Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 1998 Dec 7;265(1412):2273–2278. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0570

On the origin of species by means of assortative mating.

A S Kondrashov 1, M Shpak 1
PMCID: PMC1689519  PMID: 9881472

Abstract

Assortative mating may split a population even in the absence of natural selection. Here, we study when this happens if mating depends on one or two quantitative traits. Not surprisingly, the modes of assortative mating that can cause sympatric speciation without selection are rather strict. However, some of them may occur in nature. Slow elimination of intermediate individuals caused by the gradual tightening of assortative mating, which evolves owing to relatively weak disruptive selection, provides the alternative scenario for sympatric speciation, in addition to fast elimination of intermediate individuals as a result of the direct action of strong disruptive selection under an invariant mode of assortative mating. Even when assortative mating alone cannot split an initially coherent population, it may be able to prevent the merging of species after their secondary contact.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (162.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ghai G. L. Analysis of some nonrandom mating models. Theor Popul Biol. 1974 Aug;6(1):76–91. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(74)90032-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Kelly J. K., Noor M. A. Speciation by reinforcement: a model derived from studies of Drosophila. Genetics. 1996 Jul;143(3):1485–1497. doi: 10.1093/genetics/143.3.1485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Kondrashov A. S. Multilocus model of sympatric speciation. III. Computer simulations. Theor Popul Biol. 1986 Feb;29(1):1–15. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(86)90002-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Lewontin R., Kirk D., Crow J. Selective mating, assortative mating, and inbreeding: definitions and implications. Eugen Q. 1968 Jun;15(2):141–143. doi: 10.1080/19485565.1968.9987764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Sved J. A. A Two-Sex Polygenic Model for the Evolution of Premating Isolation. II. Computer Simulation of Experimental Selection Procedures. Genetics. 1981 Jan;97(1):217–235. doi: 10.1093/genetics/97.1.217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Sved J. A. A two-sex polygenic model for the evolution of premating isolation. I. Deterministic theory for natural populations. Genetics. 1981 Jan;97(1):197–215. doi: 10.1093/genetics/97.1.197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Wright S. Systems of Mating. V. General Considerations. Genetics. 1921 Mar;6(2):167–178. doi: 10.1093/genetics/6.2.167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES