Abstract
Five brands of ethylene oxide- and autoclave-sterilized membrane filters were examined for their ability to recover fungi from natural waters. Results showed that the recovery on Gelman membranes was consistently higher than on the other brands tested.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Dutka B. J., Jackson M. J., Bell J. B. Comparison of autoclave and ethylene oxide-sterilized membrane filters used in water quality studies. Appl Microbiol. 1974 Sep;28(3):474–480. doi: 10.1128/am.28.3.474-480.1974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Green B. L., Clausen E., Litsky W. Comparison of the new millipore HC with conventional membrane filters for the enumeration of fecal coliform bacteria. Appl Microbiol. 1975 Oct;30(4):697–699. doi: 10.1128/am.30.4.697-699.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hufham J. B. Evaluating the membrane fecal coliform test by using Escherichia coli as the indicator organism. Appl Microbiol. 1974 Apr;27(4):771–776. doi: 10.1128/am.27.4.771-776.1974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schaeffer D. J., Long M. C., Janardan K. G. Statistical analysis of the recovery of coliform organisms on Gelman and Millipore membrane filters. Appl Microbiol. 1974 Oct;28(4):605–607. doi: 10.1128/am.28.4.605-607.1974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sladek K. J., Suslavich R. V., Sohn B. I., Dawson F. W. Optimum membrane structures for growth of coliform and fecal coliform organisms. Appl Microbiol. 1975 Oct;30(4):685–691. doi: 10.1128/am.30.4.685-691.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Standridge J. H. Comparison of surface pore morphology of two brands of membrane filters. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1976 Feb;31(2):316–319. doi: 10.1128/aem.31.2.316-319.1976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]