Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Conroy R. M., O'Brien E., O'Malley K., Atkins N. Measurement error in the Hawksley random zero sphygmomanometer: what damage has been done and what can we learn? BMJ. 1993 May 15;306(6888):1319–1322. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6888.1319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Evans J. G., Prior I. A. Experience with the random-zero sphygmomanometer. Br J Prev Soc Med. 1970 Feb;24(1):10–15. doi: 10.1136/jech.24.1.10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Labarthe D. R., Hawkins C. M., Remington R. D. Evaluation of performance of selected devices for measuring blood pressure. Am J Cardiol. 1973 Sep 20;32(4):546–553. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(73)80046-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- O'Brien E., Mee F., Atkins N., O'Malley K. Inaccuracy of the Hawksley random zero sphygmomanometer. Lancet. 1990 Dec 15;336(8729):1465–1468. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(90)93177-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Parker D., Liu K., Dyer A. R., Giumetti D., Liao Y. L., Stamler J. A comparison of the random-zero and standard mercury sphygmomanometers. Hypertension. 1988 Mar;11(3):269–272. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.11.3.269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- de Gaudemaris R., Folsom A. R., Prineas R. J., Luepker R. V. The random-zero versus the standard mercury sphygmomanometer: a systematic blood pressure difference. Am J Epidemiol. 1985 Feb;121(2):282–290. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]