evolution based on nucleotide data. Genetics. 1987 May;116(1):153–159. doi: 10.1093/genetics/116.1.153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Innan H., Tajima F., Terauchi R., Miyashita N. T. Intragenic recombination in the Adh locus of the wild plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics. 1996 Aug;143(4):1761–1770. doi: 10.1093/genetics/143.4.1761. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Johnston M. O., Schoen D. J. Mutation rates and dominance levels of genes affecting total fitness in two angiosperm species. Science. 1995 Jan 13;267(5195):226–229. doi: 10.1126/science.267.5195.226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Karl S. A., Avise J. C. Balancing selection at allozyme loci in oysters: implications from nuclear RFLPs. Science. 1992 Apr 3;256(5053):100–102. doi: 10.1126/science.1348870. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kimura M., Maruyama T. Pattern of neutral polymorphism in a geographically structured population. Genet Res. 1971 Oct;18(2):125–131. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300012520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kreitman M. The neutral theory is dead. Long live the neutral theory. Bioessays. 1996 Aug;18(8):678–683. doi: 10.1002/bies.950180812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Latta R. G., Mitton J. B. A comparison of population differentiation across four classes of gene marker in limber pine (Pinus flexilis James). Genetics. 1997 Jul;146(3):1153–1163. doi: 10.1093/genetics/146.3.1153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Marshall D. R., Brown A. H. The charge-state model of protein polymorphism in natural populations. J Mol Evol. 1975 Nov 4;6(3):149–163. doi: 10.1007/BF01732353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Maruyama T. An invariant property of a structured population. Genet Res. 1971 Aug;18(1):81–84. doi: 10.1017/s001667230001243x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. McCauley D. E. Contrasting the distribution of chloroplast DNA and allozyme polymorphism among local populations of Silene alba: implications for studies of gene flow in plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Aug 16;91(17):8127–8131. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.17.8127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Michalakis Y., Veuille M. Length variation of CAG/CAA trinucleotide repeats in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster and its relation to the recombination rate. Genetics. 1996 Aug;143(4):1713–1725. doi: 10.1093/genetics/143.4.1713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Miyashita N. T., Innan H., Terauchi R. Intra- and interspecific variation of the alcohol dehydrogenase locus region in wild plants Arabis gemmifera and Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Biol Evol. 1996 Feb;13(2):433–436. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Moriyama E. N., Powell J. R. Intraspecific nuclear DNA variation in Drosophila. Mol Biol Evol. 1996 Jan;13(1):261–277. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Narain P. Effect of linkage on homozygosity of a population under mixed selfing and random mating. Genetics. 1966 Jul;54(1):303–314. doi: 10.1093/genetics/54.1.303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Pogson G. H., Zouros E. Allozyme and RFLP heterozygosities as correlates of growth rate in the scallop Placopecten magellanicus: a test of the associative overdominance hypothesis. Genetics. 1994 May;137(1):221–231. doi: 10.1093/genetics/137.1.221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Pollak E. On the theory of partially inbreeding finite populations. I. Partial selfing. Genetics. 1987 Oct;117(2):353–360. doi: 10.1093/genetics/117.2.353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Schoen D. J., Brown A. H. Intraspecific variation in population gene diversity and effective population size correlates with the mating system in plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 May 15;88(10):4494–4497. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.10.4494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Simmons M. J., Crow J. F. Mutations affecting fitness in Drosophila populations. Annu Rev Genet. 1977;11:49–78. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.11.120177.000405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Simonsen K. L., Churchill G. A., Aquadro C. F. Properties of statistical tests of neutrality for DNA polymorphism data. Genetics. 1995 Sep;141(1):413–429. doi: 10.1093/genetics/141.1.413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Slatkin M. Gene flow and genetic drift in a species subject to frequent local extinctions. Theor Popul Biol. 1977 Dec;12(3):253–262. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(77)90045-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Stephan W., Langley C. H. Molecular genetic variation in the centromeric region of the X chromosome in three Drosophila ananassae populations. I. Contrasts between the vermilion and forked loci. Genetics. 1989 Jan;121(1):89–99. doi: 10.1093/genetics/121.1.89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Tajima F. Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics. 1989 Nov;123(3):585–595. doi: 10.1093/genetics/123.3.585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Wakeley J. The variance of pairwise nucleotide differences in two populations with migration. Theor Popul Biol. 1996 Feb;49(1):39–57. doi: 10.1006/tpbi.1996.0002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES