Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2004 Jan 7;271(1534):81–88. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2531

Coherence and discontinuity in the scaling of species' distribution patterns.

Stephen Hartley 1, William E Kunin 1, Jack J Lennon 1, Michael J O Pocock 1
PMCID: PMC1691558  PMID: 15002775

Abstract

The spatial distribution of a species can be characterized at many different spatial scales, from fine-scale measures of local population density to coarse-scale geographical-range structure. Previous studies have shown a degree of correlation in species' distribution patterns across narrow ranges of scales, making it possible to predict fine-scale properties from coarser-scale distributions. To test the limits of such extrapolation, we have compiled distributional information on 16 species of British plants, at scales ranging across six orders of magnitude in linear resolution (1 m to 100 km). As expected, the correlation between patterns at different spatial scales tends to degrade as the scales become more widely separated. There is, however, an abrupt breakdown in cross-scale correlations across intermediate (ca. 0.5 km) scales, suggesting that local and regional patterns are influenced by essentially non-overlapping sets of processes. The scaling discontinuity may also reflect characteristic scales of human land use in Britain, suggesting a novel method for analysing the 'footprint' of humanity on a landscape.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (188.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Crawley M. J., Harral J. E. Scale dependence in plant biodiversity. Science. 2001 Feb 2;291(5505):864–868. doi: 10.1126/science.291.5505.864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Harte J, Kinzig A, Green J. Self-similarity in the distribution and abundance of species . Science. 1999 Apr 9;284(5412):334–336. doi: 10.1126/science.284.5412.334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Haskell John P., Ritchie Mark E., Olff Han. Fractal geometry predicts varying body size scaling relationships for mammal and bird home ranges. Nature. 2002 Aug 1;418(6897):527–530. doi: 10.1038/nature00840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kunin WE. Extrapolating species abundance across spatial scales . Science. 1998 Sep 4;281(5382):1513–1515. doi: 10.1126/science.281.5382.1513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Storch David, Gaston Kevin J., Cepák Jaroslav. Pink landscapes: 1/f spectra of spatial environmental variability and bird community composition. Proc Biol Sci. 2002 Sep 7;269(1502):1791–1796. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Turner A., Snape A. M., Wylie C. C., Heasman J. Regional identity is established before gastrulation in the Xenopus embryo. J Exp Zool. 1989 Aug;251(2):245–252. doi: 10.1002/jez.1402510212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary data file
15002775s01.pdf (290KB, pdf)

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES