Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2003 Jul 22;270(1523):1455–1460. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2390

Nanostructure predicts intraspecific variation in ultraviolet-blue plumage colour.

Matthew D Shawkey 1, Anne M Estes 1, Lynn M Siefferman 1, Geoffrey E Hill 1
PMCID: PMC1691395  PMID: 12965009

Abstract

Evidence suggests that structural plumage colour can be an honest signal of individual quality, but the mechanisms responsible for the variation in expression of structural coloration within a species have not been identified. We used full-spectrum spectrometry and transmission electron microscopy to investigate the effect of variation in the nanostructure of the spongy layer on expression of structural ultraviolet (UV)-blue coloration in eastern bluebird (Sialia sialis) feathers. Fourier analysis revealed that feather nanostructure was highly organized but did not accurately predict variation in hue. Within the spongy layer of feather barbs, the number of circular keratin rods significantly predicted UV-violet chroma, whereas the standard error of the diameter of these rods significantly predicted spectral saturation. These observations show that the precision of nanostructural arrangement determines some colour variation in feathers.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.1 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bennett A. T., Cuthill I. C., Partridge J. C., Lunau K. Ultraviolet plumage colors predict mate preferences in starlings. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Aug 5;94(16):8618–8621. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.16.8618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Dyck J. Structure and colour-production of the blue barbs of Agapornis roseicollis and Cotinga maynana. Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat. 1971;115(1):17–29. doi: 10.1007/BF00330211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hunt S, Cuthill IC, Bennett AT, Griffiths R. Preferences for ultraviolet partners in the blue tit. Anim Behav. 1999 Oct;58(4):809–815. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  5. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  6. Prum RO, Torres R, Kovach C, Williamson S, Goodman SM. Coherent light scattering by nanostructured collagen arrays in the caruncles of the malagasy asities (Eurylaimidae: aves) J Exp Biol. 1999 Dec;202(Pt 24):3507–3522. doi: 10.1242/jeb.202.24.3507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Vaezy S., Clark J. I. Quantitative analysis of the microstructure of the human cornea and sclera using 2-D Fourier methods. J Microsc. 1994 Aug;175(Pt 2):93–99. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1994.tb03472.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Zahavi A. Mate selection-a selection for a handicap. J Theor Biol. 1975 Sep;53(1):205–214. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(75)90111-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES