Skip to main content
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 1998 Mar 29;353(1367):381–388. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1998.0216

Base-compositional biases and the bat problem. II. DNA-hybridization trees based on AT- and GC-enriched tracers.

J A Kirsch 1, J D Pettigrew 1
PMCID: PMC1692220  PMID: 9569431

Abstract

We conducted a series of parallel DNA-hybridization experiments on a small group of bats (species of Pteropus, Rhinolophus, Noctilio and Pteronotus) and outgroups (Lemur, Cynocephalus, Didelphis), using whole-genome labels and tracers made from extracts enriched with AT and two levels of GC content. FITCH (additive phylogenetic trees) topologies were constructed from the four sets of comparisons, indexed as both delta Tmode and delta NPHs (normalized percentage of hybridization). Based on our previous work showing that the shared AT bias of pteropodids and some microchiropterans may affect the rank-ordering of taxa based on either AT- or GC-rich labels, our expectation was that the resulting trees would show differing topologies when generated from tracers made with the variously enriched DNA extracts. Whereas there was some variation among the trees, most of them grouped the bats together, and almost all paired the representative megachiropteran and rhinolophoid microchiropteran as sister-taxa in contrast to the other microchiropterans. As the pteropodid-rhinolophoid relationship is an unexpected and unlikely one, we attribute this association to an AT bias that was not obviated even by our most GC-rich labels, and suggest that such a bias may compromise the truth of some molecular trees. Accordingly, we believe the broader issue of bat monophyly remains unresolved by DNA-hybridization and probably also by gene-sequencing studies.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (194.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adkins R. M., Honeycutt R. L. Molecular phylogeny of the superorder Archonta. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Nov 15;88(22):10317–10321. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.22.10317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Arrighi F. E., Lidicker W. Z., Jr, Mandel M., Bergendahl J. Heterogeneity in CsCl buoyant densities of chiropteran DNA. Biochem Genet. 1972 Feb;6(1):27–30. doi: 10.1007/BF00485962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bailey W. J., Slightom J. L., Goodman M. Rejection of the "flying primate" hypothesis by phylogenetic evidence from the epsilon-globin gene. Science. 1992 Apr 3;256(5053):86–89. doi: 10.1126/science.1301735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fox G. M., Schmid C. W. Related single copy sequences in the human genome. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1980 Oct 17;609(3):349–363. doi: 10.1016/0005-2787(80)90109-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kirsch J. A., Springer M. S., Krajewski C., Archer M., Aplin K., Dickerman A. W. DNA/DNA hybridization studies of the carnivorous marsupials. I: The intergeneric relationships of bandicoots (Marsupialia: Perameloidea). J Mol Evol. 1990 May;30(5):434–448. doi: 10.1007/BF02101115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Lapointe F. J., Kirsch J. A., Bleiweiss R. Jackknifing of weighted trees: validation of phylogenies reconstructed from distance matrices. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 1994 Sep;3(3):256–267. doi: 10.1006/mpev.1994.1028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Pettigrew J. D. Flying primates? Megabats have the advanced pathway from eye to midbrain. Science. 1986 Mar 14;231(4743):1304–1306. doi: 10.1126/science.3945827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Pettigrew J. D. Genomic evolution. Flying DNA. Curr Biol. 1994 Mar 1;4(3):277–280. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(00)00065-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Pettigrew J. D., Jamieson B. G., Robson S. K., Hall L. S., McAnally K. I., Cooper H. M. Phylogenetic relations between microbats, megabats and primates (Mammalia: Chiroptera and Primates). Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1989 Nov 30;325(1229):489–559. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1989.0102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Pettigrew J. D., Kirsch A. W. Base-compositional biases and the bat problem. I. DNA-hybridization melting curves based on AT- and GC-enriched tracers. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1998 Mar 29;353(1367):369–379. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1998.0215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Porter C. A., Goodman M., Stanhope M. J. Evidence on mammalian phylogeny from sequences of exon 28 of the von Willebrand factor gene. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 1996 Feb;5(1):89–101. doi: 10.1006/mpev.1996.0008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Sabeur G., Macaya G., Kadi F., Bernardi G. The isochore patterns of mammalian genomes and their phylogenetic implications. J Mol Evol. 1993 Aug;37(2):93–108. doi: 10.1007/BF02407344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Thewissen J. G., Babcock S. K. Distinctive cranial and cervical innervation of wing muscles: new evidence for bat monophyly. Science. 1991 Feb 22;251(4996):934–936. doi: 10.1126/science.2000493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES